[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_8923.jpg (294 KB, 943x1024)
294 KB
294 KB JPG
Much has been written about a supposed “male loneliness epidemic,” as if the modern crisis facing men is simply about not having enough friends or dating opportunities. But this framing is too shallow. What we are seeing is not primarily loneliness, nor even just a collapse of confidence. It is something more primal: a biological dis-attraction that has emerged between men and women in the modern West.
Attraction is not a conscious choice — it is an instinctual, visceral response. For men, desire has always carried risk and vulnerability, but it has also been rooted in the sense that union with a woman meant connection with life, continuity, and transcendence. What appears to be happening now is that many men no longer experience this impulse with the same force. Subconsciously, they detect that what has been made of woman in today’s civilization is no longer the eternal feminine but a vessel for a narrative hostile to the masculine principle itself.
In other words, men sense that to unite with modern womanhood is not to align with nature, but to ally themselves with a civilizational death drive. And instinct recoils. The inability of men to court, so often framed as weakness, insecurity, or social awkwardness, may instead be a symptom of this deeper refusal. Men are not merely opting out,
>>
You’re homosexual, it’s okay it’s not your fault.
>>
File: IMG_8344.jpg (138 KB, 736x1190)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
>>517675881
how do I get a gf that looks like picrel in this economy??
>>
they are biologically losing attraction to what has been placed before them.
The statistics bear out the divide. In much of the West, women disproportionately identify with and support the dominant ideological frameworks — managerial “progressivism,” institutional orthodoxy, and conformity disguised as compassion or safety. Women, more than men, act as enforcers of this system, policing dissent and transmitting its values. Whether consciously or not, they embody the very orientation toward sterility and atomization that erodes both family life and cultural continuity.
This is not to say all women follow this path — of course, exceptions exist. But civilizational momentum is determined by majorities, not minorities. When nearly half of humanity internalizes a worldview aligned with sterility, the effect on eros is devastating. The polarity between masculine and feminine collapses, leaving men instinctively reluctant to approach, to risk, to bond.
1984 captured a shadow of this dynamic: women in that world were portrayed as dutiful vessels of Party orthodoxy, extinguishing intimacy and enforcing ideological purity. Winston’s aversion was not to women themselves but to what had been made of them. Our present world, though not identical, echoes the same structure — and men respond to it not with hatred but with withdrawal.
This is why the language of loneliness obscures more than it reveals. Men are not simply lacking confidence or waiting for trends to swing back. They are confronting, at a biological level, the collapse of attraction itself. When the feminine has been co-opted into a civilizational death drive, the masculine instinct to unite does not merely weaken — it withers.
The consequences of this will not be immediate, but they will be profound. Demographic decline, cultural disintegration, and spiritual exhaustion are the inevitable outcomes of a society where eros has been inverted.
>>
To call this a “loneliness epidemic” is to mistake the symptom for the cause. What we are truly facing is a crisis of attraction — one whose effects will only become undeniable decades from now.
>>
File: 3.png (110 KB, 952x553)
110 KB
110 KB PNG
>>517675881
the truth is that most men are simply losers. They have fallen behind in education, they have fallen behind in home ownership, they have fallen behind on sexual milestones and they lack the status and experience that the average woman now has. That is status and experience they will never be able to make up and will always be behind, all because they allowed themselves to become addicted to porn and video games and coped with alcohol and weed instead of just doing the work that women did. Sad, really
>>
Bump
>>
>>517676973
Also bumping. Very high quality thread and thoughts from OP. Archived it and I’m even inspired to simply read OP’s post and share as a YouTube video.

>>517676166
Fuck off. This applies to non losers as well. I have been with dozens of women and I echo OP’s sentiment where I simply haven’t been attracted to anyone in years, much due to the reasons OP has listed. Also I don’t talk to bots or parasites
>>
Dating coaches, who specialize in working with people with autism, are in demand

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1098150733/dating-coaches-who-specialize-in-working-with-people-with-autism-are-in-demand

Autism impairs your ability to be social. Romance is the most social thing humans do.

