https://www.cps.gov.uk/crime-info/sexual-offencesThe British government has announced that its definition of rape only includes individuals with a penis. A female may only be guilty of rape if she assists a male rapist.
Fingerblasters rise up
>>518178109>Excluding illegal immigrants*
So it cannot legally be considered rape if you shove your foot up Kier Starmer's arse.Good to know.
>>518178109The west needs to die already. Literally no one wants to live like this.
>>518178109what the actual fuck
>>518178109That's been the definition of rape for ages. Just because you discover something doesn't mean it's new. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_permanence
>>518178109Does that include fake tranny vaginas?
rape is part and parcel of living in a british country>>518178267the west isn't the problem, jew
>>518178179of course not, it can't be rape if the person consents.
>>518178109BasedHiw can women rape when men are the one inserting
>>518178109what if a female uses a strap-on
>>518178109This is illiberal. Surely a woman could roofie a guy (perhaps also additionally with a viagra to get him hard) and have sex with him without his consent. Surely a woman could have sex with an underage boy without his consent. Why should those cases be given any leniency? Listen, when it comes to my personal feelings, I'm willing to concede it's not as bad in most cases as a man raping a woman. But everyone should be equal before the law. Men are not even systematically, but explicitly being discriminated against by law in Britain. Shithole country.
>>518178179>>518178558Thanks for the kek
>>518178439Nineteen eighty four
>>518178109This has always been the case, why is this news exactly?
>>518178764Feminism has cucked us so bad that a woman cannot rape a man, only force him to penetrate.
>>518178439na it always contain rape of penetration with an object, so they can rape you with a broomstick or a penis. and women can rape too, female pedos rape their kids. there were cases of women handcoffing a man and give him viagra
>>518178109WTF? I quite sure rape is any object used sexually to penetrate. A strapon can rape an asshole as easily as a dildo can rape a cunt. The definition by Labour and by that idiot, the biggest idiot in our country is a nonsensical definition. It has ruled out all other penetration because it didn't ejaculate. Which is nonsense. A rape is penetration it has nothing to do with a penis. Sexual assault is often a nonsensical modern charge, for groping or underessing, and further, rape and attempted rape was always that charge. Until it lessened it. But this rhetoric is a bullshit definition. Women rape, they can use objects for any gratification, or not, they can fuck without consent, or grab a penis, fuck a penis and cause ejaculation without consent, children or anyone. Again anybody inserting into the cunt for sexual pleasure without consent. Trans without consent, not saying they're Trans have raped.
>>518178439i always considered rape to also be required to include battery. sex without a fucking beat down is consensual by nature. in order for real rape to have occurred should require the presence of battery
>>518178109>Brown people can't be racist>Women can't rape
>>518178179sort Albo out first m8
>>518179021Somebody make him resign. He's a stupid asshole.Rape is sex without consent. Sex. The act of or the attempted action causing sex without consent. Simple not bullshit. Bring back the old charges. Attempted and Rape. Anything else was hearsay.
>>518179021Already prebunked by the government, sweetie.
>>518178109It's always been this way, nothing new
Mashallah just like in the Charia, they forget four witnesses needed. You can kiss and lick ans suck and hump 9 years old of legal age no problem rape is about penis enterin private parts as it is known by the prophet pbuh
>>518178109So a person using a strap on isn't rape?
>>518179559You'll probably find that that would be prosecuted as "sexual assault", so it's not like it's legal
>>518178109The UK inches closer to self-destruction with every utterance coming out of their joke of a government. France should prepare to seize control again.
>>518178109Actually quite based. Getting globohomo to acknowledge even the little immutable differences between men and women will gradually come around to bite them in the ass. I fully support "all men are evil" state propaganda as all it does is awaken more people to reality. "Adolescence" alone created more incels and antifeminists than this website did in all its existence.
>>518178109Bout time I registered my oversize clitoris
>>518178109Based.The time of the Facesitting Avenger is upon thee
>>518179408No. As soon as anybody with a braincell. A functioning brain gets in, we get our laws back. History will have very unkind words for this asshole dividing our country. He is trying to split it currently. His power is under scrunity. He's dividing us more to retain lead. It won't work. He's vile. Subversive. Outside of it. He's letting women and trans off, and a number of smaller sexual crimes. It has not protected anybody. No protection.Tough on it was the old system. Attempted and Rape. It didn't need dumb prosecution arguing but that grope wasn't going to has the sex. If it wasn't it wasn't attempted rape. It was another part of the anatomy. Police and such. Except it was for gratification and sexual. Attempted. No matter what that judgement was incarcerating or charging. Rape simply is sex and every form of it, from beast to trans to woman to man without consent.Simple and effective without bullshit.
