How do 'end the Fed' people actually think it would play out?
>>517912010Why is a bong asking this?
>>517912097Digital id glowie
>>517912097You think the Fed has no impact on global finance?
>>517912010there's an anon here (that I casually refer to as fedanon)who posts a lot of detail on the Federal Reserve, its history mechanics and inner workingsSometimes creates his own OP threads(lately, he seems ? convinced that the administration is on the brink of 'nationalizing' the Federal Reserve)Search archive.4plebs
They dont. Its just a thing they dont really understand.
>>517912010>FED gets ended>anime becomes real
>>517915113>on the brink of 'nationalizing' the Federal Reservedoubt they could do it, but that would be a disaster. basically nothing to limit the govt du jour spending like crazy and cutting rates whenever they want votes.
>>517915906I just disagree with his assessment that the current administration is "about to" do so, and further what would it change?As you imply, the tandem gigaexpansion of fiscal(gov spending) and monetary(treasury+central bank "moneyprinting") policies will inevitably continue as a megabubbleThe current plan is to somehow ? raise the present anemic 2% annual U.S. gdp growth rate into the 5 or 6 percent range, purportedly to 'stay ahead of' Interest Payments that are tsunami engulfing discretionary spending.I'm highly skeptical that this macroeconomic policy target can be achieved, and furthermore it doesn't address the $2T/annum magnitude fiscal spending (which as mentioned is tandem-interdependent itself on the monetary gigaexpansion)All this btw goes far beyond the U.S. and its solvency alone: USD is the world's reserve currency denomination, therefore confidence in treasuries is the foundation of the global debt aka bond market that keeps this entire circus ongoing.When the global debt market (<--totally founded on USD denomination) goes, so goes it all.
>end fed>US Mint takes over printing all money (no more taxes on printing your own money)>Congress sets monetary policy>jew stock market collapse, mainstreet boomssimple asAlso, end income tax at the same time and triple tariffs.
>>517916260printing growth into existence does not work long term
>>517915906> basically nothing to limit the govt du jour spending like crazy and cutting rates whenever they want votes.Abstracting the problem behind a layer of jews doesn’t eliminate it. I bet you think VMs improve security too.
>>517912010> we switch to a hard currency > I say nigger a lot> the race is saved> bottom textSomething like that, I imagine
>>517916571See previous post. According to the present policy 'plan' the United States has about four more years of $2T/annum deficits before Total Default, and the global debt market will implode long prior to that.Global debt aka bond market has been more volatile and unstable during the past three years in the past half century. Bonds are not supposed to whipsaw up-and-down like crypto or , particularly in a global system which relies on a single default reserve debt note fiat currency denomination and is entirely founded upon debt and speculative debt instruments.Debt market is the foundation of this entire system and its stability, solvency completely relies on confidence in its currency denomination (because the whole system is supplied with and consists of debt note fiat currency). All of the debt note fiat currency issuance, for every single individual note "printed" means that simultaneously also a corresponding *bond* is issued by the sovereign nation's treasury, that must be bought. <--That is what retains confidence and stability in this jenga system: Bonds are being consistently and confidently bought up, as a secure reliable steady investment and hedge. It's a global debt-based economic modelNobody wants to buy the debt, right nowhttps://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/500310690https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/506316301the 'golden road' of "it doesn't matter" and just kick the can, don't worry about it is fast approaching the Brick Wall
>>517916999>unstable during the past three years in the past half century. Bonds are not supposed to whipsaw up-and-down like crypto or ,*during the past three years than in the past half century. Bonds are not supposed to whipsaw up-and-down like crypto or stocks,
>>517912010>How do 'end the Fed' people actually think it would play out?With a mountain of dead kikes and their shabbos and no other way.
It won't actuslly happen, ever. America had an unofficial state ideology. And that state ideology is gay.You can see how gays get preferential treatment. They get out of trouble, like Jussie smollet and these gays who had sex in the senate
>>517916550>>517916614This. Also, I disagree with you, OP, but this is a good thread.
