[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1755217471070877.gif (3.62 MB, 320x240)
3.62 MB
3.62 MB GIF
What's the worst cases of media manipulation?
>>
>>519606184
what manipulation am i supposed to see here?
>>
>>519606184
MOVE
Ruby Ridge
Waco
Iraq war 2003
>>
>>519606184
They faked the moon landings 6 different times on Live television and remotely controlled cameras is the only proof we have
>>
>>519606345
no they didnt.
>>
File: 1645145184009.jpg (336 KB, 1070x1194)
336 KB
336 KB JPG
>>519606184
I'd say the holocaust is worse than the moon landing. At least most people realize the moon landing is fake, even at the time polls showed like 50% of the western population didn't buy it. Most people believe the holololocaust tho, even though they didn't even bother faking any footage of it like they did with the moon faggotry.
>>
>>519606227
You're "supposed" to see a camera being panned to follow the lander launching off the moon by a remote control. What you are actually seeing is studio footage ostensibly produced for training purposes and then passed off as the real thing.
>>
>>519606419
its actual footage from the moon, there is nothing wrong with it, are you retarded or something?
let me guess- earth is flat, too?
>>
File: Obamamamumbum.jpg (126 KB, 960x720)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>519606231
>MOVE
Care to explain? I think both of the sieges were pretty well covered and everyone unanimously hated Johnny Africa, save a few bleeding heart loudmouths.
>>
File: vroom.webm (2.85 MB, 960x720)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
>>519606502
>its actual footage from the moon
LOL
>>
>>519606370
Come on bro. They did not pull off a daring moon landing and successfully film it let alone drive around a fucking vehicle use your brain. Their original account was so extremely risky it’s bullshit to believe they made it even riskier the fact they had to provide film to prove their bullshit hoax is proving
>>
>>519606552
I love how the horizon disappears after a hundred feet kek
>>
>>519606565
We had to make it riskier anon. The geologists demanded blooooood.
Well... they demanded better field studies and more collecting anyways.
>>
>>519606502
Look at it again with a critical mind instead of with childish wonder, it's so obviously fake. If that doesn't help, look at Space X launches and compare both of them.
Either way, you're the retard here, good day
>>
>>519606552
lol what? looks fine to me.
>>519606565
>They did not pull off a daring moon landing and successfully film it
of course they did, what makes you think its impossible to land on the moon?
>>
>>519606565
so your argument is simply that you cant believe it? interesting.
>>
File: 1675435298929556.jpg (109 KB, 600x705)
109 KB
109 KB JPG
>>519606660
I-it's... a h-hill.

>>519606688
>lol what? looks fine to me.
Yeah, but you're a 90IQ pole, bro.
>>
>>519606674
>Look at it again with a critical mind
ok i just did, looks fine to me, and not fake.
>>
>>519606669
Nah footage is fake as hell. Just because it’s the moon doesn’t mean their is no view distance. Why is the horizon literally less than 100 feet away? I’m not convinced at all.
>>
>>519606732
Alrighty then, try not to choke on your dino nuggets tonight
>>
>>519606729
>im a norwegian flat earther
5 IQ take, lmao.

what makes you think its impossible to land on the moon?
>>
>>519606184
(((Human's rights)))
>>
>>519606734
>>519606770
what makes you think its impossible to land on the moon?

also, post this sentence:

i denounce the talmud and the torah.
>>
>>519606734
Because they're surrounded by hills and mountains, and craters.
>>
File: enhance.webm (2.78 MB, 700x392)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB WEBM
>>519606813
I don't think the earth is flat. Fuck off. I just don't believe jews landed on another planetary body in a clothes rack with cardboard and foil taped to it.
>>
>>
>>519606734
its a slightly raised area (a hillock if you will) on a fairly level area. what happens if your camera cant see over the hillock?

thats right....thats s far as it can see
>>
All of it
>>
>>519606718
No. It’s that is so unbelievable they had to make it more unbelievable by adding a remote control camera “ “ and a fuckkng lunar buggie? And they say now we don’t have the technology to go back. It’s bullshit like everything on the tv screen. They’ve been brainwashing people with the television since it’s inception. When the radio played war of the worlds with no context americans literally thought aliens invaded earth. That’s how retarded the masses are they will believe anything as long as it’s on a tv screen.
>>
>>519606874
post this sentence:

i denounce the talmud and the torah.
>>
>>519606874
i dont think any of the apollo guys were jews
>>
>>519606933
We do have the technology to go back. But money.
>>
File: 1676615267831933.jpg (3.24 MB, 3241x2160)
3.24 MB
3.24 MB JPG
>>519606935
I denounce the talmud and the torah. The quran and all the other semite bullshit too. As well as the gay and fake moon landing.

>>519606936
No idea about that. Jews were in charge of the US government at the time tho, so it's their prestige project.
>>
>>519606848
What do you mean "think"? I look at that video and every fiber of my being immediately goes
>lmao u fucking serious, niggers?
>>
>>519606848
Holy fuck the irony of asking me to denounce the Talmud when the moon landing footage is about as Talmudic as you can get. Literally directed by Steven Spielberg
>>
>>519607000
Stanley Kubrick.
>>
>>519606867
How convenient
>>
>>519606933
>make it more unbelievable by adding a remote control camera
why is that unbelievable? its fairly simple electronics.
>a fuckkng lunar buggie
again...whats so hard about that? have you ever looked into how it was designed and built and operated? doing so might make it seem less mysterious to you.
>And they say now we don’t have the technology to go back
thats not what they say at all. its just that they shut down the production of it all, and are currently in the process of designing and building brand new stuff for different kinds of missions. its not that hard to understand
>>
>>519606978
>>519606981
>>519607000
its a very simple question:

why do you think its impossible to land on the moon?
>>
File: spot.jpg (245 KB, 700x530)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>>519607072
I have no idea whether it's possible to land on the moon. I assume it's possible, why wouldn't it be?

I don't think there are spotlights on the moon tho.
>>
>>519607072
Because what it he DIDNT have breakfast, today?
>>
>>519607026
That's where some of the best rocks are. Ejecta spray from ancient impacts, mountain formations, potential ancient volcanic activity, areas where you can get into the deepest part of the crust and therefore likely the oldest.
>>
>>519606345
other than the evidence they left on the moon that we can observe, obviously.
>>
>>519607135
please tell me you think those shadows are wrong. please.
>>
>>519607135
They did bring little spotlights on multiple missions.
>>
File: index.jpg (494 KB, 1600x1000)
494 KB
494 KB JPG
>>519607216
>>
>>519607035
Still not convinced. It happened all under one administration. A stack of lies is like a house of cards, once one lie comes crashing down nothing holds up anymore and the entire house falls down. Even if it did happen the amount of hypocrisy, cover ups, scandals, reality television, psyops, engineered crisis, social experiments etc etc indicates that it’s bullshit. When we finally do go to the moon and the technology they use is much different not a fucking Tin can strapped with aluminum, you’ll see how absurd it sounds that they went before
>>
>>519607216
Why shouldn't you kill yourself?
>>
File: shadow.model.webm (1.58 MB, 896x480)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB WEBM
>>519607135
please look
>>
>>519607072
When did I say that? I said the original missions are bullshit.
>>
>>519607072
It's logistically impossible for humans to go to the moon. You can't even help people stuck in a cave on Earth.
>>
>>519607285
Yes... you're using a near light source... a spot light.
>>
>>519607240
>>519607269
i meant "please dont tell me you think they are wrong'

