File: c2f6c50e41a2c1ea3bb2d1030(...).jpg (730 KB, 951x1170)

730 KB JPG

>>517660302
You're a bunch of exiled pedophiles and petty thieves not fit for the queen's realm

Oz land is run by degenerate pedophiles like kidman's father back in the day

kneel boi, good girl.

https://youtu.be/xLDxmzRCtCA?si=XShqrHIatQsRKQHt&t=91

Australians Brit’s and Canadians literally cannot go 10 minutes without comparing themselves to America in some way


you guys are nearly as annoying as the jeets on here no one cares your government arrests people for memes and refuses people entry to the country for it too kek

>>517660536
You're some spic acting like you're white

settler down fella

Also canada runs america, everyone knows this

>>517660302
Australians are cool
shame about their lack of guns or they would basically just be americans

>>517660747
Australia used to have one of the largest per capita, most well-armed, and most well-drilled
private militias in the world. Prime Minister Menzies was once frightened after asking ASIO
to get a rough estimate of the militia size. He learnt that although we had a large standing
army of about 200,000, we had at least twice that in organised, readily-supplied, and armed
militiamen. The majority of these were former ADF soldiers with tens of thousands having
seen combat in wartime.
Assuming all of the ADF’s active-duty men stayed loyal to Canberra, they would have still
been outmatched at least two-to-one. But what truly shook him and the halls of power was
the risk of disloyalty to Canberra in how integrated the militia was with our then-current high
command. These were informal connections that didn’t exist on paper but were nonetheless
very real. This left the highest estimates of de facto militia manpower at 650,000, almost all
hyper-nationalist and extremely anti-communist.
Instantly, Menzies began to fear what would happen if this military power he was not in
control of (or even in the loop of) would do if they decided he was compromised by Marxists.
He had, after all, spent almost two decades misusing the word “communist” for political
opportunism; was he capable of seeking opportunity from communists if indeed opportune?
He thus feared a coup was imminent and started taking steps to secure his power, thus
began the dismantling of the ADF from a standing military power to a small auxiliary force
supporting foreign allies who would have to bear the brunt of our security responsibilities.

>>517661185
He
purged most of the high command, using ASIO to fabricate charges of communistic
conspiracy against the only men prepared to fight against his alleged communist enemies.
Still, this was not enough, so Menzies and his successors defanged the White Australia
Policy piece by piece. After a few years of constant leadership change, Gogh Whitlam
became the Prime Minister in 1972 and abolished the final vestiges of the White Australia
Policy.
By this time the camaraderie and national spirit, birthed by the diggers, cemented by the
do-or-die defence against the Japanese, was being replaced with American ideology. Guns
were still everywhere and easily obtainable, but the culture of Australia had been thoroughly
subdued, not by the left-leaning Marxists but by traitorous power-hungry globalists. By the
90s, no longer did we live in the Great Southern Land built by and for the finest of British
civilisation. Instead, we had nearly 25 years of Southeast Asian immigration turning entire
suburbs into slums, we had an influx of Christian Lebanese whom we were promised would
not open the door to the rest of the Arab world, all to say nothing of the later Chinamen. By
this point, the only white migrants being fast-tracked to Australia were cosmopolitan
Londoners whose traitorous tendencies were useful to the GDP cultists in Canberra.
During his premiership, John Howard started to get worried about civilian resistance. By the
Menzies approach, he shouldn’t have; the private militia was tiny by this point, military
personnel did not interact with everyday folk anymore, and there was no major conflict to
galvanise white men across the country into a brotherhood; so why then was he still so
scared? Guns.

