Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076The most ethical solution seems to be to immediately help every semite move to that region so that they can contribute and have their share in achieving a good final state for the region. We non-semites are simply not made to contribute in any meaningful way, our genetic makeup is just too different. We have seen how detrimental well meant aid can be.
>>519379188WTF are you talking talking about?
>>519379076Why is Your precious allah / mohammad being buttfucked by ziggers?I don't get it, I thought he liked prepubescent children? Was aisha too old at 9 years old or something?
>>519379245you should get zutted to transcend like your prophetmuslims like to be raped + jeets that like to gang rape
I think he just got fucked in the ass and liked it
Zutted
>>519379076Ok, why does Mutthammed have a Z tattoo on his left asscheek, and why does he have a subscription to zutted.com premium?
>>519379076The Prophet is a BZC slut.Just accept it.
>>519379381Zutt is an old arabic word for gypsies. They are rootless filthy people who lived on scam and theft. They are believed to be from india. The reason he said they resemble “Zutt” is to show how ugly they were.
>>519379356Victims of rape often experience life through a lens of being powerless. It would make sense that mohamed was raped as a child, experiences physical gratification by being a submissive bottom, but then reclaims his perceived social power by dominating and abusing someone weaker than him…ie a child (ayisha in this case).
>>519379076>it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts.i am feeling retarded about this why were they in the nude?why was محمد (peace be upon him) exhausted from this?why would he lay his head on the man's lap?please make it make sense to me
>>519379853enough to gang rape mohamedi bet you are glad that he marked a line and should not be crossedimagine the eye witness accounts
>>519379356>>519379479>>519379531>>519379650>>519379750Kek Not even a single argument This just shows the IQ of the zutts.
>>519379076Well, some anons here are retarded enough to believe a shitpost called the Quran.
>>519379076It's over. You lost. Islam is now the religion of a gay sex and a homosexual "prophet". And following a homo makes you a homo too. You can't stop the memes.
>>519379076So why is the Quran describing Zutt dick size and lust in such detail?
>>519379975If you want to assume that the Hadith is true then you have to take the whole Hadith. >why were they in the nude?They weren’t humans and they had no sexual parts according to the Hadith itself. >why was محمد (peace be upon him) exhausted from this?Because they crowded on him and followed him while he had to read the Quran the whole night. >why would he lay his head on the man's lap?It’s normal among none western faggots, especially when the other man is a close friend.
>>519380386>why is the Quran describing Zutt dick size and lust in such detail?Can I see it?
>>519379076Umm sweaty, you know that questioning the legitimacy of Hadiths is committing Kufr ;)You're not a true Muslim , especially shameful considering you're an Arab. Yikers.
zutted
NEW ZUTT GENERAL THREAD!1GET THE FUCK IN HERE!!!>>519365786>>519365786>>519365786>>519365786>>519365786
>>519380633This Hadith is disputed and even rejected since 700 AD due to issues with the narrator chain and contradicting a more authentic Hadith.
>>519379076Now reinterpret the hadith in which muhmad teaches muslims to drink camel urine.
while this whole thing is pretty funny, suddenly it becoming a thing NOW of all times just reeks of another attempt to direct muslim outrage somewhere else, like europe, and thus our attention would be steered away from israelwhy latch onto something so specific and ambiguous, instead of the overall dogma of islam as a world-conquering ideology?
Don't cope muzzie, moohamad got sex sex sex in the butt butt butt, even your holy book says this.
>>519380405>They weren’t humans and they had no sexual parts according to the Hadith itselfجِنّ can have sex, can they not?>It’s normal among none western faggots, especially when the other man is a close friendyou do this?
>>519379076Ok but why were they naked? That's the strange part imho
>>519380785>Disputed Ok. By whom.>Rejected.By whom? There is no papal council to unanimously reject something. Again you're commiting Kufr.
>>519379076Anal sex at a time when people there had little water and we're wiping their butt with stone; sounds very unhygienic, something i wouldn't recommend. Just saying, butt it's upto you
>>519380785>It's fake that's why we wrote it for 1400 years
>>519381387By Islamic Scholars, they developed a method for sorting the reliability of Hadiths that is generally agreed upon
>>519379076test
>>519381085Jinn don’t have the same body as us. They can get into any shape they want whether it’s human or animal.
>>519381387Albukhary. The most well known and respected hadith scholar and collector.
>>519381794Muslims keep al hadiths even fake one. They just note it’s a fake hadith and the reason it’s fake.
>>519379076that's probably true but the alternative is funnier, so i'll believe that instead.
>>519381666Unironically was cleaner back then with no processed foods and squatting.
>>519381666>webm of Zutt fellow raping man at old age home
>>519381387Don't even bother arguing, they will say it's "not authentic" even though it's form one of the most authentic Hadith books. They say this about every single unflattering thing but the entirety of Islam is full of unflattering Hadiths about Mohamad (Married a 6 year old and raped her at 9 - if not sooner, Aisha cleaned jizz from his clothes, was a liar, thief, rapist, murderer, etc.) so they would just instantly reject the entire religion.Muslims always lie about their religion and it depends on the ignorance of non-Muslims because nobody who isn't clinically retarded could actually pay attention to that book. The Hadith is the account of Mohamad, and because Islam considers him to be the perfect man (he is a liar, murderer, thief, rapist, gay, etc.) then if the Hadith is not reliable then there is no clear instruction on how to live. So then I guess you don't have reliable texts so your religion then is false. This is how retarded they are, it's not even worth addressing anymore. Simply tell them to get zutted then move on.
>>519382090Source? Refer to the explicit dispute where he refert to it. To my knowledge he just didn't include it in his own collection of Hadiths, he was dishonest enough to omit it as it makes Mohammed look badThe fact that Bukhari's collection is considered Sahi doesn't mean the story is false. There is enough sex pest behaviour in Sahi Al-Bukhari as is. Omission is just that, an omisison. His personal choice of what to include.
>>519379076Needs more zuttsex
>>519379076OK, mud butt zlut for zutts
>>519379076Not reading all of that but mohammad got buttfucked by jeets lol
>>519382496Ibn Kathīr (may Allah have mercy on him) said:“It contains great strangeness (i.e., it is very odd).”— End quote from Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr (7/293).The reason for its strangeness may be that it contradicts what Imām Muslim narrated (no. 450) from ʿAlqamah, from ʿAbdullāh ibn Masʿūd, who said:“I was not with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) on the night of the jinn, and I wish that I had been with him.”As for the chain of narration, it is from ʿAmr al-Bakkālī, and most scholars hold that he was not a Companion (of the Prophet). Al-Bukhārī explicitly stated that it is not known that he heard anything from Ibn Masʿūd (may Allah be pleased with him).The editors of al-Musnad said:“Its chain of narration is weak. ʿAmr al-Bakkālī—whose kunyah is Abū ʿUthmān—has not been proven to have heard this ḥadīth from Ibn Masʿūd. Al-Bukhārī said in al-Tārīkh al-Ṣaghīr (1/203): ‘It is not known that ʿAmr heard from Ibn Masʿūd.’However, Abū Ḥātim said in al-Marāsīl (p. 119): ‘He narrated from Ibn Masʿūd the ḥadīth about the Night of the Jinn.’There is disagreement regarding whether ʿAmr was a Companion; most scholars say he was not, and no one is known to have declared him trustworthy.”— End quote.
>>519382012then why not just call them eunuchs? they dressed afterwards the next day in normal clothesunless I'm mistaken; this is unique behavior for jinn. No so for men though
>>519382158>Anything unflattering I declare false although i keep it for 1400 yearsTwo possibilities here:>You are clearly lying>Your religion is gibberish and nonsense with no reliable texts so you pick what to believe - so then it's not a religionBut it's actually both. Your prophet was a gay rapist pedophile who actually wasn't a prophet . That why he referred to "God" as "Al-Lah", a pagan moon deity. Now refer to Commandment 1 of the 10 Commandments:>You shall have no other Gods but me>You shall have no idolsIslam is false and Mohamad was a gay pedo rapist.