because they are fine

>>519607240
see
>>519607285
>>
>>519606227
What >>519606419 said but I can't see any effect of barrel distortion that would be caused by a camera tilting upwards and I'd say that it was a static wide angle shot that they then cropped and panned up in post. The moon landings were massively fake and gay regardless of these details however. >>519606502
>>
>>519607342
no. its set for the sun. try actually watching it
>>
>>519607343
>>519607379
Obviously they are wrong. No idea what you're on about.
>>
>>519607135
>>519607286
>uhhh its possible, but im a retard i dont understand pictures
>the lander doesnt look like a battleship from warhammer so the moon landings were fake
lol
>>519607321
>It's logistically impossible for humans to go to the moon.
of course its possible, its also way easier than helping niggers to learn how to farm crops to stop starving to death.
>>
File: 1685327132922368.webm (2.95 MB, 1280x720)
2.95 MB
2.95 MB WEBM
>>519606184
depends how you measure worst, do we gauge it by deaths resulting, how far removed are symptoms from the event, policy, social, international changes, today's "worst" is also just tomorrow's "hold my beer" moment.
>>
>>519607343
Nono, answer my question first. Ask yourself this:
Why shouldn't you kill yourself?
>>519607072
You too! Ask yourself and answer me: Why shouldn't you kill yourself?
>>
>>519607362
>im a moron i dont understand how any of this works
sounds like a you problem.
>>
File: Aldrin_Apollo_11.jpg (952 KB, 2000x2000)
952 KB
952 KB JPG
>>519607407
>lol
Indeed.
>>
>>519607362
it was quite zoomed in at the beginiing because the LRV was parked several 100m away. he panned out a bit as the LM ascended, but how are you going to see distortion where there are no straight lines to judge it by.
do you really think that a remote controlled camera was impossible? you can find hours and hours of footage of it being used as the two guys were hopping around in their suits. it was remote controlled during all their EVA, not just for the launch shot.
>>
>>519607407
It's fake and gay, just like your mutilated dick
>>
i bet all of you moon landing deniers are antivaxxers also, so edgy and cool skeptics.
how about the international LLR experiments, why wouldn't the Soviets debunk the landing if it were fake?
>>
>>519607411
seethe
>>519607460
nice picture from the moon.
which pixels do you think are fake, because you are a dumbass that doesnt understand anything?
>>
File: shadows.jpg (83 KB, 688x699)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
>>519607399
no they aren't. you just have zero experience understanding how the real world looks when rendered in 2d in a photo.
>>
>>519607407
Anon until there is another moon mission televised from the fucking moon in year 2025 and beyond. When technology is 10000x more advanced than it was in the 70s. You will forever look retarded. Until that day then we will look retarded but probably not because we aren’t going to the moon anytime soon
>>
>>519607537
>abloo bobo ablooo agoogoo
seethe
>>
File: ruskijews_stalin.jpg (393 KB, 799x1419)
393 KB
393 KB JPG
>>519607544
>why wouldn't the Soviets debunk
The Soviets were run by jews since the bolshevik revolution, just like the US was run by jews since the fed was created.

Why would the jewish leadership in Soviet call out their cousins the jewish leadership in the US?
>>
>>519607558
>nice picture from the moon.
Well, the two spotlights in that picture shouldn't really be on the moon, no?
>>
>>519607587
Just a fact. America is a land of mutilated cattle, and their rulers are notorious liars. None of them have real capabilty beyond lying.
>>
>>519607580
>um um um um retarded retarded retarded landing retarded uh uh
lmao seethe

if they landed today, and you had a 4k footage of the landing, you'd just say its AI, lmao.
>>
>>519607558
Come on, it's an easy question. Surely you can make at least one logical answer to it. Right?
Why don't you kill yourself?
>>
>>519607647
>there are pixels i dont understand on this picture because im a fucking moron
lmao
>>
>>519607660
I doubt they'll go back to the moon. They'll probably do a mars mission tho, with lots of CGI and AI, yeah.
>>
>>519607610
you are pathological, retard
>>
RETARD THREAD
>>
>>519607665
why would i?
im super happy, wealthy, and generally just fucking awesome.
>>
>>519607610
Plus all the worlds leaders run psyops together, that’s what Ukraine is a massive meatgrinder agreement made with a handshake between oligarch Jews Zelensky and Putin and the west to clear out land for blackrock investors for new smart cities. Good way to get rid of whites as well.
>>
>>519607705
lmao
>>
>>519607647
what two spotlights? explain
>>
>>519607443
Sounds like you don't understand any of it bigger.
>>519607530
No I don't think that a remote control camera was impossible but if you know what you're looking at, the camera never moved, tilted or did any other likewise shit.
>>
>>519607701
>i'll just call everyone morons that will surely work
Kek, this works better over on pleddit and badastronomy where you can ban people along with the ad homs.

Here you can't really stop people from posting pictures from the moon landing like you can there.
>>
>>519606227
A 1pbtid thread
>>
>>519607763
The two spots of light? One around the astronaut being taken a picture of, and one around the one reflected in his visor.
>>
File: 1626625700017.jpg (80 KB, 1024x540)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>519606184
>>
File: mAoO4u.gif (1.45 MB, 320x180)
1.45 MB
1.45 MB GIF
>>
>>519607660
Well they can’t even get away with creating an ai moon landing Anon. Too many eyes on them now. Too many internet autists. But anyways anyone who thinks the footage is real is completely btfo by the fact we haven’t been back despite technology rapidly advancing
>>
File: 1626625635637.jpg (186 KB, 842x1024)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>519606345
Space is fake.
>>
>>519607774
of course i do, thats why im not posting retarded dumbass shit that the moon landing was faked.
>>519607780
nice picture from the moon, what pixels from it dont you understand?
did you expect it to look like a super duper heavily armored battlecruiser from starcraft or something?
>>
File: 1626625863698.jpg (92 KB, 749x960)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>519606345
Earth is flat.
>>
>>519607732
You know that's not true. Try again. Happy people don't waste their time on 4chin pol debating moonlandings. You're wealthy compared to whom? Bums? Has anyone actually told you you were/are awesome? Do you think it was genuine or perhaps they just wanted something from you?
>>
>>519606552
Notice no particles hanging in the air? Because no atmosphere. They all follow a perfect parabolic trajectory
>>
>>519606552
how would you fake the dust, which could only behave that way in a vacuum?
>>
>>519607909
prove it.
post a working map of flat earth.
>>
File: space_tape.png (238 KB, 700x392)
238 KB
238 KB PNG
>>519607887
>did you expect it to look like a super duper heavily armored battlecruiser from starcraft or something?
No, I had no particular expectations. I certainly didn't expect scotch tape tho.
>>
>>519606552
The moonlanding was faked in a film studio.
>>
>>519607918
tldr
>>
>>519607920
>>519607921
Kek, shift rotation at NASA.
>>
>>519607774
of course it moved. how the hell could the frame be that big so as to capture the LM high up like that? the LRV would have had to be several miles away at least and you'd get no detail

>>519607826
thats the SUN ffs. explain how you think having two bright spotlights on wouldn't create double shadows on everything.
>>
>>519607962
Stanley Kubrick admitted this did he not?
>>
File: 1624115538482.jpg (64 KB, 679x960)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>519606565
If the moonlanding was real, there would be gay bars on the moon by now.
>>
>>519608014
The sun doesn't create spots of light tho.
>>
>>519606184
Scottoh rote york rite adl bnai shit.brith and jewish zionist marxist and howard Hughes stole a few hundred billion with some of this going toward adjust a super secret imagianry fake space program another spruce ponzi potemkin boondoggle lying made up embezzlement scheme amd Pavlov himself with that blackbudget bullshit
>>
Biden microphone
>>
File: 1622533877947.jpg (157 KB, 722x728)
157 KB
157 KB JPG
>>519606734
The moonlanding was recorded in a film studio in norf london where the star wars was shot later.
>>
>>519607962
>implying kubrick
No such man ever lived you stupid kike. There isn't a single shred of evidence he walked the earth let alone singlehandedly faked an entire space program. Keep drinking the koolaid tho
>>
>>519607965
Who taught this polish retard how to use a computer?
>>
>>519608082
These dumbasses will tell you it’s on a hill. How convenient
>>
>>519607941
That's not normal adhesive tape. That's kapton tape, with a heat resistant adhesive. Which at the time was new, developed by DuPont.
>>
File: 1626971807455.jpg (43 KB, 377x446)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>519606874
Of course, they didn't land on the moon.
It's interesting that every single astronaut is a freakmason. Why do they need people tested for secret keeping abilities?
>>
>>519607941
>i didnt expect tape
let me educate you, then:
they even put tape on passenger jet wings, and it works super fine.
>bonus education
>a passenger jet actually suffers from more turbulence and pressure than the moon lander
there ya go, some knowledge.
>>
>>519608135
It’s not hard to fake something with a tv screen Anon.
>>
File: loonie_lander.jpg (435 KB, 2349x2373)
435 KB
435 KB JPG
>>519608176
>it's special space tape and cardboard
Kek, ok, whatever.