>>517661291
Guns in such large supply and so openly available would make Texans cry tears of joy. Of
course, there was some legislation in the way as it was a mountain of paperwork to get your
hands on a heavy machine gun or tank, but one could nonetheless get their hands on a tank.
So, all of a sudden, despite decades of declining gun crime and crime in general, a massive
spike in loony mass shootings began in the 90s. Most were like the Burwood shops shooting
where some maniac with a pistol got single-digit casualties - often mere woundings. John
Howard needed results, so he immediately defunded all mental health care on the federal
level and said it was the responsibility of state governments. Of course, the useless leaders
at the state level refused, so all the schizophrenics and manics were let loose. Yet, despite a
few outbursts, nothing substantial occurred yet, nothing big enough to push for gun control.
In comes the Port Arthur massacre.
We know that Martin Bryant was an eerily good shot for a disabled person with no training,
we know that nobody can get that many headshots with their non-preferred hand, and we
know that a man with an IQ of 66 would not think to employ special forces techniques like
leaving a round in the chamber whilst changing magazines so as to never be defenceless.
Curiously, witnesses were refused their right to testify to seeing or hearing multiple shooters.
But it didn’t matter how dodgy the scenario was, the nation was shocked and lawmakers
took this opportunity to draft and pass laws in record time that would strip the people of their
only leverage against tyranny. This confirmation of our placation is when mass globalisation
became transparent, and so everything from the politicians to your teachers would dedicate
themselves to preaching the merits of “our globalised world”.

>>517661346
White Australia was dealt several blows in the 20th century because treacherous
governments knew that the organisation of whites was an obstacle to a government
uninterested in White Australia. That is the difference between Australian and American
lawmakers’ attitudes towards gun bans; a ‘red-blooded American patriot’ is harmless as he
only intends to use his guns as a vain and materialistic prop for photographs. An American
does not possess a rifle but is rather possessed by their rifle. Conversely, firearms were
never a status symbol to Australians, they were a tool like any other and our militiamen
simply sought to maximise their utility like a tradesman to a hacksaw.
We may never convince the political establishment to open a Royal Commission into Port
Arthur, but the existing political hive needn’t be a pursuit of the Australian man. Our pioneers
paid no mind to bureaucrats, so I say we are tasked with a new age of pioneering.

Americans are always decrying Australia as a "convict nation" populated by the lowest
degenerates of Britain, seemingly disregarding a certain event in 1776 that made Britain
redirect convicts here in the first place. Yes, Americans aren't taught their own history and
believe that they are free settlers, freer than us at that.
Given that just about everything was subject to the death penalty back in the day - even
things considered misdemeanours in modern times - we should be in agreement that the
convicts shipped to penal colonies like North America and Australia weren't psychopathic
mass murderers. In fact, the Australian convicts were even pettier criminals than their
American counterparts, as far fewer capital offences existed during the American penal
shipments. England had fewer than 50 capital offences at the beginning of their North
American settlements, and fast forward to the First Fleet there were 220.
Next, let's look at the immigration statistics. 24% of European arrivals to the Thirteen
Colonies (today's eastern USA) were convicts and an additional 66% were serfs. This means
that at the time of American independence, merely 10% of the Europeans who'd come to the
Thirteen Colonies were free settlers. Comparatively, just 20% of Australia's European
arrivals were convicts as of the final penal shipment, and as we never had white serfs, that
left our free settlers at 80% of the white migrants.
Do the maths, if the American education system allows you to.

>>517661977
>>517660404

>>517660536
We've seen many self-hating nationalists denounce Australia's alleged "cuckedness" for not
electing a fascist government in the 30's. If you want to talk the 30's, the city of Sydney
produced a fascist militia (New Guard) with greater membership than the entire American
fascist movement of the period. For the record, the United States had a 19x larger
population than Australia.
Nobody in Australia thought fascism was some evil bogeyman ideology, the reason we didn't
elect a fascist government where Germany did is because it wasn't necessary for us to do
so. Just about every revolutionary promise fascist movements made was already the reality
here.

>>517660302
Bumping truth nuke
>>517660404
>>517660725
Jeet cope

File: images (3).jpg (24 KB, 553x555)

24 KB JPG

>>517660536
We'll refuse you entrance in the coming years too, Rajesh

>>517660747
Doesn't matter, Australians will have guns in the next revolution