[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 17457883760824085.png (294 KB, 554x613)
294 KB
294 KB PNG
The cuck cage didn't work on the tank, maybe it will work on the roads
>>
File: 17457883760824086.png (1.58 MB, 1484x869)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB PNG
>>
>>519398710
couldn't they just put some hedge clippers on the drones or something
>>
>>519398710
cover the whole planet
>>
>>519398812
or even easier, a spinning circular saw blade. I wanna see looney toones levels of warfare
>>
>>519398812
just send two drones, one to detonate on net, the other to fly through the hole.
>>
>>519398812
My thoughts exactly

Put a chainsaw on a drone and this is useless
>>
>>519398710
Nice link and AI photo, dipshit.
>>
File: leclerk.jpg (49 KB, 684x448)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>519398710
>They don't work
Literally every tank from pretty much every major army now has a cage you fucking retard.
>>
>>519398710
But it does help against shaped charges?
>>
>>519398878
Remember that tv show where they built robots that fought each other? That, but flying.
>>
>>519398710
It did work on the tank, it's standard for tanks now.
>>
File: doublesguy.jpg (14 KB, 248x249)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
>>519399222
>that tv show where they built robots that fought each other? That, but flying.
checked and exactly
>>
>>519398812
>>519398878
...Or just a drone with explosives.
Is this netting explosive proof?
>>
File: 1753396013445805.jpg (235 KB, 1920x1280)
235 KB
235 KB JPG
>>519398710
Apparently USA is going to dominate everyone WW3 because no one else has jamming technology.
>>
>>519399329
They can also strafe it with a backfire torch
>>
>>519398878
the angular momentum of the spinning blade would mess up the drone's ability to fly
and hedge clippers require too much dexterity to operate
I think the true answer is that it's just better to spend the money and time of innovation to instead send 9 more basic drones at the inevitable unnetted places. Breaking the net is not worth it.
>>
>>519399397
lol if you get into another major conflict prepare to get raped by $300 Chinese fiber optic drones operated by some dude 5km away
and it will all be online for us to see
>>
>>519398879
this is what the ukrainians do to these net tunnels that the russians put up
>>
>>519399529
Taiwan is a lot farther than 5km from china silly zipperhead.
>>
>>519399397
Let's see that work against fiber optic drones.
>>
File: 1754537377890.jpg (351 KB, 1144x1592)
351 KB
351 KB JPG
>>519398710
War used to be so simple. All you had to do was blast https://youtu.be/BVAaOluYXpU over a loudspeaker to demoralize the Japanese. Now you have to put up mosquito nets everywhere.
>>
>>519399752
china doesn't need fiber drones when you have autonomous drone tech you silly goose
>>
>>519400187
They don't have that though. No one does yet. And either way, that still doesn't solve the distance problem.
>>
>>519398710
fwiw the nets actually have been somewhat effective at reducing drone casualties on the roads where they're installed. Every drone dedicated to making an opening in the net is a drone that can't directly go after a vehicle.
>>
>>519400236
>no one
>here's a video of us using them in 2016
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OixSNQp0S_k
Distance is easy with larger drones, you are still thinking consumer drones and not ones much larger, like the size of a small atv.
They could build and launch of swarm of thousands skimming across the ocean hitting their pre-determined targets at the beginning of the invasion.
>>
>>519398710
The issue with these from my understanding is that fpv drones are cheap enough that it's not an issue to just use some to blow holes in the nets and then send follow ups to go through said holes.
It's more of a slight annoyance/hindrance then any kind of solution jamming is more worth while to invest in presumably.
>>
Hope those aren't just nylon nets because incendiary drones have been a thing for years already.
>>
>>519399397
the issue is jamming is expensive, and highly situational
>>
File: YakubOrigin.jpg (66 KB, 640x476)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>519398878
>>519398812
They already displayed drones in Ukr-Rus War that shoot liquid fire downwards as a projectile, I am sure some anon can find the webm somewhere, I didn't save it
>>
>>519399397
Sorry to break it to you, but US EW is mediocre at best. You have the best comm and satnav systems, hence why its enemies of America that have the best EW.
>>
>>519399397
>wear backpack that radiates massive amounts of energy
>autonomous drone homes in on signal
end of zogbot
>>
>>519399222
checked and it was battlebots. the DRONEcuck fears the RAKEchad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZDsLaKI3M4
>>
>>519399222
Checked
Battle bots. It was kino
>>
>>519400524
>Distance is easy with larger drones,
exactly, they have to be much larger and much more expensive.
>>
>>519399529
>>519400148
>>519400187
>>519400875
>Doesn't know about our EMP weaponry
Yup, we're definitely winning WW3 now. Gg no re
>>
File: Capture.png (2.43 MB, 1289x856)
2.43 MB
2.43 MB PNG
>*shoots 50 drones per minute out of the sky*
You realize that drone warfare is already hard countered, right chuds?
>>
>>519398710
isn't it funny how this war breaks nato. soon nato is gone, good riddance
>>
>>519401105
You do realize we're talking about china though
boomers really fucked up because it would be absolutely no problem at all to scale and fabricate them if the big bug men demanded it and they could shit them out in no time at all
work 24 hour shifts we will weld the factory doors shut
>>
>>519398710
>drones breech the netting covertly
>highwaytohell.webm
>>
>>519399397
All you need is a spark gap generator you retard.
>>
>>519399329
a drone with an explosively formed penetrator or high explosives detonated from above would probably still ruin your day?
>>
>>519398812
Or easier, tandem drones. One to blow up the supports holding the netting up, the other to just ram you when you're trapped under the collapsed net.
>>
>>519401189
>Loses to a bunch of goat herders in the middle of the desert.
Sure thing, m8
>>
>>519401189
There was this battlemech universe where emp tech became so commonplace that everything went back to to hydraulics, analog, and mechanical for warfare
Forget what it was called
>>
>>519401189
keep being delusional
>>
>>519399081
And they still don't work. Slats don't stop tandem warheads. These cope cages are only useful for lazily dropped grenades.
>>
>>519399081
They don't fucking work you have no idea what drone warfare is
>>
>>519398812
The weight would throw it off balance.
>>
>>519401478
nafo and their powerfantasies, no wonder ukraine is losing
>>
>>519401318
>You do realize we're talking about china though
yeah exactly lmao
>>
>>519401229
that's for old drone tech that flies high
autonomous drones will fly low, really low
>>
>>519401637
Oh really? Then explain this.
It doesn't hurt. Some drones will be stopped by a piss cage. Every little bit helps.
>>
>>519398710
>Mix incendiary with shrapnel and anti-vehicle drones (jn proper order)
>Win
I really have no clue how fucking stupid everyone is concerning drones and defense from them.
Real defense is obvious
>>
>>519401925
>shows annihilated tank
>explain this
Nigga there's a reason why there's Mad Max happening in Ukraine and they all stopped using tanks. Imagine at least a 15 km zone being observed by everyone and if someone sees a tank it gets wrecked by a bunch of drones that are much cheaper than any tank(don't forget the crew). I'm not even gonna talk about the fact that there are works with ground drones. The war changed.
>>
>>519401229
too expansive
>>
Tanks get destroyed by drones, by artillery, by aircraft, by mines, by soldiers.
It's hilarious how they became obsolete so fast.
>>
>>519401860
I’ve already seen a vid of something like this for ciws on vehicles for those cheap slow drones.
>>
>>519398710
>send two drones
>one drone explodes and takes out area of netting
>second drone flies into the hole created by the first one