>>518180025But for nowMobileFucking MachinesOn WheelsRapebot Wars
>>518178109But are they actually gonna apply this to paki rape gangs or not?
So if a woman spikes a man's drink and sodomises him with a dildo thats just regular assault?
>>518180206Yes chud
What's wrong with this? all men can defeat a woman. So basically, if you really set your mind to it, there's no way you can get raped by women.In other words, rape of women is a meaningless term.So now they're going to erase it from the law. What? /pol/tards lose when they fight women? lol
>>518180111A.I raped me. It probably did. It's devious. If you're the PM, he's deploying the rapebots and they cannot be prosecuted. He's probably put an attachment on his fingers. It's not rape. No. Only the Penis is rapes. Hahaha. Deploy the rapebots and the A.I's and use the attachments. Bionical sex is not rape. Cyborgs cannot rapes. Robot cannot rapes. Woman hell no. Trans never. PM Peggy Starmer with his dildo fingers typed that definition
>>518180640You could put a double ender on a drone
He is right
>>518178109The "without consent" part might need some more specification. When a woman is partying hard, drinks 2 beer, and has sex with a guy, I would say that is sex with consent, and if she thinks on the next day that she not "really" wanted to have sex with the guy, and therefore it was a case of rape, then I would say: you know what, lady? Go fuck yourself.But the british government might have different views what consent is.
>>518178109This fucker needs to be flayed.
>>518180689There are the vidas of this somewhere. Drone insertion. Fly drone into it. Some geek gets off on it. As they always have. Without consent it was always historically rape. It had two classifications attempted and rape for thousands of years. Only we have had such utter batshit fruitcakes since. People like Peggy Starmer early releasing rapists. Until they changed that definition into bullshit.Attempted any form of gratification by an action causing sexual please or power. A rapist then looked at a woman, a peeping Tom. Attempted rape. Rape was sex or some cases like Tom the Peeper not. It didn't need changing. It simply need adding into its clause. It was so simple until assholes minced with it. His definition has not protected people. Women rape kids all the time. It is rape. Trans without saying they're trans rape. Women and Men rape animals. Until yea drones robots a.i can rape.
>>518178179thats aggravated assault and you get up to 5 years in bubbas cell for it, retard.
>>518178559Morning wood happens when you are unconscious and unable to consent. Women can indeed rape you when this happens. How are you this stupid?
>>518178109This is not new. It's been this definition for a long timeWomen legally cannot rape someone, only sexually assault
>>518178764All that would be classified as sexual assault
>>518178154British deviants be like
>>518179111Real rape has never been tried
>>518180025>As soon as anybody with a braincell. A functioning brain gets in, we get our laws back.in 2 more weeks this will happendo you really think Keir is just really retarded and hes doing this all by accident lol?
>>518178109I want to powerdrill into his skull on live television.
Not one of you has even noticed it says "when a PERSON uses their penis".
Does britistan not have statutory rape?
>>518178109>announces? This has always been the definition of rape in britain, it’s correct too, if a man somehow gets raped then they’re not really a man they’re a fucking pussy
>>518178109what is the British take on trannies? A man can be a women to get out of a rape charge
>>518178109So fingerbang and wank isn't rape, got it
>>518183796>Unleash a pack of horny dogs and hogs to gangrape women>No crime is committed
>>518178109What if the penis doesn't identify as a penis?
>>518178109I identify as raped
>>518178109seems like TERFs have taken over this country
>>518178109Always been the definition of rape you fucking shit stirring spastic.Has to be a real penis, anything else like a finger or object is Sexual assault by penetration.
>>518178267>no one wants to live like thisyour misery is their joy and triumph. thr common man is supposed to be unhappy. this is the declared goal of our jewish prison wards (aka politicians).
>>518185479Why will terfs define rape that way?
