well /pol explain the political implications of generating CO2 when it's supposedly destroying our climatehttps://www.agriexpo.online/agricultural-manufacturer/co2-generator-4679.html
>>519840529Farming is such a climate sin that it's more climate holy to use an EV than pedal bikes with two people, because of the additional food needed and EV recuperation.
>>519840529CO2 is good for the plants and planktons. Not good for anything else.
>>519840529Farmers are scum. They regularly rape their own animals, use chemicals that castrate local men and spread cancer through airborne droplets. And we pay them to do this to us.No doubt they have machines just to fuck up local waterways and throw batteries into the sea on their regular holidays off while illegal immigrants come and do all the work
>>519840750True. But the issue is excess C02, which contributes to global greenhouse warming
>>519840529The implication is that we are the carbon they want to eliminate
>>519840805>excess C02Fake and gay
>>519840805Wrong retard
>>519840805Yes that's why I specified "Not good for anything else", Its fucking poisonous for us the animals and shits up the atmosphere but hey at-least the soibeans will be 1.5 times larger.
>>519840529The CO2 used to boost greenhouse yields is pretty fucking negligible compared to the literal billions of tons produced by industry.
I can't explain why OP is a faggot, sorry.
>>519840924yeah but the claim is to cut CO2 emission when this a literal machine that produces it, if it was a real concern they wouldn't focus on cars alone
>>519841208The point is you solve the bigger and easier to fix problems before you hammer down on smaller and harder to fix ones.CO2 generators are a negligible contribution while providing irreplaceable benefit.Cars produce a lot of CO2 and can be made more efficient while compromising little on performance. You're asking why the doctor isn't stitching a papercut on a man currently bleeding out from an axe wound.
>>519840805>excess breathing outKek
>>519841208>the claim is to cut CO2 emissionWho is making that claim and why?
>>519840805>plants inhale co2, they keep the C, they exhale the O2>CO2 helps the plants grow bigger>bigger plant, more CO2 inhaling, more O2 exhaling>what if we put more CO2 in the atmosphere?>plants will get bigger and consume more, so the CO2 will go back to normalwe are doomed
>>519840529co2 is kinda heavy so it stays close to the ground around the plants
>>519841431CO2 emission standards for cars have been the same for the last 20 years, if you really want to do a difference stop using combustion engines.but that won't happen until it's the year 2035,and still you're allowed to use them only if they are carbon neutral or produced prior to that.even then you're using petrol to make electricity for the EVs, and if the consumers change the car every 10 years or less it's kinda pointless
>>519840529>>519840750it sustains the life on earthearth had 4% CO2 at most. The world was a jungle then. It's 1/10th of that nowand 1/4th of current level would be the end of life on Earth.
>>519840529Farmers are useless. I get my food from the grocery store.
>>519841431>Cars produce a lot of CO2They really don't.
>>519841935Yeah, it's a slow process for a slew of obvious reasons.The main improvements have been made on the power generation and efficiency front. Industry got better at producing and using electricity without dumping as much CO2 into the atmosphere. And there's still improvements to be made.Note I'm not defending every single policy with the stated goal of managing climate change. Politicians are in charge of those and they are fully capable of being stupid, corrupt, and/or misguided.
>>519841663>they keep the C, they exhale the O2Wrong. Plants keep the CO2 and combine it with H from H2O and release the O2 from the split water.
>>519840529It's a $cam.Plant more trees morans.
>>519842147About 10% of anthropogenic CO2.It's a much bigger share than fucking CO2 generators.
>>519840750yea what have plants ever done for me
>>519840916>Not good for anything elseYeah, because lush vegetation across the entire planet is such a bad thing for us and the animals, you absolute fucking moron.
>>519840805Here's a hint, they lied to youClimate taxes are whats destroying the economy and leaching money to the top percentage of people
>>519842194Anon, wut?
>>519840529Can do the same thing on a smaller scale just by growing mushrooms inside your grow area.
>>519842581That anon's correct.CO2 is combined with hydrogen to form carbohydrates.The O2 comes from the water they consume.
