Which political party supports wolves the most?
>>518374002awoooooooooooo
>>518374002Republicans are murdering wolves with glee out west.
>>518374002In all seriousness, probably a green party
>>518374002mercenarieshttps://www.youtube.com/live/ZjmGydpfPOw
>>518374002The Nazi party was literally led by a guy named “Great-Wolf House-builder”, so you tell me
>>518374002Republican.
>>518374002This is actually a tough issue, because as a Conservative, I can see the ranchers and anti-Wolf points that they make ranching harder and are a threat, but as a non-moron, I can also understand that wolves were always a natural part of the ecosystem and do a lot of good to balance it like keeping the sick and weak out of herds. When you have overpopulation of prey animals, you get starvation and nasty diseases like hoof-and-mouth disease which is horrible.Most of the ranchers argument is that they can't protect their herds/flocks and it will cost them more to do so, but it's kind of the same bitching that the basedbean farmers do when they're forced to switch to a real product. Farmers have been protecting their products for thousands of years, so you'd think that it would be worth it to allow wolves back into the ecosystem where they belong, but they're kind of stupid.The biggest problem across both sides of the issue is the stupid faggot fucking government never does anything right, so it won't reintroduce them properly or control them properly, and won't allow citizens to do what they need to do.I voted yes for them though because I like wolves better than I like people.
>>518374538incorrect.
>>518374002Is there a furry party?
holy fucking cringe
>>518374654Yeah it's called Elgin AFB I hope those glowniggers die in a fire.
>>518374002I'm pretty sure furries have more of a loving community then everyone on the planet right now. That's some sad shit right there.
>>518374619>I can see the ranchers and anti-Wolf pointsIn Montana, there are over 2 million head of cattle. Last year, wolves killed 34 of them. Ranchers should (and can) protect their herds but wolves are not some sort of existential threat to the cattle industry desite what republican ranchers want you to believe.
>>518374002It is nice to see that you are doing well, Mr.Wolf.
>>518374619Based. Farmers/ranchers are hard-working and conscientious, yes, they're also the definition of conservative in that they have a knee-jerk reaction to always keep everything the same and never try anything new or adapt to circumstances. The only reason they're not using rotary phones is that nobody makes them anymore. So where change is needed or where the farmers need to take a slight L so the system as a whole can get a big W, that change must be forced on them. There is no logical argument that can be made to a farmer that will change his mind about anything at all ever. If he's always done it that way, he'll keep doing it that way until a gun appears in his periphery.
>>518374002Why would you support wolves at all?Those dog packs are a threat to our food income.And if winter gets rough, they might attack humans.Kids, most of the time.Fuck Wolves.
>>518374002Dems unfortunately. It's really the only thing wrong with republicans. Right wing conservationism is the key to owning th3 libs and pillaging their women.
>>518375939muslim go home back to your muslim shithole
>>518376195Yeah, pretty much the same problem.
>>518374619Based. This is the correct position. Ranchers are welfare queen tier to an embarrassing extent. Just get a dog, hire a guy, put up flags, or actively manage your cattle at all. They lose more cows to coyotes, bad weather, and not bothering to deal with disease by orders of magnitude.
>>518374002>I am a wolf
>>518374002Republicans are in tune with the wolf.They know their place in the world.They do not encroach on other breeds.
>>518374002I think if we had fursecuted harder we wouldn't have trannies.
>>518374293It’s called population control.Ask cattle or sheep herder’s.
>>518374002The one that openly targets democrat voters and politicians for acts of violence.
>>518377083lol. There's population control and then there is trying to wipe ou the population like its 1910. Montan is allowing for almost half its current wolf population (1000) to be eliminated if all the tags are fulfilled. Thats retard-tier management.>Ask cattle or sheep herder’s.I have. 2million head of cattle in Montana...only 34 were killed by wolves last year- less than griz or mnt lion....ranchers wil be fine.
>>518377473Damn, if the Fuehrer would be here today, he would lead the green party...
>>518374293Colorado libs rigged the vote to have wolves stocked in Republican areas. Now the govt is second guessing their decision but the cat is out of the bag, isn't it?
>>518374002Erdogan's.
>>518378407Retard republican areas are all rural, did you expect them to release a pack of wolves in downtown denver?
>>518378407there have been wolves back in Montana for 30yrs. everyone survived even retard ranchers
Prawo i Sprawiedliwość of course
