> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs-MarxIsn’t this PEAK human exploitation?>people are producing at maximum capacity>people are consuming at base necessityThis seems to be a recipe for extraction the theoretical maximum surplus value of another persons labor.>if they don’t produce to their ability, they are underutilized>if they take more than they need they are overconsumingSeriously, someone fucking explain how it is even THEORETICALLY possible to exploit someone to a greater degree than> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needsIt’s literally fucking impossible.
>>518698960> From each according to his ability, to each according to his needsThis is the type of principle that sounds good on a surface level (if you are dumb), but when taken to its logical conclusion results in a complete collapse of incentive structure, and the most capable people in society will just be slaves working towards someone else's cause, plagued by mediocrity and unfulfilment.
It depends on where that surplus value is going. If it's getting efficiently redistributed back to the welfare of the population and not siphoned off by a parasitic elite then that is theoretically how one would maximize the general welfare
>>518698960Lmao this nigger is still trying to argue with FACTS and LOGIC.Nigger dont you understand REAL communism is when GOOOD STUFFFF!!!Finally understand that communism and communism are two sides of the same jewish coin.A means to an end in which the jews own everything and you are nothing more than their slave.
>>518699070>the most capableNo, the most exploitable.
>>518699070Capitalist societies are also plagued by mediocrity and unfulfillment because pure selfish materialism is as much of an autistic oversimplification of human motivation as the idea that we should all participate in a eusocial bug hive hugbox
>>518699368Kinda this, jews have no soul, jews own our countries and influence our culture, so our culture becomes exactly that
>>518699070Soviet comedy clip on soviet work ethicshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYBwY6zKSNk
>>518699070No you don’t understand.You only get your needs taken care of if you give to your ability. Consider slavery. People are well capable of working 15+ hour days. People are able to be experimented on. Women are able to produce more glorious communists.>whether they like it or notA humans needs are rather meager as well, when you get right down to it.>>518699077>peak human exploitation is a good thing if we help the ones we are exploiting.You people are wild.
>>518698960Communism sucks because it doesn't extract nearly enough to sustain itself. Now to each according to what they minimally accept and you are talking.
>>518699875>peak human exploitation is a good thing if we help the ones we are exploiting.I'm not even making an ideological statement brainlet. If you had everyone produce as much as they were able to while consuming as little as they needed to then that would produce the theoretical maximum amount of surplus, which if it were then perfectly redistributed to improving the quality of everyone's lives would be how you would maximize the general welfare
>>518698960>Isn’t this PEAK human exploitation?No, Ameripoor. This is:«A 2023 survey conducted by Payroll.org highlighted that 78% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, a 6% increase from the previous year. In other words, more than three-quarters of Americans struggle to save or invest after paying for their monthly expenses.Similarly, a 2023 Forbes Advisor survey revealed that nearly 70% of respondents either identified as living paycheck to paycheck (40%) or—even more concerning—reported that their income doesn’t even cover their standard expenses (29%).» - https://www.forbes.com/advisor/banking/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-statistics-2024/
>>518700588Maybe not being perpetual slaves would maximize welfare more efficiently?Possibly even to a greater degree?
Yeah, it's retarded