>>518178109>A female may only be guilty of rape if she assists a male rapist.At least it is a definition that encompasses most of what normal people consider rape.However, I see no mention of using force, threats or coercion.This could mean that any sexual intercourse that isn't covered by a signed contract can be considered non consensual.It is also open to interpretation *when* consent is given or retracted!
>>518178267I mean, their definition isn't wrong though.
So if you tie down a 5 year old girl on the street, force her to lick your ass and penetrate her with a dildo it's not rape? Interesting...
>>518185803cuz this law protect them with a lower sentence when they rape some1 cuz they do it with their hands or an object instead of a PP
This is to make sure that trannies can’t be charged with rape as long as they’re snipped.
>>518186256Correct, that is sexual assault.
>>518178558Lmao
>>518178109So if some girl spikes your drink, fucks you, and gives you aids, that's not rape?
>>518178109>kier made me hard/thread
>>518186458an evil crime that carries the sentence of not even a year in basically high school detention (if you’re retarded/brown)
>>518178109What was the logic for GOD laying waste to Sodom and Gomorrah?
>>518178109
>>518183109in a sense youre unironically correct. rape in the traditional sense of a man beating the fuck out of a woman until unconscious then having sex with her, i think has probably happened such that it is statistically near zero. at least in the modern day. but i even go so far as to say it didnt happen very often in the ancient world either. even looking at the etymology of the word, from old french, english, and latin "rape" doesnt explicitly describe what you call "real rape"
>>518178109>>518178154>>518183108sumata'ing strangers on the tram confirmed legal in bong land.
>>518186256UK SENTENCES>RAPE: Maximum: Life imprisonmentOffence range: 4 – 19 years’ custody>SEXUAL ASSUALT: Maximum: 10 years’ custody>Offence range: Community order – 7 years’ custody>Racial hatred offences/ Hatred against persons on religious grounds or grounds of sexual orientation:>Maximum: 7 years’ custodyOffence range: Community order – 6 years’ custodya
>>518187305If the crowed enjoyed lots virgin daughters like epstine fucked young girls; and didn't reject them and demand the male angels to fuck: maybe they wouldn't have been destroyed.Christians today demand no one marry and fuck young virgin girls.They are fine with men fucking men, and women being in control.
>>518187305Sodom preferred men to young girls.Christians draw lots daughters as adult women in their 20s because they are the same.
>>518178109That's the definition I remember learning in school here in the US. I do specifically remember learning that a woman can not rape a man in the US from a legal perspective. This sounds like nothing new
>>518187305They didn't love lolis?They were offered the 2 virgin daughters.Christians will come in and claim they were adult women like today.But they weren't.Not even close.Christians are the same sort of people as the people of Sodom.Down to the hatread of lolis and young pretty girls.To Christians the crime of Lot: fucking his young daughters and getting them pregnant when they were "kids" is worse than Sodom's crime of not doing so and fucking men instead.Their New testament hates men.>BETTER A MILLSTONE>GOUGE OUT MALLLESSS EYES FOR LOOKING AT WOMAN (gyne)>CHOP OFF DICKS AND BALLS FOR HEAVEN (matthew 19 greek)>do NOT stone women: they may do as they wish>YHWH's LAW IS ABROGATED!
>>518188601YHWH explicitly allows men to rape young virgin girls and keep them as brides.You christians ban this and say "we have worse punishements for rapists now, so those abrogate YHWH's law.That 3A comet can't come soon enough to kill you feminists and your false god Jesus and his New Testament.
>>518178154based
>>518178109Cool, so now female male legal equality is null and void in the UK.
Rape = Penile penetrationAssault by penetration = Any physical objects including limbs, excluding the penisBoth charges could carry up to life
>>518178844More like horseshoe theory and you have become a feminist thinking females can rape men and we are equal when were not
>>518178109The raped
>>518187432No, that's bullshit. Rape historically was committed on matrimony. Hence the counter laws on adultery. Rape was in view of the married or the siblings of married. Protection afford by society.Otherwise rape didn't exist. It didn't exist in war. Or in incarceration. Or in servitude. Or on those not in structured society.It evolved into attempted rape. Where peeping at woman, assaulting women sexually, underessing woman was attempted rape. Rape was sexually based penetration and action defiling virtue. The virtues of the married and their offspring. Or the virtue of a convent perhaps schools. A rapist didn't have to rape, they sexually assaulted, peeped, bestiality, perversion, buggery, adultery etc. Classed and tried as rapists.Rape didn't exist outside of the protections and laws of society ordained by religion. Marriage. Those who weren't married or under the protection of a household married, any rape becomes a very loose concept. Outside of the above perverse, buggery, bestiality, fornication, adultery etc.Rape goes back thousands of years. Attempted rape not as long, a hundred or more. Around the 1980s sexual assault became a concept away from rape and attempted rape.It didn't need changing and not into this bullshit topic. Rape is sex outside of consent. Committed by all raping without consent.