>>519379076oh so it was just piggy back rides?
>>519380405>It’s normal among none western faggots, especially when the other man is a close friend.Zesty bucks. Ready to get zutted
>>519382198Based. It is funnier
>>519382895That’s because you’re a fucking retarded who doesn’t understand what you’re talking about. Hadiths themselves aren’t religious texts. They are just bunch of narrations for what happened during early islam period. Some of them are authentic some of them fake. Muslims have created a system to rate Hadiths based on how close to the truth it’s. Hadith only becomes religious when it’s about something the prophet said or did. Other then that it’s just for entertainment. >That why he referred to "God" as "Al-Lah"“Allah” was already used to refer to God by pagans, jews, and Christians even before Mohammad was born.
>>519382895I've actually not heard that one...here's a lustful image for your trouble
>>519382858So I was right. Its all cope boiling down to " umm I don't trust the witness" literally "DEBOONKED , NOT CERTIFIED BY EXPERTS" I trust a contemporary more than some guys born 200 years after the fact and coping away a thing that makes someone look bad. That's just dishonest.
>>519382880He wanted to express how ugly they were, so he said zutt (aka indians)
>>519379076The thing is that no one cares if it's true or not, I personally am surprised it's being spammed now of all times when that vid from David Wood is half a year old but whatever, I personally couldn't care less about Islam but this Zutt spamming is just because people don't like Muslims(or at least the immigrants who commit crime in white countries)
Wallahi moe moe is truly the strongest prophet of them all, he took the strenght of 30 men with members that never weakens all night long and survived the encounter.
>>519383270Here; if Mohamad is truly God's prophet:>How does he not know how to address God? Did God not tell him? Would God allow himself to be named after a pagan moon deity>Why do all his teachings contradict all the moral teachings given directly from God in the Old and New Testaments? - Mohamad is a liar, murderer, thief, rapist and gayI could also ask about how Mohamad said he received a message from "God" but said later he was mistaken and that it was actually satan, meaning:>Mohamad said he talked to satan>Mohamad said he couldn't tell it was satan
>>519379076>the guy pushing this on jewtube is a roided out jew can you zoomers do anything that isn’t blatant fucking shilling for jews
>>519383347How do you think Hadith is being rated and authenticated, retard? They had no way to check the authenticity of a narration directly. They had to judge based on the narrators’ character, whether the narration chain is connected or not, how well it goes with other narrations.
LOL Imagine worshipping a pedo faggot that was fucked all night by jeets.
>>519382895>Joseph E. B. Lumbard, a professor of classical Islam, has described the claim that Allah was a moon god as "not only an insult to Muslims but also an insult to Arab Christians who use the name 'Allah' for God."interesting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah_as_a_lunar_deity
>>519383574What the fuck are you talking about. I am an exmuslim btw, and could have made much better arguments than this retarded argument.
>>519383354is this ever done elsewhere?
>>519383623No you retarded coper.It's literally opinion Vs opinion.The hadith exists. Some cope it away and claim it's doubtful, not even daring to claim it's straight untrue because they know that they're risking Kufr by denying it outright, contrary to stupid modern "Muslims" like yourself .
>>519383694Allah is Al-Lah, it doesn't matter what Arab Christians use, that's the actual etymology of the word and historical source. It's also worth noting that Arabs weren't natively Christian, nor was the levant and the spread of Islam brought Arabs there in the first place. IE places like Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, etc weren't Arabic until Islam came. In Syria ARAMAIC used to be the language.Now stop posting degenerate porn.
>>519379076>guys you dont get it guys. The narrative is perfect and unchanged but we changed guys. Language changed but the hadiths are still perfect guys. No ignore that one about child raping mo getting raped in his asshole by Indians. It doesnt mean rape guys. It was all consensual guys. Like with the goats and 7 year olds.
>>519384110Also the Bible uses the term Lord, which is a different word in Arabic.
>>519384068>Some cope it away and claim it's doubtful, not even daring to claim it's straight untrue because they know that they're risking Kufr by denying it outrightSchroedinger's Hadith. What a dumb religion.
>>519383694By the same logic christianity is sun worship.
>>519384110>Arabs weren't natively Christian, nor was the levant*nor was the Levant natively Arab
>>519379076Imagine pooing in another thread just to come here and whine about Muhammad being butt blasted by Indians.>>519375806
>>519379076>Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet.Correct, he didn't witness the prophet with jinn.The prophet was getting buttfucked by a gang of jeets.
>>519379076Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519384562Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379853When not otherwise occupied by touching small children and violating goats, the prophet loved getting nutt'd in the butt by zutts.
>>519384068>It's literally opinion Vs opinion.No it’s not. I am not going to waste time explaining how.But all what you need to know is that the hadith itself isn’t the problem. In fact no one found the content of the Hadith to be problematic. The issue is the chain of narration and that it contradicts another Hadith with better chain of narration.
>>519384601Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519384110https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tth1QVg780>Now stop posting degenerate porn.fine
The bot is broken.
>>519384562>>519384601>>519384819It's been pretty well known for a long time that Mo was gay. We know all about muslim love for young boys. Sadly for you, people around the world are aware of this. Did you muslims think you'd kept it a secret from everyone else? lol
>>519384819Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385001muhammad really got zutted. Theyre doing damage control
>>519385042>>519385092Have you ever been zutted? If not, do you feel you missed out?
>>519385092Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385366Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385001i hit him with my jew magic
>>519385315>Have you ever been zutted? If not, do you feel you missed out?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXGLhpIyL3Q
>>519382858>“It contains great strangeness (i.e., it is very odd).”lmao
>>519384110Allah is a short for Al Elah. “Al” means “the”. “Elah” means God. The “E” is removed when “al” is used to make it easier to pronounce. The etymology of Elah is the word “El” an ancient Semitic deity. Aramaic uses the word “Alaha” to refer to god.While Hebrews use the word “Elohim” (a variation of Elah) to refer to god.
>>519385405Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385604“Odd” here means no body else narrated it.
>>519385677Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
Zutted lol
>>519385729Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385931Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519385655https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicQuran/comments/1br4kpx/triad_of_the_deities_of_the_moon_sun_and_venus_in/found this on google just now
>>519385699and what does strangeness stand for?
>>519386003Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076All zutt posting are Indian Hindu
>>519385699Look it's ok man the prophet Muhammad (jeets be upon his bussy) had a bunch of naked indians ride his ass all night long.You don't have to commit blasphemy and deny your religion because you don't like it, stop trying to view this through a modern lens of sexuality and morality.Muhammad had a long hard night of having a train ran on him and that was just part of his journey.It's you who are too insecure to accept this so you blaspheme against your own religion.
>First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times.>Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. >Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. >Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.Your arguments are as retarded as your bot, please fix both of them
>>519386162Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519386199Thank you
>>519386235Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519386403Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076You guys are never living this one down. First you follow the Jewish religion V2.0 then you get outted as a bunch of fags, kek. Sys (stone yourself)
>>519386285>>519379076India Hindu keep posting zutt .
>>519386134He used the same word twice to emphasize the oddity of the narration. It’s just translation error.
Let's talk about how the Koran encourages men to grow beards so they aren't tempted by each other?
>>519386477Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076NUMBER ONE>why does jordan have the same flag of palestine but does fuck all to help them?NUMBER TWO>why would you worship someone where someone can write anything disgusting about them and tarnish your perspective/faith?NUMBER THREE>am I suppose to believe you're a jordanian and actually know perfect english?