>>519608196
>they even put tape on passenger jet wings, and it works super fine.
lol
>>
File: Moon-landing.jpg (134 KB, 1280x960)
134 KB
134 KB JPG
How did they fit the rover into the capsule?
>>
>>519608236
Looks like something a toddler would design
>>
>>519608211
>he believes in the kubrick fabrication
lmao keep carrying water for the kikes dumbshit
>>
File: 1626627658250.jpg (16 KB, 277x210)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>519608018
Yes. Luciferians/freakmasons have to admit and confess everything to offset bad karma. It is part of their religion.

Look at the NASA founder rocket scientists Werner von Braun's confession about space being fake on his tombstone.
>>
>>519608282
It was inflatable Anon
>>
File: 1748129283447451.jpg (183 KB, 700x678)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
>>519608014
>how the hell could the frame be that big so as to capture the LM high up like that? the LRV would have had to be several miles away at least and you'd get no detail

>what is a wide angle lens?

>>519607887
Do you fucking poles ever stop seething over the most inane shit?
>>
File: PIC3.jpg (72 KB, 551x381)
72 KB
72 KB JPG
>>519608282
Hmmm....
>>
>>519608236
It's actually mostly titanium alloy covered in aluminized thermal blanketing. No cardboard involved, because cardboard is heavy, weak, and would catch fire.
>>
>>519608236
lol what, sweetie?
you didnt know they put duct tape on passenger jets wings?
damn son, you're kinda dumb, arent ya.
>>
>>519608312
Keep falling for mk ultra psyops.
>>
File: 1661622049369619.jpg (696 KB, 1080x1087)
696 KB
696 KB JPG
>>519608377
Ok, if you believe in space hobo shacks flying around and landing on the moon, that's fine. You do you. I just don't believe in that.

>>519608392
>lol what, sweetie?
kek
>>
File: 1705127395103233.jpg (117 KB, 768x713)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
>>519606184
>>
File: 1640682643600.jpg (384 KB, 811x606)
384 KB
384 KB JPG
>>519608282
NASA can be considered as a tax payer money embezzlement scheme. They take billions of dollars from tax payers and then they produce a few films in film studios and a few deep fake cgi photos of space/globe earth.
>>
>>519606227
Zero flame
>>
>>519608435
kek indeed, you didnt even know they use tape, what a fucking moron.
>>
File: Flash Gordon.gif (1023 KB, 500x288)
1023 KB
1023 KB GIF
>>519608479
Fireworks, tho.
>>
>>519608282
>How did they fit the rover into the capsule?
Why "into"? They strapped it to the outside like suitcases on top of a station wagon.
>>
>>519608479
>>519608523
why would there be flame?
>>
>>519608403
I'm not the one repeating jewish bullshit about an alleged jewish filmmaker who just so happened to not only singlehandedly craft the entire moon landing, but he also made a movie about jewish ritual child abuse with hollywood A listers before dying suspiciously before the movie could come out. If you believe any of that horseshit I've got a bridge to sell you holy fuck.
>>
>>519607204
You mean rocks lol.
>>
>>519608523
Shit looks like a scene from Star Wars
>>
>>519608073
read about it here

https://moonhoaxdebunked.blogspot.com/2017/07/517-how-come-aldrin-looks-like-hes.html
>>
File: 1728099196996310.png (1.52 MB, 1280x1280)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB PNG
>>519608524
kek

>>519608550
Why would there be flash gordon fireworks fizzlers?
>>
>>519608470
best of all that no mechanical camera could work in space due to freezing temperatures yet they filmed everything like in studio
even today most expensive cameras you can buy can operate in -20 degrees celzius while temperatures in space are close to absolute zero
american losers just rushed production in desert so they "win" over USSR who actual beat them at it
>>
>>519608586
>https://moonhoaxdebunked.blogspot.com/2017/07/517-how-come-aldrin-looks-like-hes.html
>There’s another problem with this conspiracy theory: the original photographs don’t show this spotlight effect. It only appears in the low-quality versions used by these theorists.
Top fucking kek.
>>
>>519606184
>What's the worst cases of media manipulation?
the holocaust
>>
File: 1628458148323.webm (2.78 MB, 884x552)
2.78 MB
2.78 MB WEBM
>>519607610
Russians fake their space programmes too. It is an international project led by 33rd degree freakmasons in each country. Below that degree level, most space workers think what they work on is real.
>>
File: Hannah lies.jpg (89 KB, 526x759)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
lol another moon thread
this will get 404d
but they are fun while they last
>>
File: nice costume.jpg (155 KB, 975x1024)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>519606184
911 was #1 until corona and the theft of the 2020 election
>>
>>519608597
Yeah they totally thought

>we are going to an inhospitable place which we might die on our way there let’s pack a fucking lunar river that we have to assemble on the moon in our space suits

The lack of common sense here is mind numbing
>>
File: lrvfolded.jpg (81 KB, 500x511)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
>>519608282
folds up. was a pretty neat design

https://www.collectspace.com/ubb/Forum29/HTML/000731.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXNyRckuxnM&ysclid=mh3ehe5qws864564353
>>
>>519606552
Just a reminder we brought this thing on a module like Goofy's car from It's A Goofy Movie. Not a separate trip like Nasa proposed in recent years.
>>
File: boingboing.webm (3 MB, 490x370)
3 MB
3 MB WEBM
>>519608690
What, you wouldn't go to the moon to ride dune buggies and play golf? What would you do up there then?
>>
>>519608343
>>what is a wide angle lens?
go away troll

>>519608647
its true though. those are the ones that lying American Moon guy showed to the pro photographers too. not original prints - prints that have have their levels changed quite a bit.
>>
>>519607921
>which could only behave that way in a vacuum?
watch Bill Cooper and kys
dont get me wrong I believe we went to the moon
just not using 1920s rocket tech
and much of the footage is fake like this provably retarded rover that dumbfucks cant tell is just slowed down footage
>>
File: 1654135229941.jpg (92 KB, 903x578)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
Moon landing:
>there and back in a week in the sixties when we didn't even have a pocket calculator
>no other country has done it, ever
>can't do it today, b/c we 'lost the technology'
>12 pics and 4 rocks from the entire trip
>press conference with astronauts was the most damning, all three were sheepish and embarrassed
>still today with advanced photography, can't take a clear image of the flag we supposedly left there
>the data tapes were erased and reused due to a data tape shortage in the 80s lol
>and the other 300 pieces of evidence about lighting, tracks, shadows, lack of stars, etc.

I wonder why they faked it
I’m guessing:
1) to make america look superior
2) to get rich
3) to make themselves look smart
4) to get more funding
5) to gain support due to morale fading from a lengthy Vietnam war
6) to unite Americans
7) to see how stupid the public is for future fleecing
>>
>>519608789
>its true though. those are the ones that lying American Moon guy showed to the pro photographers too. not original prints - prints that have have their levels changed quite a bit.
I downloaded that picture from NASA's own apollo collection and adjusted the contrast.

