Why did British colonies become so successful while French/Spanish/Portuguese colonies are stuck in the third world?
>IndiaYou were saying?
>>519822717Quebec isn't third world
>>519822717>Calling yourself a successful british colony while you are nothing more than a Pajeet ethnostate nowIronic kek
>>519822717>>519822889>>519823020>>519823036guys guys guys do not fall for thisthis is a deliberate attempt at provocation posted with the intent to get reactionsplease plase please leave india out of this they dindu nuffin.
>>519822717>Why did British colonies become so successfulYou mean colonies where they transported Europeans. India, Africa and many other places colonized by the British are some of the worst shitholes on earth. If India had been colonized by Spain or Portugal - even France, it would've been a much better country.
>>519823204Brazilbro we should let these retards get replaced by pajeets while we enjoy our time here and remove Venecos ourselves.
>>519822717Because the 1 of the british colonies exterminated the natives and the other one held no ill will towards them.
>>519823381tomarei mate a isto
>>519822717for starters they went there to settle, not to exploit
>>519822717>Why did British colonies become so successful while define "successful"...have you been to a British colony lately? Are you sure you wouldn't like to reevaluate your premise?
>>519822717settler colonialism vs. extractive colonialism.british colonies that were never fully settled are 3rd world too.
>>519822717The English language increases your IQ.
>>519822717I don't think Bangladesh is a succesful place
>>519822717>stuck in the third worlddo you know what 'third world' means?
>>519824386>have you been to a British colony lately?1) They're still head and shoulders above Spanish, French and Portuguese colonies. 2) Any decline in former British colonies has been a result of impendence and lefties. Done it to themselves basically. Nice try faggot
>>519823020quebec is an anglo country larping as latinosthat's why they're not accepted as latin americans
>>519826915Brazil mogs your little Guyana hard, mate
The weather, and the terrain, and a slower growth rate, and the integration of natives which were of many many types, most of them quite stupid and savage, and slave niggers
>>519826915The UK is an example of a successful French colony
>>519822717Protestant work ethic.
>>519822717The spanish didnt fill the country with their own people.
The british wanted out of that shithole that bad
>>519826998People in Guyana have a GDP 3x that of Brazilians. There were 117 murders in Guyana in 2024, there were 38k murders in Brazil during 2024.
>>519822717>Why did British colonies become so successful while French/Spanish/Portuguese colonies are stuck in the third world?because those British colonies had either sparsely populated indigenous peoples are were wiped out by the plague.the few British colonies that had a sizeable amount of indigenous people turned into shit and the White colonists became extinct.See South Africa for such an example.
>>519826965>Quebecers larp as latinos What, you fucking Paco nigger, you need to stop spewing bullshitNigger
>>519822717The best argument I could come up for this is the quality of the natives, it's even more important than the resources found in the country.In Australia they exterminated them.In USA they exterminated them.In Africa they could not exterminate them.In south america:You can see, even with the US intervention and sabotage of local governments and historic fuckery, that the higher % of natives exterminated correlates with a better society.Argentina as bad as it is now, was the single best country, up until the 50s. I do not know about Chile, they are doing way better than most now, and so is Uruguay. I believe they didn't exterminate the natives as much which goes against this argument, but I am not sure.Naturally it falls within a lot of variables being the driver of success or failure, but this one I believe is an important one.
>>519822717Because brits murdered the natives and spaniards failed to completely mix with the natives
>>519822717Diaper cult and 200 years of normalized thievery. Before that, you have basically Spanish laws and institutions running everything smoothly. In the caribbean colonies were already struggling with the 322. At that time, kikes had already a strong grip on England, and the US, their peak creation, was set into motion to make things worse. Won't say it's not about the locals, but it is a custom crafted coffin for america.
>>519827582Upon further research it seems the extermination % is actually inverse with the success of the colonies.But another interesting thing is also related:The amount of miscegenation:Even if Haiti reports almost 100% extermination of natives, how come there are so many blacks?Turns out the extermination doesn't take into account the mixing.
The natives started outbreeding the Europeans happened in Argentina already over the 60's.Cut the welfareStop feeding the wildlife
>>519822717Demographics
