[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is there so much occultism in the entertainment industry? Feels like a bunch of tryhards
>>
When Mel didn't add the Greek inscription on the True Cross in the Passion, that's when I knew he was with the Fourth Crusaders
>>
>>519853705
Because occultism has to do with symbols and gestures. Symbols and gestures can be used for identification and identity. And people lacking in true self-identity love symbols and they love the occult if you offer it to them, because they get to feel like a real person with enough pageantry and symbol games. They depend on it like opiate.

So why entertainment industry? Why actors, singers, performers? Because think about what type of person they are. They exist to mimic and emulate other characters, they exist to perform emotions they don’t actually authentically possess. They are people who don’t have a true self identity, so they got really, really good at performing like they do to compensate. They can cry on demand, laugh on demand, and genuinely trick themselves to believe fantasy as reality whenever it suits them. So naturally, they love symbols & the occult because it encourages and even rewards such a way of ‘life’, to have no life but throw up signs and symbols that you do.

Tl;Dr there’s actually a strong correlation with entertainers and borderline personality disorder, a disorder where the sufferer feels they don’t know who they are inside, but are really great at mimicry and falsifying their own emotions. And they are very much drawn to identity games, and occultism and symbolism does exactly that for them.
>>
>>519854338
This brit i think we met before on here. Christ is King.

Directors are acting as a god, deciding who lives and who dies in film. Quentin taratino is a particularly evil fake god
>>
>>519853705
they get money for doing nothing, like enormous amounts of money, so they start to think it's because they are special people because some feel little guilty at times that they make an average ten yearly incomes just by showing their face. so they turn to crazy shit like occultism, it's the same behavior as people who are royal or just inherit large fortunes, or people who have lived long enough with vast sums of money. I think it's almost basic human behavior to start thinking you're special or some other strange belief
>>
>>519854338
idk man, i should've emphasized that this illuminarty shizz got more on-the-nose in the late 20th century and 21st century
it wasnt always like this. like i cant show you any pic of Buster Keaton doing shit like that, i dont think people in the past cared that much. now they're all trying too hard to be 2edgy4me
>>
File: newhaircut.jpg (29 KB, 770x482)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>519853705
Religion is a method of binding different people.
Creating a hierarchy, gives the one who creates it, control over adherents.
Success then hinges on obedience, rather than talent.
So to gain access to opportunities for advancement, one must show understanding and obedience to the controller. This is done using symbols, rituals, and preaching. This is why performers are often called "Meat Puppets", or why most people are considered "Sheep"... They must "sell their soul"....Give up their autonomy, to have the fame and fortune they're after.
>>
>>519854564
Christ is King, and I believe we have yes.

Here’s a neat occultism observation for you.
>The occultist poses with one hand over the eye

It has to do with the left-hand path vs. right-hand path.

Left hand path = Worldly, self-interested, materialistic, self-master & power driven

Right hand path = ‘Heavenly’, other-interested, spiritual/aesthetic, self-sacrificial & ‘peace’ driven.

If the celebrity or occultist is covering an eye using a right hand, they are declaring “I am right hand path.” If a celebrity throws up a left-hand over their eye, the message is “I am left hand path.”

Rarer still, the celebrity/occultist who covers both eyes with both hands, the implication is they reconciled the right with the left. They are “both-hand path/masters of the occult”. They blind their own worldly eyes, but the implication is they ‘see’ out of their third eye, using the light of their own mind.

Three stages or tiers if you will. Left hand, right hand, two-hand.

Left hand = Hylic (The one who lives as the body)
Right hand = Psychic (The one who lives as the Mind)
Both hands = Pneumatic. (The one who lives as neither, lives as spirit).

They do this to identify themselves, to themselves, to others who partake of it, to create a rank and file order among themselves
>>
>>519853705
That's just to show if they are evil (left hand path) or not(right hand path)
>>
>>519854338
No one has a "true" self-identify. The "self" is a conceptual construct - it's an idea that aggregates the competing drives and impulses of your body into something resembling a cohesive unity so that consciousness is able to persist through time and corrective learning , through causal thinking, can occur.

