[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: natgeo.jpg (38 KB, 800x532)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
Do abos belong to the human species?
>>
>>519761437
I am a abbo so I would say abbos are Ubermensch.
>>
Typically organisms are considered to be of the same species if they can interbreed and create fertile offspring.
>>
File: awobO08_460s.jpg (54 KB, 460x552)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>519761437
What do you think?
>>
>>519761437
yes
>>
>>519761644
>(monkey, the country) says abos are human
>>
>>519761437
is this what passes for "politics" these days?
>>
>>519761437
Those are dravidians
>>
Yea, they profess abilities that only humans can do, mainly language, arts and generally culture. Doesn’t matter if they’re brown, ugly and dumb.
>>
>>519761702
Says the gypsy, a literal pajeet who actually has abo blood kek
>>
>>519761792
I am 100% polish german
>>
File: ss.png (619 KB, 854x487)
619 KB
619 KB PNG
WATCH OUT!
>>
File: images (23).jpg (23 KB, 447x447)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>519761437
Pajeet are mutant stinky version of abos
>>
>>519761437
How many generations of bleaching before they look more evolved than a homo erectus?
>>
>>519761437
They're certainly a different species.
>>
>>519761932
about 32
>>
File: 1661248452168869.webm (1.67 MB, 720x404)
1.67 MB
1.67 MB WEBM
Jeet detected
>>
>>519761932
thats not how it works. would never happen
>>
Actually joking aside it’s Indians who should most probably be excluded from any references to a ‘human species’.
>Species
of course is a mostly fictitious idea. But having said that Dear old lovely Poo is so inbred that he’s long passed the tipping point and into the end game of degeneration. He’s made evolution kind of real (but not really). Nothing can stop them getting smaller and more stupid, the entire poo race is doomed. 5’ 5” (male height) and 72-76 iQ’ed he’s already eating shit and gang raping iguanas & stray dogs. They are the banjo players of the deep south of asia. Homo Streetshittus. The designated sewer mutants of the near future.
China & Russia … they need checking on too. Checking for banjos.
>>
File: IMG_6604.jpg (819 KB, 1179x1249)
819 KB
819 KB JPG
The Hills Have Designated Mounds.
Pic: chromosomes & cabbages.
>>
File: bugs-bunny-NO.gif (16 KB, 220x220)
16 KB
16 KB GIF
>>519761437
>Do abos belong to the human species?
>>
>>519761437
Same species as indians.
Not human.
>>
>>519761437
no.
>>
>>519761868
Manflesh
>>
>>519761437
The girl on the right looks my crush. Just that she has rapist mughal/british gene which made her skin tone fair like Katrina Kaif.
>>
Does he look at a white woman and think dayum she's ugly? How did evolution create this monstrosity?
>>
Nope that's a monkey.
Seriously that's all I see is a monkey. Not a fellow human.
>>
>>519763053
fucking gross
>>
>>519761437
Literally closer to Sapiens and to Cro-Magnon than you Neanderthal kikes.
>>
>>519761746

I can barely see any difference between a dalit, brahmin, dravidian and whatever other flavour of shitjeet exists out there.
>>
>>519761437
I read abos and black africans are at opposite ends of the spectrum, they cant breed successfully.
>>
>>519763335
No, because they're not a subspecies. A subspecies is a group that can interbreed with its kind.