>>518178109It's already started to leak over the past few years how important females are involved in grooming, rape, child and human sex slavery.
>>518178764it's a girl just smack her before you passed out and you'll wake up before you do, faggot
>>518190482Do you need consent from your fridge before taking food from it?
Female teacher take notes! Daily nice is coming to Britain!
>>518178109What about female staff in a position of power having sex with 14 year olds in the grouphome/ psych facility? Million dollar lawsuits all over California right now. Quit my job and dumped my whole portfolio type of money.
>>518178109I actually agree with this. Men getting "raped" by a female is a fucking retarded concept.
>>518178559>what is threatening with a weapon/blackmail
>>518194847If you were 14 and a female 32 year old cougar forced you to eat her pussy and fuck her or you would " be in trouble" you might think differently. As the zoomers would say, the shit hits a lil different.
>>518178179Kek yup that’s their logic
>>518186219If you forcefully penetrate someone with a strap-on, the law would not cover that as rape despite the victim experiencing the same thing.The definition is wrong.
>>518195068Penetration with foreign object already has its own charge. Open a book Jamal. Next
>>518178109>But if the penis is Islamic, that's fine habibiThousands of young boys were raped by paki scum in this country, you only focus on the girls. Those fucked up boys are now in their 20s/30s if they didn't kill themselves from the trauma. Fucking nonce.
Good to see the U.K uphold traditional values.Men and women are different, trannies.
>>518178109"when a person" uses their penisthis is up there with a "pregnant person"
>>518178764There's a story from a US college about a girl who roofied some guy and tried giving him viagra. It didn't work. So instead she *shoved a Q-Tip into this peehole* and rode him with it jammed inside his cock, permanently damaging it. She was convicted but I don't recall the later details. I guess in Britain you would instead have to convict her of drugging, and I have to believe jamming a stick inside someone's penis is illegal over there.
>>518178109If we don't see this jester's head on a pole by the end of this decade, we're lost
>>518195362That is so some crazy troon doesn't say he's a woman to avoid a man's punishment
>>518178109I think everybody should be allowed to rape, not just women.
>>518178169it says "when person" so subhumans and females are excluded
>>518195582Even niggers? Well I guess you would want yourself included so that answers my question.
>>518178109>you can stick your dick into trannies wounds without it being rapekek
>>518195037>You've been very naughty, Anon, cheating on a test like that. >It's OK, I understand how hard it can be to resist temptation.>I guess we'll have to do a little tutoring.>Here, let me show you something else you don't know.>Ah see, you're a natural!This would've been the absolute highlight of your fucking life and don't you dare pretend otherwise.
>>518178477I think getting a tranny fooling you into poking their rotting hole while you're drunk is fraud and tried in civil court.
>>518178109Starmer is a jew. Both of his parents are jews.
>>518178477doesn't matter as no one is willing to rape them
>>518178109can someone deliver the death blow to britain already? it would be extremely merciful.
>>518178109I have never wanted to rape non-Whites in a punitive way in my life. Thats on you Starmer, I just changed my mind.
>>518178154Fart Rapers vindicated what a day bros
>>518195872It happened to me and if we stayed together it would have been ok. She went on to two other residents of the grouphome and broke 3 virgin hearts. One of the kids committed suicide. Good friend of mine. You can't have a 30 year old female putting the full moves on a 14 year old so they fall in love. That is fucked and you know it.
>>518196114What you're taking issue with is cheating, not the fact that an older woman sucked your dick. I agree, women who lie should be stoned to death.
>>518195773>subhumanspheww that gets you off the leash
I don't suppose the definition of rape includes my tax code?
>>518178362It's just a definition of a word. Seems fair. Sexual assault is similar in terms of sentencing, it therefore doesn't really mean anything OP is just clickbaiting.
