What is the possibility that the small-brained, half-sentence race-baiting enticements to violence on this website stem from secret societies and government intelligence agencies themselves? Think about it: if one person is conned into killing a bunch of people, sure it's a temporary L, but the media fallout will be a W, in the end. What if it turned out that some of the dumber antisemitic encouragements to violence came from Mossad itself? Would you put such a thing past them?... I mean, it seems to be a meme here that Feds encourage Whites to attack us or others...Just be wary of those who fan the flames.I grew up in a pretty Jewish area, and I'm not about to throw my friends under the bus. But if the circumcisions continue, it's going to be hard for us to hang out.
>>519874790*incitements
>>519874790Bump
>>519874790>sure it's a temporary L, but the media fallout will be a W, in the endI encourage violence specifically against you
>>519875150Allow me to clarify what I said. It's a figure of speech known as "invoking the speaking manner of another person." In this case, I myself was not lauding how the ends justify the means, with regards to intelligence agencies encouraging people to be violent. In this case, I was putting myself in their shoes for a moment, in order to try to understand how their twisted minds could work, that would lead them to encourage people to be violent. I could go on, but I hope you understand that I myself am not encouraging violence in any way, shape, or form. I merely am trying to understand how they could rationalize such policies.
i'm forced to wonder why nobody ever decides to flip out and kill judges, or lawyers, or senators. it's always some dumb bitch or some sorry sap at the grocery store.really makes you think.
>>519875615Shalom, Fed! I hope the donuts are piping hot this morning!
>>519874790>secret societiesMore like hate groups that are bored and want to troll>government intelligence agenciesDefinitely Russia and Israel
>>519875437>invokingWhy do zoomers spam this word? And I think what you mean is you were 'speaking to your audience'>>519875615Violence is wrong. It doesn't lead anywhere good for anyone—it just creates cycles of violence.
>>519874790are leg holsters decent for open carry? any decent protection against from snatching it out of the holster? i know police holsters require a certain movement pattern before it allows the gun to be pulled out
>>519876056*emulating, sorry I haven't slept much.emulate: To strive to equal or to excel in qualities or actions; to imitate, with a view to equal or to outdo, to vie with; to rival.
>>519874790Name 5 revolutions or massive changes to social order that transpired without violence or threat of it.
>>519876180Name 5 people in the First World who don't sit atop a mountain of violence
>>519876171If you're writing like that because you assume your audience will better understand it, that's called speaking to your audience. It's a general phrase that is used to describe this technique in persuasive writing. This used to be taught in public school...
>>519876269No results for that phrase. I'm not a Zoomer, B. T. W.
>>519876180You're conflating state level conflicts with individual violence. There were a lot of failed communist revolutions, for example, around the time of the red revolution—you just don't hear about those as much. And all of that involved huge numbers of organized people working as essentially a government of their own, not lone wolf psychos shooting at innocent people. Incitement to violence in a place like this is pretty alarming.
>>519876269I wasn't writing like that so that my audience would "better understand it." I was emulating the thought process of a Fed, and speaking as he or she would have spoken, in an attempt to understand how he or she could rationalize encouraging people to be violent. Word on the street is that they are above the law, B. T. W.
>>519876449Not all violent movements are successful, but literally every movement to have ever been successful was violent.
>>519876436I just assumed you were since 'the phrase 'invoke' has caught on in "video essay" circles, lol. One thing that disturbs me about AI is that it defines reality for people who haven't yet been exposed to a concept. And now that search engines are shifting from original content sources to amalgamated AI sources, there's a feedback loop that causes trends and recent popular ideas to take precedence over classical knowledge in what you are shown when doing surface level research online.I recommend picking up some old dictionaries and encyclopedias from the 40's and 50's. They're still somewhat easy to come by and the information in them is pretty surprising compared to what you'll find online and in popular consciousness nowadays. It's important to remember that certain info never really becomes 'outdated'.
>>519876656Pretty much all of those successful revolutions involved what you might call dissident governments. These are not just a ragtag bunch of autists, they are well organized, intelligent people operating a state within a state. Even FARC, for example, wasn't just a bunch of savages in the hinge—they had accountants keeping books on kidnapping revenue, lol
>>519876894>in the hingein the jungle*
>>51987479075% of all burgers have the mark of infinite dishonesty. When 3/4 of your population has been molested by a Jew at birth it's not hard to see that you're simply outnumbered op, you are the Mossad Jews and your constant finger fucking of foreign elections is exactly the Jew behaviour that the normies have started to (((notice))) in your longbeak overlords.Until the burger expunges the Jew, every last one, no burger can be trusted
