Modern-day sub-Saharan Africans have been proven to have admixture with an unidentified extinct archaic hominid (most likely Homo erectus or Homo habilis). A "ghost DNA". This is not found in non-sub Saharan Africans. If the rest of the world came from sub-Saharan Africans. Why don't they show the admixture of this archaic hominid as well? Did the "people who left Africa" forget to take this with them?
>>519444617>If the rest of the world came from sub-Saharan Africansthe "out of africa" theory (which is largely debunked) has never claimed that we came from modern day ssafris, only that we all came from the general region before branching out afterward.
>>519445528>the "out of africa" theory (which is largely debunked) has never claimed that we came from modern day ssafrisIf you dug into the minutiae, that's correct. But it was definitely the pop culture image the communists in the anthropological field wanted to convey regardless of scientific veracity.Human species outside of Africa has its roots in a Euasian-North African paleopopulation. They probably had intermediate skin and most certainly were not negroid in appearance.
