>nuclear powered cargo ships There I fixed your pollution problems. You can stop crying about cars now The 8 larger cargo ships create more pollution than all the world’s cars combined
>female indian drives it into the george washington bridge at mach 5 and turns manhattan into a crateri don't actually care about that though, i hope the world goes nuclear
>>519854732>russian shadow fleet is now a global network of dirty bombssounds like fun
>>519854875>>519855069No such thing
>>519854732>There I fixed your pollution problems.Thank you sir! I will promote you for Nobel prize.
>>519854732so long as they can actually arm themselves to repel pirates trying to steal them for ransom or whatever then sure, why not? makes so much sense it will probably neve rhappen
>>519854732I have a better solution:Nuclear powered slave ships
>>519854732This is not gonna change the shitty air in every city.Btw who give a shit, only monkeys today live in cities
>>519854732But then what would they do with all the bunker oil? They aren't just going to throw it away
>>519855329Dump it into the ocean
>>519855329inject it into the ground
>>519854732>nuclear reactors on cargo ships>pajeet crew causes a meltdown in Baltimore harbor>violent steam explosion spews radioactive water all over the city>all the niggers dieand the left lied that nuclear energy was a bad thing
>>519854732>The 8 larger cargo ships create more pollution than all the world’s cars combinedNo way these things have like 100 MW, car has 10 kW or so, 24 hours vs 1 hour, it's like two million cars or so, six million worst case.
>>519854732Cars are polluting where people live, retard.
>>519856344think of the whales
>>519856206OK, I repent. It's not "pollution", aka the climate boiling scam, OP meant actual pollution, for which it is true.
>>519854732have you seen how poorly literally any maritime shipping company handles maintenance on their vessels? i'm sure they'll handle nuclear just as well.
>>519856652clearly they'd need to be held to higher standards in order to run such a vessel. would be interesting to see if the economics of a nuclear powered ship would make the extra investment and everything involved worth while. imagine not needing to source any fuel for the next 10 years or whatever....thats got be worth something. they could probably run faster too, cutting transit times.
>>519856206>>519856474get a load of this smart ass
Manufacture stuff in your own country.There, I fixed cargo ship, employment, polution, and many other problems. I can't fix the fact that OP is a faggot.
>>519854732Even MORE problems when a shitskin jeeto crashes the next ship into a bridge.
>>519858855nuclear powered ships wouldnt even notice that shit. just power right on through. fuck yeah
>>519855304i’ll one up you with nuclear powered gas chambers, checkmate
>>519859172and i'll go you up one more with nuclear powered masturbation machines. double check and mate 5 games in advance
>>519854732>The 8 larger cargo ships create more pollution than all the world’s cars combinedthat's not true.the article that comes from only tracks a single form of pollution, sulfur oxideyou fucking retards have been repeating this lie for two decades now
>>519854732>>nuclear powered cargo ships>>>Dude in the middle of the ocean, salt water everywhere>>>Dude has never heard of electrolysis>>>Dude wants to sell Yellow Cake instead
>>519854732Pollution is just an excuse to shut down global trade in order to lower peoples standards of living to encourage depopulation. Consumers are not needed in a world replacing them with machine labor. Consumers just waste resources and make lots of trash. The machines can find them talented people to maintain the machines. Everyone else will be a small maintenance population.