Your "debunker" site is just straight up lying.
>>
>>519607965
Why don't you kill yourself?
>>
>>519608597
>Why would there be flash gordon fireworks fizzlers?
because thats enough to lift off, the moon has low gravity, if you farted strong enough if would eject you to the moons orbit.

you really seem like an uneducated dumbass, its extremely fucking funny.
>>
>>519608789
You saar are one dumb faggot saar.
>>
>>519608856
>if you farted strong enough if would eject you to the moons orbit
Now this is soicence.
>>
File: 1621538869695.jpg (49 KB, 588x960)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>519607558
The Moon is not round or globe either. It is a plasma antenna dish that spreads/beams/transfers negative energies to Earth to keep us down.

Those meteor craters on the Moon are not meteor craters, no meteor stone there. Those are impacts from human weapons from previous civilisations who knew that the Moon was something evil.
>>
>>519608844
checked
anything faked just means they are stealing most of the funds allegedly used for the project
>>
>>519608179
How many thousands of pictures do people need of certain public figures wearing clear secret society insignias and doing obvious hand signals, to start atleast asking some questions. You can't just forever ignore for example, a man who supposedly went to the moon running around for years giving interviews telling it's fake and doing weird ass hand signs no one would ever do. Then he conveniently shuts up after he is given a new hot young wife
>>
>>519608844
Who needs pocket calculators when you have slide rules you can wear like a math sword and feel like a wizard.
>>
>>519607072
This is massive cope.
>>
>>519608973
I mean, most people today realize the moon landings were faked. The true believers will never change their mind, they're too invested in their jew science fiction.
>>
>>519608597
>Why would there be flash gordon fireworks fizzlers?
Not a rocket scientist, but some of the chemicals are their own oxidizers, and when they ignite it'd be visible.

If it was all fake, why didn't the fucking commies tell the world as much? They would've wanted to embarrass the US. They were smart enough to do so.
>>
>>519609136
>>519607610
>>
>>519607853
Good one.
Building 7 memoryholed after the first 12 hours, while we got to see the towers fall a few thousand times over the course of a week.
A strong indicator that the media, as a whole, takes orders from the same source.

It amazing that the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act and sudden shift from 24/7 coverage of Occupy Wall Street to 24/7 coverage of Trayvon/Zimmerman and idpol clown shit hasn't been mentioned ITT yet.
>>
File: lucky_larry2.jpg (472 KB, 1981x3000)
472 KB
472 KB JPG
>>519609172
Pull it.
>>
>>519608789
You know what? You and the pole seething so hard at the thought of the camera not being tilted on site and seemingly not being able to comprehend the process of panning in post got me thinking. You're trying to dismiss it because if more people clue on and realise that's what it is, they're going to ask why the uncropped version isn't available kek. Nice own goal shill.
>>
>>519608845
so you also had to alter the photo. i see.
>>
>>519606184
is that glitter? fakest shit I ever saw
>>
>>519607216
Their is no atmosphere on the Moon so light should be going in one direction not scattered.
>>
>>519609208
You have to understand, these people aren't just retarded. They're NASA shills, they're paid to obfuscate and lie.

>>519609234
Like this faggot, who got called out and now has to keep lying. It's not even good lying, it's the laziest form of lying, just making shit up and then hoping people don't check.

When that doesn't work, they just sperg out and call you stupid over and over like a pledditor child. At that point you would have been banned on pleddit, which really grinds their gears that it doesn't happen here.
>>
>>519608844
Space faking serve a number of reasons. It will be the basis of the coming demonic invasion by the military of satan. They will claim to be space beings from other planets to deive humans. Would they do a decade/century long propaganda to get billions of souls for satan? Of course.
Globe earth/space makes humans feel irrelevant, just dust in the vastness of space, not the favourite creation of God.
It is a symbolic truth that there are diferent planes (planets) of existence that wrap around our own dimension like space a round globe earth. A visual representation of the multidimensional nature of reality. The demons come from the other planes, from the extra dimension beyond Earth.

Remember, aliens are demons. They live for thousands of years. Fooling billions of humans for a few decades feels like a few days in their lives. Low effort, high return. They get to keep those souls for torturing for eternity.
>>
>>519609271
>Their is no atmosphere on the Moon
of course there is
just not much of one
but its not 0
>>
>>519609208
its not seething so much as utterly shock at retards rejecting the idea of a camera being able to pan and tilt by remote control. its hard to know how to deal with such determined stupidity
>>
>>519609321
he's insulting nasa and your photo and you're trying to make him into what you are, it's embarrassing. why the fuck are you altering photos and claiming they're legitimate anyway
>>
>>519607576
>Atmosphere
>>
>>519609333
>deive
?
>>
>>519609356
this is like zoomers asking why more people didnt catch the planes hitting the buildings on 911 with their cel phones
>>
File: 1616953347407.jpg (144 KB, 749x762)
144 KB
144 KB JPG
>>519609321
Polake is an obvious nasa shill. These shills actually believe in globe earth.
>>
>>519609381
>up the contrast
>YOU DOCTORED THE PHOTO!!!!
kek
>>
>>519609398
*Deceive
>>
>>519607558
His suit isn't pressurized for starters.
>>
>>519609271
what if it scatters from the surface because its composed of tiny sharp fragments of rock?

>>519609321
i notice that you never even tried to answer the question about how 2 bright light sources in one photo were not causing double shadows. its impossible that there are two bright spot lights in that, or any other, photo.

>>519609346
and thats a distinction without a difference. what difference does it make?
>>
>>519609418
here's the retard flerfer to come add select special nutrients and minerals to the well
>>
If we really want to the moon why haven't we been back a single time in 60 years
>>
>>519609002
>>
>>519609458
>its impossible that there are two bright spot lights in that
And yet, there they are... for anyone to see.
>>
>>519609394
hahaha. good one.

>>519609453
it is...to about 4psi
>>
>>519609458
>haha retard there's no atmosphere there so your assertion is bunk
>what difference does it make if there's a small amount of atmosphere
gotta love it when retards can never just admit they're fucking wrong about something
>>
>>519609509
without creating double shadow. i guess its the same effect that flat earthers use to say that the sun only lights up a small area of the flat earth - the light just...stops.
>>
File: 1620378820137.webm (902 KB, 640x480)
902 KB
902 KB WEBM
>>519609453
The suits are diving suits.

