Wikipedia's reign of narrative control is over.Long live Grokipedia!https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1972992095859433671
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1972716529608237173
will it accept real archaeologists as sources
>>517674345David Sacks means one thing: it's not pro-Jew and pro-Israel enough for his tastes.
Will it list jews as jews? Thats the most important part and I suspect thats why he’s creating it - netandyoohoo told him to create one that doesn’t name jews so the Goyim can never be sure that the ones oppressing them are jwesiss.
>>517674345>the goal of understanding the universeIt's the jews. Mission accomplished.
they just want to turn it into an israeli propaganda tool musk and sachs share all the same liberal priors
>>517674722>>517674903Netanyahu addressed this concern about X when talking about the TikTok purchase and will have his good friend Elon look into it.
>>517674345>scrape internet to train AI>use AI to generate a gorillion web pages >scrape internet to train AI>use AI to generate a gorillion web pages>scrape internet to train AIIt’s all so tiresome
>>517674722>>517675103kek autonomous palantir death drones are going to kill us all for the slightest wrongthink
>>517674456yes, as long as the source is an X post
>>517675103>Elon looks into itYup. Still the jews. Have they considered changing their behavior?
>>517674345David sacks is a loser. He would had everything left named as terrorists.
>>517674345>an encyclopedia>that aligns to youlol, hilarious
>>517677870You appear to be labouring under the misapprehension that there is such a thing as a 'neutral' source of information.The reason AI is jewed is that its training data is.
>>517677870No such thing as neutral information, thats the type of tactic that turned Wikipedia into a troon infested antiwhite shithole.
>>517674456only grokaeologists
>>517678217>>517678783you are both misunderstanding, I am a nominalist and are considering it hilarious that platonist realists are btfod in real time>muah jew/anti whiteoh two bots that have a shizo context
>>517674405I was involved with Wikipedia back in the 2000s and it was obvious it was pozzed back then. I went on IRC to complain about the bias and they mods and admins openly mocked me. It's pretty clear that Wikipedia was really the precursor to all the degenerate shit in the West in the past 20 years since every other article on politicians has a blurb on how pro-LGBT and pro-abortion they are.
Source: Catturd2. (2023, September 2) X.
>>517674345Holy based.
damn, imagine if wiki admins and execs started an heroing hehe over some words he terrible hehlets try 6 of them
>>517680188>nominalistguess what idiot, labels don't exist eitherget fucked kike
>>517674345ELONGATE