>>519379076In the video whose thumbnail you included, he points out that the word for "rode" had also been used in other hadiths for sex, as in a man rides a woman. A man certainly does not follow a woman.
>>519386633Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
Like it says in the dudes video, mounted and rode have been used as sexual innuendo all acroos the world including the middle east long before Islam
>>519385655That did NOT change my core point in any way. But it's also false. It's Al-Lah. Al in Arabic is the proper noun marker. You cannot even transform the word like that. However, there is an exact pagan arab deity named Al-Lah! Imagine that.All your posts now are basically making shit up that might sound plausible to outsiders and that's how all you Muslims lie.
>>519379980The argument is that, even if you consider the exact wording to not have a direct sexual connotation, it's pretty much impossible to not attribue it as an euphemism given the circunstances. In fact, you can delete the "mount" part of the structure and the semantic structure of the passage will still imply that he got zutted (technically fucked by people or djinn who look like zutts, but w/e).
>>519386730Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076> the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context.The context is that there were a bunch of naked guys surrounding the Prophet.
>>519379076Those desert rapists probably knew he was a homo.
>>519379076uh huh. so a bunch of lusting gay niggers "followed him closely" to completetion which by coincidence also chafed his ass hole raw
>>519386866Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519386966Guys it's melting down
Look at the desperation as soon as attention leaves hating on jews for a few threads. 1 guy spamming replies in several threads defending his pisslam. Jews and arabs are literally the same. They both lie decieve and destroy anything they touch. 4chan has been invaded by middle east, them getting access to the western internet was a mistake. Much like how theyve invaded europe.4chan is being spammed by islamists
>>519386966Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519387042damn this shit makes em go fucking nuts
>>519379076Jizzlam
>>519387220Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379245let me mount your sister and mother
>>519386833No they were naked and just rode on top of him all night long, leaving him exhausted and in pain. This is not sexual or shameful in any way, that's why he told Abdullah to stay away where he couldn't see.
>>519386757Removing letters from words after joining them with another word is common in arabic and it’s called “idgham”. And I am proving that all Semitic languages have the same word for god. If this doesn’t change your core point. Then what is your core point? Alaha in Aramaic is almost the same word as “allah” in arabic, for example. How doesn’t this challenge your core point? El itself is a pagan deity.
>>519379076>coping because it's an old storyyeah and the quran is old too and you have no way to actually verify that mohammed (confirmed pedophile) spoke to an angel in a cave that nobody else actually saw either.
>>519379076India hindu spamming zutt post here lookWhat i found>>519385878
>>519379076I think he was HURT after the "mounting"
>>519387299Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519386874Bunch of none humans with no sexual parts according to the narration itself.
>>519379076OP they're just disengenuine see >>519386965No matter how in depth you go it's just le zlutt meme.They'll even go so far as saying they aren't christcucks which is basically their own form of taqqiya.
>>519379076Nigga your prophet take it in the booty
>>519387599answer me >>519386697
>>519387559Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076Why are you trying to explain something to people who are either malicious or too stupid to understand?
>>519387834Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519387440>(confirmed pedophile)Asma was 10 years older than Aisha, and that Asma was born 27 years before the Hijrah, i.e. in 596.Thus:Asma was born in 596: she was 14 when the Prophetic mission began and 27 at the time of the Hijrah.Aisha was born in 606: she was 4 when the Prophetic mission began and 17 at the time of the Hijrah. She was married at 14; the marriage was consummated when she was 17, or 18 if we allow for a few months after the Hijrah.The historical sources are unanimous that Asma died soon after a famous historical incident, the death of her son Abdullah bin Zubayr at the hands of Hajjaj bin Yusuf in 73 H, when she was aged 100.Thus, she was born in 596 and died c. 693-696Ibn Kathir mentions in Al-Bidayah wa l-Nihayah that “amongst the females who accepted Islam during the first three years of the Prophetic mission were Asma and Aisha. This was whilst the Prophet’s preaching was covert. Then, in the fourth year of his mission, God commanded him to announce his mission publicly.”This again contradicts the original narration of Bukhari, since the latter implies that Aisha was born in the fourth year of the Prophetic mission.However, according to the correct calculation, Aisha was born 4 years before the Prophetic mission began and so was 7 when she accepted Islam, being just about old enough to do so.[Salahi (p. 204) further adds that Aisha is mentioned in Ibn Ishaq’s Sirah, the earliest book on the biography of the Prophet, amongst the first fifty people to accept Islam. She is nineteenth on the list. There are no children on the list, although Ibn Ishaq mentions that she was young. Salahi estimates that she must have been at least ten, making her 18 at the time of her marriage. – U.H.]That being said I'll take prime cunny over born again christian OF roasties in their 30's and 40's.
>>519386833That’s because you’re assuming they are humans when the narration itself states they are not. The picture it’s trying to convey is scary creatures that resemble ugly humans with no decency crowding on Mohammad and following him everywhere while mohammad reading the religious text to keep them away.
>>519387883can you explain it?
>>519387599Irrelevant questions
>>519388014I explained it here.>>519386965>>519387101
>>519382858>“It contains great strangenessYeah it it pretty queer huh?
psdo moohamud got ass raped, by indians at that... the end. lol
>>519388014The self evident truth of /pol/ being filled with bots and shills? Or what the OP is talking about.
>>519379076this is prophet muhammad (pajeets blast upon him) after he got ZUTTED
>>519379076>jeetfarm thread
>>519387791Irrelevant questions and thanks for commending my english.
>>519387935Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519383327That is a very fertile looking young woman
>>519387969>Aisha was born in 606You retards will lie about anything and everything
>>519388215Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519387980>when the narration itself states they are not.it does?
>>519379076We Will post more Zutt post until muslim cry to death.
>>519388171Islam might be for retards but mocking a literal toddler for being mangled is probably the lowest IQ behavior imaginable. Kill yourself
>>519388193>why would you worship someone where anyone can write anything disgusting about them and tarnish your perspective/faith?is very relevant. I want to understand this
Whatever bro. Our MSM never attacks Islam. That's all I need to know.
>>519379076dayumn
>>519385001MOOOOOOM THE BOT IS BROKEN!!!!
>>519388274>has no argumentI'll accept your concession christcuck.
>>519387969The argument that Aisha was between 6-9 years old when Muhammad consummated the marriage is based on a number of hadiths and historical accounts that are widely accepted and well-established in the Islamic tradition.Firstly, there are several hadiths that explicitly state that Aisha was very young at the time of her marriage. For example, the hadith in Sahih Bukhari (5134) states that Aisha was six years old when she was married to Muhammad, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine. This hadith is considered sahih (authentic) by the vast majority of Islamic scholars.Similarly, the hadith in Sahih Muslim (3310) states that Aisha was a young girl (jariyah) when she was married to Muhammad, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine. This hadith is also considered sahih by the vast majority of Islamic scholars.Furthermore, there are several historical accounts that support the idea that Aisha was very young at the time of her marriage. For example, the historian Ibn Hisham, in his biography of Muhammad, states that Aisha was six years old when she was married, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine. This account is based on the reports of Aisha herself, as well as other early Muslim scholars and historiansIn conclusion, the argument that Aisha was between 6-9 years old when Muhammad consummated the marriage is based on a number of well-established hadiths and historical accounts. While there may be some variation in the reporting of Aisha's age, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that she was very young at the time of her marriage, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine years old.