>>519840529It absolutely boggles me that people talk about CO2 being some sort of greenhouse gas when it has basically zero greenhouse effect whatsoever. It must be the greatest psyop ever perpetrated - even more than the saturated fat bad psyop - since it has been internalised by 99% of the population even so-called sceptics.CO2 is vital for life on earth. Historically it is higher than it is now. In the last ice age it was 6x higher. In the Cambrian Explosion it was 20x higher. It has no effect on temperature, but rather it's pretty clear that temperature has an effect on CO2 in the atmosphere. The reason you've been psyopped into believing complete horseeshit is because carbon is a proxy for natural farming and industrial activity. If you want to attack a people, what better way to destroy them than to convince them that a natural way of life is destroying the earth and that they should instead eat leaves, have no kids, and defer all their economic activity to outsiders.
>>519840529Governments and corporations love talking about CO2 instead of addressing actual environmental issues. It is just the puppet show they put on to distract you from companies like Dupont poisoning literally everything.>>519840916Your body absorbs 0 CO2 from the atmosphere. It is almost completely inert retard. I could put you in a room that is 79% CO2 and 21% O2 and you would be just fine.
Can someone fine that Meme that the earth Loves CO2 and then they end the interview? That made it all it home for most people.
>>519840805It'd only be "excess" in a small area, but the global wind currents make sure the overall CO2 in the atmosphere ultimately evens out across the planet.The planet needs to warm to keep the cycle up. Though I'd say we do need better fuel than oil, and these hippy methods aren't working.None of these current energy systems give us enough payout vs what we put in. Lots of energy is still lost to the systems producing them.Yes the planet is experiencing "climate change" because it always does. I can't really call you a retard because we're all retarded monkeys on this monkey jungle prison, but c'mon man, do a little research on the numbers they feed you and who puts them out and what they stand to gain for lying.(Spoilers: they have a lot to gain about lying)Again, oil sucks, but these guys saying "muh CO2" are just as rotten.They're creating a false dichotomy as bread and circus to fool you into thinking it's one or the other when we should be ditching their whole shitty system altogether. Sadly they keep killing anyone who does, surprise surprise.
>>519842859CO2 is one of the most variable freenhouse gasses. Other, stronger, ghg's like water vapor tend to follow rises in CO2 due to various positive feedback mechanisms. The air can hold more water vapor the higher the temperature is, for example.>Historically it is higher than it is now.Historically there isn't usually any ice at all at the Earth's poles.>In the last ice age it was 6x higherThis claim is outright false. Like genuinely retarded.>>519842908>I could put you in a room that is 79% CO2 and 21% O2 and you would be just fineCO2 is highly toxic at like 10% concentration, retard.
>>519843225Even if you believe jewgle search results that say the last ice age was 200ppm vs our "426ppm" now, it's still not enough to suddenly cause massive concern.What you should be truly concerned about are all the other nasty components in industrial waste.Do some studies on what the primary agitators in the air are in the #1 polluted place on the whole planet: China. Once you study what their city smog is primarily made out of, you'll know exactly what the actual problems are.(It's not CO2).Maybe you need to refocus your optics back onto what's actually happening, and look at what people in other parts of the world are doing, if you can't see it in-front of your face.
>>519840750>and planktonsThe little bastards love it up until the ocean is acidified and they start croaking.
>>519842748>>519842194sorry, I didn't write the entire process of photosynthesis.
>>519840529Co2 is what plants and trees eat. Stop believing the MSM, you fucking retard
>>519842859>It must be the greatest psyop ever perpetratedI always like it when some random clown on 4chain claims to have overturned decades of scientific research, while providing no evidence whatsoever.
>>519842859/thread
>>519840529Yeah imagine pumping greenhouse gasses in a greenhouse.....
>>519841431CO2 control is a globohomo scam to destroy the birthrate in europe, it was the excuse for de industrialization.
>>519840805But if CO2 is heavier than oxygen and all of the plants are on the ground, how does it cause global warming?
>>519840529"Climate change" is a satanic inversion of the truth to being about the conditions that will destroy the planet so they can associate our freedoms with destroying the planet this justifying it.
>>519846091>CO2 control is a globohomo scam to destroy the birthrate in europemulticulturalism, climate change is a scare tactic
