Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight? Like, you’d think with all the wars, invasions, and raiding going on, more societies would’ve realized having women who can defend themselves or their homes would be useful.
>>519417590>globohomo will says this is a manMany such cases!Much sad!
>>519417590Women simply can't do it.>far less muscle mass>muscle is weaker pound for pound>bones are brittle, break under any kind of heavy load>endurance and stamina are shit>hand eye coordination is shit>start shrieking and freeze up in a tense situationI mean fuck man you can't even just give them bows and arrows and let them pew pew from a castle wall. Women are FUCKING WORTHLESS in a fight.
>>519417590>women can defend themselvesa weak chud can rape a women easily my man , trust me i tried it
>>519417763They have less muscle mass and weaker bones because men bred them to be that way by only going for short and meek women.
>>519417590i love how much she looks like me
>>519417590You don't gotta do all that fag shit just admit you want her to screw your jew boy butt hole up the ass with her strap on dildo you mamas boy bitch
>>519417763Pretty much this. Prairie Nigger Indians are pretty tough though.t. Have fought women
>>519417590>Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight?Women didn't fight.They stood on the side of the battle and shouted at their men to kill the enemy.
>>519417885My woman is Hella meek bro.
>>519417590nonwhites and jews flocking to this thread for a quick wank
>>519417590Nearly all Homo sapiens clans trained females to fight & defend home territory while males were away hunting or trading or warring.Domestication took this away from humans, weakening them.
>>519418005You're here and statistically Indian.
>>519417590Honestly I think it's just that Viking woman could man handle a good portion of malnourished medieval peasant men well enough to warrant it.
>>519417590Amazonia uhh hello?
>>519417590Vikings didn't actually do that shit like you see it on tv. The viking genre is infested with globohomo woke garbage and flat out fake aesthetics. They were still cool but been heavily misrepresented.
>>519417763Generally true, but are still vital and important, even under extreme circumstances such as a siege or warfare. Man may man walls, but the women were still expected to carry supplies to the men, take care of fires (if they arouse from outsiders), nurse the injured. Ideally, everybody does their part and helps. Do not fall for the "women are totally useless" divide and conquer Jew psy-op.
>>519417590Imagine her pegging you after she conquers your tribe and makes you her slave….
>>519417956Lmao story please
>>519418005I don't get what you're saying.
>>519417590Shieldmaidens were very rare and probably bull dykes. 99.999% if viking women were not trained in fighting, but trained in child rearing and staying home.
>>519417590>saar many bob when we get to valhallayou faggots are so fucking sad to witness
>>519417590Vikings aren't a people or civilisation they're Norse pirates you faggot and their was never any practice teaching Norse women to fight
>>519417590they get pregnant for 9 months and so they have to stop fighting for a 1 year+ and look for the children , and considering how much they got pregnant back then "about 6 children per women" they are pretty useless
>>519417590It's my fetish to be beaten up by a girl (lovingly)
>>519418271Pirates have always been based.Somali niggers excluded.
>females>fightingkekSomeone post UFC videos of some fatass rando fighting 2 or 3 pro UFC women fighters at once and kicking their asses.
>>519418147This. Vikings attacked pacifists, the old, the frail, and the unarmed.
>>519417590shields maidens did not fightthey held the fort as a last line of deffencethere are very few historical intances of women fighting in the west, whenever it happened it was notorious enough that everyone remembers themif you want female warrior go to japanfemale samurais were actually a thing over therenot sure how common they were nor often they saw the battlefield nor their proficiency with the blade, but i do know they had to tie their legs togeder before commiting sudoku so if a specific suicide method was made for them i asume they were a frequent occurance
>>519418155This.
>>519417590The only societies that had “warrior women” were resource scarce steppe societies where hunting and fighting off other tribes was as common as the brutal weather. You had to be on the move constantly, the whole family is a unit, and extremely active activities such as hunting, fishing, and herding were of greater societal value than anything else because nothing was stationary. Agriculture was impossible due to the nature of the steppe so nothing sedentary could be built. Even in these societies, most of their warriors were still men because such is the nature of men and women. Women will always find more fulfillment through people than activities or things. Sedentary agricultural societies did not have warrior women because women are not inclined towards warfare the way men are. Women prefer to manipulate and emotionally bully as opposed to solving disputes through direct violence, and it is why little girls will exclude other girls from social events to express their contention while boys will resort to fisticuffs. The nature of war is inherently masculine.
>>519417590Vikings didn’t either. Women fighting is completely fucking retarded they have like 1% of the capacity for violence of an average male.
>>519418427Its actually a good idea to teach women to fight for this reason, if the men lose, the woman can atleast attempt to protect her children, hopefully the men she encounters are wounded from fighting the men giving her a better chance. Plus she will have homefield advantage as she will know her villages layout better than an invader.Sending women to the frontline is very silly tho
>>519417590Vikings didn't train their women to fight. That would be retarded.They staged fights between hotties for the amusement of men like modern mud wrestling.
>>519417590thats useless for them theyre so much inferior to the male its insane. they dont have these adrenaline spikes like men. >The women were approximately 52% and 66% as strong as the men in the upper and lower body respectively. The men were also stronger relative to lean body mass.you can not recover from this no matter what you do.
>>519418427> so if a specific suicide method was made for them i asume they were a frequent occuranceThis is a dangerous assumption to make. Japs have arcane rules for literally everything.
Promote peace and love and unity and its nice to see japanese east asian men fuck blonde white girls, brunette white girls, ebony black girls, ginger white girls, asian girls, brown girls, latina girls, mixed race girls, and etc
>>519418529Spartans did basically the same thing. They’re not 100% useless in a fight, more like 90% (if they have weapons. If it’s purely physical then they’re about 100% useless).
id go as far as say that their brainfunction also only has 52% to 66% of males but i could be wrong. it feels right though, obviously retarded men do not count only 130++
>>519417590ScythiansLombards
>>519417590I want to fuck the savage cutie
>>519418381Those are sheboons, not women
>>519418417Vikings weren’t even real. Some random poorfag criminals and pirates somehow were made to represent an entire civilization.It’s like saying the British were all dudes like Black Beard with wooden peg legs and talking parrots.
>>519418759Whenever I meet a dumb man, I assume his sisters are even dumber.
>>519418587Yeah I don't think people appreciate just how thin the margins are when you're competing with other humans. Like in sports or video games or whatever, the superstars are not twice as good as the other pros, they're like 10% better and that 10% translates to absolute dominance. A 40% handicap is absurd, insurmountable
>>519418338Feelsgoodman.png
>>519417590>>519418235I train my woman to fight. Now she knows how to take a punch without crying.
>>519417590Google "battle of Watling Street".
>>519418889I think that was the point.
>>519418427Female samurai were largely like shield maidens, part of the warrior class and trained to fight but not really required to leave the home. Probably the same practical concerns as Vikings and Spartans at root, samurai would spend a lot of time out on campaign leaving the women to tend things at home. Vikings going out on raids might not be home for most of a year or longer.