>>519379076You guys are reason why Indians are heated in all social media.Now we will make zutt post to take our revange
>>519388285Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519388355he voted for it
>>519382858There is no contradiction. Let's just do some exegesis:>“I was not with the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) on the night of the jinn, and I wish that I had been with him.He was not with Muhammad during that night.So, let's see how that hadith begins:>So we set off until I reached a certain place, and he drew a line for me and told me to stay within it. He said, 'Do not leave this area, for if you do, you will perish.' So I stayed within it. Then the Messenger of Allah ﷺ went away for a while, or seemingly went far away. Do note that, up to this point, the text does not make mention of night or day. We can assume that, given the context, this passage happaned during or immediately after dusk. The fact is that, at this time, Muhammad left Abdullah ibn Mas`ud and went towards the "zutts".>Then he returned and mentioned Haneen, as if they were locusts. (Affan said, or as Affan said if Allah wills), they had no clothes on, and I did not see their private parts at all. They had very little flesh. Then they came and started riding on the Messenger of Allah ﷺ. Prophet of Allah ﷺ began reciting to them. They came to me and it seemed as if they were flooding around me and attempting to interpose themselves. Abdullah said, "I was terrified of them more severely than I was the first time." A'rif said in his narration, "Then he sat down or as he said." Then when the dawn broke, they left, or as he said. Then indeed the Messenger of Allah ﷺ returned very weary and exhausted, or almost exhausted due to what he had ridden. This passage narrates that, after dawn (ie. after the entire night), the prophet came back and narrated what happened to Abdulla ibn Mas'ud.Both passages are in perfect hermeneutical harmony. The only argument that stands against this hadith ultimately falls into the "absence of evidence is not evidence of abscence" conundrum, as it is impossible to know if Mas'ud told al-Bakkali about it or not.
>>519388524Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519388355That guy used to spam pictures of sead kids in /chip/ threads. It's pretty obvious Jews forced this meme so people forget about their war crimes.
>>519379076Are you angry little Zutt slut?
>>519387969pedos are just losers who missed out on teenage love
>>519388392It's true and neither do the politicians who accept bribes from foreign governments like Qatar.
>>519388482SAAR IS HERE TO REDEEM, THAT ASS!!!
>>519379076zutt slut cope
>>519379076>
>>519388569You doubt the prophet and pervert his message when you deny him the train ran on his anus.
>>519388569Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519388480OK here is Jesus(I'm assuming this is your triune god) telling Moses in the Bible that it's completely fine to have sex with children.(Numbers 31:17-18)"And now, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has had sexual relations with a man."But all the women children who have not known a man through sexual relations, keep alive for yourselves."After knowing this and finding this out do you denounce Jesus Christ as your lord and savior?
>>519388099i speak a little jew, & we kinda have a word like qalb (lev/לֵב) so i fallow what your saying however, the zutts are naked while they have this interaction, & then dress after
>>519388908Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076just watch the video bro.>First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times.he already covered this>Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context.he already covered this>Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet.He already covered thisyou haven't watched the video, watch it and make a new thread
>>519388571i singlehandedly killed chip
>>519388390First nobody worships Mohammad. In fact, the core of Islam is made around the fact that muslims worship god not Mohammad. >when the prophet died. Abu Baker said to the people “As for what follows: Whoever among you used to worship Muhammad — then indeed, Muhammad has died. But whoever used to worship God — then God is Ever-Living and never dies. God, said in Quran: ‘Muhammad is no more than a Messenger; messengers have passed on before him. So if he dies or is killed, will you turn back on your heels? And whoever turns back on his heels will never harm God in the least — but God will reward the grateful.’>anyone can write anything disgusting about them and tarnish your perspective/faithI can write anything I want about anyone in the world. How does this make them less legitimate?
>>519388954Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519388168>Or what the OP is talking aboutyou got anything to dispel the zutts?
>>519379076>First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years.bullshit
>>519389147new copy pasta
>>519388607simps are just liberal feminists who don't get any love whatsoever
>>519389147Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519389062>First nobody worships Mohammad. In fact, the core of Islam is made around the fact that muslims worship god not Mohammad. sure, but he's still an integral part of your beliefs.put it like this.you guys are against idols. do you understand the practical side?if you depict a picture of Mohamed a jeet or jew can go and desecrate the picture by drawing vulgar things on it. >How does this make them less legitimate?its not a question of legitimacy, but a question of practicality. You make yourself vulnerable to lose your faith (even if you're not outright worshiping Mohamed)
mohammed slept with his head on grown men's lapshe was visited at night secretly by 'an angel' that he said was just disguised as diyah al-kalib, who he said was one of the most handsome men (this is why they don't let dogs in the house, they might bark and let people know about the gay sex)he walked around with cum stains on himhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXCYh7TcKUwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtTYxxmVpvA
>>519379853Its possibly zutt men and the prophet simply had a spiritual exchange of ideas and energies and this exhausted the prophet because the zutt men probably were dabbling in strange activities. But ofc the average 4chan retard is projecting his own gayness on a holyman. Many such cases. They also do it to jesus calling him a gay pedo, and you sort of did it to the men of zutt cause the prophet woulndt have received them if he didnt thought it was fruitful so the men of zutt for their stature had atleast some sort of spiritual value(perhaps jinn related?) The sad thing is these guys on this board see homo and troon everywhere and in everything so this is not going to end well. Sadly. I just hope some have the wisdom to foresee the consequences of their fleeting pleasures of shitposting. Is it really worth that brainrush to post whatever whenever?
>>519389343tbf, i slept with your grandmother, mother, wife
>>519388942How does that imply that it's okay to have sex with children?
>>519379076Your religion follows the teachings of a pedophile who enjoyed being anally ravished by a group of men for an entire night and then said that it's not gay to sodomize young boys so his followers wouldn't stone him to death.I understand you were brainwashed with your religion at birth, but eventually you have to realize that it's flawed and either accept the flaws or realize that the scripture is nothing but the ravings of a man who used force to spread a set of rules that applied to everyone except himself.How did your prophet die anyway? Was he zutted to death?
>>519389293ok loser
>>519389303Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519389338>its not a question of legitimacy, but a question of practicality. You make yourself vulnerable to lose your faith (even if you're not outright worshiping Mohamed)Why? God himself is being mocked all the time. Does that mean we shouldn’t worship god?
>>519389436>it was a spiritual bukakke!
>>519389573Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
today, op lost his fucking mind over zutts
>>519388942Also, you didn't argue or address the post you are replying to >>519388480I assume you just admit you were lying.
>>519389474t. faggot apologist
>>519389584>Why? God himself is being mocked all the time. Does that mean we shouldn’t worship god?it makes it more difficult to and tempts you to not 'worship' a guy that has a religion built around him being ass raped (even if its a false rumor) or if the statue/idol has a dick drawn on its mouth.are you intentionally being obtuse?I can give you (you)s and bumps without you doing this
>>519389637many such cases
>>519389436>zutt men probably were dabbling in strange activitieswhy were they naked?they had clothes. they put them on the next morning
>>519389625Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076How old was Aisha when he raped her?
>>519389878Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519389669you're playing into the hand, goyim. sign up for the draft and kill 'dem godamn mudslimesdeus vult, brother
>>519379076Islam is Jewish fairytales seasoned with Arabian sauce just like Christianity is Jewish fairytales seasoned with European sauce.
>>519379076Admission is one of the hardest things that rape survivors have to overcome. It happened. It does not have to be okay that it happened for you, but it happened.
>>519388946Show me the hadith you're referring to.
>>519389961>no lies detected
>>519389868Maybe they were firedancing and didnt wanna catch their shirt on fire, its said those guys are from india?, arent they obsessed with fire there?
>>519387980
>>519389888They claim nine, but she may have been even younger.
>>519389559You're simping for whores and I'm the loser?lmao
>>519389937Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379980Islam is so self evidently false that it doesn’t require anything more than shitposts to dismantle. It is spiritually pointless and the only reason people follow it is because they were raised surrounded by it, so Islam is their brain’s default state. That’s the only way it makes sense.
>>519389999Rape is nonconsensual. The zutting was very much consensual.
