[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G4PtuhlWQAA03S-.jpg (83 KB, 1080x442)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
So this missile can loiter for months 3 seconds from Washington or other cities, and MAGATS cant do shit.

Z
>>
>>519919151
We probably have rods of God.
>>
>>519919151
Why is Russia so based?
>>
>>519919151
Cool story. Why russians are so dumb?
>>
Why would they admit they have a weapon like this? Why not keep it secret?
>>
>>519919531
It's a deterrence weapon, so you want other people to know you have it, and that it works.

Same reason why North Korea is constantly demonstrating the abilities of their nuclear program.
>>
>>519919531
When you are weak, appear strong.
>>
>>519919584
Deterrence from what? They already have nukes and ICBMs.
>>
>>519919531
Nukes only work as a deterrent. If they ever start flying for real, they're all going to fly pretty quick and no sane person wants that. I don't see these things being that practical unless they're going to be sending them on patrols around the north pole or some shit.
>>
>>519919680
It's an intermediate step.

When you launch a ballistic missile, it's game over, because you are committed to destruction.

With this weapon, you can launch it and have it make circles above the Atlantic ocean for a few days while you pick your phone and call Macron or Trump for final negotiations.
>>
>>519919651
yeah, i think you're missing the point. they can't do anything against the drone because it doesn't have a pilot. even if it was shot down by a patriot missile or something, the drone would just fly to another area and continue its mission
>>
>>519919151
They spew massive amounts of radiation. Its an air cooled open core reactor thingy. Its retarded. Americans dropped their design in the 1950s because its retarded.

This bs together with their Poseidon torpedo is just nuclear terrorism
>>
>>519919151
now russia can export it to countries so they can send him his booze extra quick
>>
>>519919904
34 minutes from kola to Washington with an icbm

Unchanged since the 60s. Nuclear deterrence hasn't changed other than billions spent on interceptor programs with bad odds
>>
>>519920157
If the drone is shot down the drone will fly somewhere else?
>>
>>519920175
Shouldn't that make it easy to detect and so shot down?
>>
>>519920316
Detect, yes (but that's a feature, because you want Americans to know you've actually launched it).

Shoot down, not really, because the radiation is spread all over the place.
>>
>>519919584
>>519920138
>>519920422

why they hire dumb people like you?
>>
>>519920175
>Its an air cooled open core reactor thingy.
No it isn't, it is a closed system, not air cooled
>>
>>519920316
No, it flies close to the ground, and can be fired from pretty much everywhere
>>
>>519919293
nope
>>
>>519919151
Russia knows their missiles
>>
File: 1730803432210689.jpg (89 KB, 767x1024)
89 KB
89 KB JPG
Look up the armament American nuclear subs carry

FAFO
>>
>>519920512
Looks pretty open to me
>>
>>519919293
Waste of resources when a missile is more efficient
>>
File: IMG_6959.jpg (42 KB, 720x405)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>519919531
>Why not keep it secret?
>>
>>519920512
Oh wait i said open core, its not. But it spews radiation like mad
>>
>>519920687
It does not. The first attempts at making something like this did, but this one does not, as the nuclear reactor is a closed system. The earlier ones did because they used air to cool, and that air was contaminated with radiation.
>>
File: IMG_36251[1].jpg (107 KB, 1000x667)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>519920680
Because Russias defence strategy is based on keeping up a tough facade, the second it met a real country on the battlefield it'd be in for a real bad time. Probably still win in the end unless it's China or something due to eternal human waves.
Basically a armed forces doctrine inspired by the tale of Potemkin village
>>
>>519919151
If Trump doesn't calm down and starts focusing in unfucking the USA instead of fucking with other countries and doing the kike's bidding, Putin is gonna genocide the Americans. He doesn't want to but he will when he loses hope that Americans can change.
>>
File: IMG_4930.gif (2.03 MB, 320x180)
2.03 MB
2.03 MB GIF
>>519920549
From pretty much everywhere?
>>
>>519919151
>>
>>519920834
Meant for >>519919531
>>
>>519920286
A cruise missile like this could theoretically fly forever and avoid detection completely. Allowing Russia to completely bypass US defense.
>>
>>519920818
It's been a while since i read about it. They issued warnings in norway due to our proximity to the test site and possible fallout from testing
>>
>>519919151
didnt ukrainians just drone strike moscow last night? is this going to be the new gigacope from bot accounts pumping AI videos on social media now
>>
File: Smol Anne.jpg (446 KB, 1355x1996)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
>>519919151

You can't possibly fucking believe this. I realize that you potatoniggers are basically Sub-Saharan Africans in terms of IQ, but even you can't be this stupid.
>>
>>519920965
>undetected
>leaves a trail of glowing radioactive exhaust
>>
>>519920818
>It does not. The first attempts at making something like this did, but this one does not, as the nuclear reactor is a closed system.
you are a retarded shill
the missile doesn't exist you pathetic retarded turd
>>
>>519919151
he knows he's going to become the leader after putin dies and he will nuke the west
>>
>>519919651
Is that why the US is posturing so much lately?
>>
>>519920849
ICBMs require launch pads, which are tracked by satellites. Not this one.
>>
"The Skyfall is a uniquely stupid weapon system, a flying Chernobyl that poses more threat to Russia than it does to other countries," said Thomas Countryman, a former top State Department official with the Arms Control Association, referring to the 1986 nuclear plant disaster.