>>519418169>find 8.5/10 teen Indian>fuck same day>weeks of this>she gets triggered>slams me into wall etc.>she is strong but I am male>part of her mating ritual apparently>regret nothing 20 years later
>>519418381>Someone post UFC videos of some fatass rando fighting 2 or 3 pro UFC women fighters at once and kicking their asses.They aren't fighters, they are Instagram whores. If you actually paid attention you would notice that they don't know how to throw a punch.
Japanese had a ton of those.>inb4 hurr Tomoe goezen is a memeThere were organized women combatants in the Boshin war. Nakano Takeko led a suicide attack of twenty women armed with polearms. Niijama Yae killed numerous men with her Spencer carbine in Aizu.
>>519419401Is a suicide attack supposed to be impressive?
>>519418364Pirates were just hired by big daddy government
>>519419469No, but women sacrificing themselves to kill their enemies is.
There were several instances of African armies deploying large numbers of women (Dahomey Amazons, etc.) due to male mortality being so high that they simply couldn't field male armies and it always went terribly, even relative to how terribly it usually went when they fought European armies. There was one battle where the French fought an army of 900 women and 100 men. African casualties were almost total whilst the French lost 2 men, and most of the fighting was by bayonet.
>>519418530>tank build pvp
>>519417590Mongolians trained their women archery in case of raids happening in their settlements. I don’t believe they ever made them fight hand to hand though, since they weren’t retarded enough to buy into girl boss narratives
>>519419610I forgot to add the French themselves only numbered 100, so there were still equal numbers of French to African men and they still killed almost 900 women on top of that.
>>519417590because women are fucking useless in a fight, you retarded faggot
>>519418454> Was Hitler on Epstein Island too?
>>519417590>Besides the vikingsVikings didn’t. It’s just that circumstances sometimes forced women to fight. But they were never intentional or particularly effective in battle.The only examples of societies who extensively used women for war were the scythians (and its extent is disputed) and makuria.
>>519419961Eat shit Moshe.
>>519417763alright so just lay back and get raped and let your village get burnt down, children slaughtered and eventually your own throat cut after the horde is done filling your holes? get real
>>519417590Sikhs have female warriors Even generals commanders
>>519417590A pubescent male would effortlessly overpower and have a woman of that stature anyway that he saw fit.Feminist self-inserting fanfic doesn’t overrule natural law.Women are, on the whole, physically weaker than men.Sure, you can point to a small handful of women that could fare better than most other women in terms of athleticism, but those examples only prove the rule.Women who do happen to excel in terms of athletic ability still pale in comparison to their male counterparts, and it will never be close. It’s why, at the peak of the trannyism period, dudes who were bottom-tier athletes would claim to be girls, then blow records completely the fuck out which were set by top tier female athletes, by such a wide margin that they could never hope to be broken by a legitimate female again.Equality among the sexes is a social construct.
>>519419610The veterans who fought the Dahomey Amazons said they were better drilled and more competent than most African armies they had faced. Damning by faint praise for sure, but most of their problems came from them firing from the hip and using short bayonets where the French had a massive reach advantage, not the fact that they weren't strong or brave enough. Physical strength really only comes into play if you can reach your enemy and aren't climbing over your own bodies to attack entrenched Frenchmen in a fortified camp who have longer bayonets than you. I'm not saying women make good warriors, I'm saying that African tactics make all warriors bad.
>>519417590Japans samurai families trained the women to defend homes to the death and often did in cases of war. Naginata was the weapon of women, high school girls still train it today. A few prominent female warriors too
>>519417590>flat pancake tits full of sawdust from drinking & sport fucking her way through her 20s, the post
>>519420183Is that movie good?Is it based? The bird people look like jews
>>519417885that is not how dimorphism works you dolt
>>519420724i loved it as a kid. never watched it as an adult... im talking about the older movie with jennifer connely and david bowie. i dont watch new slop so i dont know about the new shit.
>>519418893Britain if it was cool
>>519417590Scottish picts, dunce. Literally the one time even the Romans gave them props for whooping their fucking asses.
>>519418235>Shieldmaidens were very rare and probably bull dykes.Sure but I've seen some crazy bulldyke fighters in the SCA. Even the regularly built ones are useful when trained. A slower and more brittle man is still another sword. Men generally fought from adolescence to old age, and most women can be trained within acceptable levels of either end of that bell curve.
https://theravenreport.com/2017/01/27/battles-not-burkas-these-ancient-persian-women-fought-for-their-cause/
>>519417590>Besides the vikingsShieldmaidens were are rarity just like Brock Lesnar daughter, you wouldn't have a Shieldmaiden in every house hold, and basic defense with daggers and bows was something more people knew because of hunting and cleaning animal carcasses.That said, it's a good question, there is no records of a female only army that dominated anything at all. Damn, there are no records of a female only army at all.Also, guns completely made the physical difference between men and women almost irrelevant. Just look at the Vietcong, women were normal soldiers and they were more or less good enough as foot soldiers. Women also are more sadistic than men by nature.
>>519417590I'd let her plow my garden
>>519421156>Brock Lesnar daughterJesus fuck I just looked her up. That bitch has a physique and face that just are perfect for living in a cave with a big pile of treasure she took from all the adventurers she ate.
>>519420911Yeah I would assume the new one would be worthless considering its a netflix thing.But was interested in checking the old one out
>>519417885Women are the drivers of evolution in humans, retard.
>>519417763Yes but any amount of physical stresses upon a woman will improve the quality of her offspring. You can't act like men are the sole donor of genes. We need women who fight and compete with one another.
>>519417590Viking bitches didn't fight you stupid fucking cumguzzler.
Answer is very simple:your tribe can recover if you lost even 80% of men in breeding age.If you lost 80% of women in breeding age, you're doomed
>>519421727Both men and women have a hand in that, retard.
>>519422075In some cultures the women and children would commit mass suicide after their men lost a battle. It would honestly have made more sense for those cultures to arm their women and children with slings or pikes block or some other weapon which requires more coordination than strength or skill.
I am so tired of the shield maiden myth. Norse women were not warriors. Shitlibs are now trying to rewrite Greco Roman history to include women soldiers just like they did with the Norse.
>>519422085No, retard. Look it up.
>>519422604There is evidence that some Norse women took part in battles. Probably not to any significant degree, but it probably happened from time to time. If you're gathing up a war party sometimes any extra hands will do I guess.
>>519422085P.S. You can start by researching why everyone has more female ancestors than male ancestors.
>>519421718The new one is extremely based. It was directed by Henson's daughter and she stayed 100% true to the vision, which is very clearly antisemitic.
>>519417590> herodotus spoke of a tribe, in what is now Iran, called the Amazons. Women who lost their husbands in battle, but banded together. Their calling card was a burned right breast, so they could shoot a bow proficiently.
>>519417590
>>519421900Women are more valuable as reproductive units. You protect them because every single one of them will produce offspring whereas men are disposable in this regard. If you lose 80% of your men you can still reproduce your numbers whereas if you lose 80% of your women you're fucked.