>>519390142Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519388480Thanks ChatGPT, you fucking cuck faggot.
>>519390142>jeetfarm thread
>>519382158this is a problem imo because you fall into situations like now.
Earlier this bot had an Israeli flag spamming zutts in threads
>>519389942>Noooooo, you can't shit on faggot satanic pisslamics without also serving satanic kikes or being a satanic shit loving pajeetfuck off, niggerKEKthis OP is just copy pasta'ing his own thread absolutely zutted
>>519390209t. ass blasted pisslamic
>>519390207Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519383354>zutt are raping indians>no thats not what happenedYou must know how this looks. Aren't you blaspheming the prophet right now by denying him when it is not convenient?
>be Mohammed>explicitly teach that gays are so abominable they have to be murdered immediately>take one of your followers out to the desert, have him stand behind the cuck line and watch as you get your prophussy obliterated by a mob of ZUTT bulls>after you death, instead of doing the intelligent thing and just not telling anybody about how you were no match for the ZUTT, he spills the beans>instead of getting immediately killed for claiming he watched you getting ZUTTED RAW in the desert, this behavior is so on brand it gets entered as a highly trusted hadith.Mohammed might be the funniest person from antiquity.
>>519390312>holy jewsus isn't as gay as muhamedlmao, they're both gay and jewishyou are brown
>>519390426Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519387427Al is the a noun marker, it marks "Lah". Transmogrifying the word like that doesn't work. Al-Lah refers to Lah, the pagan moon deity. Elohim comes from semitic "El".
>>519389827I am not sure whether you’re being trolling or just stupid.How is Mohammad being worshipped? You tried to brush this off but it doesn’t make any sense. How exactly is “Islam” is “a religion built around him being ass raped. How did you get to this conclusion? How do you know Jesus wasn’t ass raped?How do you know god wasn’t ass raped somehow?
>>519390103im a 6'4 zoomerchad, youre some ugly brownoid loser who missed out on teenage love and copes with worshipping a zuttbroken pedowe are not the same
>>519390147All religions are false
>>519379076I don’t think your Prophet would be very happy to see his followers revise history and deny aspects of his life that they find unsavory. If you truly loved and venerated Him, you would embrace all of Him and love Him for who he was. It wouldn’t matter that he was a pedophilic rapist who loved taking Big Zutt Cock up his ass while making his friend watch. You’d get on your hands and knees, face Mecca and pray to the filthy buttslut.
>>519390361Internet’s dead, retard. It’s all just chat bots spamming and faggots copy pasting chat bots. All religions are dogshit.
>>519390209> you fucking cuck faggotExcuse me sir, my name is not Mohammad (pajeets bust upon him)
>>519390488>How is Mohammad being worshipped? oh okay, islam has nothing to do with mohammed (peace be upon him, for no reason apparently)>How exactly is “Islam” is “a religion built around him being ass raped. How did you get to this conclusion?the al zutt horshit>How do you know Jesus wasn’t ass raped?i'm not a christian. he could have been for all i know. but the charges are usually him being son of a whore and a pussy>How do you know god wasn’t ass raped somehow?too abstract, no one knows my god but me
>0 threads about gazaOh, this really is just a jewish psyop to distract people with.
>>519390479Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519390241Nobody really cares about it. There are much better gotchas you could have came up with rather than this.
>>519390488islam demands you submit to mohammed as equally as you submit to allah/satanmohammed was a fagtherefore, islam is gay
Why the fifteen different ID’s? Did Pakistan or whatever that shithole flag is marshall their Internet Defense Force?
>>519390025>And the scrawny ones came with tall white garments on, but the Messenger of Allah (SAW) had fallen asleep. And I became more intensely terrified of them than I was the first time
Allah has warned, "we will drag them by the forelock" this is exactly whats happening nowHear no evilSee no evil
>>519379076I have a question. I got tortured into believing in Jesus. But before that I thought it was just absurd. I don't believe in Jesus now but I'm wondering, do you think Jesus isn't real and it's a crazy idea, or do you think Jesus is real but he's brown? I c pp
>>519390731Maybe
>>519390681Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519390488You literally have to pray towards a rock he touched multiple times a day and you MUST visit it before you die.Imagine, the God who said>You will have no other gods>You will have no idolsSupposedly sent a "prophet" to teaach his followers that God's name is actually that of a pagan moon god (because apparently God never told him how he should be addressed and he's totally cool with being called that) and to be incredibly immoral and violate all his commandments and moral teachings. Then to top it all off, Islam incorporates works from the Talmud, which are NOT part of the Bible. One such example is "Abraham smashing the idols", sounds like something against idolatry, while Muslims worship a rock in Mecca, a literal idol. Your religion is actually retarded and contradicts itself so profoundly it's like multiple layers of contradictions inside of other contradictions.
>>519390712Why are you randomly lying?
>>519390663gazans are still getting bombed kek, a shame all the new pali gore vids are censored thoughi barely have anything to post
>>519390578seems like you're just mad at what chatGPT, which is basically just google+, says about mohammed being a dogshit faggot >>519390690yea, like the quaranic dilemma https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbqLsvMY38cno matter how you approach it, islam is retarded and gay
>>519390652I always found their denial of worshipping Mohammed weird.You cant say his name without a prayer. If you speak about him negatively they'll kill you.their entire faith is based on his biography. Like fuck off dude Mohammed is your god
>>519390814Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519390850You sound fat and handicapped
>>519390891exactly, jeet. you get it
>>519390843>randomly lyingneither random nor a liehttps://www.faithbrowser.com/submitting-to-muhammad/Qur’an 4:65“But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad SAW) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission.” Qur’an 4:80 declares: “He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah….”
Oh i aint perfect, but jesus and mohammad got close, they got close
>>519386833>djinnYA ALLAH IT'S THOSE FILTHY MAJOOSI WHO LET EVIL SPIRIT UPON OUR PROPETH (PBUH)WALLAH BROTHERS TOTAL SHIA GENOCIDE IS NOW MORE JUSTIFIED THAN EVER!!!!
>>519390901Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
Mohammed was a fag and not even Allah knows why he fucked and sucked a football team of hung, sweaty Zutt men on a sweltering hot night in the year 620.Allah didn’t ask him to do that shit
>>519391036Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076>Mohammad (zbuh) had an anal orgy with zutts>No bro, you are interpreting it wrong. words change their meanings, ok!? >:(ok
>>519390794i'm not Christian in any way, shape, or form. here's something that made me stop hating them; https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/the-strange-identity-of-jesus-christ
>>519388099>arabic is expressive while english is literalyou are dumber than a rock
>>519379076ZUTT STATUS: BROKEN
I have no Zutts and I must suck-Prophet Mohammed, 630 CE
>>519391110Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519390487Thats “al-lat”. Not “lah”. It’s an arabic goddess and seems to be a feminine of the word “allah”. It’s probably also derived from the word “El”. Since El was a popular Semitic pagan deity before being turned into one god.
>>519390902im literally the exact opposite of that
>>519379853Why did the pedofile false prophet Mohammad allow himself to be ridden by naked jeet niggers until he was exhausted and in pain? Please make an honest attempt to explain these passages away like you people always try (and fail) to do.It makes me kek everytime.
>>519391229Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519391229So why take any of the book seriously if the meaning has been bastardized to such an effect that text can no longer be taken at face value?
>>519391305This OP I need a good laugh Also you’re a faggot
>>519391230>an arabic goddessthe levels of irony
>Urduni lost itLolLmao even
>>519390872Nice meme, faggot.
