As long as the lawn is a vegetable garden OR hosts one fruit/nut bearing tree, this is the perfect set up.
>>51986290050000x overpopulated
this is incredibly land inefficientso on average, the distance people need to travel is fartherso you have to driveso everyone drivesso the roads need to be wider, and buildings need big parking lots and drivewaysso things get more spread outso the distances people drive are longerso the roads need to become wider
>>519862900where's the low income housing? where's the community help center? where is the Slop and Urban Decay?
>>519863201>where's the low income housing?Africa.
>>519863153maybe there should just be less people then. humans are not meant to be crammed into towering apartment blocks like dogs in a kennel.
>>519863359Correct. Deport all non-whites from North America. Then begin a gradual depopulation, not with sinister vaccines but tax incentives for only having 1-2 children. The goal is to reach a population where everyone can have 40 acres.
>>519862900>first time playing Cities Skylines
>>519863359even if you have a country with a total population of 1 million or 100 million, the fact that low density is incredibly inefficient standseconomic hubs, cities, should be denser so that walking and public transit is viable(obviously this doesn't apply to literal farmers)examples:pre-1960's north americaall of europe and asia for all of human history
>>519863201>Where's the low income housingLouisiana
>>519863776Pre-1960s North America was considerably less urbanized than it is today, as was Europe and literally every country on the planet. What you desire is what we have now and it's a collection of sardine can shitholes with one pretty district for the tourists. Take a trip to rural America and see where once thriving towns have been reduced to a bunch of crumbling buildings with plywood instead of windows. All because you got what you wanted - megacities (and because of Nafta but that's a subject for another discussion.)