>>517916999>All of the debt note fiat currency issuance, for every single individual note "printed" means that simultaneously also a corresponding *bond* is issued by the sovereign nation's treasury, that must be bought.? not every new dollar is automatically tied to a new bond...>Nobody wants to buy the debt, right nowyes they do. bond market isn't that fragile.
>>517917124can you take your ramblings and naked pictures elsewhere
>>517912010they unironically think that we'll go back to the gold standard, and that this would be a good thing
>>517912010Amazing how quickly that went from 'end the fed' to 'audit the fed', almost like the powers that be really don't want this create of Jekyll island to die.I think that what's referred to as the 'money power' in the Protocols is really the main weapon of the Jews (i.e with that they can get all the other things they want). Things like usury are how they "earn a living" while getting to take real assets if the person can't pay but that's also quite overt, people notice it and there's also the option of just not getting into debt.Baking the usury into the counterfeited money itself is the new "invention" of the modern system. And the tax cattle are the base that "have to pay" this debt and to do so requires more counterfeiting.This thing was always going to go exponential. Yes, there are various tricks they have like like playing with the interest rate like a valve that limits the new debt (and thus new countefeit money introduced) and also the circulation of said money which is actually what causes the devaluation as that counterfeit money is actually introduced into the wider economy.I think like any institution, whether public or private, it's always going to want to preserve itself at the expense of others. We see them lowering the interest rate to try to stop the debt spiral but now that just let's more counterfeit money go through the gates and whirl around and cause more inflation."defaulting" on the debt is a kind of sacred cow but only because it might unravel this scheme. It's happened before in the history of the US and it will happen again. I think this whole system only "works" because there are still enough guillble cattle who beleive it's needed. We may see an emperor has no clothes moment where they try some new trick (like they did with "quantitative easing") which simply doesn't work and maybe even makes the problem worse then there is government intervention which may make the problem even worse before we see a complete reset.
>>517917570>bondEvery note of debt note fiat currency 'created' by a nation's central bank is tied to a corresponding *bond* issued by that sovereign nation's treasury(You) don't know what (You)'re posting about. At all>yes they doNo they do not. Central banks are putting unsold bonds back onto their balance sheetsCouple years ago, Bank of England was forced to buy up bonds to prevent U.K. pensions from imploding. Read the archive.4plebs threads in post (You) just replied to(You) have *absolutely zero concept* of what your own OP thread is even about.As previously suggested in Reply #4 of this thread, consult archive.4plebs to view some of the 'fedanon' <--my arbitrary nickname for him threads on the Federal Reserve and central banks
>>517919336wrong. Fed creates dollars independently of Treasury bonds.. each dollar is not automatically tied to a corresponding U.S. government bond.>Central banks are putting unsold bonds back onto their balance sheetswrong. central banks aren’t putting unsold bonds back onto their balance sheets, they only maintain or reinvest existing holdings...
>>517919628>independentlyAbsolutely 100 percent Wrong.That is what debt note fiat currency is by definition. "money printing" (<--which is a bad analogy and incorrect phrase to begin with) by definition means: the sovereign nation's Treasury issues a bond aka note of Debt.it's a global debt-based economic model. All currency is *debt note* fiat currency, it's backed by nothing but Debt: the bonds that are issued by each nation's treasury and must be bought. That is why the bond market exists (in the first couple decades of Bretton Woods, when gold still backed USD and other currencies, the bond market wasn't as crucial to global finance; after the 1970s however it gradually became the entire foundation underpinning and stability of the whole global system, which itself became reliant on a single default reserve denomination of debt note fiat currency)Watch, study this film and comprehend it:97% Owned — How is money createdhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcGh1Dex4Yo>aren't putting unsold bondsYes they are.>reinvest existing holdings(You)'re a moron and have no idea what (You)'re posting about. None
>>517920022dude this is stuff you can just google. i'm not going to waste time arguing over facts.