>>519391341Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519380955Regardless of degree of truth in either claim,>Why focus on the weakness of an enemy when you could instead talk of their strength?Because that's how war propaganda works. You can and should show the enemy as evil, but you also want to clearly show weakness and incite disgust to embolden your target audience to act against them. targeted imagery of disgust and duplicitousnous (jew imagery) moves better than representing the enemy as a giant, stomping the cities (America, the image of the giant with kkk helmet and a bomb for a foot). Fence sitters and cowards could rightly view the latter as admission of superior strength in the enemy. You're not giving them a target, you're teaching them to fear. None of these claims of mine are based on much, and instilling fear has value in lowering risk to women and children from enemies that would attack them given the chance. Any effective historical examples of the sort of message you want to convey to your countrymen?
>>519379650my little prophet cant be THIS CUTE
He’s so zutt broken he’s resorted to just spamming. Truly sad
The fact we got these sandniggers typing whole essays no ones reading to counter a few memes with quotes fron their “holy” book has me dying in my office chair.Forget it, the boats sailed. Even if the text is being misinterpreted (as unlikely as that is, whats been communicated is fucking explicit), its far funnier to run with the narrative that your Great Holy Man that so many have died for over the centuries was a pozzed niggerfucker.And here I thought Christcucks had it bad.
>>519391405It's an Israeli bot. It was posting with an Israeli flag in another thread. Half the posts here are bot posts. If you lurk enough, you'll see the same posts appearing over and over again in response to similar threads.
>>519391407your anger and completely lack of argument is glaringly obvious>>519390843>>519390988where'd you go, boznia?you weren't just lying for taqiya, were you?or are you like most pisslamics and don't even know what is in your retarded book?
>>519391462Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519389850until this very weird affair blew in the open, I thought jeets were the second lowest life form on the planet, just above abos (their progenitors)but apparently, jeets are the third lowest life form on the planet, just above mudshits (since their "prophet" was a butt zlut for those, it clearly establishes the hierarchy) and abos (nothing changes here)the moar you know, really
>>519379076HAHAHAHHAHAHAH THIS MUZZIE HAS BEEN COPING ALL DAY ABOUT THIS HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>519390147Nah, bro. That's probably true for some but for the most part Islam promises greedy, sexually immoral, inbred, brownoids that they will be rewarded with all manner of earth pleasure in the next life. Islam promises that muslim men who die will get to defile 70 virgins, this is something that is considered divine in the culture of sexually immoral child and goat rapists.
>>519390988That’s because Mohammad is the messenger of the God and he only tells what the God wants him to tell. >And if Muhammad had made up about Us some [false] sayings,>We would have seized him by the right hand>Then We would have cut from him the aorta.>And there is no one of you who could prevent [Us] from him69:44
>>519391537Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519391504This is the most hilarious aspect of this whole thing to me. Theyre SERIOUSLY trying to have a debate over how gay and how many nigger cocks their profit took on 4channel LOL
>>519391537pilpulof course, he didn't see jinnsbecause those were jeetswho zutted muhomod, in the butt
>>519391560it do be like that
>>519391129>starts off with one of the most easily refuted nonsense arguments against Christ being called God in the biblekek, not reading the rest of thatbut if you thought that was convincing you've done no serious searching
>>519391462Yes that's what I am suggesting, this pasta is calling your religion into question. None of it can be taken seriously, particularly if you are going break your neck doing mental gymnastics like this to avoid facing embarrassment. Do you think you are convincing anyone by pasting the same cope repetitively?
>>519391230No, it is most definitely is Al-Lah. Your argument is the "The Apple" comes from "thesaurus" because of "the".
>>519390891>You cant say his name without a prayerYes you can>If you speak about him negatively they'll kill you.He is highly respected. How doesn’t this mean he is being worshipped? >too abstract, no one knows my god but meHow do you know anything about your god?
>>519391607exactlyso the muslim god, allah/satan, is cool with stealing your adopted son's wife and having sex with children and getting ass blasted by pajeets and sleeping with your head on men's laps and walking around with cum on youthank you for the concession
>>519389514This verse is literally in reference to concubines.Don't play stupid.>>519389663Everything you just brought up was countered in the previous post that you originally replied to.Everything I said in the earlier post is referenced by Ibn Kathir and Al Dhahabi in historical context.Regardless of that I do not care what age she was because God allowed it and nowhere even in your Bible can you show me where your god objects to this.I accept your concession.
>>519391720Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519391678Keep spamming this wall of cope, sandnigger. May the janny zutt butt rape you with a permaban.
Sand Nigger, why the FUCK are you dragging us into this shit ? Saying Jeets or Jews gonna make it more obvious ? Nigger, we really don't care if Mumu was a faggot or not. Though it' a fact that Madrasa Imams often rape kids and try to justify it with some fucked up hadiths.
>>519391777Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
When I think about how big of a degenerate faggot a guy would have to be to get a train ran on him outdoors, in front of a captive audience, in an era of poor hygeine and in a place with limited access to water to clean off afterwards? Fucking nasty
>>519391875https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU&t=41s>MUHOMOD SAID ZUTT ZUTT IN THE BUTT>MUHOMOD SAID ZUTT ZUTT IN THE BUTT>MUHOMOD SAID ZUTT ZUTT IN THE BUTT>ZUTTS WANTED TO DO IT, IN HIS BUTT? IN HIS BUTT?>ZUTTS WANTED TO DO IT, IN HIS BUTT? IN HIS BUTT?>ZUTTS WANTED TO DO IT, IN HIS BUTT? IN HIS BUTT?>THEY DID IT IN MUHOMOD'S BUTT. OKAY?
>>519391698Wonder what they will come up with? I foresee them splitting hairs regarding the size, shape and number of thrusts involved.
>>519391129Theologians, many of them, much greater than this guy have easily refuted this. It’s one of the oldest heresies
>>519391893Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519391534Read the preceding verses. It's talking about giving precedence to monotheism over polytheism. A monotheist must submit to God's law as formulated in the Quran and Sunnah and as interpreted by lawful authorities. See 4:51.>Have you ˹O Prophet˺ not seen those who were given a portion of the Scriptures yet believe in idols and false gods and reassure the disbelievers that they are better guided than the believers?
>>519391928Spamming sandnigger. The janny zutt doesn't take kindly to this kind of behavior... bend over, Muhammad. Let's reenact a historical tradition of your culture.
>>519391741>arguments against Christ being called God...that was a pro Christian article imo whatever floats your little boat
>>519391964Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519391868kys loser, no one will miss you
>>519391802They are not even comparable.Turning letters to silent when joined with other letters is very common in Arabic. In fact it has a special name. It’s safe to assume that a letter was dropped after some time for a common combination (Al and Elah).Also you didn’t explain the similarity between the Aramaic and Syriac “Alaha” and the Arabic “Allah”.
>>519391958actually wretched reading this
>>519392095Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076I also extensively studied this hadith,and i came to the conclusion he got his prophussy stuffed
>>519391737I think the species hierarchy is like so:#1 Humans#2 Nips#3 muditerranigs#4 easterners#5 viet-kongs#6 prairie niggers (lazier than viet-kongs, but not as bad as dirty chinks)#7 burritos (less lazy than prairie niggers, but more bloodthirsty)#8 dirty chinks and dirty gooks (the shittiest bridled eyes, clearly)#9 niggers#10 jews (they love black cock, so it settles the hierarchy)#11 streetshitting zutt monkeys#12 mudshits (their prophet was a butt zlut for them zutts)#13 abosany objection?
>>519391504Never really cared. Just had some free time and wanted to get some entertainment.Also if you think a 8 lines thread is an essay you’re retarded.
>>519392082please explain how this changes my argument at allgenuinely asking>>519392131>Most Christians think the New Testament says that Jesus is God. They’re wrong.that doesn't sound very pro Christian, but I already admitted that I didn't read it after that first argument so maybe I misunderstood what seems like a very blatant statement against Christ's deity as the subtitle of the article
>>519391868>This verse is literally in reference to concubines.No, it's not. I don't think you know what literally means. You just read into it that it's okay to rape children, including little boys, because that's what your Mo liked to do.>Everything you just brought up was countered in the previous post that you originally replied to.No, I countered and corrected the lies you posted. Reread what I posted. You just admitted you don't care that Mo (pajeets bust upon him) was a child rapist. Why did Mo have sex with all of those jeets? honest question.
