When does nepotism go form being ok to bad?
>>519810099Bad: Have existing employee train your son to do his job, and then fire the employee. (true story. I know the employee)Bad: Be CEO of a corporation that has three companies, military aircraft (McAir), civilian aircraft (Douglas) and computer services (McAuto). Put your worthless shit of a son in to run McAuto. Your pride and joy is the only one of the three companies to make a profit. "Why should I keep you other two companies around if my son is the only one who can make a profit?" You ask. "Let us buy our computer services on the open market, and we will show you who's not making a profit!" comes the answer from Douglas and McAir. Sure enough, an audit shows the worthless POS son was sucking up all the profits from McAir and Douglas. (true story, btw).
>>519810099Because if everything is on the down down, i would rather prefer my own blood over any redditor. Not just on the down down in a short time span but like really substantial.
>>519810099svengoolie?
>>519810823My post is asking when is nepotism ok and when is nepotism bad. It can be both >OkHiring your kid and having them prove themselves >Bad Hiring your dipshit kid as boss of your company after you dieThat's my opinion
>>519811001Sventoonie
>>519810699I agree with you
Good: you have four candidates for the job, your son, a tranny, a black and a pajeet.
>>519813058somebody has to do the job or take the hits, think it throughly and then come back
>>519810099 checked>when kikes do itGood>when goyim do itBadOnly they can have transgenerational wealth, anon.