Here is an air bubble coming out of the helmet of a Chinese astronaut. Looks like it was filmed in a pool.
>>
>>519606184
>whitey on the moon
>media manipulation
nice try Shlomo
>>
>>519609533
right...like how you cant answer wht difference you think the incredibly tenuous few atoms of gas per sq/cm mean in practice. you just mentioned it because you think saying so makes you look smart. lots of retards do that and they can never explain what they think their statement actually means.
>>
File: moon press conference.jpg (129 KB, 1377x779)
129 KB
129 KB JPG
>>519609333
>get billions of souls for satan
pretty sure humans do that all by themselves lol
why does more free time rarely lead to better humans or progress?
why does tech only make things more expensive, less secure and more complicated?
>>
File: 1619001024257.webm (1.52 MB, 720x576)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB WEBM
>>519609453
>>
>>519606184
look in the mirror, you'll never love another person no matter how much you kiss it
>>
>>519609555
Or you know... you could direct your spots at different areas, like in the picture.
>>
File: 1624568304084.webm (2.95 MB, 675x379)
2.95 MB
2.95 MB WEBM
>>519609657
Lights, shades are major giveways.
>>
>>519609625
>stop noticing I made a provably false statement
>what difference does it make
>>
>>519609200
He looks like some kind of goblin
>>
>>519609506
Hook up that speak and spell to the right hardware and wire three of them together, I'll send it to the moon. (But not with people on board, the chips in plastic packaging would die. pun intended).
Also that's not the entirety of the apollo guidance computer, that's just the dsky unit.
But what he's refering to really is the manufacturing processes and tooling necessary to produce parts for the saturn v, like the F-1 engines.
>>
File: HOLY FUCK ANON.png (90 KB, 719x551)
90 KB
90 KB PNG
>>519609437
HOLY SHIT ANON, I JUST ALTERED THE CONTRAST, HERE'S A REAL PHOTO. TURNS OUT EARTH IS DICK SHAPED!!!! SOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
>>
File: 5864.jpg (174 KB, 700x700)
174 KB
174 KB JPG
>>519609709
Nothing about light makes sense in the moon landing. Here's a readable sign in pitch black shadow.
>>
>>519609642
Hairspray is used to create the fake weightlessness effect on the hair.
>>
>>519607918
Bro didn’t you know 4shit is full of millionaires and 6 foot 4 guys that get tons of pussy and live amazing lives
>>
>>519609749
Why would a picture from the moon look like it has spotlights when you up the contrast? If it's uniformly lit by the sun, the light would be uniform as well when you increase the contrast, no?
>>
>>519609506
I had a 64K RAM home computer in the early 1980s and I could do tons of things with it. Nothing odd there.
>>
File: 1632784016843.webm (2.85 MB, 670x376)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
>>519609709
Another film production expert analysing the moonlanding footages.
>>
>>519609781
I'm a less than 6 ft virgin.
:(
>>
>>519609356
No you stupid fucking nigger. There is no distortion of the horizon as the view pans up. It is 100% a stationary camera. Even if you believe in the moon hoax why the fuck would you bring a heavier motorised rig just for one shot when you're trying to save weight?
It all makes sense now though. You don't want people asking where the uncropped footage is.. because it probably has fucking lighting rigs and the lunch room in it.
>>519609321
It sure looks like it at a glance. Who the fuck would actually be paying them?
>>
>>519609781
Oh, shit. My bad! I wonder if being 6 foot 4 millionaire in POLAND is enough for him to logically answer why he hasn't KILLED HIMSELF YET.
>>519608856
>>
File: 1636784904876.webm (2.41 MB, 1280x720)
2.41 MB
2.41 MB WEBM
>>519609773
>>
>>519608714
>Completely crushes all electronics onboard
>>
>>519609867
>Who the fuck would actually be paying them?
Soience jews. This moon religion is their schpiel.
>>
>>519609867
>because it probably has fucking lighting rigs and the lunch room in it.
lol
>>
>>519609506
>>
>>519609808
shut the fuck up you're all gross and poopy shidding and farding crying desperately, rolling in your shit, literally rubbing fecal matter all over yourself crying and screaming, why would anyone take what you have to say seriously
>>
>>519609937
Come on, this is getting badastronomy tier levels of debate.
>>
>>519609346
>>
The captcha should turn into a physics problem if you post moonlanding denial stuff and flat earth nonsense.
>>
>>519609968
You see when slow moving gasses and a gravity well such as a celestial body love each other very much.
>>
File: 1629110103946.png (2.76 MB, 1774x1074)
2.76 MB
2.76 MB PNG
>>519609937
>>
>>519606874
>but anon
>its goooollld foil tape!
>>
>>519609968
What color is your skin?
>>
>>519609721
oh, i didnt say the moon and no atmosphere, although in practice is doesn't matter either way. thats what you're not getting. you just think you sound smart for saying ' well akshually....".

and yes, what difference does it make? can you explain?

>>519609760
>pitch black
apart from all the light reflecting in all direction from the lunar surface and off the guy in the big white suit holding the camera.
>also, what is dynamic range and pushing exposure during developing?
seriously
>>
File: FB_IMG_1732444456469.jpg (65 KB, 720x617)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>519609937
You have a scat fetish?
>>
File: abollo.jpg (65 KB, 512x309)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>519610075
>apart from all the light reflecting in all direction from the lunar surface
Sooo... why is it pitch black then, if there's light going everywhere there?
>>
File: 1635769645100.webm (2.88 MB, 1280x720)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB WEBM
>>519610074
Whitest white
>>
>>519609968
>what you you mean the atmospheric density just drops off until its very small
reminder that if you set the bar for "earth's atmosphere" very low then technically it extends beyond the moon's orbit
as electrostatics proves, matter clumps
and space isnt a perfect vacuum
so when you make assumptions and are wrong....yeah let's just double down on it
>>
>>519609867
>bring a heavier motorised rig just for one shot when you're trying to save weight?
see? you know NOTHING about the subject and aren't even paying attention to what other people say. it wasn't for that one shot. the LRV camera was operated remotely for the entire time the guys were EVA. the entire mission. and not just that mission.
>waaah remote controlled cameras are impossible
ok retard

>>519609882
go read about it and find out how stupid you are.
>>
>>519610095
If you can give me those exact NASA photos i will become flat earther.
>>
>>519610075
>now I'm going to go back and try to say I didnt say something I said and can still see if I scroll up this page
>>
File: S69-39335.jpg (3.11 MB, 4531x3262)
3.11 MB
3.11 MB JPG
>>519608550
NASA Concept art said it would
>>
>>519606184
The Indian moon landing was real and straight
>>
File: FB_IMG_1732444309532.jpg (47 KB, 704x891)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>519610216
Here is your nasa photo, anon.
>>
>>519610269
The concept art was wrong. But it makes it look cool.
>>
File: 7fy2u.jpg (82 KB, 540x720)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>519606529
Nice tits.
>>
>>519610320
Give me a link to the photos on their website. I know you can't, because you're a liar spreading photoshopped garbage.
>>
>>519610343
This, the fireworks fizzlers didn't look that cool in the studio shot at all.
>>
>>519610120
depends on how its been developed or altered. there is clearly some information in the dark areas. Do you know how camera exposure works anon? Films have a certain range in which they can capture light information without under or over exposing, which means no useful information is captured. if you expose so you can see everything in the dark areas, you will almost certainly blow out the life areas, resulting in blank white.
you can see that in this shot, the highlights are almost too exposed and some of the brightest spots have blown out.

you'd have to play with the original positive to see what you can pull out of the dark areas.
>>
>>519607921
You live in a vacuum nigga?
You seen how dust works first hand in a vacuum nigga?

Better send vids of proof along with the video zooming in on your cock to prove yourself
>>
>>519610223
that wasnt me. go look.
but i notice you cant begin to say why your comment needed to be said.
>>
>>519610405
>bla bla bla bla bla
kek
>>519610120
>>
>>519610391
It wasn't faked anon.
>>
>>519610143
>>
>>519610451
I think it was.
>>
>>519606874
I've literally posted this before and ppl still tell me that that's aluminum stress or someshit kek
>>
File: FB_IMG_1732444324458.jpg (63 KB, 540x960)
63 KB
63 KB JPG
>>519610484
It was faked. Space is fake. It was an imaginary invention of luciferians a few hundred years ago.
>>
>>519606184
Video of apollo astronaut playing golf on moon.Around 0:38 there's a loud bang in "space" they probably added that later or some radio noise, it's probably supposed to be sound of ball hitting the golf bat or something
https://youtu.be/t_jYOubJmfM
>>
>>519610545
You're another shill, filling this thread with flat earth bullshit to make your Polish and Canadian colleague look better.
>>
>>519609136
>why didn't the fucking commies tell the world as much?


Mostly because of all the space accords and diplomacy in the 70s between the US and Russia.
>>
>>519610451
Aliens are fake too. They are demons, the military of satan.

Semjase is the name of a well known demon, it has its own wiki page.
>>
File: NASA Module Concept.jpg (107 KB, 1000x778)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>519609346
>Just not much of one

Massive cope
>>
>>519610204
Once again, I never said it was impossible but that footage 100% wasn't tilted in camera. It was cropped and panned in post production. You have no fucking idea what you're talking about, 90% of my fucking bans on this retarded basket weaving forum come from /p/ and I know what perspective distortion and panning in post look like. You are a stupid fucking nigger. You are the stupidest fucking nigger in this thread.
>>
File: 1638619231693.jpg (109 KB, 690x1080)
109 KB
109 KB JPG
>>519610545
Airforce and mega construction project leaders are told to assume that the Earth is flat.
>>
>>519606935
After kikes i hate the Polish the most.
Its not surprise, since over half of your population are jewish mongrels.
>>
>>519610604
No, norske bro. We just did the relevant research about flat Earth. Research this topic, there are so many websites.
>>
>>519610444
>ignores how cameras work
>wants to judge how cameras work
lol. good one. see you in the next flat earth thread.