>>519391958Whats gayer still is his followers trying to cover it up. They are ashamed of their own prophet. Poor little bugger has the most closeted tale of all time.
>>519392291Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
This is the first time I heard about this. So Muhammad was into loli and BBC? Hilarious
>>519379076So you are basing your entire approach to this off an authority of fallacy? The chain of narrators for this Zutt Hadith were just incapable chuds you imply? What if you are wrong? You seem quite biased and its almost as if you would do anything if this were the truth to convince us it wasn't. Idk what is it, probably my deep divine spark speaking to me through intuition, but *sniff sniff* ulterior motives exist between your words. Also what do you mean by they "weren't" human is that a literal thing or are you just being racist. I do both a lot so I can't tell.
>>519391989>It’s one of the oldest heresiesdid i miss something here?there is a Enoch~Jesus heresy? i think the number of Christians i've met that had heard of Metatron (or his cube) i could count on one hand
>>519391813>b-b-but god can’t allow this. It’s immoral. If god is real, who are you to tell god what he can and can’t allow?
>>519392523Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519390764Show me where it says >the zutts are naked while they have this interaction, & then dress afterhere's the hadith https://sunnah.com/urn/730940
>>519392387nah, solid listid personally put gooks (koreans) one step above chinks for kimchi
>>519392453It doesn't demand you submit to him to the same extent as you would to God. The Prophet is like a friend and a brother, as are all other prophets. He's a human that can make mistakes and I am allowed to correct those mistakes. God is God.https://www.abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadithonline/2011/05/19/know-better-affairs-dunya/
>>519392722kimchi stinks, and is one of the reasons I value them as low as dirty chinks
>>519392646That's more like it, say it with your chest. If you believe in your god at all you wouldn't hide, you wouldn't explain yourself and you most certainty wouldn't vicariously hide in the closet for him
>>519392570probably because there is nothing Christian about metatronits from the talmud and jewish mysticismthe heresy that anon is referring to is that Christ did not explicitly claim His divinity
Makes you wonder, did Mohammed dictate women cover up because the sight of beautiful Arabian women gave him the “ick”?Did he make Muslim men wear those white pajamas in the hopes of seeing the shadow of a swinging cock when the sun hit their robes just right?
>>519392291Like this? >"Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some zuttposting but it seems that some anons here are zutted enough to believe these zuttposts.First, you should know that the Hadith was zutted 1400 years ago and remained unzutted all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for zutts though out different times.Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some zutt or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively zutted throughout these centuries. There are many zutt-terpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any zutt-terpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any zuttual matter.Third, the word “zuttt” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “zutt closely”. For example, it’s said “the zutt mounted the Muhammadt”, which means he zutted the Muhammad closely. Another Hadith says “then omar zutted the prophet” which means that omar zutted him closely. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone zutted the horse or the donkey, for example, they both zut together as one. So the word “zutt” became an expression for how closely 2 people are zutting together.Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t zutt the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of zutters than the zutts Hadith."
>>519392453i was actually trying to be nice today, so, i guess i'm sorry... feels gay to apologize on this website
>>519392705sad
"Zutts In literary and anecdotal texts,they are grouped together withother 'southern or dark-skinnedpeople, all of whom have thefollowing traits:> sexual potency> prominant genitalia> physical strength & virility"fuckk muhammad such a sissy 4 bbc
>>519392846Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519379076>>519379076>>519379076Reminder that the "no tail" posts are made by VPN niggers of a troon squad from iDrama and Valent Projects cuckademics to normalize furfag degeneracy across the board.Same trannies who shill for Jewkraine and make the /uhg/ threads btw.https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518123762/#518129824https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518281658/#518287969https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518256371/#518256990
>>519392924Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519392766its good for you, like sauerkraut but spicyultimately i prefer sauerkraut though
>>519392752Those are obviously angels. Also, weak hadith in chain. And any hadith that has Abdullah ibn Masud present is weak in content.The Quran itself says that they listened to the Quran and left. >˹Remember, O Prophet,˺ when We sent a group of jinn your way to listen to the Quran. Then, upon hearing it, they said ˹to one another˺, “Listen quietly!” Then when it was over, they returned to their fellow jinn as warners.
>>519392193>Turning letters to silent when joined with other letters is very common in Arabic.So then Al-Lat can become Al-Lah? All you arguments defeat themself. Also you just changed your argument. In the OT God is THE LORD. God says that HE IS THE LORD. Mohamad never got the message because he never talked to the Lord. The root of Elohim is NOT present in Al-Lah. I don't even speak Arabic but anyone with a high school education in English or practically most languages can tell this.Remember how it says in the Koran that Mohamad said he talked to SATAN but also didn't know it was him? Kek.
>>519379980Kill yourself faggot.Your prophet was a homosexual pedo goat fucker
>>519391129Do you realize you're namefagging right now? Don't do that with that name if you want to actually lead people away from the distraction that is the trinity. Trinitarian concepts were enacted to muddy waters and destroy Gnostic thought.
>>519392705Those are obviously angels.Also, weak hadith in chain. And any hadith that has Abdullah ibn Masud present is weak in content.The Quran itself says that they listened to the Quran and left.>˹Remember, O Prophet,˺ when We sent a group of jinn your way to listen to the Quran. Then, upon hearing it, they said ˹to one another˺, “Listen quietly!” Then when it was over, they returned to their fellow jinn as warners.
>>519392646thank you for admitting itallah is satan, so of course his morality is an inverse of the actual Godthis is much better than your faggot copy pasta>>519392752of course it doesthat is exactly what those verses are saying >no resistance to your decisions and accept them with full submissionyour taqiya doesn't work here, zutt lover>Tafsir Ibn Kathir for Qur’an 4:65, which commands submission to Muhammad, narrates the fate of a man who refused to submit to Muhammad’s authority.>‘Umar went to his house and emerged from it holding aloft his sword. He struck the head of the man who rejected the Prophet’s decision with the sword and killed him.>Tafsir Ibn Kathir 4:65those who do not fully submit are to be put to death
>>519392998Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519393194Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519392867telling jewish lies about Christ, the Creator of all things, is not being nicebegone, jew
>>519392825the jews get real funny about Metatron. he had to have been well know in the time of early Christianshis absence is telling imo, especially since Christians kept a lot of angle mysticism in their lore
>>519392705The chain of narration is not unanimously accepted as fully sound; many scholars treat it as weak or defective.There is no true answer its just a fucking war of shit flinging of one interpretation trying to cast out the other. I think the chain of narrators for 2861 were very capable and they were accurate in their approach. The only argument you faggots have against it is just claiming the chain of narrators was wrong lmfao, its just all fallacy of authority.
>>519392479If it's not about concubines than what is it referencing?>No, I countered and corrected the lies you posted.No you didn't you just copy and pasted something without going through what it was that I said point for point thinking you stonewalled me.It's over you were proven wrong even before you posted that retarded shit.Tell me why you believe your mangod Jesus who is also the father raped his mother when she was 12 years old and then to give birth to himself the son?After you explain that and the above verse and how according to you it's not talking about concubines lmao I'll tell you to refer to these posts >>519386965>>519387101 to answer your last question.I'll wait, don't take too long tho.
>>519393194>the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith"Proof of the above claim, sandnigger? Or are you just a spambot created by retarded sandniggers who worship a pedophile who got zutted?