they realize these are suicide weapons, right? and that like...they don't mind if they "lose" a drone, right?

like that's the entire point; it's worth exploding a cheap ass drone if you take out a much larger, more expensive target?

are they fucking retarded? have drones really showed how retarded EVERY military in the world is?
>>
>>519398879
damn shoulda scrolled down before my post. at least other people thought of it, too.
>>
>>519402594
>have drones really showed how retarded EVERY military in the world is?
Yes.
>>
>>519401020
FUCK that faggot jomboy holy shit i can't believe i have seen him posted here on 4chan.
>>
>>519402594
I think pretty much everyone but Russia and Ukraine is absolutely clueless.
>>
Any nation that didn't build a HAARP-type radio warfare system is a sitting duck.
For example, the US Navy has equipped subs and naval ships with HAARP-type systems with project Seafarer.
>>
File: images.jpg (19 KB, 389x514)
19 KB
19 KB JPG
>>519398878
The new AADS drone
(Acmd Anvil Delivery System)
>>
>>519402594
But if it's a road, the targets are moving. So now you need to hit the vehicle as it is passing through a gap in the netting that you previously created, right?
That sounds way more difficult.
>>
>>519402961
lmao no you don't, once the hole is there, you can just fly in as many drones as you want. now they are flying in the net tunnel.

are....are you fucking retarded, anon? you realize these things...fly, right? and they are really small? it's like a missile that could only hit THRU the hole, and not like....a fully remote thing that can move omnidirectional?!
>>
File: 1630348772593.gif (3.5 MB, 332x293)
3.5 MB
3.5 MB GIF
>>519399397
>mentions jamming technology with a photo of niggers using it.
That jamming technology is smarter than the niggers.
jews are going to give their pet niggers and other nonwhite pets billion dollar technology and expect them to be smart enough to use it.
Are there enough jewish babysitters around to manage?
>>
>>519399397
modern drones in Ukraine arnt even radio controlled anymore they are fiberoptic with a fishing line size cable that is miles long
>>
>>519398878
The only reason a saw can cut is the force pushing it through material. A drone can't push
>>
>>519401229
>what is double-tap
>what is cover
>what are angles
If you're so confident: Use one in Ukraine. Best place to prove this works.
>>
>>519401925
A tank costs a few millions. A drone a few hundreds to a few thousands. Means: Economically the tank always loses. It still pays if you dump 50+ drones per tank, all at once or lemming style. On top of that: The drones are unmanned, the tank has a crew.
>>
>>519398710
it needed 60- drones to destroy this *cuck cage* thats much better than 1or2 with no *cuck cage*, and you wont accepting it as improvement to tanks just because russia started using it first, is some deep mental defect you got
>>
just add blades to the blades with and expandable/retractable tether, like on a keychain.. simple.

i feel like the people using drones are not very ingenuous. theyre like glowniggers begging for our help after someone does a terror. want us to do their jobs for them for free.
>>
>>519401189
saudis bought one and said it took them like 30 minutes to down a drone from like 10 miles away



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.