A chimpanzee can interbreed with a bonobo and produce fertile offspring.
>>
>>519765589
Monkeys can breed with humans. That's how Brazilians emerged.
>>
>>
>>519766082
Nobody notices the striking similarity between Aboriginal and Olmec phenotypes?
>>
>>519761535
Polar Bears and Grizzly bears can reproduce fertile offspring just to name one. Neanderthals and Denisovans are probably the best example that led to why we can today but I don’t think any rational person thinks all humans are the same species. I don’t even mean that in a racist way but more differences are clearly more than cultural or environmental.
>>
File: 1752064883109789.jpg (45 KB, 610x345)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>519761437
The guy looks like a Greek statue and the woman looks like an American accountant
>>
>>519766961
>Polar Bears and Grizzly bears can reproduce fertile offspring just to name one.
Which means they are the same species.
>>
>>519767248
These guys are from far North Queensland where their traditional diets were far close to Pacific Islanders in particular Fijians than all other aboriginals. They don’t exist here anymore as diets got corrupted but if you go around some remote Fijian villages you see guys still looking like this with zero weight training just diet and lifestyle.
t. Former rugby league and union recruiter who used did two unearthed talent recruitment trips to Fiji.
>>
>>519767290
No, they aren’t. I just used one example you also have some foxes and dogs that can.
>>
>>519767521
What's the deal with that phenotype on the right ?
He looks like a Med but far darker
>>
>>519767572
Like fox terriers
>>
>>519767572
If the definition of species is
>Animals that can produce fertile offspring
Then since
>Polar bears and Grizzlies can produce fertile offspring
It means
>They are the same species
Are you dumb or something
>>
>>519766961
>I don’t even mean that in a racist way but more differences are clearly more than cultural or environmental.
The word you're looking for is race
>>
>>519761437
Yes, but they are different to whites and shouldn't mix with our people.
>>
>>519767756
Polar bears are classified as Ursus maritimus and grizzlies as Ursus arctos horribilis. Literally no one considers them the same species.
>>
>>519768064
How are humans classified
>>
>>519767693
It’s the same phenotype the lighting just causes the difference by making his nose narrower but if you zoom in it’s identical to middle.
>>
>>519761535
coyotes and foxes can do so and they are not the same species
>>
>>519768120
That’s the point, the human classification is a (((lie))), we accept that species other than human who even appear and act far more different can be classified as different species and still breed fertile offspring but we don’t apply the same logic to races.

Arguing that polar bear and a grizzly are different species but an Inuit and a Kalahari bushmen aren’t is absurd.
>>
>>519768328
>That’s the point, the human classification is a (((lie)))
See, this is how I know you're dumb:
First:
>The science books classify these and those bears as different species
>I have no definition of species BUT I blindly trust those books
>I don't question for a second that science could be wrong
OTOH when the SAME book classifies humans as one species
>They are lying they are kikes
Second
>I have no definition of what a species is
>Therefore I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about
>But I will debate it anyway
They are both bad and point to significant retardation but the second one is way worse imo
>>
>>519768599
I really should have worked out earlier from the meme flag you’re Israeli and I’m ashamed I didn’t.
>>
>>519768842
Nah I was shitposting in another thread
>Has no arguments
>Muh Jews
So what's your argument now that my flag is not Israel, dumbass
>>
>>519768599
Doesn't the simple fact that, like animals and jews,, humans like to live and procreate with those that at least look like themselves?
>>
>>519761920
Ug. What is up with that jew nose
>>
>>519768966
Then I literally don’t understand your argument. There are multiple species science accept can breed and have fertile young so to not apply that logic to humans is absurd. That isn’t my opinion it’s straight up accepted mainstream scientific fact. Neanderthals, Denisovans and some humanoids are all recognised as different species who interbred in different combinations and geographies. DNA to this day shows this with Africans having greatly higher Neanderthal mix.

The (((mainstream science))) opinion is that’s where we all became the same species despite yhe differing combinations and geographies I mentioned but it contradicts other examples like grizzlies and polar bears who we say started as the same species but got reclassified when they branched out.
>>
>>519765453
Someone should put them in a zoo and try it
>>
>>519769453
>I don't understand
It's really simple
>If you want to debate species
>You have to have a definition of species
You don't have it
You cite books when it suits you and call them Jewish when they don't
You're fucking retarded
>>
>>519761437
>OZ insurrection containment thread.

how far we've come in such a short time. kek.

