When I was younger, I used to express controversial opinions.By controversial, I mean things like: "I'll be a perfect dictator. I see nothing wrong with genocide."That's how the world has been since the beginning of time. When a tribe won a war, they would simply kill or enslave the losers.When did we become such pussies?When did it become wrong to say something natural and normal like:GENOCIDE IS BASEDI blame moustache man.
>>517716137didnt read. death to israel.
>>517716137Bro ehy can't you just live in Madagascar ot some spacious African country and not a tiny desert strip filled with Palestinians who've lived there for 1000s of years. This is literally what happens when you follow schizobooks like the Talmud.
>>517716137You VILL be deported to Kashmir und you VILL be HEPPY
>>517716137Genocide isn't natural because the baseline assumption is that youve amassed enough technological power to selectively kill en masse.>Causing mass suffering is le based when the GOOD guys winReturn to monke tier take. Notable cringe
>>517716210
>>517716137Imagine how cozy TKD would be.
>>517716137reddit spacing, memeflag.. is this amateur hour?
Like with hamas, kike and kike adjacent aided greatly in mustache man's rise. I blame myself for not being a god able to kill without consequences
>>517716137Also, on a completely seperate note, the phrase "x has a right to exist" is fundamentally dishonest. >Do or create something that infringes on existing population>Existing population rightfully calls out bullshit>"DoEs x thing hAvE a RiGhT to ExISt?">Infringes more on existing population while simultaneously trying to say that the existing population is "dehumanizing" or "oppressing" you.I don't even care who the belligerents are, its just shitty discourse
>can we invade and genocide you>No>Oy vey this is genocide!
