>... the story of Anne Frank in the fifty years since The Diary of a Young Girl was first published has been bowdlerized distorted, transmuted, traduced, reduced; it has been infantilized, Americanized, homogenized, sentimentalized; falsified, kitschified, and in fact, blatantly and arrogantly denied.>... nearly every edition ... is emblazoned with words like "a song to life," "a poignant delight in the infinite human spirit." Such characterizations rise up in the bitter perfume of mockery. A song to life? The diary is incomplete, truncated, broken off; or rather, it is completed by Westerbork ... and by Auschwitz, and by the fatal winds of Bergen-Belsen.>... both Miep Gies ... and Hannah Goslar, Anne's Jewish schoolmate and the last ot hear her tremulous cries in Bergen-Belsen, objected to Otto Frank's emphasis on the diary's "truly good at heart" utterance. That single sentence has become, universally, Anne Frank's message, virtually her motto--whether or not such a credo could have survived the camps. But why should this sentence be taken as emblematic, and not, for example, another? "There's a destructive urge in people, the urge to rage, murder, and kill," Anne wrote on May 3, 1944, pondering the spread of guilt. These are words that do not soften, ameliorate, or give lie to the pervasive horror of her time. Nor do they pull the wool over the eyes of history.https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/10/06/who-owns-anne-frank>tfw little Anne will never hear the thunder of the Rebel Yell as Confederate soldiers ride to her rescue
Unless he sold the rights, the guy who wrote it owns it.
There's way better lolifics out there, hoss.
>>517714438did anne frank have sex while in the camps do you think
>>517714804>guy
Anne Frank's dad finding her diary and being like>maybe i could sell this
>>517715929Kek
>>517715533Its too bad jewish women are the servant's of the devil.
>>517715509No you
>>517715509>>517716983lol
