Top GOP insider here,I'm debating now on whether it is a good time for me to write a book on wealth.I have read the books which have already been published, ie by Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki and I feel like they do not encompass the matter entirely from the rich man's perspective.Thought they are well written, very well, and have both imagery and allegories which are quiteendearing. I feel like the Rich Man book subject has to be better written in terms of actual substance, i.e. like wines have to mentioned, how either wrote mooks and only once mentioned Ace of Spades slightly I find bizarre,I know many of you do too, it's like why you try to explain why Patek Philippe will always be relevant, like I understand plebians don't understand, but it's importantDo you think if I write a book about what it means to be a Rich Man, it would actually be well accepted, I think it is time, I am already published but I feel like the GOP and America deserves a quality canon text on being a Rich Man, because we are the Gods of this worldWho is in support of this plight?
bump
>>517661195It would be accepted if it is written well.With these things it's normally not the subject matter. It is the execution. If you're so rich, get a good editor.FAGGOPTT
>>517661195>top GOP insiderOP is a pedo
>>517661195>like wines have to mentioned>wrote mooks>only once mentioned Ace of Spades slightlyYou shouldn’t even be allowed near a keyboard OP.