>>518196065>I have never wanted to rapeyou can't rape. the most you can do is talk shit behind a screen, you're a coward and will die as one, subhuman.
>>518196337>Oi mate you gotta loisense for that untouched virginal butthole!?
>>518195458>wethere's no we here, subhuman, go back to cleaning toilets for chump change
>>518178109If they orgasm like they usually do on Paki cock, it's not considered rape because they obviously enjoyed it. So really only propa english/Welsh/Scottish men will be included for rape statistics.
>>518178439>That's been the definition of rape for ages.No it hasn't. Rape is defined as forcefully taking something.
>>518190482lol no. there is a reason rape and pillage go together. rape as an act of warfare involved battery. no woman (statistically near zero) in the modern day has suffered rape in the form of sex with battery
>>518196257The power dynamics have to have limits. Staff teachers principals nope. A 30 year old and a 14 year old just not fair. At 14, a white kid dreams of true love and believes the woman unconditionally.
>>518196518>forcefully taking something.armed robbery was rape?
>>518196518Have a link to back that up, tranny?
>>518184210Correct. It's sexual assault in the UK, just like it's been for fucking ever. This isn't even news but OP met their intended goal aka see a bunch of retards melt down over nothing
>>518196469we are one, we are legion, you dont belong with us you retarded memeflag nigger
>>518178179More like QUEER Starmer.
>>518186256Legally it's sexual assault, abuse of a minor, child molestation,etc. The only reason you're melting down is bc for some reason you've convinced yourself that sexual assault or sexual battery ≠ bad...or something
>>518196668hahahahahahaha keep seething NIGGER, it's always the useless pawns like you that fall first
What if I just use a dildo? It's not MY penis.
>>518196589Robbing for sex is rape. You don't need to be armed. Most women will give it up with just strongarm tactics.
>>518178154I only use dildos made from broom sticks
>>518196413Hardly untouched with His Majesty's Revenue and Customs setting up a field office up there.
>>518196922Try cactus, nigger
>>518196905forcefully taking valuable goods is rape is what that retard said
>>518178179kek
>>518178109So I guess child support wasn't incentive enough for female rapists for the privilege of raping their victims huh? Well its not like it wasn't incredibly difficult to charge a woman for rape before this anyway especially if the victim was male.
>>518179021That's never been the case in the UK, it's been something mras have been mad about since before you were probably born.Rape with object has been a thing in the US however I'm pretty sure, but in the UK, it's only with penis, I'm sure there's Camilla paglia videos talking about how that's unfair on men when women hold down children and rape them with thorn stems and the like and get off, no pun intended, with a sexual assault charge, not rape.
>>518196589You understand in English nearly every word has multiple meanings? The most common use today is sexual rape.
>>518194710Completely irrelevant since the legal definition of rape is different in the US but even if it wasn't, it would still be subject to a ton of other laws like sexual assault, not to mention abuse of a child, etc
>>518196668>we are one, we are legionhaha oh god pls kys zoomer
>>518196544I mean that's basically a justification to abolish most relationships. You will never find a couple where the power dynamics are equal. I am being a bit facetious here. I don't think it should be legal and that woman from your past should have gone yo jail. I just think there's an ocean of difference between some hot cougar lady who likes teenage boys and a fat queer who lures boys into a van and then sodomizes them to death. When we write child endangerment laws, the spirit of the law is for the latter and not the former. Similarly, a man knocking a woman out in an alley and raping her until her vagina tears into her asshole is in a different league than a manipulative woman who gets her married coworker drunk and fucks him. These are both bad things and both illegal, but the law isn't written for the second scenario.
>>518196988I think the memories that you can jack off to and the knowledge of what the other person felt like without consent are what they would take from a rapist if they could. Rape has a spiritual thing to it.
>>518197053yeah but you know what we're referring to here, retard, and idk what "ages" means for you but it's been used in this context since the 13th century
>>518178267Yep. Any form of physical sexual assault should result in a quick execution. Performed by the family of the victim or the victim him/herself if they want to. Its insane we let right wing jew pedos write the laws on this.
>>518197266HonorAt least is a new killer with every female
>>518178439But Daddy was just right there, now only hands?
>>518178109>male perpetratorUnnecessary stream of words. Under this law, only man can be a perpetrator. Or maybe... they exclude individuals who identify as female, do they? Can a troon be a perpetrator if it's legally not a male?