>>519610572
or it couuld be the shock of hitting the ball traveling through the guys body and being picked up by the mic which is attached to his head.

>>519610799
>that footage 100% wasn't tilted in camera
why though? it wasn't. you can see the camera panning and tiliting for hours on end in the other footage. was all that done in post too? of course not.
>>
>>519610439
>you cant begin to say why some atmosphere has any significance vs a complete vacuum
no you're just being retarded and rejecting facts like a typical indian
>>
>>519609458
>what if it scatters from the surface because its composed of tiny sharp fragments of rock?

Not really. Even aerial photos of the Moon show shadows going in one direction.
>>
>>519610918
Nah, you're not fooling me. I know how you guys operate. You fill the thread with flat earth crap, and then your colleagues spend their time deboooooooonking that so they don't have to deal with things like
>>519606729
>>
File: FB_IMG_1732444574721.jpg (147 KB, 640x1351)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
>>519610274
Space faking is an international conspiracy. The Russians, China, India are all in it. Every single astronaut is a blackmailed freakmason or similar.
>>
>>519609514
Compare suits in LEO to the Lunar shots it's like night and day.
>>
>>519610918
>We just did the relevant research
You did zero research. You blindly copypaste retarded shit someone else made because that's what you are as well: a retarded piece of shit.
>>
>>519610459
you're simply going about this all wrong
often when your starting point is skewed or fallacious it simply sets you out on a path where you were always directed away from figuring out truth
your pic assumes having air pressure is the default state and le vacuum of space should suck all the atmosphere away
when it is a matter of there being islands of clumps of matter
>>
File: 1638613843400.webm (2.85 MB, 1280x720)
2.85 MB
2.85 MB WEBM
>>519610987
I am alone without colleagues. Some of my meetings were cancelled and now I have time to post on /pol/.
>>
>>519610797
hilarious when people cope by telling someone else to cope
there is a small atmosphere on the moon
you're a retard if you dont know this
>>
>>519606184
government redactions creating split history
>>
>>519607909
Is that the sodium vapor process on the first one?
I thought they lost it.
>>
File: lmshadow.jpg (9 KB, 250x225)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>519610918
yet you never did any research into that lying webm you posted there. if you had, you would know that the guy did two different presentations.

>>519610962
so why did you feel you had to mention it? how did you think that your correction applied to anything at all? will you keep avoiding to answer because you cant?

>>519610968
the shadows do go in one direction UNLESS terrain changes cause it to appear different.
>>
>>519610075
Except we have photos where zero light is reflecting off the surface.
>>
>>519611025
not the same suits....if you could show what you mean we could talk more about it
>>
File: 1619009803265.png (1.13 MB, 960x960)
1.13 MB
1.13 MB PNG
>>519611102
>>
>>519611023
You're retarded tho
>>
>>519611201
>zero light is reflecting off the surface.
so how can you see it?
>>
Wow, 300 replies of retards arguing with flat earthers.
Hey retards, they're too stupid and dishonest to be convinced by evidence. Just don't engage
>>
>>519611176
read the thread dumbfuck
it was argued that since there's no atmosphere on the moon then some optical feature could not exist in the footage
>>
File: IMG_0794.jpg (523 KB, 1242x934)
523 KB
523 KB JPG
Legitimately how do you people function
>>
File: AS11-40-5864HR.jpg (1.06 MB, 2349x2373)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB JPG
>>519611248
Studio lighting.
>>
>>519606184
Covid and it's not actually close.
>>
>>519610204
>go read about it and find out how stupid you are.


How about explaining it so you can show how stupid I look?
>>
>>519610948
>next flat earth thread.
i see you're trying to conflate normal skeptical people with flat earthers again today
>>
>>519611271
this.
just dont bother replying to flerfers
let them make their own flerf threads to discuss that retarded fake bullshit
>>
File: 1627070513005.webm (2.74 MB, 932x524)
2.74 MB
2.74 MB WEBM
>>519611102
The same trick.
>>
>>519611296
May I see pictures of these things rather than AI regurgitations?
>>
>>519611314
It's the only way they have to not look like complete bufoons. Notice how there's only one person in this thread posting flat earth bullshit, the German agent. And the NASA shills are mostly engaging with him, and calling this a "flat earth thread."

This is rote, tho. It's what they always do.
>>
>>519610343
>NASA is wrong

Thanks for finally getting it.
>>
File: 1615787088406m.jpg (107 KB, 1024x742)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>519609837
>>
File: IMG_0795.jpg (150 KB, 1200x900)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
>>519611296
“These are also photoshop even though other countries that aren’t controlled by American propaganda verified them”
But keep being retards it seems fun
>>
>>519609837
Save the images, videos shared above. Post them everywhere. Space is their biggest lie. We have to kill it.
>>
>>519611418
Anon, one random gauche painter unaware of how hypergolic plumes look doesn't qualify as all of NASA.
>>
>>519611146
>Small atmosphere

>Stars were expected to be seen more clearly than on Earth

>Apollo astronaut says their were no stars

Yea your coping
>>
>>519611530
what am i supposed to be seeing here?
>>
>>519611567
The reason why there are no stars in NASA's space is because you'd instantly be able to point out how they are wrong.
>>
>>519611458
someone should email nasa that the secret photo they removed is uploaded again

https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/a12/images12.html#Mag46
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/static/history/alsj/a12/AS12-46-6765HR.jpg
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS12-46-6765
>>
>>519611567
that astronaut said "well yeah of course we didnt see any stars, it was bright as fuck over there".
>>
>>519611567
>Apollo astronaut says their were no stars
>Apollo astronaut says he couldnt see stars
pick one faggot
>>
File: 1615963947345m.jpg (80 KB, 1024x779)
80 KB
80 KB JPG
>>519611458
Every and any image of globe Earth is fake. I know this is difficult to accept and process. You have been lied to your whole life about a lot of things, including about space. It takes time to accept the truth.
>>
File: NASA_Sorcery.jpg (297 KB, 930x528)
297 KB
297 KB JPG
>>519606184
Yes only an American can fooled by a stupid puppet show. Dumb gutless motherfuckers.
>>
>>519611672
>This photoshopped image made by a retard is photoshopped
Congratulations, you're a retard who fell for a meme
>>
>>519611592
Man's foot leaves a noticeable displacement of material, meanwhile the foot of the spacecraft has left the ground completely undisturbed.
>>
File: 1624115910639.jpg (40 KB, 408x408)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>519611695
>>
>>519611722
look very disturbed to me, try getting your eyes checked.
>>
>>519606184
CNN broadcast of the invasion of Kuwait.
>>
>>519611672
>Every and any image of globe Earth is fake.
of course its not, what makes you think so?
the earth isnt flat, lmao.
>>
File: 1761054868376128.jpg (131 KB, 1024x686)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>519606184
The "holocaust"
>>
>>519611289
and you think that the moons 'atmosphere' plays some important role in that context? can you explain why? can you demonstrate it

>>519611303
no. sun light and sun light being reflected.

>>519611308
you want me to explain in detail about why folding the LRV up as its designed to be folded would not cause all the wiring to be crushed?
>>
>>519611666
Man shut up Satan, why don't u point to some artifact that proves authenticity.
>>
File: 1726694436028199.png (605 KB, 576x576)
605 KB
605 KB PNG
Bros even my dead almost 100 year old grand mother knew the landing was fake. The family was the only one in the neighborhood that had a TV so everyone came to watch
>>
>>519611176
>the shadows do go in one direction UNLESS terrain changes cause it to appear different.