The missile's nuclear engine poses a threat of radiation release along its flight path, and its deployment carries the risk of an accident, which could contaminate the surrounding region.

According to U.S. sources, only two of the missile's thirteen tests have ended in partial success. In 2019, one of them ended in an explosion and the deaths of five Rosatom employees.

Some experts argue that the nuclear-powered missile is not so much a technological achievement as a political tool. Putin needs it to strengthen his image as an authoritarian leader capable of threatening the civilized world.

Source: https://reuters.com/world/europe/us-researchers-find-probable-launch-site-russias-new-nuclear-powered-missile-2024-09-02/
>>
>>519919151
Who is this meant to impress? Pajeets?
>>
>>519921099
God i wish, no more cucktin and we would get based madman Medvedchad. But no, the next one will be some no name guy who will carry on Putin work,
>>
>>519921238
its pretty well established at this point that russias time as any kind of military power is long gone. they will exist mostly sperging out on the internet while a third world country like ukraine drone strikes moscow and refineries day after day after day
>>
>>519921336
We were missing the resident poleshit seething about Russia
>>
>>519920965
Us defense has what? 500 interceptors with a 50-50 success rate?

This weapon has obvious benefits if it doesn't blanket everything with radiation making its use an act of terror and self harm.

>>519921218
It flying at cruise missile speeds it should be easier to shoot down than an icbm from a mobile launcher no?

Tracking is an obvious issue but would you consider it a first strike weapon?
>>
File: 1736890778958865.gif (890 KB, 245x180)
890 KB
890 KB GIF
>>519919151
Shut the fuck up and send it already,fucking jews!
>>
>>519921218
BS. there are mobile launched ICBMs as well.
>>
Strange how they can’t get any further than their own border without experiencing megadeath then isn’t it.
>media thrills ‘n spills
>Russia mighty
>bhrappy
Teehee. Russia wouldn’t have atomics if it wasn’t for the central bankers, the Rothschild family to be precise who should be exterminated, eradicated with any tools for the task.
Sadly asia is a turd. Russia is a turd too. A miserable one. The axis of lying, i’m gonna go ahead and identify Russia, then china and supoopower mighty Bhrappy as the axis of buggers. Ooh you bugger. You bugger.
Bugger.
Oooough you buggers.
>>
File: 454b9514d6ae2d2a.jpg (23 KB, 435x448)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>519919151
Ahhh yes the next wonder weapon. Just like T-14 Armata.
>>
>>519921336
russians are their own greatest enemies!
they will nuke self!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident
>>
>>519921384
man its not working anymore. russian immigrants living abroad in other countries running damage control just doesn't interest anyone. you can use your AI bot accounts like Lord Bebo or Spetznaz07 but all the engagement you get are just buttblasted indians bobvageneposting. thats really the future of the country you left, move on with your life.
>>
>>519919151
This popped up right now during the 3I Atlas crisis
Think about that
>>
>>519921392
>"The Skyfall is a uniquely stupid weapon system, a flying Chernobyl that poses more threat to Russia than it does to other countries,"
>>
>>519919151
>nuclear powered missile
kek
just like our nuclear subs
vewy scawy
>>
>>519921392
>It flying at cruise missile speeds it should be easier to shoot down than an icbm from a mobile launcher no?
ICBMs fly in a parabolic predictable route, and since they go up to the stratosphere, and they are massive, they can be easily picked up by radars and satellites. This one flies close to the ground, 25-100m above ground level, meaning radars will have a hard time detecting it in time, and having a lock on it is even harder.
>Tracking is an obvious issue but would you consider it a first strike weapon?
No, the pooint is to have different weapons with different capabilities to make it much harder to defend against. Now mutts do not have to worry just about ICBMs, but ICBMs and this, and many others. Defending against one system is extremely complex, but defending against all systems is exponentially more complex. I sincerely hope the nuclear power leaders aren't thinking about first strikes, but this is more useful to disuade others from attempting one, because they know a second strike will be impossible from stopping.
>>
>>
>>519919151
Due to the nuclear propulsion and sizable amount of nuclear material necessary for propulsion the launching of any of these Missiles that do not land in Russia or allied territory is tantamount to attacking a country with nuclear weapons.
This falls squarely under MAD doctrine and invites a neutralisation salvo from all other non allied nuclear powers.
I dont think the ruskies thought this through.
Well done, ruskie iq on display.
>>
File: 1651794655497.png (1.23 MB, 764x1280)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB PNG
>>519921475
>abroad
temporarily embarrassed Russian territory
>>
>>519921607
NATO pussies shitskins wont do shit lol. If it fell on your shithole nobody would lift a finger, best you would get is a strongly worded letter
>>
>>519919680
Exactly. And so does USA/NATO.
This is some random shit unless they quickly say its for space exploration or shit.
If they did make one why not sell it for space exploration grafts, catch up with Probes sent in the 60s for the lulz
>>
>>519921584
in nuclear sub, reactor is contained and not open to enviroment
in this rocket propulsion is air heated in nuclear reactor who is open to enviroment