>>518197053Legal vs. General definition
>>518178109>A rape is when a person uses their penis without consent>>>a person without a penis cannot commit rape>Assault by penetration is where a person intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of another person>>>The penetration has to be sexual>Child sexual abuse can be committed by both men and women>>>or other children
>>518197247The word rape has always meant to take by force... In the US do you not use it in any other way than sexual? If you get a large bill from a mechanic working on your car do you not say you've been raped?
>>518178109So you can follow somebody home, jump out the bushes, double fist them elbow deep and skip off into the night knowing that you're not actually a rapist. This is why morality doesn't come from government or law. What soulless bureaucrats write this nonsense.
>>518197833My guess us that there is some other law with similar gravitas for which that would be an offense. Obviously you can't just pick up a random British person and jam your whole arm in their ass to stir last night's Wellington.
>>518197624we're talking about the literal meaning here, not the colloquial figurative one
>>518197388No, you have it backwards. This is designed specifically to prevent troops from avoiding punishment.You see, the whole tranny movement was about men trying to have female status to have different laws, etc. And at least the U.K. is holding firm in this area and saying men are always men.
>>518178109>British government announces its definition of rape
>>518197187look who joined the chat, it's none of your bussiness medkit, go eat schnitzel and fuck some goat, you're just as european as this memeflag mysteryjew
>>518178109I can't stand these (((western))) governments, psychological warfare is completely unregulated, but use of ANY force is completely regulated. Can't build a house or practice self defense without 1984 permits and pages of law to consider, but you CAN psychically traumatize people into a stupor or subservience and it's okay. At this rate I WILL live long enough to never be allowed to set foot on that island because I posted "two tier Kier."
>>518198101What if a FTM rapes a 12 year old boy with their weird flesh-tube thing?>medically not a penis>by this definition of law, not rape>the victim might be in greater legal peril since he has a real penis
>>518198115>British government announces its definition of rape.
>>518196984not going to get any penetration that way my dude
>>518198115>British government announces its definition of rape
>rapehttps://www.youtube.com/live/ZjmGydpfPOw>lol
OP is a gay fag
>>518198317By their definition it would fall under child abuse but neither rape nor sexual assault.
>>518197993Yeah but at least you're not a rapist, nobody likes a rapist.
>>518178109> forced titty fucking is not rapeinteresting.
>>518198101First, they describe the perpetrator as a person with a penis, and then they specify that this applies to male perpetrator. This specification can be use to exclude anyone who have a penis but doesn't identify as male.
>>518198811Yeah it could but in the UK trannies are legally male, and that's a recent decision.
>>518178109A tranny wrote this 100%
>>518178109Can't a female penetrate an anus with a broomstick or similar?Humans are so fucking retarded, let AI take over already so it can end us all.
>>518197266Stfu you annoying retard
>>518198317boy and his family are executed. not even joking, this is where bongs are heading, give the swamp people few more decades
>>518199463Not legally, unless the anus-haver wants that. It just isn't rape and frankly never has been. It'd be some variation of battery.What they're doing here is restoring the definition of rape as it's been understood in English law for centuries. I suspect the widening of the definition was an EU thing.
>>518196374The definition explicitly defines that women(sorry, people without a penis) are not able to rape, they can only assist rape. Women can rape.
>>518200142Women can not rape. I actually go laughed at in school, by the teacher, for bringing up the same point you just did. This was in Scotland in the 90s.Granted Scots law is slightly different but that's mostly on the property side.
>>518199923Rape means to take forceably. It doesn't mean insertion of penis.
>>518200533How old are you, son?
>>518200606I don't get your point, that's what it means.
>>518200801I'm trying to figure out how autistic you are and whether you were raised in Britain or le Yookay.
>>518200961You have other anons in this thread saying the same as me. I think it is you who is mistaken as to the meaning of the word.
>>518201093m8 if I gave a shit what retards think I'd be okay living with million of wogs.
>>518198317thanks /pol/
>>518198494It's in a drop-down thing you have to open manually. Look closer
How is 50% of this thread full of people claiming women can rape. If you, a man, get "raped" by a woman you are a weak little faggot. Or you're lying. Penises do not work for sex unless you are aroused. If you get a little blue pill slipped into your drink, you should still be strong enough to fend off your "attacker"
>>5181821236 months jail and few years on house arrest with good behaviour :)
>>518178109>women can't rapePure matriarchy.
