>The British Society for Genetic Medicine (BSGM) agrees that citing health as a reason to ban first-cousin marriage is not justified. It warns that, according to research, focusing on cousin marriage in this way stigmatises certain communities, undermines trust in medical services and causes couples to disengage from clinical support.
Kek

>>519385594

to appease the new britons

>>519385594
>>519385594
Different races have a different tolerance for inbreeding just like different animals have different tolerances. For a dog you'll notice the diversity and speciation or whatever not speciation sorry different breeds right? And they've got all these health problems specific to the breed obviously that is due to inbreeding that's how you make these different breeds.
Now let's compare that to cats cats basically it's impossible for them to inbreed somehow they are genetically not vulnerable and they're also not domesticated cats can be released back to the wild and survive just fine.
Okay so now let's talk about humans pakistanis and somalis are like dogs and that they have very specific health problems also our dear friends with the tay-sacs and the Blue bloods of Europe with their Hapsburg chins and hemophilia also don't have tolerances for inbreeding.
For the sake of this discussion when referring to inbreeding we are talking about first cousin or further.
Examples of races that are better at the inbreeding or afghanis Iranians French I don't know the others but check out this academic paper it's quite interesting it'll totally change your mind basically outbreeding causes death of the species.
I'll post a link in a minute hang on.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22152499/

The existence of species rests on a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding. An essay on the close relationship between speciation, inbreeding and recessive mutations

Etienne Joly

Abstract
Background: Speciation corresponds to the progressive establishment of reproductive barriers between groups of individuals derived from an ancestral stock. Since Darwin did not believe that reproductive barriers could be selected for, he proposed that most events of speciation would occur through a process of separation and divergence, and this point of view is still shared by most evolutionary biologists today.

Results: I do, however, contend that, if so much speciation occurs, the most likely explanation is that there must be conditions where reproductive barriers can be directly selected for. In other words, situations where it is advantageous for individuals to reproduce preferentially within a small group and reduce their breeding with the rest of the ancestral population. This leads me to propose a model whereby new species arise not by populations splitting into separate branches, but by small inbreeding groups "budding" from an ancestral stock. This would be driven by several advantages of inbreeding, and mainly by advantageous recessive phenotypes, which could only be retained in the context of inbreeding. Reproductive barriers would thus not arise as secondary consequences of divergent evolution in populations isolated from one another, but under the direct selective pressure of ancestral stocks. Many documented cases of speciation in natural populations appear to fit the model proposed, with more speciation occurring in populations with high inbreeding coefficients, and many recessive characters identified as central to the phenomenon of speciation, with these recessive mutations expected to be surrounded by patterns of limited genomic diversity.

Conclusions: Whilst adaptive evolution would correspond to gains of function that would, most of the time, be dominant, this type of speciation by budding would thus be driven by mutations resulting in the advantageous loss of certain functions since recessive mutations very often correspond to the inactivation of a gene. A very important further advantage of inbreeding is that it reduces the accumulation of recessive mutations in genomes. A consequence of the model proposed is that the existence of species would correspond to a metastable equilibrium between inbreeding and outbreeding, with excessive inbreeding promoting speciation, and excessive outbreeding resulting in irreversible accumulation of recessive mutations that could ultimately only lead to extinction

>>519385594
haven't royals and nobility everywhere been inbreeding forever, at least 1st cousins?

But in reality second and third cousin marriage is much more practical or socially acceptable in today's world. I saw someone stay on here like 100 to 200 years ago one of the things the Catholic church was very proud of was that they stopped this kind of cousin marriage in Europe.
Also I think you're less likely to cheat on your spouse if they're in your family because your whole family will disown you

>>519386372
That is more to do with money and power

To appease muzzies