[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


This is a political thread for the practical policies and approaches to saving society by taking women's rights away. Discuss.
>>
Restricting women's rights won't solve it now without similarly restricting men.

1. Make all extra and pre-martial sex a crime. If she wants to fuck Chad, she needs the ring. If Chad wants his dick wet, he better make sure she's the right one, because #2 is going to hit like a ton of bricks.

2. End no fault divorce.

3. Criminalize birth control, mandatory paternity tests on birth.

4. Income tax only for people who have not had 2+ children, to ensure we're meeting replacement levels.

Society is saved.
>>
>>519766661
Put women in an industrial farm on a continuous production line popping out high IQ high SMV Ubermensch for rearing in a neo Spartan agora. Only let them out when they're married. They have ONE job
>>
>>519766661
>I CAN'T GET A GIRLFRIEND SO WOMEN DON'T DESERVE RIGHTS!!!!
Bro I'm literally a 5'6 poor brown Mexican and even I have a girlfriend. Stop being pathetic and just go talk to women. Being an angry incel is not the solution to your problems.
>>
>>519766823
>Society is saved.
Society extinct.
None of that would address the population collapse. Only abolition of women's suffrage would solve every problem while ensuring we don't go extinct.
>>
>>519766823
Fuck, I didn't expect to get such reasonable and practical advice on post one. Thread over, I guess.
>>
>>519766936
Ok yeah, this doesn't remove their power to just vote these policies out. But then your point can just be #5 on the checklist.
This was a quick thread.
>>
Take them away by taking their privileges away
They will prefer the privileges over the rights, especially after ai takes all the jobs and men need to mine for magnets 100 miles under the ocean floor breathing through a straw for 5 goybucks an hour
Don’t even refute them, women have no logic and aren’t worth a rational dialog
>>
>>
>>519766661
basically just follow taliban model: no right to education or to vote and whoring is punishable by death
some eugenic policies wouldnt go amiss either
>>
>>519766823
This seems reasonable.
>>
>>519766842
How many children do you have? How many have you murdered in the womb?
>>
>>519766661
>saving society by taking women's rights away
won't work
>>
It’s all so much easier than all you guys are saying

Simply restrict women’s right to own shoes.

>shoes

Yes shoes.

Without shoes women can’t leave the home to work, vote, cheat, buy cellphones. Restricting women’s shoes means women will be conpletely dependent on the men (father, brothers, husbands) to do almost anything, specifically they won’t be able to do any of the things which are ruining society.

One executive order, ban the sale and manufacture of women’s shoes. And once people see the benefits we can enshrine it in the amendments to the constitution

I don’t think any of the founding fathers could have predicted a future where women would own shoes and go out driving and having jobs and cheating on their husbands
>>
>>519766936
Nah. Married women vote conservative in higher rates. You remove promiscuity and incentivize marriage, you solve women being women. Things like them voting become irrelevant.
>>
>>519766823
You still wouldn't be getting laid, chud.
>>
>>519767317
>Without shoes women can’t leave the home
youve clearly never seen any british city centre at 2am on a friday night
>>
>>519766842
how big is she
>>
>>519767524
Wouldn't matter. The litmus was saving society, not me having sex.
>>
>>519767407
>Married women vote conservative in higher rates.
Too important to take that chance. What problem would it solve to let them vote if men can just vote in their place?
>INB4 to give them a sense of belonging or investment.
To the contrary, they should know their place is beneath a man.
>>
>>519767795
The memeflaggot's place is beneath the nation representative too btw.
>>
File: dirndl.jpg (500 KB, 1280x854)
500 KB
500 KB JPG
>>519767317
Based deshod chad
>>
>>519768036
Hey I'm just pointing out your naivety. After all the trad crypto feminists who have been exposed lately, you're still willing to risk giving them the right to vote knowing they are the majority electorate? Sounds naive to me.
>>
>>519766661
>>519768232
thank you Lord for female beauty, help more women and girls Lord to know the truth in Jesus Christ, who created and knows all beauty in creation.
>>
File: 1758100362247845.png (68 KB, 333x314)
68 KB
68 KB PNG
>>519766661
Just impose a genuinely meritocratic order that only rewards ANYONE according to what they produce. Women will prove to be overwhelmingly useless in that arrangment and incapable of participating in public life anyway, we just need to prevent them from overturning or gaming the system
>>
>>519768347
>help more women and girls Lord to know the truth in Jesus Christ, who created and knows all beauty in creation.
>posts pic of pagans
>thinks what would actually be better is following the teachings of a mentally ill jew
>>
>>519766661
It's a maxim of law that women can not hold office, the maxims of law are the tenets of western civilization.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.