Change this or that part of the brain enough, "you" become like a different person. Events can and do change personality, memory, behavior, perception - all the things that make you "you". So maybe the occultists you describe are not playing catchup with self-identify, but rather they are awake to the nature of self-identity as mutable and contingent, while you are playing catchup continuing to mistake the map for the territory; the ego/self-image for the "real" or "highest" self.

The contempt you have for these people leaks from every other sentence like blood from an arterial wound. Since you provide little or only poor reasoning yet speak so confidently in your assertions, I suspect that your reasoning is motivated by this contempt and not the other way around.

Embracing the role of self-construction and employing all the alchemical tools available is, in fact, based.
>>
>>519853958
I always remember INRI on the Crucifix
I'm also Catholic so maybe it's different for Orthodox Christians. But be that as it may, the Apostolic Churches are in communion so it doesn't matter that much
Also obligatory, Enrico Dandolo did nothing wrong
The IV Crusade was self-inflicted
>>
>>519856507
Yeah, and so was 9/11
>>
>>519856632
Most likely
Empires on autopilot go off the rails
>>
>>519853705
because the devil needs souls and there's none better than those who have influence and status in society they way celebrities do
>>
>>519856325
>No one has a "true" self-identify. The "self" is a conceptual construct - it's an idea that aggregates the competing drives and impulses of your body into something resembling a cohesive unity so that consciousness is able to persist through time and corrective learning , through causal thinking, can occur.

Everyone has a true self. That true self is the likeness of God. The worldly self, as you so wonderfully deconstructed there, is transient, yes. A false existence that masks the Truth.

>So maybe the occultists you describe are not playing catchup with self-identify, but rather they are awake to the nature of self-identity as mutable and contingent, while you are playing catchup continuing to mistake the map for the territory;
They aren't even playing catch-up. They discard one mask for another, one face for another. Whether they are aware they do this is irrelevant, the fact remains that without the masks, they do not see their own face. A void instead.

>The contempt you have for these people leaks from every other sentence like blood from an arterial wound. Since you provide little or only poor reasoning yet speak so confidently in your assertions, I suspect that your reasoning is motivated by this contempt and not the other way around.

I don't have contempt for them, I have contempt for their dilemma. The same way I'd feel contempt for barbed wire that ensnares a brother or sister.

>Embracing the role of self-construction and employing all the alchemical tools available is, in fact, based.

Based on what? The answer you will say is 'Based on the self'. Which you already reduce down to illusion. Which means it is a road with a dead end, a void.
>>
File: muttlandia.jpg (301 KB, 1233x1241)
301 KB
301 KB JPG
>>519856325
>No one has a "true" self-identify. The "self" is a conceptual construct
"Self" is the thing that thinks. The only real identity someone has, outside of that, is their genetic belonging. Everything else is superficial, such as nations, religions, fraternities, factions, and so forth.
This is why globohomo promotes race-mixing, and denies the idea that there is a "self", and a God-given genetic identity, in order to destroy it, so they can redefine it, and therefore control it.
>>
>>519857645
>>muh racial purity
>t. the neandethal admixtured mongrel
wignats are fucking pathetic
>>
File: IMG_3173.png (116 KB, 454x453)
116 KB
116 KB PNG
>>519856325
How does one change themselves for the better? How does one get more positive and less caring what others think?

How does one become closer to their true self?
>>
>>519858014
By letting go of yourself. Maximize faith over control. Consider it a matter of two worlds: The inner world (what one may call the self) and the outer world (what one may consider the non-self/reality).

The inner world cannot be understood or identified without the outer. And vice versa.

So then, the self should be regarded as a stone of marble. And you want to chisel this marble into shape. The marble cannot use its own marble to chisel itself. It requires an outside force to break it and chip at it, then the image beneath becomes revealed.