There were warrior women in the Caucasus according to Greeks. That's where Amazon comes from. Colchis iirc.
>>519417590Female vikings weren't warriors. You think that because of Hollywood and feminism
>>519420911You just mixed up Labyrinth and The Dark Crystal.
>>519423829>>519422604>>519421156Were you alive back then to confirm this?
>>519424164NTAs. They're from mythology, retard.
>>519422075>your tribe can recover if you lost even 80% of men in breeding age.Modern simp bs.If your nation is 80% women, it's gotta sell a lot of those women.>If you lost 80% of women in breeding age, you're doomedRome started out with barely any women.They simply took them from next door.Yes, women are a limitation.But each woman can have 10 kids each.If men could handle their jealousy and switch between who gets pregnant they could all have a kid and replenish their tribe in a generation even without raiding another.
>>519421900No we don't you lamarckian retard.Women should be women.Even in modern militaries where fighting is done with ten pound firearms and pushing buttons to launch missiles women perform worse than men.>>519417885Doesn't matter in the slightest, globalist retard.>>519418155Women are useless in a fight.Did I say they were useless outside of a fight?No, learn to read.I love women but I would never ever ever ever ever ever fight side by side with one.I'd rather go it alone.
>>519417590normalize topless women please
>>519417590Cuz it's a waste of time and effort outside of the most desperate situations. Why expend resources to train and arm the most physically and mentally inferior? Viking snow niggers can't farm for shit half the year and famines are an annual event. The only thing to do is to get high off psychotropic shrooms and raid English coastal villages. Whenever there weren't enough men to row the boats or form an effective raiding party, you gotta send in the women too.
Video games have nudity now?
>>519421967>Viking girls typically married between the ages of 12 and 15>It was rare for girls to be married before the age of 15these are sentences following immediately each other. if you ask some LLM, at least read the reply before posting it.
>>519417590Security risk, the men would rather keep the under control than have more soldiers. For the most part it evens out as their enemies also control women.This is a hardwired male instinct btw, males used to be subordinated to women since the Toba event, and were killed and eaten by them, leaving only the best males for breeding. Only the horse domestication in the steppe led the way for male emancipation, as women were often pregnant and could not ride fast horses.
>>519424297So you have no sources?
>>519423273Most of this are just tales and folklore, like the many tales of huge sea creatures like Leviathan who swallowed ships whole.
>>519417590because women have a better and more important job to do which is RAISE CHILDREN!!!!!!!
>>519423195Are you insinuating that women can breed other women? Are you genuinely this dumb?
>>519423260Legit?I'll give it a watch.I did catch the original not too long ago. Still peak puppetry. Recommend for any anons interested in some unique high fantasy. Not saying it's exactly meaningful. But take out of it what you will.
>>519424466You're retarded. The instinct to protect women comes from the fact each one of them has the potential to produce multiple offspring whereas a man is interchangeable with any other man. The reason our population is declining is because a majority of women are in the workforce instead of reproducing.
>>519418381>>519418530what a nigger thing to do
>>519424756Why can't they do both at the same time?
>>519424713The sources on shield maidens are mythological, memeflaggot. It wasn't a widespread phenomenon.
>>519420933Women can't fight for shit and they suck at everything they do. Stop simping for them you disgusting beta.
>>519424768I'm pointing out that you and everyone else in the world has more female ancestors than male ancestors. If you didn't know this and can't understand why even after researching it you're a moron who isn't worthy of conversation.
>>519417590sexy man. would kiss feminine penis.
>>519418381
>>519417590Reality and physics, I would assume....
>>519417590holy shit is that arya stark naked
>>519424879I know you failed 4th grade twice, but could you maybe try to articulate your point better? You said that women are the sole drivers are evolution, I replied with an obvious fact that you need both men and women to make babies, you then claimed that there are more female ancestors than male ones. What are we supposed to make of this and how does this prove your point in any way?
>>519417590Training woman to fight is like training your poodle to be fire dog. The woman will spread her legs to invader the same way poodle will get squashed by tiny peeble falling off burning building.
>>519424505this is the best you'll get
>>519418495>>519418465Didn't Romans claim that the Celts had female warriors?
>>519421727>Women are the drivers of evolution in humansOnly in the modern era.And they're doing a terrible job.For most of history, either their father, or the conquering army decided what man she'd be with.That isn't to say that there weren't henpecked fathers who let their daughters act stupid in the past, but his call was still the rule.
>>519417590Ukraine would do better if they conscripted female since it would keep the young ones in the country, Ukraine lost more female through the war than males because they just left. Also it would cause them to rise birthrate because many would rather be pregnant than being conscripted. Yes females do worse than males but so what? Athletes do better than basement dweller, so we shouldn't let basement dweller fight? Also there is an example where females were useful, in the Red Army in WW2. And I think females would do much better if they wouldn't be pampered their whole life.
>>519425247Didn't read, retard. Shield maidens are based on mythology, not widespread reality, and you have more female ancestors than male ancestors. The fact you didn't know the former and can't understand the latter outs you as a retard who isn't worth my time. No more (You)s. Cope how ever you want. You're a retard and a faggot.
>>519425371>Only in the modern eraNo, it has always been that way. If you don't understand why you need to learn more about genetics and evolution.
>Besides the vikingsMany did actually, from goths to wends and even in south America. You just don't read any history books
>>519417590>Besides the vikingsWho told you that bullshit?The only people that trained their women to fight were some African loons called the Dahomey who used them to attack and enslave unarmed villages. Every other instance of a female warrior in archeology is just some modern archeologist finding a sword in a woman's tomb and writing bullshit fan fic to explain it.
Vikings didnt even actually train women to fight, its mostly a meme. Women are small and tiny and a woman in a shieldwall would be an untenably weak link
>>519417590>Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight?Uhhh, you ever heard of the Scythians? Check out the book "Amazons" by Adrienne Mayorhttps://www.amazon.com/Amazons-Legends-Warrior-across-Ancient/dp/0691170274
>>519423120>If you're gathing up a war party sometimes any extra hands will do I guess.Occasionally, maybe sometimes for desperate home defense.But you would never take a woman as a professional soldier especially in medieval times.They're dead weight now and they don't even need strength to pull a trigger.They had a place as cooks and prostitutes, but using them as soldiers is straight dumb.Any claims of female warriors requires serious evidence beyond some academic trying to win points with his female colleagues.
Not like Conan style warriors, all migrators had tough women of course. Could hunt and save your kids from raiders.
>>519425412>Didn't read, retardOf course you didn't. You literally failed preschool.
>>519417590viking women didn't fightthat's just silly
>>519425606feminist fantasy drivel
>>519425348Equality advocates will never be able to find an example of men being this stupid as a group.
>>519417590Women don't care who wins. They get wet for the winners.
>>519425753Easier to just shoot your big alcoholic mouth off than read it, I guess
>>519417590>Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight?I'm lowkey influencing my zoomie gf to start martial arts. Other than it being good for her confidence it's also kinda hot
>>519425462>vague bullshitWomen aren't driving evolution when men are calling the shots.And for most of history, men decided which men would be breeding based in distribution of women and executing men who violated the laws.Women, with few exceptions only had as much say as they could complain to their male guardians for.
