>In 1893, U.S. House Representative Lucas Miller from Wisconsin proposed renaming the United States as “the United States of the Earth.” His reasoning was, ''it is possible for the Republic to grow through the admission of new States into the Union until every Nation on Earth has become part of it.I approve. We are a race of conquerors. Why did we ever stop?
>>517695252I want to start a kingdom around the Great Lakes and down to St Louis, then force everyone east of the rockies to pay tribute to me. I will winter in Denver, where I will ski.
>>517695714>St Louis
>>517695972Yes, that's me. Give me 4 years, and your midwest will be peaceful and nigger-free.
They had globalists back then too
>>517695252the US has stopped benefiting most of it's 'citizens', treating most of us as 'subjects' whose labor and energy our elites leach from. indeed those elites regard themselves as separate, above, and unaccountable to us
>>517695252Wtf is this map
>>517698810Beleriand before the War of Wrath sunk it into the sea.
>>517695252that looks like some kind of a civilization 3 generated map or some shit like thats one of those pangea maps on civ 5
>>517698774dont worry, it will all trickle down
>>517695252colonialism is a tragic mistake that should never be repeated again
>>517695252It makes geographic and logistical sense for America and Canada to be one country, but only on the grounds of it being 100% White.
>>517695252You stopped because you lost to Canada
>>517695252A fucking Republic is NOT supposed to Empire, you idiot. That’s what Britain did, it’s called the “commonwealth” and others. America is supposed to be the beacon of hope for the rest of the world to raise up and overthrow their fucking archaic forms of government (monarchy/despotism). Whoever is congressman was, was probably a democrat and a Britain loyalist.
>>517695252is that an ai version of the united states?
>>517700383lol no faggot, we need to do it harder next time
>>517700524America actually won against the French in Canada in the 1760s. Britain took Canada (that’s why they are a commonwealth country, governed by a king, they just cope LMAO) and made the American Colonists PAY Britain for Winning that fucking war for them. Britain then told the colonists not to settle past the Apps and not to settle into Canada. The Brits then put exorbitant taxes on the Colonists, caused them to default into slavery, caused their currency to suddenly have no value, boom you got 1776. Learn your fucking history, fake Poland.
>>517695252White supremacy got in the way.They conquered a good number of browns but didn't want to integrate them as states because then they'd have to make them equal citizens, so the Philippines became independent and they satisfied themselves with puppet states in Latin America (and only took the empty parts of Mexico)
>>517701120>Learn your fucking history, fake Poland.Is this some obscure form of Australian humor that I'm too sober to understand?
>>517695252>>517695714seems like an administrative nightmare like the galactic senate.
>>517698774>>517700256why do you think they want to stop making you pay taxes? once citizen no longer pay taxes the goverment is no longer accountable to it's citizens it is in fact more accountable to trade and industry.
>>517695252I like this old map of america because it looks like a dinosaur.
>>517701359Yes, it’s called “baiting the narcissist” :) I got a good laugh from it.
>>517695252It's a poorly thought out idea. It's the same mistake that many famous conquerors forgot:> you never want to control more than 40% of the world.In order to have a thriving economy, you need outside entities that you can either abuse or make sales to. So, you'd be pulling out the resources of 30%, selling to 30%, and using the profits to boost your own 40%If you control the whole world, your economy eventually goes to shit because you have to balance the needs of all, instead of just the part of the world you control
>>517701846Ok, that's good on you buddy.You go show the worlds what's what like by continuing doing what you're doing or whatever.
>>517702016>doesn't consider a policy of depopulation