modi was stupid for trying to be friends with these wiggers. they only understand the language of repression.
>>
File: 1760487521293243.jpg (404 KB, 3000x2000)
404 KB
404 KB JPG
They're the best of us.
>>
File: IMG_6266.jpg (271 KB, 1320x1133)
271 KB
271 KB JPG
>>519769567
Let’s walk this back. Are you claiming polar bears and grizzly bears are the same species? If you are that should be really easy to cite.
>>
>>519761932
we tried that already and all it did was create millions of white abos wanting gibs
>>
File: IMG_6267.jpg (373 KB, 1320x1296)
373 KB
373 KB JPG
>>519769567
>>519769823
>>
File: IMG_6268.jpg (289 KB, 1320x1160)
289 KB
289 KB JPG
>>519769823
>>519769567
>>519769823
>possible when recently diverged
Grizzly bears and polar bears diverged 500,000 years ago. Neanderthals and Denisovans 50,000 years ago.
>>
>>519769969
OK now ask it if blacks and whites are the same species
>>
>>519761437
there's like 200k abos in existence. even Aussies don't talk about abos as much pol does
>>
What are they anyways
>>
>>519768328
What are all the human species? Is there a /pol/ chart for the correct classifications?
>>
>>519770211
You won't like it
>>
>>519761437
they can feel what's happening to trees or animals hundreds of miles away, so not really, they belong to a previous era of life on earth
>>
>>519769453
>DNA to this day shows this with Africans having greatly higher Neanderthal mix.
False. Europeans and Asians have higher Neandterhal mix. Africans have almost none.
>>
>>519770069
Are you retarded? I literally explained the double standard in multiple posts. I refuse to believe you are Croatian, I spent 5 summers in the Adriatic and never encountered a Croat as retarded or disingenuous as you.
>>
>>519770652
Yes. I apologise I wrote that wrong but the point stands.
>>
>>519770715
>I don't trust ChatGPT
>But I'm gonna use it to prove my point anyway
>Unless I don't like the answer in which case GPT is a kike
Lmao you are dumb as fuck
Why won't you ask it. You did ask it didn't you. Post the cap kek
>>
>>519770808
No more replies Moshe.
>>
>>519770071
yeah 'cause these are all spooked government shills.

we should give guns to all these abbos and tell 'em to run free. fight for their freedom. it's such a huge coast, anyway. who's going to find about a little dingy.
>>
>>519761535
>>519766961
I think it's more appropriate to say that if two organisms CAN'T interbreed with fertile offspring they're NOT the same species.
>>
>>519770932
Your concession is accepted
>Inb4 replies anyway after saying "no more replies"
As expected from a retard
>>
Well, considering how varied humans are, yes motherfucker
>>
>>519761437
they are "australopicus"
don't worry
ausies gov is giving them unlimited food store credit, so they are drinking themself to death at 40 and have artificialy culled fertility
>>
>>519761535
Tigers and lions
>>
>>519761534
>I am a abbo so I would say abbos are Ubermensch.
that's factually wrong, a Chinese is genetically closer to an Aborigine than an Indian.
>>
>>519761437
Certainly. Its a sub-species.
>>
>>519761437
only just
the "stolen generation" was unironically the best thing that ever happened to them as a people
>>
>>519761437
They are the native species. Whites are the Hybrids. RH+ versus RH-.
>>
File: IMG_6034.jpg (96 KB, 640x723)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>519761574
>>
File: saardeep.png (21 KB, 2560x2048)
21 KB
21 KB PNG
there is nothing below pajeets on the humanity scale of all 2-legged speaking primates
>>
>>519766082
A prime human next to a disgusting Morlock
>>
>>519761437
they're literally the most mutted people on earth but not unique other than that. 60% white/sapiens, 20% kike/neanderthal, 20% nigger/erectus and even the sub-1% denisovan/asian genes that are left. they only seem to be missing some human hip/pelvis genetics and the denisovan/asian eyes aren't present. the weird thing is their ears, they have big ears like kikes but they extend UP and nobody else really has ears like that. big ears always extend down to the mouth but theirs go nose to above the eyes which is more like sapiens/erectus but they're large like neanderthalensis and tilted mostly vertically like sapiens, also detached earlobes like sapiens

humans rise and fall and mutts happen in every cycle, they're the mutts of a past cycle and they get whiter every generation because people with white genes they don't have keep fucking them



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.