>>519417590I can imagine them killing wounded Romans on the battlefield. But their support role is mostly not physically relevant, but mental.
>>519425370I'm a history buff and I don't recall that. With the Vikings the whole shield maiden thing was a major jumping of the gun, it was just a grave of someone's wife or concubine buried with the dudes weapons. Some Baltic or northern Slavic nation had a town where the women took up arms but that was a one off. For the most part women pumped out kids, and pregnancy/caring for newborns drains you. Men have an inherent 30lbs of strength over women too, a basement NEET could overpower a female athlete easily; excluding people with bad genetics like Indians.
>>519417590Why would a woman risk bodily harm defending her home when she can just submit to the victor instead? The only one with anything to defend is you
>>519417590vikings are stupid. the most well trained female swordsman will still get raped and killed by any male will basic swordsmanship. just like in any other martial art. compared to men, it is like watching a large clumsy toddler swing at you.
>>519425981you joke, but that is exactly how women think. they know trading their pussy is ALWAYS an option for survival.
>>519417844Women are not stronger than men, but with weapons they can best men.You won't be able to rape shit if one tries to seduce you and while you let your guard down she stabs you in the neck. Or if one sneaks behind you and plants an axe in your head.
>>519425852go try to fight a man, see what happens
>>519425852men are better at that too, tranny.
>>519425823This is probably where the "rape fantasy" comes from. It's a evolutional safety switch in the event your village gets take over.
>>519421607Snu snu
>>519417590how many women were "shield maidens"? like fucking 3? not of historical significance what so ever. I'm tired of retards blowing it out of proportion.
>>519417590Female vikings didn't fight, real life isn't hollywood.
>>519417590the ''shield maiden'' concept is mostly a hollywood thing, women were never known to be warriors or fighters in general
>>519424647You can't read between the lines because you're not White. Kill yourself mongrel.
>>519424164Fuck off, kikel
>>519417590Would.
>>519417590Warrior women were ultra-rare and never really accepted, not even among the vinkings.Teh term SHIELDmaiden should give you a hint.
>>519417590cause Nordnigger women were expected to fight off any raid they got after their men went raiding othersjust nigger business
>>519420249No, run and hide (with a couple handguns for last resistance and suicide).
>>519417590mongol and turkic women used to fight it did depend on there religion mind you especially after the majority converted to islam
>>519426261>3Try zero. I love how from the academic community there's massive rejection & fighting over if Jesus was a real person, but one sword next to a dead female and suddenly half the Scandinavian women were warriors. They did the same thing with homosexuality too: one poem where a man loved another man, which doesn't only mean he's gay but all Vikings were progressive bisexuals. The only good thing historical academics are good at is gathering data, but they sure as fuck can't interpret it.
>>519426159Hand-to-hand? Probably notBut with a bladed or ranged weapon? Soitanly!
>>519426517have you ever drawn a bow?
>>519417763Whites going extinct and the containment board is just vibing.
>>519426599>Whites going extinc>more Whites now than any point in historykike
>>519425925It's not vague bullshit, retard. You have more female ancestors than male ancestors because female reproductive success is far higher than male reproductive success. The idea women never had any agency is a lie sold to you by feminist propaganda that you mindlessly repeat without even knowing that's the framework you've bought into.
>>519426505never happened (but it was real in your head)
>>519417763There were no Viking warrior females >We found the last 6 survivors were the wives that had picked up their husbands swords and shields to give their children 20 more seconds to escape.>STRONG VIKING WAMEN POWERarcheology/paleontology is Jewish vomit
>>519417590Scythians, Sarmatians, Turkic people, Mongols all did train women in handling weapons, especially bows, but in practice, as several posters stated, it was mainly a last line of defence when the men were out. Burials exist, where women were buried with swords, spears and armor besides typical female grave finds.We do know of Turks in Anatolia deploying all-women units against Byzantines, but only as auxillary horse archers, they were not expected to hold the line against actual soldiers.
>>519426424>bullgarianShe wouldn't fuck you even if she were real
>>519417590Some places did, but it’s generally for defensive purposes as a last resort.Japanese noblewomen trained with the naginata so they could help defend the home if it was attacked while their husbands were away on campaign.Scythian women were known to assist their men fighting as horse archers and were the inspiration of the mythical amazons.As far as shield maidens go, I seriously doubt the modern portrayal of them as frontline warriors, especially in expeditionary or pirate raids. It’s more likely that like the samurai wives they were trained to defend themselves and the village while their husbands were away at war, and that limited numbers may have been camp women assuring as nurses and water carriers. There’s just no way any pre industrial society would endanger their women and expose them to actual protracted warfare, marching, famine, disease, and frontline combat.
>>519417590I'd fight herI'd fight the fuck out of her
>>519426121He isn't jokingvictoruous tribe may kill all men, but won't kill the women of the vanquished. They will be raped of course but in time will get used to their position.It's just very politically incorrect to mention it
>>519417590Woman that doesn't have a duty to birth children has a duty to defend the tribe.
>>519427380“While he [King Alboin] sat in merriment at a banquet at Verona longer than was proper, with the cup which he had made of the head of his father-in-law, king Cunimund, he ordered it to be given to the queen to drink wine, and he invited her to drink merrily with her father” (History of the Lombards, Book II, chapter 28).
>>519425758brother you forget about poojeets lmao
>>519417590The leftists, they even have women with penises.
>>519417590The Frisii and Frisians and many other Germanic people.
>>519417885Then explain why the men arent weak despite both men and women being born from those same meek women you dumb fuck. Also even if women were strong enough, they cant do anything umder pressure. Their vagis nerve will literally freeze them up and they will just lay down and wait for the raping. Its pointless to pretend.
>>519425852>just buy this fantasy bookMake a summary if you want to use it as a point.There was one Scythian queen who allegedly beat the Persian emperor Cyrus the great.The only source is Herodotus, who is known for his fantastical storytelling. Other contemporaries have her as his wife and him dying of old age.None are particularly reliable.Before the Romans you can basically pick and choose what you want to promote.So they pick what they like, which is the strong woman story.
>>519426739>You have more female ancestors than male ancestors because female reproductive success is far higher than male reproductive success. They are equivalent on average.More women reproduced because in war men died and women got taken by the winners.Slaves also got a shitty hand, might have to share a girl the master didn't want while he keeps the pretty ones to himself.You had polygamy for the rich.Emperors had 100 concubines, slaves might get one go on occasion.>The idea women never had any agencyTheir dads and husbands might dote on them. But they had no real political power beyond individually using a specific simp.With rare exception they could only exert power by proxy, through a child, father, or husband.
During the siege of Eger the wives of the warriors fought with them.They were pouring lava on the fucking roaches and fending them off with swords.They gave their lives so sven wouldn't speak arabic, yet kraut fucks it up 500 years later
>>519427100+japanese had onna bugeishasBut yeah, it was always the last resort. Expending the future of your population as frontline soldiers would be mad.