Except we have photos where the surface is even and these anomalies take place.
>>
>>519611218
Exactly. Why didn't they use the Apollo suits in LEO during the shuttle program?
>>
>>519611314
you both use the exact same kind of stupid ignorant arguments and patterns of thought. every point you raise as to why the moonlandings were faked is as retarded as anything flat eartheers come out with. you just dont see it.

skeptical is fine. but at least try to know something about the things you're being skeptical on. you guys dont know anything about this subject, nor even how camera exposure works

>>519611609
not at all. its trivially easy to locate all the major constellations on the inside of a dome or whatever, or to add them in after the fact. why wouldn't it be? do you think they look different than on earth?

no, the simple reason is that the camera just were not set for the right exposure level to capture dim stars. i think venus was seen in a couple pushed frames. thats about it.
>>
>>519611950
your grandma was a dumbass, then.
>>
File: rachel.png (530 KB, 860x932)
530 KB
530 KB PNG
>>519606184
Worst, as in most blatant, was Trayvon Martin
>>519609172
>MSNBC editing the 911 phone call that George Zimmerman to make him appear racist.
>Editing Zimmerman's photo to make his complexion appear lighter
>Omitting that Trayvon was carrying the ingredients to make Lean, a mind altering drug cocktail that can cause aggression
And Jesus this fucking Rachel Jenteal clown show. TLDR SHE WAS A FUCKING IMPOSTOR AND EVEN A MINOR BIT OF INVESTIGATIVE WORK WOULD IMMEDIATELY PROVE SHE WAS AN ACTRESS
>>
>>519611998
>Except we have photos where the surface is even and these anomalies take place.
Post them then
>>
File: 1623153948703.png (1.06 MB, 1280x720)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB PNG
>>519611799
>>
>>519606977
so why can't blue origin and spacex go back? their successful launches are when the spaceship doesn't blow up in low orbit. you're a stupid faggot lol.
>>
>>519611659
sure they didn't see them during normal working conditions, because they were lookig down at teh bright surface all the time etc. but they did use stars to set their guidance system by looking through a little telescope inside the LM. they also saw them under some other circumstances.

http://onebigmonkey.com/apollo/stars/staquotes.html
>>
>>519611542
It isn't the only one. The point is that NASA had a different idea of what we actually got.

>>519611609
This.
>>
File: zero-g-maneuver.jpg (154 KB, 1099x752)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
>>519611102
>>519611349
There's no need for lines.
It's easy enough to fake with tricks known to be used by Hollywood.
>>
>>519612045
>try to know something about the things you're being skeptical on
That's a big point

Asking questions is great - everybody should ask questions about things
But you have to then listen to and honestly consider the answers that are given to those questions
Conspiratards question something, get an answer, and reject the answer in favor of their own pre-selected belief
>>
>>519611998
be good see those

>>519612044
i think they used a later model, because suits for the ISS were not needed for quite a while after Apollo. but please, do show what you mean by the suits not looking pressurized.
>>
>>519611659
That was specifically the guy who was in the command module. You know the guy who traveled to the dark side of the moon?
>>
File: 1622747825263.jpg (110 KB, 840x600)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
>>519611799
Every image you have ever seen of globe Earth was fake, artificial.
>>
>>519611847
>you want me to explain in detail about why folding the LRV up as its designed to be folded would not cause all the wiring to be crushed?


Ya
>>
>>519612163
because their vehicles are still in development?

>>519612262
right. they treat skepticism like its some kind of super power or somethings, imagining that it instantly sets them up as being smart and knowledgeable. it doesn't
>>
File: GkmbLKuXIAASt0p.jpg (138 KB, 1179x900)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
>>519606184
>What's the worst cases of media manipulation?

1pbtid

OP with Brasil flag is a known shill
>>
File: flerf-volleyball.png (1.23 MB, 771x1033)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB PNG
>>519612311
Distance to a sphere affects how much of it you can see
A 10 year old can understand this - why can't you?
>>
>>519612153
and? what am i supposed to see here?
looks fine.
>>519612167
>yes they couldnt see the stars because it was bright as fuck
cool glad we agree.
>>
>>519612060
Ok your country was being raped while she was alive soooo
>>
>>519612254
Yes, falling planes can imitate weightlessness. This is used. You may have noticed that a lot of scenes recorded with this technology are very short, only a few minutes long, as the plane will have to stop free falling eventually.
>>
>>519612311
whats fake about it?
the earth isnt a pizza, lol.
>>
>>519612397
>Ok your country was being raped while she was alive soooo
>1969
XD

what about the van meme belt?
>>
>>519612394
That the continents have different sizes in different globe Earth pictures.
>>
>>519612353
no. you can go read all the detailed documentation if you want to go in depth, which you dont of course. once you've put some effort in and have come to be familiar with the thing, then maybe your proclamations of fakery might be taken more seriously. right now its trolling.

>>519612394
>>yes they couldnt see the stars because it was bright as fuck
>cool glad we agree.
sure, its pretty much the whole reason right there. once there were able to let their eyes adjust to darkness, or observe the stars through a telescope, they saw stars. simple really.
>>
>>519612125
>>519612264
Coping incoming
>>
>>519612415
not really, no, these videos are very long, proving it wasnt on a plane.
most of them were even played live on TV, sometimes an hour long.
>>
File: 1615133613064-1.jpg (88 KB, 1024x576)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
>>519612438
>>
File: file.png (368 KB, 525x526)
368 KB
368 KB PNG
>>519612515
>the continents have different sizes in different globe Earth pictures.
Krauttard, I know you've seen this before
Do you get paid for what you post, or is it just the only way you can cum?
>>
File: contsize2.jpg (106 KB, 1240x726)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>519612515
yes, thats right
>>
File: 1760098809488040.gif (3.94 MB, 258x258)
3.94 MB
3.94 MB GIF
>sole potentially good thread of the day ruined by flerffers
If you guys can't see how this is a psyop then yngmi.
>>
>>519612560
did you just make this using chatgpt?
>>
>>519612549
if you were serious it would be a sign of serious problems on your part
>>
>>519612415
>only a few minutes long
As always, you're lying. Secondly, even your false assumption of "minutes" of continuous footage would be impossible with a parabolic flight. Retard.
>>
File: space-tim-curry.gif (1.41 MB, 244x244)
1.41 MB
1.41 MB GIF
>>519606184
Look at the bright side anon, if the americunts and slavshits lied about going to space that means there's still one place in this world that is free of jewry and normie hordes
>>
>>519612515
yes, because thats how photography works.
>>
>>519612547
>no. you can go read all the detailed documentation if you want to go in depth, which you dont of course. once you've put some effort in and have come to be familiar with the thing, then maybe your proclamations of fakery might be taken more seriously. right now its trolling.