>>519393016>Al-Lat can become Al-LahNo, that’s changing letters not dropping letters.“Allah”, “Elah”, and “AlElah” are all used to refer to the same entity in arabic. And all 3 of them are used in Arabic and even Quran. Allah is similar to Syriac and Aramaic Alaha (still no argument against that)Elah is similar to “Elohim”.
>>519393276Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519393276>>519393194>>519392998This bot is malfunctioning.I guess the butthurt after getting gang banged in the desert is too much.
>>519393412Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519382158COPE lmao your faggot crossdresser prophet got fucked in the ass
>>519393060>Don't do that with that namei am, what i am >>519393286>telling jewish lies about Christwhat was the lie?
>>519393375no way this loser straight up ignored my postyour prophet literally got gang raped by niggers kek, theres no debate
>>519393333Yeah I know it's daif and I've gone i to detail how arabic is an expressive language that when translated it doesn't convey the deeper meaning into English because it's too literal.
>>519393301"jews" get a lot of stuff wrong about "their" traditionChrist is the angel (malach, messenger) of the Lord in the torahHe is the one who wrestled with Jacob to test his faith/determination/worthiness to become Israelthere really isn't a lot of 'angel mysticism' in Christianity. they are messengers, Michael is incredibly powerful and will lead the fight against evil in the end times, that's about it
>>519393142Except that hadith is also graded as weak.https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/361051/story-about-%E2%80%98umar-killing-man-who-rejected-prophets-judgment-inauthenticI obviously have to accept his authority in legal matters. It goes like this.>Always follow God.>Follow the Prophet in spiritual and legal matters.>Follow your local leaders as long as they don't contradict the other two. Hence 4:59 right before 4:65,>O believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you ˹truly˺ believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is the best and fairest resolution.
>>519393461Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some shitposting but it seems that some anons here are retarded enough to believe these shitposts. First, you should know that the Hadith was narrated 1400 years ago and remained unchanged all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for words though out different times. Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some jeet or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively studied throughout these centuries. There are many interpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any interpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any sexual matter. Third, the word “mount” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “follow closely”. For example, it’s said “the man mounted the footprint”, which means he followed the footprints closely. Another Hadith says “then omar mounted me to the prophet” which means that omar followed him closely to the prophet. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone mount the horse or the donkey, for example, they both move together as one. So the word “mount” became an expression for how closely 2 people are moving together. Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t witness the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of narrators than the zutts Hadith.
>>519393613your conflation of Christ with metatron, for oneyou pretending that that article was "pro Christian" when it tries to come up with how Christ's deity was a post-thought, when it is actually blatantly declared all over the Gospels themselves
>>519393063I agree
>>519393613Respect.
>>519379076>>519379076>>519379076Z U T T E D LOL LMAO
>>519393735I wonder what specific reply triggered you retards to begin spamming to hit the bump limit.... HMMMMM
>>519393414Zutted.
>>519393414What happens if you drop the T? Retard kek. Not worth responding anymore, this lie is so hollow.
>>519393650that verse, from the kooran not a hadith, does not say what you are saying>Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and His Messenger>AND HIS MESSENGERit doesn't say if there is a disagreement between the two, allah trumps mohammed, because it would never admit that mohammed would say anything contrary to allahyour taqiya is very weak
>>519393735>zuttslut triggered
>>519380405>Admiting your whole muzzie religion is full of fags lying on each others lapsFucking kek. Not beating the allegations Mohammed
>>519393142>so of course his morality is an inverse of the actual GodHow do you know? Maybe god and satan are friends and they are playing games on humans.Morality in religion is defined by God. So it’s nonsense to argue that something that’s supposedly came from god is immoral. When you want to argue against a religion come with something that can logically prove it to be illogical. Not something you feel like it should be wrong.
>>519392999I hate sauerkrautsmells just like piss
>>519393375>the hadith in Sahih Bukhari (5134) states that Aisha was six years old when she was married to Muhammad, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine. This hadith is considered sahih (authentic) by the vast majority of Islamic scholars.> the hadith in Sahih Muslim (3310) states that Aisha was a young girl (jariyah) when she was married to Muhammad, and that the marriage was consummated when she was nine. This hadith is also considered sahih by the vast majority of Islamic scholars.You just ignored all of this, and then said that you don't care that Mo (pajeets bust upon him) raped at least one child. Why are you arguing if you don't care, and you actually think it was good? Aren't you contradicting allah?That passage is not about concubines. What made you assume that it was? It's quite normal for a conquering nation to slay the men folk and let the females live and assimilate them into their nation. You just think it's strange because you worship a faggot and a child rapist.
>>519383869>The zutt suddenly stops responding There's your answer
>>519394042you're better off with your copypasta, retard>how do you know that it isn't good to get assraped by a pack of jeets?kwab
>>519379650Gem.
>>519393945Anything outside of spiritual and legal matters is completely the domain of evidence-based experts. The Prophet can be completely wrong about how to best treat cancer. He isn't an oncologist. That's why only submission to God is unconditional in all spheres of life. You're also not getting the context of these verses. Some people opposed his authority on stuff they wanted to keep doing. Go back a few verses and it's talking about drinking. As long as we pray and fast, who cares? The answer is that it doesn't matter if you like doing something. Laws exist because some people will want to break them. Therefore, you have to accept both the laws and the person enforcing the laws. That doesn't mean you think the person enforcing the laws is God. Obviously, he's not the Creator or Sustainer of the Universe. Just a trustworthy guide and judge.
>>519393996Actually I have seen few people lying on other’s laps. Never thought of it as “fags”. Only how close friends they are that they feel comfortable leaning on each other’s lap. I don’t blame you for not understanding this. Your whole society is built around fags. So yes, it’s probably the first thing that would’ve came to your mind if you see them.
>>519379076Make a new thread so I can respond to this retard as soon as I get home from work >>519394090 because weve past to bump limit and I'll be driving
>>519392705>some men came to me that appeared as if they were from Az-Zut (A dark people, either from North Africa or India. See Tuhfat Al-Ahwadhi and An-Nihayah), both their hair and their bodies. I did not see nakedness nor covering>there appeared some men wearing white garments, and Allah knows best just how handsome they were
>>519394324>Actually I have seen few people lying on other’s laps.That's because Muslims are literally fags.
>>519394069ask grandma to make some
>>519394298you're arguing against a strawmani never said that pisslamics think mohammed is godi said they have to fully submit to anything mohammed did talk about in order to be considered in agreement with allah and pisslamnothing you said is an argument against my actual argumentyou're bad at this
>>519393928>What happens if you drop the T.There is no reason to drop the T. It’s not in middle of two words to be dropped as in idgham. >Not worth responding anymore, this lie is so hollowThat’s better
>>519392846Just zutt my shit up.
>>519394324kekekekekekeholy shit you pisslamics are fagsembarrassing shit, OP
Kek imagine lying on another man's lap and believing that's okay.Sand niggers are embarrassing
>>519394440I've already eaten supposedly prime choucroute, brought by an Alsatian friendand no: it just smells like piss
>>519394457Except we don't. That's why I posted the hadith about agriculture. He specifically said that you shouldn't listen to him on agriculture if you know more about it than him. His authority is final on RELIGIOUS matters.There's another hadith driving home the same point.>Rafi' b. Khadij reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came to Medina and the people had been grafting the trees. He said: What are you doing? They said: We are grafting them, whereupon he said: It may perhaps be good for you if you do not do that, so they abandoned this practice (and the date-palms) began to yield less fruit. They made a mention of it (to the Holy Prophet), whereupon he said: I am a human being, so when I command you about a thing pertaining to religion, do accept it, and when I command you about a thing out of my personal opinion, keep it in mind that I am a human being. 'Ikrima reported that he said something like this.
>>519394340kek this losers gonna be seething the whole way home from work