>>519427763When I'm wrong I'm wrong.Good work gypsy.
>>519428473>They are equivalent on averageNot they're not you complete and total retard. You have more female ancestors than male ancestors because female reproductive success is higher. This means that a large percentage of men are genetic dead ends (just like you will probably be) whereas women are overrepresented. >But they had no real political powerNeither did the vast VAST majority of men you complete and total retard. Holy shit, you want to rail against feminism and don't even know when you're buying into its frameworks. Fuck you're dumb.
>>519417590Achilles got killed by an Amazon, so they aren't that bad in fighting.
>>519419191hot i love amazons
Kurdish women occasionally carry out combat operations. There was that chick in Syria too that suicide bombed an Israeli convoy.
>>519428552>pointing the finger at Germany, not AmericaTrianon was deserved
>>519417763I never met a woman I couldn't knock out with a single punch
>>519424773Legit, there are few pozz thing cuz muh current time but it is overwhelming good, jews took it down after one season.
>>519428724>This means that a large percentage of men are genetic dead endsI literally just described that in detail.If one man has 20 kids, 3 men have 0. 4 women have 5 kids each.The average is 5 for men and 5 for women.>feminist frameworksThe feminist framework that every civilization didn't let young women do whatever they felt like?I do buy into that.Do I buy into the framework that they were horribly abused? No.I'm not retarded enough to think that marrying some ugly soldier is worse than dying alone in a mine.Society has always been nicer to women.But it rarely gives them the power to take everything in exchange for nothing.Women are good at complaining and getting men to give them stuff.But they are only as influential as their simps.
>>519428086Who said men and women need to be on equal strenght? Imagine being so close minded you only think within 2 extremes. Women can be bred to have more muscle mass, still not as much as men, but enough to be not be short and weak. African american women are generally taller than other women and also have more testosterone, does that mean they are stronger than their male counterparts? No, but they are still not as weak as say small asian women
>>519428875>Kurdish womenPhoto ops mainly. The overwhelming fight in Kurdistan is/was done by men, but you'd think they're an all female army by the reporting on them.Women can sometimes do stuff like that.They can be as fanatical and violent as men.But there's more to being a soldier than that.
>>519426739>You have more female ancestors than male ancestorsmaybe true for you because you are inbred
>>519426151>if
>>519417590Oh boy another incel blackpill thread.
>>519417977So cheerleaders at a football game are a retelling of this ancient tale?
why are blonds universally dunked on for being stupid?
>>519417590Some Celtic women would fight pre-romanization of Europe. Chug women will also throw hands with pretty much anyone, including men(largely lashing out over their cousins and brothers and fathers diddling and raping them their entire childhood ans teenage years.) >t.fought a chugess, fucked her stupid mouthy ass the next day
>>519429585>I literally just described that in detailYou don't get it, retard. It doesn't "even out" because most of your genetic ancestors are women. Fuck you're dumb. >The feminist frameworkYou're too dumb for this convo, retard.
>>519417590If you train your women and the enemy village trains theirs, you won't get to go on an easy rape holiday.What the old tribes used to do is pretend they were going to fight. They would head to the meeting place but then those dishonourable dogs would decide to sneak around and attack your undefended village! So to take revenge, you quickly attack their undefended village instead of going back and defending your own.
>>519417590>Sparta, Japan, steppe peoples, some Germanic tribesCultures with a very strong warrior ethos like Sparta or Japan expected their women to be able to fight. At least fight off attackers. Samurai women for instance were trained with the spear and the women of Sparta defended the (walled) city while the men were off campaigning.Tribes from the Eurasian planes had fighting women because with their generally lower birth rates, each pair of hands was valuable and because women lead a physically demanding life and had to know how to hunt and live from the land. So their men and women were naturally more egalitarian.>>519417763The strength difference isn't that much if the woman knows how to wield her weapons. A woman with a spear is a deadly threat, just like a weak armed man would be. Men are and always were the preferred warriors, especially for pitched battles. Trained women however could and did fight to defend the home quite effectively. Siege defense is mostly about making it too costly to storm a place.
>>519430179Mate, we have an equal number of male and female ancestors. Do you mean to say that females had a higher chance to pass on their genes?
>>519417590Women have always hunted/worked. You? Not so much
>>519430108Jews in Hollywood. They spread the lie over decades but in the 70's it really took hold. Shortly after you could find dozens of even hundreds of widely promoted films depicting the blonde woman as either helpless, dumb, or w/e. Then later they became the "prize" for the swarthoid (think Karate Kid) or the nerdy Jew who gets revenge on the blonde white jock who is also depicted as dumb or the heel (Revenge of the Nerds, Real Genius, etc.).
>>51943095680's and 90's there was at least one jew kid fucks the popular blonde girl movie every summer
>>519417590The only real reason to go to war is for the protection or benefit of your women. If the women are going to war, then you aren't protecting the foundational aspect of your tribes health.
>>519417590maybe they need to make arrows
>>519417763>start shrieking and freeze up in a tense situationThis is the biggest part and why they can never beat men even when outmassing us: 8 guys will beat 60 women because the women won't fight back effectievly.
>>519431085Yeah. It slowed down a bit in the late 90's or early 2000's because people's tastes changed, but it's still happening to this day.
>>519417590maybe they need to teach, so no posts cesspool shit
>>519428966Based balkan wife-beater.
>>519430821>Mate, we have an equal number of male and female ancestorsNo we don't and the ratio is something like 2:1. Again: far fewer women are genetic dead ends than men. What this means is that any given woman throughout all of history has a higher chance of being someone's ancestor than any given man. Also, genetic contributions dissipate in only a few generations (i.e if you have kids your genetic markers will be drowned out in noise within 4 generations). What this means is you receive a far greater amount of genetic material from females than you do males. If you don't understand this Google it or if you're a complete retard ask AI to give you a summary.
>>519431127Such a simp way to look at it.
>>519418107I’m gunna put it out there, Penthesilea has two titsFite me
>>519418381> shaves head> strews uneaten banananas and one dollar notes in a random fashion as if they epwere caltrops> ? > profit
>>519424483You should learn to read, anger-mutt. The fact you get BTFO and double-down and get upset with everybody speaks volumes. Neck yourself ASAP.
>>519430821>No we don't and the ratio is something like 2:1. Again: far fewer women are genetic dead ends than men. What this means is that any given woman throughout all of history has a higher chance of being someone's ancestor than any given man.this has nothing to do with any individual's family tree
>>519428678
>>519430606This is nonsense. These strong warrior cultures have a totally larpy background in the first place. "Sparta" was made up in the Renaissance. Topography and archeology, even the names don't match with what would be expected.But the proof is already in the pudding. Where did those "warriors" go?It's just made up, anon.Secondly, the >strength >coordination>willpowerdifference is massivewhile there's so many additional drawbacks>destroys cohesion>creates drama>makes you question the sense of the whole thing (who am I fighting for?)Third, the differences are clear to anyone training martial arts. This creates a very clear conundrum. An athletic woman can, with many years of training, be on part with the worst warriors, roughly the shitty 10% at best. A once in a generation woman can be a bit better.But this means you're okay with the additional drawbacks I listed above for a boost of maybe 15% of your troops.But here comes the real kicker:>those outlier genes would not proliferate any longerIn other words, the few "talented" girls are horrible but would give the tribe really good warriors if these genes end up in sons.So the hundred warriors from your village would include ten gals who are supremely shitty, make drama, have periods, destroy cohesion, complicate logistics and fuck up shit. And the next gen will have much fewer great fighters.What a great deal.