Anon I'm literally begging you to make me look like an idiot. Explain it for me since you know it so well. We lost all the blueprints which is why you can't.
>>
>>519612045
>its trivially easy to locate all the major constellations on the inside of a dome or whatever, or to add them in after the fact. why wouldn't it be?
No, that wasn't trivial at all in the 1960s. Getting all the intensities right, all the other planets in the right places etc. I can totally understand why they just opted on having no stars in space in the production.
>>
>>519612633
>Secret Worksheeld USA archives
Clearly AI, yeah
>>
File: 1623156419288.png (233 KB, 488x654)
233 KB
233 KB PNG
>>519612438
This is the cross section of our Earth.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1761159111674.jpg (33 KB, 521x589)
33 KB
33 KB JPG
Imagine so many people blindly trusting 70 and 90 year old millionaires without any question of how they made that much money off a 250,000 salary "way less in the 60s"
>>
>>519612153
>OMG LOOK AT THE EARF IT LOOKS DIFFERENT WHEN YOU TAKE FISHEYES AT DIFFERENT ALTITUDES
>>
>>519612677
>guys i added some text to my AI image in MS Paint
whoaaaa
>>519612686
>talmudian jewish nonsense
awwwww, and into the trash it goes.
>>
File: 1721329298782867.png (1.12 MB, 1728x1010)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB PNG
>>519612497
Are you retarded? She was born way before 69
>>
>>519612755
Sorry, I was agreeing with you - the AI often misspells shit on their images
The krauttard is, well, a tard
>>
>>519612673
>I can totally understand why they just opted on having no stars in space in the production.
>but I really dont know how cameras or optics works at all
>>
>>519612817
yeah this guy is fucking hilarious, he just posts random dogshit and expects people wont fact check it.
>>
>>519612755
>>talmudian jewish nonsense
>awwwww, and into the trash it goes.
Remember to thank your flat earth buddy over in Germany for helping you out in this thread. Imagine if you had to spend all that time answering real issues instead of his schizo blathering, wouldn't be a very nice thread for you then.
>>
File: zero-g-flight.png (487 KB, 826x586)
487 KB
487 KB PNG
>>519612415
25 second hang-time in that example.
Should be dependent upon speed of climb going into it and distance of drop.
Easy enough to record minutes of it by skillfully mending several maneuvers during the same flight together.
>>
>>519612919
real issues like what?
>>
File: AS12-47-6910.jpg (1.56 MB, 2340x2350)
1.56 MB
1.56 MB JPG
>>
>>519612986
>>519606729
>>
>>519613122
we already went through that - your inability to grasp how photography works is your issue, not ours.
>>
>>519613186
>we already went through that
Nope.
>>
>>519613122
>Backgrounds match exactly
No they don't, and any retard can check it by looking at the official images instead of your 10 pixel jpeg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums
>>
File: glow.gif (3.24 MB, 480x400)
3.24 MB
3.24 MB GIF
>>519613186
>ours
kek, didn't spot this one.

Say hi to the other glowfaggots at the base from me.

>>519613213
Yes glowfaggot #2, people should absolutely check themselves. That's what you're banking on them not doing.
>>
>>519609333
checked
no one is in control
it an already wound clock
if you knew anything about DNA you would know that
>>
>>519613211
yup we did, the whole thread is trying to educate you how photography works.
>he's too retarded to understand it
your problem.
>ours! he said ours!
yeah? as in non-retards, like you.
>nuh uh you're a top secret american CIA agent!
yes thats right ive been found out, CIA agent Smith here.
>>
>>519611403
it is sad
but their level of attention alone paid to ANY topic reveals what they are most worried about
>>
File: 1755598729499152.jpg (57 KB, 604x453)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>519612045
again today
what do you do for work?
you little 'truth teller' as you called yourself yesterday
>>
>>519612670
you can find all the info you want about the LRV. as usual, just repeating untruths you heard somewhere. seriously, dig into the LRV documentation and explode the fakery. make diagrams about how it couldnt possible work without destroying the wiring etc.

>>519612673
they had planetariums and stuff anon. they had people who could use star charts. and, ifyou look into it, when venus was found in some shots, people figured out where it should be and found that it was exactly where it should have been at that time and date. why do you carry on like this? you just make shit up.
>>
File: file.png (557 KB, 1390x647)
557 KB
557 KB PNG
>>519613290
Go fuck yourself
>AS18-82-11082
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21672244462/in/album-72157658635051560
>AS18-82-11057
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21683669795/in/album-72157658635051560
>>
People love to debate the moonlandings when in reality it’s completely irrelevant. They love conspiracies like these, perfect distractions for noticers to waste their energy on instead of real, potent conspiracy about current events.
>>
>>519612920
>nasa is so dumb they forgot to add stars hahaha
>they forgot to remove the wires LOL
>LMAO their lighting is completely wrong
>anyway the countless hours of continuous footage you see is actually segments of 30 seconds perfectly spliced together without any errors in continuity
>>
>>519613304
DNA is not real, or not in the way you think.
>>
>>519613519
im a man of leisure at the moment. i also procrastinate a lot, hence being on here.
how about you? you're here again so i guess you can aim your super sleuth powers back at yourself.
>>
File: AS12-47-6911.jpg (1.48 MB, 2340x2350)
1.48 MB
1.48 MB JPG
>>
>>519613611
DNA is completely real or so many of our biotechnologies would simply not work. Yet they do. I have worked in labs and done experiments with DNA gain of function on bacteria. It is very real.
>>
>>519613290
>>519613559
It took me 4 minutes to show that you're full of shit, and that included pasting the links and double-checking the image indexes
4 minutes to completely destroy your position, which you didn't do in hours of your "research" into the subject

Why do you pretend to "seek truth" when you make no effort to do so?
>>
>>519613653
what are we supposed to be seeing here?
>>
>>519613546
>you can find all the info you want about the LRV. as usual, just repeating untruths you heard somewhere. seriously, dig into the LRV documentation and explode the fakery. make diagrams about how it couldnt possible work without destroying the wiring etc.


I'm just asking you to explain it. You've dodged it like four times already. You know how they did it so just say it already.
>>
>>519613806
by routing cables properly. thats it. its possible to route cables so that they are neither trapped nor stretched to breaking point. got it? now go show that your initial claim (it would crush the wires) should be taken any more seriously than retards screeching 'no stars no stars'
>>
File: Apollo15LunarRover.jpg (225 KB, 1200x794)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
>>519614110
I like how you think cable management was the biggest hurdle. Totally not the satellite dish,batteries,seats, etc. LMAO
>>
>>519614273
You're the retard who is harping on cable routing and how it's impossible to fold something without breaking cables
Holy shit, you're either genuinely retarded or you have the memory of a goldfish
>>
>>519614110
>now go show that your initial claim (it would crush the wires)


Where did I say that?
>>
>>519610948
>why though? it wasn't.
On top of being a stupid nigger you are also blind and have obviously never used a camera that wasn't your sm0rtfone
>>
>>519614273
the point under discussion previously was the claim that all the wires would be crushed because the LRV was folded up for transport. Theres obviously no issue with anything you mentioned either and im sure you wont be able to make any case for their being any problems.
>>
>>519614404
>You're the retard who is harping on cable routing and how it's impossible to fold something without breaking cables


By all means show me where I once mentioned cables?
>>
>>519614451
Where did I say cables? You fucked up
>>
>>519614451
why would the wires be crushed?
crushed by what?
>>
>>519614417
it was said here, >>519614110 then you started on about it too. i may have lost track of who was talking.

>>519614421
explain what you mean please
>>
>>519613611
it is degradable if that is what you mean
>>
>>519606729
The shapes in your picture thumbnail look exactly like that one "it appears my superiority has led to some controversy" trollface meme picture and therefore I see you are trolling.
It is not an accusation btw, it's just a divine rule, the lies are visible through the "evidence"
>>
>>519614514
i dont think they would be. the other guy said it.
>>
File: file.png (13 KB, 977x138)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
>>519614456
>By all means show me where I once mentioned cables?
>>519612353
>>
>>519606184
>>519606184
>>519606184
Reminder that the "no tail" posts are made by VPN niggers of a troon squad from iDrama and Valent Projects cuckademics to normalize furfag degeneracy across the board.
Same trannies who shill for Jewkraine and make the /uhg/ threads btw.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518123762/#518129824
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518281658/#518287969
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/518256371/#518256990
>>
>>519613637
what did you do for work?
boy you really are avoiding the question
so adamant about your position, yet can't even answer a simple question
>>
>>519614599
he did?
>>
>>519613637
>you're here again
i come to the moon threads b/c they're funny
this will be 404d usually
>>
>>519614541
Where did I mention anything about cables? I never said once that it was impossible to route cables. I mentioned the electronics being crushed. You know computers,batteries,antennas etc. So I asked explain how they weren't crushed. Why are you lying you dishonest fuck?

>>519609882
>>
lol someone's gramma's lawn chair seats



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.