By framing the crucifixion as “the greatest evil ever committed” yet at the same time the necessary gateway to the highest good, Christianity implicitly teaches that even the most obscene acts of cruelty can be rationalized as part of some hidden, higher plan. Once you accept that logic, every atrocity can be sanitized: genocide, slavery, child abuse — all can be excused as “mysterious workings” that might someday reveal a divine payoff. Evil stops being evil in itself and becomes a kind of perverse currency, something that can be traded for future meaning.This is why the crucifixion story is so insidious. It doesn’t just manipulate emotions in the moment — it programs people to reinterpret suffering and injustice as potentially sacred. If the worst evil in history turns out to be the best thing that ever happened, then why not accept every other horror as possibly necessary too? That’s how the narrative disarms outrage and resistance, teaching people to endure and even sanctify cruelty instead of confronting it. The resurrection doesn’t just redeem Jesus’s death — it redeems the logic of abuse itself.
>>517685999You have not discovered a deep philosophical point, memeflag.>"The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born."
>>517686619>don’t worry, evil will sort itself out, god will handle it in the end
>>517685999As a typical kike rat what you're doing is baiting and switching the "hero's sacrifice" with the act of killing the hero and pretending they're both the "same thing" therefore both are "good"Reality couldn't be further from the truth of your kike lies.
>>517687002You can’t separate the hero’s sacrifice from the act of killing him, because without the betrayal and executioners there’s no salvation story at all. The system needs the murder to justify the miracle. You can dress it up however you want, but the theology sanctifies the very crime it condemns. Evil isn’t opposed—it’s built into the plan.
>>517687218>You can’t separate the hero’s sacrifice from the act of killing him,Of course you can you lying jewish rat>because without the betrayalNot needed for sacrificial atonement>and executioners there’s no salvation story at allThey aren't the same thing. Are they part of the same story? Yes. But that doesn't make them the same thing thus one being good does not make the other good. >The system needs the murder to justify the miracleWhat miracle? Be specific>You can dress it up however you wantDon't need toMeanwhile, you have made half a dozen lies trying to dress it up to fit your false narrative>but the theology sanctifies the very crime it condemnsNope. Empty claim you haven't proven. You just pulled a bait and switch like the typical kike you are and then lied about it some more after your OP lies. Lets start pointing out a few shall we?>By framing the crucifixion as “the greatest evil ever committed”LieChristianity doesn't frame it that way you dumb jewJesus even forgave those who crucified him.He doesn't forgive those who blaspheme against the Holy Spirit, hence that is committing a greater evil. Your very opening claim in fewer than 10 words is a lieYou are a ling jewish ratThere's plenty more lies in your OP too, I'll keep exposing them
>>517687989You keep pretending murder and sacrifice are separate while insisting the murder was necessary for salvation. That is either moral bankruptcy or bad theology. Which is it? Calling me a liar won’t paper over the logic you refuse to face.
>>517688587>jewish rat doesn't address a single thing I said, lies againConcession accepted Next lie you made in OP is of course the very next 10 or so words:>yet at the same time the necessary gateway to the highest goodLie #2God is the highest good, not his sacrificeYet another lie from the lying kike rat OP
>>517689443So you declare God the highest good and think that settles everything. That word game doesn’t change the structure. Your theology makes a violent death the way God’s “good” gets delivered. Either you admit murder is instrumentally justified by the outcome, or you admit the moral logic of your story is broken. Which one are you defending?
>>517689726>So you declare God the highest good and think that settles everythingNope, it was already settled. I was just pointing out more of your liesHere's the next one:>Christianity implicitly teaches that even the most obscene acts of cruelty can be rationalized Lie #3Murdering Jesus was not rationalized in any sense. It was sinful and should not have been done.Yet another lie from the lying kike rat OP
>>517690082So it “should not have been done,” yet it had to be done for your salvation story to function. That’s the rationalization right there — evil recast as indispensable. You can deny it with words, but the logic of your theology betrays you.
>>517685999fucking AI slop, anyone who responds to this thread without appropriate herbs is a retarded nigger.
>>517690259>yet it had to be done for your salvation story to function. Wrong again. God doesn't "have" to do anything. He simply chose for it to be so. He could have let every sinner into heaven without the sacrificial atonement, but he chooses to be consistent instead. >That’s the rationalization right thereNo, you're just slipping in more lies to form a false "rationalization" that doesn't exist. >evil recast as indispensableproven lieHere's the next lie in your OP:>rationalized as part of some hidden, higher planLie #4I conveniently already explained how it isn't "rationalized as part of a plan" above in this very postNothing about the sacrifical atonement was "hidden" eitherLie #5 you madeYet more lies from the lying kike rat OP