>>519431300>What this means is that any given woman throughout all of history has a higher chance of being someone's ancestor than any given man. That's a logical fallacy. Just because more women had kids than men does not negate the fact that every person who exists has equal male and female ancestors. It's just that more people will have the same male ancestors than female ancestors.It also does mean that women are less likely to be "genetic dead ends". I don't think you understand what that means. It is the males of the species where the brunt of evolutionary pressure rests, not on the women.It doesn't matter anyway, because women still pass on the genes of their father, no matter how many of their brothers died in a war. This is a key fact you're missing. You don't have to breed to pass on your genes. You can also do so by ensuring your siblings have a higher chance to breed healthy children. Our sisters and female cousins also carry many of the same genes that our brothers and male cousins carry.
>>519417590>the vikings>actually train their women to fight?You've been watching too much hollywood bullshit, faggot.
>>519418454all those women raped by slavswhat a waste
>>519421607Wood nut in cider.
>>519431793>That's a logical fallacyFor fucks sake it's not a logical fallacy, retard. It's born out by mathematics and the fact women reproduce more than men. If a male and female parent have 4 kids, 2 male and 2 female, there's a higher likelihood the female children will reproduce. This means that that original male will only pass on his genetics through one of the males but 2 of the females. This happens again in the next generation until the ratio rises to almost 2:1 female versus male ancestors. Don't respond to me until you've researched this and actually understand it.
pajeets should be posting on bharatchan and living on the subcontinent
>>519420724It's a charming movie with exceptional puppeteering. There are some based bits. But it's not political. It's normal tale of good and evil for children.
there was never any good reason to share a country, a language, or the internet with pajeets
>>519431728>logistics, cohesion, 10-15% of your troopsYou are very stupid. I described how societies had women that knew how to fight, not how to be soldiers. A samurai woman, a noblewoman trained from childhood, knowing how to wield a spear and using it in home defense and women defending a walled city from a siege are not at all comparable to women being part of regular military formations where logistics and unit cohesion matter.
>>519432029You're fucking retarded and completely missing the point. I literally addressed that point in the comment you replied but you are too fucking stupid and fully invested in "being right" that you are raging on 4chan.The fact that more women have bred in history is COMPLETELY FUCKING IRRELEVANT. Got it? It's irrelevant. In case yo don't know what that means, it means it doesn't matter.Fucking brownoids, I swear. There needs to be a melanin check to access the internet.
>>519432215>You're fucking retarded and completely missing the pointNo, retard. You didn't address it because you're denying something that is born out by simple mathematics. Again: women are more likely to produce offspring than men. This means that there are more male genetic dead ends than there are female. Because of this if you add up your male ancestors and your female ancestors the ratio will end up approaching 2:1. If you don't believe me fucking Google it already and stop talking out of your ass you complete and total retard.
>>519431300We still have an equal amount of male and female ancestors. If you don't, you are simply inbred. We do not even have more female genetic material than male genetic material in our lines, because guess what? Every child is conceived by a man and a woman.>genes dissipate over generationsExactly. Apart from the X and Y chromosomes there are no sex specific genes.What you are saying is that women have cooties andonce they touch a gene it is forever female. What you should say is that a smaller group of Y chromosomes than X chromosomes were passed down.
>>519421607
>>519432486> Exactly. Apart from the X and Y chromosomes there are no sex specific genesWut
>>519432029likelyhood to more female descendants does not mean likelyhood to more female ancestors. if there is a significant sex inbalance in your family tree, that means you are inbred. and you actually might be since you are retarded
>>519432486>We still have an equal amount of male and female ancestorsNo you don't. You have more female ancestors because more of them bred: https://investigativegenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2041-2223-5-13Or if you're too retarded to understand that:https://www.livescience.com/47976-more-mothers-in-human-history.html
>>519417590The only example I can find of a “fighting” Norsewoman who allegedly existed was Freydís Eiríksdóttir, who was a hot tomboy but also a psycho bitch if the sagas are to be believed. There was that one time when she was 8 months pregnant and slapped her naked, milky preggo tits with a fallen warrior’s sword and it scared off an army of skraeling injuns. And then there’s that other time when she lied about some guys who had apologized to her, and she threatened to divorce her husband if he didn’t take his boys out and kill them all. When they did there were five unarmed women left that the men thought would be dishonorable to kill, so Freydis killed them all herself with an axe. Vikings weren’t doing feminist shit like whatever netflix told you.>>519417885>lionesses have less muscle mass and weaker bones because lions bred them to be that way by only going for small and meek lionessesOk retard.
>>519432563Because the other chromosomes can appear in both men and women? The genes on them therefore can't be attributed to one of the sexes.Okay, so can the X chromosome, technically. But you get what I mean.
>>519417590vikings didnt train their women to fight retard stop watching goyflix sloptheir women were just tall af and had to chop their own wood half the time, so they werent massive fucking pussies like everyone elseno even semi-civilized society would ever put their women in a fucking combat role. not only is it fucking retarded, but thats how you get literally wiped out as a race
>>519425507isn't that most of feminist history?
>>519432618Ancestor refers to a member of a family tree. Please learn basic English.
>>519432563He doesn't know what he's talking about, anon. It is counter intuitive because you automatically think "it takes one male and one female to make a kid" but the fact is when you go back through generations you see more females producing offspring than you do males. This means that reproductive success for females is higher (they're more likely to pass on their genetics) so you'll have more unique female ancestors than you do males. Another way to think about it that I mentioned in a different post is the fact your specific genetic material is pretty much washed out in only a few generations. On top of this if all of your ancestors were truely unique you'd have more ancestors than people who have ever lived going back only 500 or so years.
>>519432190There's exactly ONE society were we can somewhat believe they had unusual amounts of female warriors. >Hint: it's neither the Japanese (who were/are ultra sexist) or SpartansLogistics & cohesion matter a lot in defense, too. eg>How do you partition food?with women, muscle and important connective tissue wastes away quickly, they spare fat.With men, not so much.During a siege you'd be a retard to hand out calories equally, ie to women?Sieges could involve months of dilligent defense. It makes no sense making men out of women and larp about "muh warrior wombman". And guess what, it's never been done.>samurai womanpresent evidence. You have only legendary accounts. All somewhat grounded reports about samurai in action involve 100% men.
>>519432716>I'm wrong on the internet so I'm going to try and resort to semanticsYou still have more unique female ancestors than you do male ancestors, retard. If you can't figure that out from context clues and reading the sources I've provided you with you're a joke.