So the direction is to not depend on your inner self, your marble, to sculpt your self. Allow the outer world to do this for you.
This is called experience. Experience is what brings wisdom, and it is wisdom that allows you to see. So seek wisdom, lots of it, as King Solomon advises, chase after it as though it was rubies or gemstones. Go after it like silver or gold, and you will see.
>>
>>519853705
They think they're summoning Satan, but they're in for a surprise.
>>
File: burgerlandian.jpg (463 KB, 1680x1050)
463 KB
463 KB JPG
>>519857769
>races don't exist
>t. raceless mutt
>>
>>519858502
Great advice. So going outside and getting beat up by life is how your chisel yourself into something beautiful, but what is you create something ugly, chisel yourself into destruction, how do you go about making the right hammer blows on the marble?

And king solomon, isnt that what the jews worship? The temple of solomon aswell?
>>
>>519861136
>Great advice. So going outside and getting beat up by life is how your chisel yourself into something beautiful, but what is you create something ugly, chisel yourself into destruction.

You will not create something ugly or chisel yourself into destruction, because it’s not you who does the chiselling you see? Reality does. You hand that chisel over to someone or something else.

>how do you go about making the right hammer blows on the marble?

So the question is not how do you go about making the right hammer blows. The question is, to whom do you entrust that chisel to? To mankind? To the world? To yourself? Or to God? That’s the choice, brotha. And to entrust the chisel and to pass it, that action is called faith. Whatever you put your faith into will shape what you are in the long-term. Evaluate what this means for each choice.

Choosing mankind means becoming as good or and as corrupt. Choosing the world is likewise, choosing yourself sounds wise, but be careful, many men dissolve their souls in their attempt. Since a man with no foundation cannot build, only sink. Giving it to God however, that can either mean infinite misery, or infinite glory. It will include both. One thing is for sure, it means infinite growth. No dead-ends.

>And king solomon, isnt that what the jews worship? The temple of solomon aswell?

King Solomon is known for a lot. Seven hundred wives, three hundred concubines, and had practiced sorcery, and lots of it. His wisdom did not come from himself. His wisdom happened after God had transformed his wickedness into wisdom. Solomon is the man who has been around the block, knows how to avoid evil because evil is what he had done, and from this, he tells us what not to do.

The book of Proverbs in the Bible was King Solomon’s work.
>>
>>519856886
That void is the very substrate upon which we project meaning. Nihilism is a precondition for existential freedom. Obviously, I don't believe in your God, and I don't believe in this "other world" you propose either. I believe that those beliefs are human structures of meaning projected over the world we actually perceive with our senses; illusion and reality are one in this scenario, because what you understand to be "real" is the combination of what you physically perceive and how you frame that within your worldview. In your case, it's a worldview that rejects the reality of the world it sees in favor of these abstract, constructed beliefs and norms that exist solely in the mind, believing those to be the "true" reality instead.

People like me and those celebrities are those who have encountered this view I just described and found it far more plausible than your weird philosophical inversion of a worldview.
>>
>>519858014
>How does one change themselves for the better?
Discover what you'll accept as "better" and put it in clear terms, then approach everything you do in life with a strategy that serves the goal of your life matching those terms. It feels like describing basic cause and effect, honestly.
>How does one get more positive and less caring what others think?
Solitude. Isolation. Endure the pain of living without others warmth and you will be forced to find the will to live in sourves that are independent from other people. Then, your well-being will not depend on how others view you, so they will not have so much influence over your thinking and behaviors; and your focus will be on things that matter to you without others' input.
>How does one become closer to their true self?
Your "true self" is what you are from birth to death - the sum total of everything you ever did. Therefore, your "true self" is yet to be revealed in full, and you get to play a big part in how that unfolds; that is, if you acknowledge that you have this power in the first place. Some anons don't seem to like that idea. They would prefer their purpose to be given to them by others. We need those types too.
>>
>>519861985
Solomon handed over the ark of the convenant to a nubian kween that suckd his balls dry

>>519856325
Babys first theseus ship
>>
>>519862248
>That void is the very substrate upon which we project meaning.
You see it as a canvas, as a painter sees a blank sheet to draw upon, yes?

