I've been wondering what the best approach to solving the digital ID slop problem will be. From my perspective it seems like the Internet under the WEF/Jew is going to instantly become a hazardous zone where fat retards in government positions can just click a button to instantly de-person us over opinions they don't like. It's going to come to the US as well so there's no avoidance of the problem at this point.In the UK, Jew Starmer wanted to introduce the slop to force the slop on the public. In Canada, government retards are pushing through bills to give them unlimited access to remove encryption as well as remove people from the Internet over speech that these fat retards don't like.>https://tuta.com/blog/canada-bill-c2-surveillance>https://theccf.ca/bill-c-8-would-allow-minister-to-secretly-cut-off-phone-internet-service-ccf-warns/I want to look at potential avenues to get around the slop. I found that the only real means to combat the slop is to use a privacy operating system that doesn't store details in your SSD/HDD, and a dummy phone that does peer to communication over blue tooth which cannot be traced due to no cellular service. The public image on the Internet will have to be sanitized slop, probably created by ChatGPT to make fake affirmations to people on LinkedIn who I couldn't give a shit about, as well as fake normie traffic.I don't want to leave /pol/ because you guys have been my niggers over the decades. But it seems at this point we're now in an existential crisis thanks to people who do not deserve any of the power that the normies gave to them. How do we beat the totalitarian slop other than decentralizing the slop and using private communication channels?
>>518373700>what are black waltz servers>what is the penumbraweb>what is ahriman's psychopathtunnel>what is the orange skyWhat is the up that's down?https://youtu.be/f1yk0DYaPSM
>>518374142We need to be serious.
Re-establish physical communication with friends and family, abandon spyware technology. Buy a dumbphone. Kant said the world is what we imagine it to be, Dante said Love is the ultimate force for unity, they're our best weapon against evil and the techno oligarchs. Start with your family, disregard the losers who say no and embrace the chads in your family, the sheep will follow. Locate and spread word of non-spyware technology for example: books, writing and touching grass. Abandon the cringe, embrace humanity.
>>518375140I rely heavily on the Internet for research papers and tutorials for building things. That's not something that can simply be shut off since it's an integral part of my life. I understand the need for books. I have many. But it's not going to really counter the problem at a fundamental level since communication and understanding the corruption now with western governments will become much more difficult without being well connected and having a system to manage their slop.You can't just turn off the slop when they try to force people to use it for your right to work and get food.
What does the WEF have to do with this?
>>518375796They are the main players who pushed Digital ID:>https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1G0X000005JJGcUAO>https://www.weforum.org/publications/reimagining-digital-id/>https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_Blueprint_for_Digital_Identity.pdfJust watch their own clips:>https://www.weforum.org/videos/identity-in-a-digital-world/>https://www.weforum.org/videos/the-power-of-digital-identities-86e582217f/Additionally from their own voices they want to tie the digital ID to programmable currency.>https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Digital_Currency_Governance_Consortium_White_Paper_Series_2021.pdfIn other words they want to track everything you do on the Internet, put a currency to your name which they can program, remove you at will with the click of a button over opinions they don't like. It's a system that will immediately cause people to lose their fundamental human rights and these retards absolutely want to have that kind of power.
>>518376078There are many moral hazards that these fucks are wanting to create with programming your ability to buy and sell based on what they want you to buy or sell>https://wltreport.com/2023/07/06/wef-digital-programmable-money-to-block-ammunition-purchases/All of this is based on digital ID and the vision these people have to control us. It's that simple.
>>518373700Found another thread for Windows OS switch for privacy as one avenue.>>518372581
>>518375467Good point, I gotta say I'm not really practicing what I just said, its more the ideal standard of how to combat WEFags. I've been networking more with family and chatting with friends more, also bringing up these concerns in conversation, even if it just ends in me being the conspiracy guy. For practical advice I don't have anything beyond suggesting you to encourage and practice what you can of what I said before. If it's just a dumb phone and a few more social events a year, it's still of benefit to the cause. Just avoid giving up, anon. Waiting on the smart people to comment now, I'm low on ideas to contribute.