>>519432662 No. I don’t speak retard. What do you mean? So apart from chromosomes, there are no genes that dictate breast size, how roomy and spacious a vagene is - be it bed sitter or massive cavernous chateaux? With ensuites. And off road parking?Are you sure?
>>519431417It is what it is, the entire point is protecting your genetics and your people. Do you prefer the modern warfare where you go to war for Jewish banks and then import the people you defeated and give them everything you own while they rape your women?
>>519432847gee i wonder fucking whyits almost like no one willingly puts women in combat roles, so they dont all die by the millions in fucking wars
>>519432662Youre talking directly out your ass. They can compare a whole slew of markers just not hurr durr dick or pussy.
>>519432847Anon, I don’t know what I’m talking about, vis genetics, but this fucknuckle makes me more and more sure I need a Nobel prize for schnauzer breeding improvements. And I don’t have a schnauzer
>>519432847Lol, you are retarded.>if all your ancestors were unique you'd have more ancestors than people who ever livedThink about what you just said for a moment.>if your father didn't fuck your sister you would have more ancestors than family membersis what you just said.
>>519433003*not just
>>519432989Its not just that but the fact a small amount of males are selected by the group to produce offspring. Also, when a civilization begins putting women in combat roles it's because it's desperate--you can lose a majority of your male population and it can still reproduce itself but if you lose the majority of your female population you're fucked.
>>519432662You are literally out of your league. Genes express differently in the sexes. There's traits that offer advantages in one generation and drawbacks in the next precisely because of that. In other words, evolution weighs the pros and cons over hundreds of years.You might carry a potential disease amplifier which enhances health in your female progeny only. If it's a net gain, it's still an adaptive trait.Homosexuality might be a phenomenon because of that. There's zero evidence for genetic lesbianism but weak evidence for genetic faggotry.
>>519430165Dafug is a chug?
>>519433007Lol. >>519433017Fuck, I explained it to you multiple times and provided you with a technical source and a summary meant for academics. Do you want some from retard tier publications too? Here:https://medium.com/@qcaa/you-have-twice-as-many-female-ancestors-as-male-ancestors-3658917b211chttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/sep/24/women-men-dna-human-gene-pool
>>519432965Women whose eggs aren't at optimal fertility (30 and above) should be on the frontlines too.
>>519433098Tut mit leid anon, but the best indicator of faggotry isn’t genetic, it’s flags. Leaf, kraut, memflag, wherever mal draw was from…Hang on
>>519432925You got half your chromosomes from your father. He got half of his chromosomes from his mother. It's more or less random which chromosome of the two chromosome pair one person passes on to a child. So you got a quarter of your chromosomes from your grandmother. Meaning that apart from the sex chromosomes, all chromosomes appear in both male and females. The genes on these chromosomes express themselves dependend on the genes with which they were passed on with. The gene that gives women an innie might give a male child an ant eater dick, etc.
>>519433082>Its not just thatit is, in fact, mostly just thatalmost entirely that, eventhe men lived far more dangerous lives, because they had to, otherwise their women would dieif you lose your women, you have nothing. so their lives were always protected, where mens were disposable. even the dumbest nigger tribes of africa knew this shit. women CANT fight, and are usually more harm than good IN a fight, so you have to protect themit sucks and is extremely cynical towards mens lives, which are to this day, still seen as fucking disposable. but unlike opie and his retarded viking goyflix slop show, its actually what fucking happened
>>519417590If you’ve ever wrestled your sister you’d know how fucking stupid this is, you only child retard.
>>519433313So you’re not sureCoolSo you’re basically a pole who unblocks toilets (poorly) for a living
>>519417590Some women look like guys already anon
>>519417590Women don't typically have the right thinking for a fight. They don't endure, they don't push against the odds and those the qualities of a fighter. It's not just muh muscle mass or muh bones or muh height and whatnot.
>>519433003Parents:AA AA AA AYBB BB BB BXChildren:AB AB AB AY or AXBA BA BA BY or BXBA AB BA....Apart from the Y and (second) X chromosome, all chromosomes can appear in both men and women. They are not sex specific. I don't understand what is contentious about this.There are some genes that express differently in men and women and some that are more beneficial to one of the sexes than the other. But that doesn't make them sex specific.
>>519417590If you've watched women play contact sports like rugby or AFL is Australia you'd know why. These are the most butch, strong, manly women in countries full of manly women and they're pathetically weak and incapable and also get injured at much higher rates. Now imagine that in war but you're also losing your breeding stock when they inevitably die and your enemies will be capturing and raping them.Women are meant to be protected, not put in danger. They're also biologically predisposed to join conquerors, not a good instinct for lethal combat.
>>519417885>because men bred them to be that way by only going for short and meek womenBingo. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. We could all have had badass Amazon mistresses but instead we got stuck with weak useless Eve's. Man is punished, toils and suffers for its actions.>>519424483Found the cuck simp lol
>>519417590>Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight?This never happened.
>>519433601Simple math, retard. Your ancestors double with every generation. This means 2^(generation) is how many ancestors you have from that generation (i.e. going back to your grandparents, 2 generation before you, would be 2^2=4). If you go back 35 generations that's 34359738368 ancestors. That's accounting for all your ancestors who lives between now and around 1150 A.D.. Now, if you go back just 5 generations more you arrive at a number that's far larger than all people who have ever lived. New people don't spring out of thin air, retard. >>519433349>it is, in fact, mostly just thatNo, it's not. Men aren't dying in wars now but you stil have like 5% of men getting 95% of the matches on dating apps like Tinder. It's a common pattern throughout all of human history and incels rage about it, lol.
>>519433601Sure but that doesn't explain why most women can probably beat you up
>>519433313>Meaning that apart from the sex chromosomes, all chromosomes appear in both male and females.Mitochondrial DNA, idiot.
Daily reminder, given this krait flagged faggot can safely be assumed to not be an actual pole, but an ukie, that the capital of Ukraine is not Kyiv, or Kiev, it’s Kevin. This is proof that Russia is fighting a pointless war because Ukraine (kevinlandia it the tales of yore) is rightful Australian clay. Ask yourself, did anyone ever hear about Ukraine before the Crimean war? No. It’s amusing that these proto pole toilet attendants pretend to be an ancient race when the Crimean war was in the 1850s and yet AUSTRALIA WAS FOUNDED IN 1788Pretty prophet numerals ehCop that hippy
>>519430091Unironically yes.Sports, and all the pageantry around them, are basically ritualized non-lethal combat.
>>519433763>but you stil have like 5% of men getting 95% of the matches on dating apps like Tinderno thats just modern 5/10s having completely unrealistic standards and jewish dating algorithms being made to demoralize. that has nothing to do with anything, and very likely isnt even an indication of anything either. casual hookup culture has precisely fuck all to do with the societal role of men and womenthe actual sentiment of men being disposable is carried over from thousands of yrs of history. thats not something that just goes away after just a century or two of stability. nor does it get undone by a fucking phone app
>>519433870Men have mitochondrial DNA too. Do you mean to say that men do not pass on mitochondrial DNA? Yes, but you are retarded and can't formulate a clear sentence.
