[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I think the new National Socialist state should have a social credit score system, let me explain. Under National Socialist the people should have the right to protest. Further more if there is a surveillence state under National Socialism, then #1 the courts shouldn't be able to prosecute the people for certain low level crimes, the surveillance state should only be used to prosecute high level crimes like terrorism. Or #2 if all crimes are prosecuted by the sueveillence state, then if the people don't want certain people to be prosecuted by a court or be put in jail or prison, then the people can vote case by case to not charge said person(s) or even vote to release them from prison if the people believe their prosecution by the state was unjust. This is foolproof, because if the people are good, then justice will prevail, but if the people are corrupt and free wicked criminals then only God can save us at that point, it was meant to be. However this vote can be overriden by the SS aristocracy on their vote if the SS really want said person to be prosecuted, the SS can also vote to free people and their votes have priority over the mongrel commoners since they are the pure masters. There will be a caste system in society btw.
>>
>>519341296
Don’t give me more reasons to consider you my brain damaged friends.
>>
>>519341373
wat? lol
>>
>>519341296
>People should have the right to protest, if surveillance state exist then courts shouldn't be able to prosecute the people for certain low level crimes

Ok so I just get to keep stealing shit.

>or if all crimes are prosecuted by the surveillance state people get to vote if that person deserves punishment or not

Ok so instead of having educated people that seek to serve justice just have everyone involved in ever court case everyday all the time or start up a poll everytime someone thinks it was unjust so we can get the nations vote, lol.

>if the people are good then justice will prevail
so just cross your fingers and hope the people you let out are actually good?

>introduce ss aristocracy

so just start up another poll for whether the person should be in jail despite whether they are innocent or not, when you could literally just have like minded figures in the courts to begin with saving this whole retarded process.
you could have started this whole thread just by saying I think we should let off petty crimes because you think they may have been starving but it's unlikely to even happen if you think ur national socialist system would lead to barely any poverty.

this is like intersectionality standpoint theory but for nazis, thanks for the entertainment though "prince evropa" lmao
>>
>>519341296
>>519342327
Also, militias are allowed to exist as long as they swear allegiance to National Socialism and Nordicism. Regarding the peoples vote to not prosecute or even free people from jail/prison if the vote is more than 70% of the people who voted, they can be released/not charged.
>>
>>519342371
that's cool, you should write a substack or a blog or something, best of luck to your endeavours man.
>>
>>519342327
It gives power back to the people. The people can vote on literally anything. But the SS aristocrats can override their votes with their votes or judgements. The SS can release people.
>>
>>519341296
I ain't reading all of that shit, faggot
>>
>>519342505
>power back to the people, the people can vote on literally anything
>have ss aristocrats that will be overriding the vote for when the masses vote for retarded shit which is why we abandoned democracy to begin with
yeah nah that's awesome man, you're putting in some real brain storming, I respect the hustle
>>
>>519342550
Basically he doesn't understand the context of Cesare Borgia and why you can't bargain with a population and get what you want without it causing social instability, which is why Cesare Borgia ordered his friend to be tyrannical to enforce his own standards in that particular religion, then Cesare Borgia would have him hung so Cesare seems to be a man of order, transparency and leniency while setting up his own kangaroo courts giving a false hope, fake democracy works best for this reason.
If OP had read Machiavelli, Gustav Le Bon, Vilfredo Pareto and Schmitt we wouldn't be having this discussion.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.