>>518377198I'm not going to avoid giving up, and having a dumb "goy" phone connected to the digital ID would have to be different from your real phone for communication through peer-to-peer applications.From my perspective it seems the smart way to avoid the problem starts with decentralizing communication from the Digital Goy ID and personal devices to prevent them from data mining/forcing the slop.
>>518377610>I'm not going to avoid giving upI meant I'm not going to give up.
>>518377610To shed all of the Goy-ware, I imagine it will be as painful and labourious as it was for Germany to shed the chains of usery in the 1930s. and maybe I've been misinformed but isn't Russia doing this now too?I am struggling to think of practical solutions which aren't violent. WW3 ragebait it seems.
>>518373700It's very simple: It will make the internet dysfunctional and obsolete.So either they reverse course or they lose the benefits.
>>518373700Digital ID? No thanks. I don't even have a "government" ID. I let that shit expire like 20 years ago when I realized that the first commandment is to never enter into a contract with the criminals masquerading as "government."
>>518373700Consider learning bombmaking for funsies
>>518378377>So either they reverse course or they lose the benefits.We know they're dead set on not reversing course anon. They don't want us to have any of the benefits. People like Bill Gates reveled in the thought of people losing all anonymity on the Internet by connecting everything to your digital ID slop.
>>518378972I dunno about that, realising they breached the branch that supports them tends to scare even the most arrogant knowitalls into reconsideration.What remains to be seen if they realise it in time to halt it.
>>518378250>I am struggling to think of practical solutions which aren't violent. WW3 ragebait it seems.The practical ways is to just have two different lives and don't connect to their central data bases (i.e. blue tooth communication for personal/private information), and a public goy account that just generates slop/noise to satisfy the government retards who want to ruin your life with one click over opinions they don't like.The stakes are extremely high. I can't see how it doesn't end in Nepal like removal of the ruling class in many western countries. However for now the main option is to shed the goyware.
>>518378596This is a board of piece. We do things for educational purposes.
>>518376078WEF has zero political power. Dunno what you are trying to say.
>>518379399>WEF has zero political power. Dunno what you are trying to say.The largest companies in the world all banding together and demanding digital ID have zero power? Huh, weird since these same people are pushing for digital ID in all western countries.It's not the organization itself. It's the people involved and their connections to state leaders.>https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/world-economic-forum/young-global-leaders-on-davos
>>518379170I'm willing to try this.
>>518379573WEF is not the largest companies in the world banded together, what are you saying? Funny how you shit your pants in hysterical fear about some nobodies.
>>518380055>What is mckinsey group?
>>518379170agree
>>518380148>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLbAs9NM23sPBS News reports who this consulting group is.
My guess, as someone who isn't smart enough to be a player in this fight, is a predictably unsatisfying answer- if you don't have pertinent knowledge on fighting this shit, your best bet is probably adapting. Wait, resist it however you can, keep an ear to the ground and see what the more knowledgeable and paranoid people are doing.
>>518382878The goal of this exercise is to figure out how to beat the system rather than just accepting the digital ID. My bet is that it's bound to fail and causes massive problems but the ruling class won't care. What matters more is how people can protect their self from these fat retards.
>>518383133To what degree do you mean beating the system, though?Predictions seem to be that the IDs are rolled out and made mandatory pretty much immediately for things like getting a job and paying rent, right?At that point (depending on how long that period is), you're going to either be forced to get the ID, or REALLY adjust how you live. The latter's a problem, because it's going to really depend on you having family or friends willing to accomodate you to an uncommon degree. Too many people simply won't have that option. So then you go to the other options, complete opting out- homelessness? To be clear, I'm not opposing you on this, I'm just extremely pessimistic about how to fight it- any refuge will basically come down to "hopefully they won't require it for xyz... yet". Our primary hope is in their lack of competence, but it's never wise to assume things will go your way.
>>518384531>To be clear, I'm not opposing you on this, I'm just extremely pessimistic about how to fight it- any refuge will basically come down to "hopefully they won't require it for xyz... yet". Our primary hope is in their lack of competence, but it's never wise to assume things will go your way.There needs to be a realistic approach. My approach was to have a goy slop internet/goy device, and a series of devices not connected to the central databases for starters.