>>519417590>usefulYou've never worked with women or spend much time around them. They're fucking incompetent and better to just not have around when it comes to important matters. They'll fuck everything up. They weren't even brought along on hunts let along into battle.
>>519434001>no thats just modern 5/10sDoesn't matter, anon. It's the same pattern throughout all of human history. Women are the gatekeepers to the production of offspring and a small percentage of men have access to them. For various reasons far fewer men reproduce than women which means you have 2:1 the number of female ancestors to male. Women also moved around more throughout history so they quite literally were responsible for spreading genes out over distances as well.
>>519417885Nope, it's so they can be raped more easily. For the majority of our existence women had to be raped for our species to continue. Eventually they just became more agreeable. They don't have to think much either, a smart women is harder to rape or convince to be your bitch.
>>519433611>They're also biologically predisposed to join conquerorsDepends on the culture. In nomadic and hunter-gatherer societies, women fight and hunt. In agricultural societies, the women have harem psychology. The most successful conquerors in history were steppe nomads. I have genes from more egalitarian societies so my psychology is different from your average agrarian cuck.
>>519434111>Men have mitochondrial DNA tooYes, retard who was wrong on the internet and having a meltie about it. Do you understand why you have more female ancestors than males now and was 2^(#of generations back) simple enough math for you to understand that if your ancestors were all unique they'd number more than the amount of all humans who have ever lived by a significant margin (and that's only going back to around ~1000 A.D.)? Lol, you're fucking retarded.
>>519434223Mitochondrial DNA is passed exclusively by the mother
>>519434158Maybe your culture reproduces by rape but women from my culture would cut off their nuts if they tried that. The men from your tribe seem to be proud of having weak women.
>>519417590these modern "viking" women seem like the biggest feminist sluts>PROVE ME WRONG>CHANG MY MIND
>>519434266Correct.
>>519433601You're being a literal homoretardfaggot, and also a nigger.We've explained it to you several times. You are wrong. Gene expression is heavily modulated and not a logical, intuitive sandbox. I'll repeat the best argument against female "warriordom".>1.Women are empirically horribad fighters. >2.even outliers are so rare and mediocre they would not significantly boost numbers, while adding a ton of noise, discord and additional problems>3.The genes from those exceptional female "warriors" are way better served through procreation, which does not mix well with military service.It's essentially the same with "smart" women. It's way, WAY>WAY better for those female "scientists" to pop out male kids with her genius genes who will be way better at science. The alternative is one more mediocre scientist in this generation. Yay!
>>519424647kek, reminds me when i googled some medicine i took for possible indications>Yes, it's perfectly safe>No, it's potentially fatal
>>519433187Indian (feather not dot). It comes from the fact a lot of Indians are alcoholics (chug booze).
>>519434223why would you have more female than male ancestors? genghis khan? chad meme? eventually you'd come to start seeing same female and male ancestors the higher you go up the ancestor tree
>>519417590It's being pragmatic, division of labor. Men go out and perform arduous tasks that flourish the clan, and the women nurture that clan so that they next generation can exist as optimally as possible.Anatomical differences between them essentially reinforce this. Women produce milk for babies, and have more developed caretaker hormonal instincts from the endocrine system, while men are more developed in the muscular system, perfect for performing work and violence tasks.Societies which veer from this do so for environmental reasons, either necessity, or cultural adaptation. Over time, this may also manifest biologically through successive generations of this behavior.
>>519428966>siege of Egergod, femoids are ugly without filters, in this case, skin
>>519434113>For various reasons>It's the same pattern throughout all of human historynotheyre completely unrelated data that just both happen to be pointing in a similar direction and youre probably actually 80IQ or a nigger to not immediately see it. men were not disposable 5000yrs ago because tinder exists now. its the other way around. men are still instinctually seen as disposable because of the thousands of yrs of history where that was their primary job>Women also moved around more throughout historylol yea i know women were raped and sold into slavery and traded around like cattle retard. thats what happened in every instance when the men "lost". then you had all the various royals who used them basically as diplomatic solutions.now, they had their own degree of disposability, but they were always getting "used", because no one but niggers wastes valuable resources like thatbut the big completely all-encompassing and primary reason for all of this, is because women cant fight, and you have to protect them from a fight. they were guarded. by men. half of whom got cleaved in half by a fucking axe and died at 16thats itanything else is just you being a fucking pedantic little faggot
>>519434223Mitochondria DNA has nothing to do with the number of female ancestors.Your math only proved that you are retarded. You tried a mathematical proof that without inbreeding you'd have more ancestors than people who have ever been alive. I don't even need to say anything.
>>519434525The fact a higher percentage of women are successful in producing offspring than men. Also, the fact the number of unique ancestors available is tiny compared to the number of generations there have been (i.e. going back to just 1000 AD you have more ancestors than people who have ever lived).
>>519434661>Mitochondria DNA has nothing to do with the number of female ancestorsI never said it did, retard. Now, do you understand that you have more female than male ancestors and if you go back just 40 generations (i.e. around the year 1000 AD or so) you gave more ancestors than people who have ever even been alive on the entire planet throughout all of history?
>>519434594>yea i know women were raped and sold into slaveryIt's not just that but the fact women were expected to move to live with their husband's tribe/family. >but the big completely all-encompassing and primary reason for all of this, is because women cant fightIt's because women are more important to reproducing the group (i.e. men are disposable). It used to be that disposability came with a certain degree of respect because of the roles we fulfilled but in modern times it just leads to a lot of mental health bullshit like incels and such.
>>519434741Show me in your family tree where your family skipped a couple billion ancestors by inbreeding.
>>519434950Easy>>519434950Checkmate faggot
>>519434950>seething so hard he can't even form coherent sentences anymoreHere, I'll teach you something. Somewhere above I said you only have to go back 500 years for the number of your ancestors to outnumber the number of people who have ever lived. I was wrong, my estimate was off because of the exponential number of increase and I erred on the side of not going way over, but I looked into it further and now I know 1000 years is closer to the correct number. See how easy that was, anon? I was wrong about something and I just admitted now. The fact you got completely demolished in an argument and haven't learned anything from it proves that not only are you retarded but you also have shitty character and will never improve, lol.
>>519428966The difference is less significant when you correct for body weight tho, since women also are some 25-30% lighter, which explains why they can run almost equally fast.
>>519417590>Besides the vikings, why didn’t any other civilizations actually train their women to fight? Like, you’d think with all the wars, invasions, and raiding going on, more societies would’ve realized having women who can defend themselves or their homes would be useful.they were nagging men to fight from behind a horse cart, not fighting
>>519417885>utopian feminest cope Humans predate culture and civilization. Those things evolved around the natural state of the human being, not the other way around. We cant hate these people enough.
>>519421156>there is no records of a female only army that dominated anything at allthe Amazons, in Greek mythology, came close to thatbut their very existence is uncertain, as they left no archeological record
>>519435526>which explains why they can run almost equally fast.No they can't. What the fuck are you talking about?