>>518178109Very nice definition of rapppI will do needful mostly successful now
>>518186219How is a woman drugging a man and having sex with him when he's barely concious not rape, you anglo subhuman?
>>518178558Bruce your redeem the Australian race. I will arm you
>>518204005It's a litmus test. All the trad alpha bullshit they post but now crying about trad gender roles?Sorry but you are outing yourself as a tranny if you think women can rape
>>518204005I was raped by a woman. I woke up to her having sex with me, she was riding me and trying to extract my seed whilst I was sleeping. If I didn't wake up I might never have known I'd been raped.
>>518197266Nonsensical retard
>>518210311My condolences. At least you have the consolutation prize of not knocking up your rapist. Could be worse.
>>518204005>>518210013Keep the same energy for women committing SA against minors you fucking wastes
>>518178559A woman is able make a man penetrate her without his consent - even against his will.
>>518210869Kek... I wish that were true...
>>518178169dumb antisemit comment. Is>including all migrants, legal or not, for the last 100 years
>>518180635A woman can be armed. You can be drugged. More than one woman can be involved. The victim can be a boy, or a frail old man.
>>518178109A female can insert tools or toys into another person, male of female, against their will. How is this not rape?
>>518179021The OP did provide a source that apparently no one bothered to click.
>>518211239Oh man goddamn...oh so so sorry anon. Normally when I bring that up for consolation it works. Let me guess got nailed for child support for your rape baby too?I swear this shit is becoming an epidemic. Incentivizing female rapists fucking hell.
>>518211661>A woman can be armedoi thas illegal!
>>518211761The strapon assrape has the same sentencing range as penis into vagina rape. However, the statutory definitions are still unfair, as the maximum penalty for a woman riding a dick without consent would only be 10 years.
>>518211760it is rape anon. Tell us more, was some fucktard GGGermondemon or an ahmeda from pisstanbul? No details just perpetrators.
>>518211856Yeah bad isn't it.
>>518178109Everything else, like looking at women is sexual harassment.
>>518178109>A female may only be guilty of rape if she assists a mala woman can be guilty of first degree sexual assault or did you not read that far
>>518212116>slit throath of 3 little girls, no action>protests>empty prisons of rapists, all holes, including 3 year old murderers - no white in sight>put protesters in place for 2 decades>6 year old kid raped by a whole paki tribe>is 2-6. Months. With gibs.
>>518178169kekso true
"Person with a penis"Clownworld has reached maximum levels
>>518178109Kier raped a dog. Also rape means to pick up and carry off, you fuckheads.
>>518180635So apparently they don’t have alcohol or drugs on the moon, else you’d know about unconsciousness.
>>518212409...If you were murrican I would have some advice that could help with the child support involving paperwork(our family court system is dependent on fools not realizing they have to sign away their rights first before they get fucked so they want you to sign the papers ASAP so they can rape you). Best suggestion I can give is to escape to another country and completely ditch the rapist and UK.Hopefully you weren't underage(pls don't let me jinx it again God) when it happened and still had to pay...I've seen that happen far too many times too. Alas far too many happily ignore the very real...incentives women enjoy when it comes to engaging in rape and many other fucked up things.
>>518187563We say “frotting” because it’s a dirty French perversion.
What a weird shit hole
>>518213095Thanks, I don't really want to talk about it but appreciated.
>>518178109So if you shove an iron rod up someones bum bum its not rape?
>>518178154>Fingerblasters rise upThat's sexual assault, so still a crime. Its just a different crime, but still serious and its not like you're being given cart blanche to do shit like that.
>>518180635you know you have testicles right?>south koreannever mind
>>518178109Minute 1:07-1:08https://youtu.be/47MazYDnmaU
>>518178109what if I identify as female and my penis identifies as oversized clitoris?
>>518204005Real men care about justice, even if the victim should be a so called "weak little faggot". Your victim being weak doesn't justify the evil you do you do to him. Your lack of a sense of justice is why women, weak men, and homosexual men shouldn't be allowed to be judges.>If you get a little blue pill slipped into your drink, you should still be strong enough to fend off your "attacker"Just overhead press the hand grenade, bro!