You can lead a normal life.
>>
The social contract has been broken by women, boomers and jews.
Until they die (jews and boomers) or submit (boomers and women), nothing will improve.
No land
No pussy
No kids
No taxes
No military service
>>
>>517676166
>It's the porn and video games not the feminism
God I'm tired of you glowbots. Always the same old shit.
>>
Yea because in this day and age if you approach women you are called sexist mythogenist blah blah blah
Who wants that.
>>
>>517676166
Always the porn and video games with you pathetic lot.
Why not just fucking pay us a living wage so that we can have families and homes?
Or do we need to make that payment with your blood?
>>
>>517678907
This is short sighted. Non autists are also dropping out. This thread seems to serve as an IQ test.
>>
>>517675992
By becoming the girl.
>>
File: 1585920333939.jpg (98 KB, 1024x788)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>517675881
>>517676070
>>517676116
Nice post — what was your prompt?
>>
>>517676166
>muh heckin’ successful girl boss!!
Every company is filled with easy adult daycare jobs which companies fill with women so that they can fulfill their diversity quotas. Women have no idea how much of their existence is being subsidized by mandatory hiring policies. If you’re a woman going into STEM then you basically get the red carpet rolled out for you. Women apparently confuse this for outdoing their competition on a meritocratic basis
>>
>>517675992
be rich
>>
>>517675881
Youre a faggot OP
>>
>>517675992
If you really wanted a girlfriend you would have one. You just dont actually want one
>>
>>517679574
I'm not OP but I ran it through Quillbot which doesn't think it's AI generated. (I was also concerned). Also if you copy and paste OP's text into chatgpt it'll rip it the fuck apart from the exact point of view that OP is calling out as the problem. I don't think it's AI anon.
>>
>>517680424
>flag
Maybe he wants a woman, not a hippo
>>
>>517675992
Be asian
>>
>>517675881
Im actually repulsed by western women.

It's to the point that I couldn't even imagine what being with one would look like.
>>
>>517679257
No point engaging with tradcons. Its just cover for neoliberal globalist asset stripping traitors.

Conservatives AREN'T conservative.
>>
>>517678773
Thank you. I’ve never made a video as a longtime lurker but thinking of changing that based on value provided.
>>
>>517676116
Orwell’s 1984 captured a shadow of this dynamic: women in that world were portrayed as dutiful vessels of Party orthodoxy, extinguishing intimacy and enforcing ideological purity. Winston’s aversion was not to women themselves but to what had been made of them. Winston Smith confesses that he “doesn’t like women.” This isn’t because of any natural dislike, but because women in his world have been conscripted into the role of ideological enforcers. Our present world is beginning to echo the same structure — and men respond to it not with hatred but with withdrawal. The women join the Junior Anti-Sex League, treat intimacy as mechanical “duty to the Party,” and embody the orthodoxy more zealously than men. For Winston, to approach such a woman is not to enter into eros but to unite with the very machinery of his own oppression.
>>
File: IMG_5095.jpg (251 KB, 1242x2208)
251 KB
251 KB JPG
The solution to make loneliness is to lift heavy object until you are a chad like me
>>
>>517675881
Nope, up until know qualities today denigrated as "nice guy" were actually hugely important.
Not being a deadbeat, not beating the shit out of your woman, being responsible and serious.
Marry a deadbeat? The state supports you.
Get beaten? The state supports you.
Live in poverty? The state supports you.
The benefits women derived from associating with men decreased due to them becoming universally enforced by the state.
So what reason does a woman have nowadays to associate with men? Lust, thats pretty much it.
Problem is men havent undergone millenia of selection to be attractive and this paradigm shift has left many of those still clinging to the old system in the dust.
My heart breaks for those poor fucks thinking they need to learn PUA and or become more confident.
I act like an absolute shy sperg and get regularly approached by women with everything from getting asked out on dates, offers for sex, even love confessions. Why? Because im attractive, thats all there is to it. No PUA, no fake it till you make it confidence, no self improvement or gymcelling, its 70% your face, 30% height.
>>
>>517675881
Imagine thinking some hoe won't suck and fuck chad if he's xenophonic, fucking cucks LOL



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.