>I believe that those beliefs are human structures of meaning projected over the world we actually perceive with our senses
So you are then bound to your own rule, those beliefs are simply those who took the brush to the canvas, just as what you would do.

>In your case, it's a worldview that rejects the reality of the world it sees in favor of these abstract, constructed beliefs and norms that exist solely in the mind, believing those to be the "true" reality instead.

So do you paint over the canvas, or do you not?

>People like me and those celebrities are those who have encountered this view I just described and found it far more plausible than your weird philosophical inversion of a worldview.
It would not be an inversion of a worldview, but actually its completion. You say the world is a necessary nihilistic void that serves as precondition for existential freedom, to presumably, create. Then O.K. Exercise that freedom, tell a tale, a story, spin a yarn and paint a picture. If one paints a picture of God, then where is the fault, in your own framework?

I am saying that the void isn’t as empty as you think. When we paint over it, we paint over the pathway towards God. Jump in that void, and see who is on the other end is what I’d say.
>>
>>519853705
Paganini, Robert Johnson, probably lots of others, sold their souls to the devil. It's just part of the biz.
>>
>>519862809
>Solomon handed over the ark of the convenant to a nubian kween that suckd his balls dry

We know who the Ark of the Covenant is, she has a name. Inside of the Ark, her body, was carried God’s own enlightenment in the form of flesh. You know her name. Hint: ‘Star of the sea’.
>>
File: IMG_1172.jpg (178 KB, 741x1024)
178 KB
178 KB JPG
>>519853705
Because they’re all active practitioners of occult magic. The entertainment industry is actually a massive occult ritual projection where deception and manipulation spells are woven into the fabric of broadcasts, films, and tell-a-vision. Fear based mind control is one of their go-to weapons against us. Occult magic aimed at the public is always fear based mind control, prying at insecurity (make up, ozempic, vaxx updates), and lust provocation. The magic they practice behind closed doors and in their shrines/groves is even more diabolical and involves the consumption of children to sustain their wicked existence. Ari Aster is very open in his occult knowledge and showcases it in his films, similarly “Weapons” and “Doctor Sleep” are some of the most accurate representations of occult witchcraft and what a real witch is/how they operate. Nearly every population’s mythology discusses witchcraft. There is a reason why witchcraft has always been closely associated with the murder of children for a very very long time. These rumors and stories of old are always rooted in a long forgotten truth. They still exist, just secretly, and the population is so hex’d that they can flash their symbols on live television and no one even so much as questions why the fuck they just made a strange hand symbol, etc. I recall Christy Teagan laughing and saying how the best or most wild sex party she was at was at the Obama’s before being hushed by her handlers. Of course they’re try hards - they all made pacts with the devil, and if they die they will face judgement. How then do they prolong their life? The consumption of children, and they’ll continue to destroy moral fabric of the world so that Satan may rule over it. That is the ultimate purpose of the mass media - mind control via witchcraft and to turn every church into a brothel.
>>
>>519853705
the major art director and stylists in the late 90s in LA, who worked at the most popular magazines were members of a sort of cult, but really a social scene where they were into occult things and put the symbolism into their projects. after a few years of this it became more mainstream and became a source of material which less creative people could draw from and copy.
i wish i could remember the names of any of them and any of the magazines of the time, but i can't.
there is some seriously weird and disgusting things going on in LA and the Hollywood industry, but a lot of the occult pictures, the symbolism, has become de rigueur in that world to show you fit in.
not denying they aren't sacrificing people at altars and doing sex magick, but the original reason the occult symbolism is in magazines goes back to that cult like group of art directors and stylists.
>>
>>519853705
The photographers tell them to do this.
Ask yourselves who the photographers were, and who they worked for.
>>
File: 1732080450503424.png (1.04 MB, 698x840)
1.04 MB
1.04 MB PNG
>>519855256
finally a proper explanation for the one-hand symbolysm, thanks anon. also Christ is King!
>>
File: 1744067514062493.jpg (142 KB, 700x700)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
bumping the only thread thats of substance on this dumpster fire of a board



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.