Democracy requires the equal distribution of political power in order for the public to rule. One version of political power is the ability to administer legitimate force. To reject this would be to deny certain people the ability to use force while others could, thus creating a situation where the force can be used against those who cannot legitimately fight back.If the people rule, the people must have power, and for the people to have power, they must be able to initiate violence. This is would be true for Irynas killer AND anyone who would want to slay the killer.Whenever someone speaks about democracy, always remember, you have the right to kill people.
wtf ima democrap now
>>517664001They are unironically the only party in america who takes democracy seriously, to the point of actually using their right to kill for their own benefit.One side effect of this realization is that there is no such thing as terrorism in a democracy either. If you have the right of legitimate force, then you can engage whoever you like, however you like.
>>517663879Are you retarded? A democratic elected government quite literally hold the monopoly on violence.
>>517663879Violence is always valid. Even in dreams and astral and nde and ayy abductions it works always. Just fucking embrace it already
>>517664642Nope. That's fake democracy. Power wasn't actually distributed to the public so it doesn't count.To really have governance by the public, there needs to be an equal distribution of power. That's what "one person, one vote" was supposed to do. The failure point is that the ability to violently coerce people was not equally distributed either, so the party that can hurt is the party that rules. You can solve this and institute real democracy by acknowledging that everyone has the right to initiate violence, regardless of their morality.
>>517664876You know how you can describe "big bang"? As violent. Its literally engraved in universe
>>517664939Someone decides to be violent. How you stop it? With more violence. You can't fix violence without violence. What water is for humans, violence is for reality.
>>517664876>>517664939>>517665177You're right, but uh, are you okay?You are having a conversation with yourself.
>>517663879>>517664203>>517664921You're a fucking retard. In a democracy the people pick representatives that will decide what is or isn't appropriate. The people's check on power in the form of violence is an emergency measure that they ideally wouldn't have to use because their interests are represented. Iryna Zarutska's killer's charges will be brought by the people. You need to go back.
>>517665262No. I exist. It pisses me off all the time.
>>517665298>democracy the people pick representativesDelegating power to others leads to the concentration of power. The result is rule by the few, not by all, so it's not a democracy. You mentioned these "representatives" would decide the appropriateness of activities like violence, but that is the exact problem. It's creating a distinction between those that can use violence and those that cannot, and those that can use violence have more power and ability to rule others as a default. What you are arguing for is an oligarchy, where power is only held by the few.So long as people support democracy, rule by the public is the equal distribution of power to the public, including violence.
>>517665411Well...you are in Germany...a progressive state that wants to control everyone's lives...You might just be the fabled hero of legend.
>>517663879Every time I see that pic it fills me with SEETHE. Thanks for refilling my white rage meter anon
>>517665616No, retard, that is democracy. Representatives are voted on by the people. Dempcracy isn't whatever dumb shit you're shilling that means people just do what they want. I understand that in India any tiny bit of authority is both not earned and immediately abused which is why you need to go back as you're incompatible with democracy.
>>517666174Always remember, you have a right to apply your rage based on the ruling ideology. So long as people advocate for equality of power, you will have equality of force.
>>517666203Representation is not democracy as it is the distribution of the power of many into the hands of one. To be equal in the ability to govern, one must represent themselves, and they can only do so if the capacity to use violence is universalized. To do otherwise is to deny one their representation.
>>517666174Rage is vril, vril is life
>>517667639It doesn't mean you just get to do whatever you want because you're capable of violence. That's called anarchy. You also can't have any form of governance without representation. There will always have to be somebody to conduct the business of government. Wherever people assemble there will be rules and where rules are broken there will be consequences.
>>517668366>It doesn't mean you just get to do whatever you want because you're capable of violence.Yes you can.>That's called anarchy.That's democracy.>You also can't have any form of governance without representation. There will always have to be somebody to conduct the business of government. Wherever people assemble there will be rules and where rules are broken there will be consequences.You can have governance by just representing yourself. When it comes to consequences, remember, you can just "kill them back". You don't need to centralize power to pull that off. An equal distribution of power, including the right to kill is self-regulating. An armed society is a polite society.