in other words Flying Chernobyl!
>>
>>519920422
A nuke will not trigger without the mechanism
>>
>>519921600
this guy gets it. this missile cements the MAD doctrine. it's a cruise missile with virtually endless flight time, very high maneuverability and low altitude so, no radar problems and i bet it can do even better speeds.
>>
>>519921661
do it pidor!
>>
>>519920175
Even if it was a closed system it won't be when it crushes down.
Its nuclear terrorism as PR stunt.
>>
>>519919151
>insinuates a maintenance-nuclear reactor
now I’ve heard everything. thank you for that.
>>
>>519920286
Less than 3 minutes from subs. For both US and Russia.
Putin forgets that others have nukes too.
>>
File: 1646098898923.webm (1.36 MB, 480x360)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB WEBM
>>519919151
yep US is totally helpless. Thats why Russia is dominating the world and winning in Ukraine. Surely now with this cutting edge technology Kyiv will fall in one-two more weeks, right? Just two more weeks lads. Two more weeks and Kyiv falls, for real this time!
>>
>>519921808
>Russia's "friends"
Is it a North Korean missile?
>>
>>519920641
The retard ment its not a nuclear reactor exposed to the elements but couldn't fathom that its not a properly closed system as it wouldn't be able to fly lol.
>>
>>519919651
When you are pedo, build a ballroom.
>>
>>519920641
One unlucky large bird could stop in the inlet
>>
>>519921759
That's not what I'm saying.

What I'm saying is that you can't hone in on the missile (i.e. shoot it) by following its radioactive trail, because wind will disperse it all over the place.

It's like a regular cruise missile, and if you want to intercept it you would need something else to target it.
>>
>>519921238
Hahaha
Fucking right he is
A flying cernobyl disaster its exactly what this retardation is
>>
>>519921600
To target the US it has to cross the ocean where it will be incredibly fucking easy to spot.
>>
>>519920965
I'm unsure that we should live in a world were there's nukes constantly flying over us indefinitely, that's pretty grim
>>
>>519921808
>Even if it was a closed system it won't be when it crushes down.

considering it's carrying a nuclear warhead, the radiation from the propulsion is going to be the least of your concerns when it crashes down...
>>
>>519922094
Spotting is not the same thing as intercepting.

Ukraine can spot and track pretty much all the missiles sent by Russia (that's how they make those maps showing all the colorful flight paths), but they can't intercept them easily.

If you have powerful satellites or AWACS you can spot it, but the question is how you would intercept if above the ocean, with a missile.
>>
>>519922102
We used to live like that

>While the B-52s no longer fly with nuclear weapons on constant airborne patrol as they did during the Cold War, they are kept on high alert and participate in "Bomber Task Force" missions. These missions involve flying strategic routes for training and demonstrating readiness, sometimes with a nuclear deterrent capability.

Wouldn't be surprised if we return to 1980s levels of deterrence since china is rapidly expanding their capabilities. We dont exactly have the greatest leadership right now
>>
Ill.never understand how russians cant just chill. They have already the biggest country but they need more? Niggers start developping and updating your country instead of spending all this manpower and ressources to grab more.
Most of your people dont even have heating in winter and like like street niggers in poverty.
>>
>>519922340
Are you pretending that CIA jews aren't constantly scheming to balkanize Russia and seize its natural resources?
>>
>>519922241
That's unsettling to hear but it makes sense... About the history that is. As far as modern deterrence goes, I'm fairly sure that sponge is saturated
>>
>>519920965
>fly forever
>gets shot down over ocean
>why ddin't we just build more ICBMs instead?
>>
>>519919151
>14000km
>15h
>tactical warhead

It's useless.
>>
Loitering munitions aren't new and relative cost to effectiveness of a nuclear loitering munition vs a more traditional one is kind of retarded and that they'd see a niche for it despite that cost speaks to their conventionally powered airtime being nowhere near on our level.
>>
>>519920549
>it flies close to the ground
modern radar can see it as it wouldn't be flying close enough to the ground to evade it.
>>
>>519922094
How would it be easy to spot? If it flew above ships yes, it can be stopped by eye, as it is subsonic. But so what? You will shoot it with a rifle?
>>
>>519919151
>UNLIMITED RANGE CRUISE MISSILE
May we see it?
>>
>>519922885
Modern radars aren't magical, they can't detect something not on its horizon. AWACS can, but USA does not have enough to patrol their entire borders. Radars would detect it, but it wouldn't be able to lock on to it long enough to shoot it down, for the most part. Keep in mind that of the 19 drones that went into Poland, all the NATO wunderwaffe only managed to shot down 4
>>
>>519923073
Completely invisible to radar I'm afraid.
>>
>>519923352
invisible to the naked eye too
>>
>>519923834
Yes, and like a vampire it cannot be photographed or filmed.
>>
>>519923352
Their only chance of taking out the drone is to launch hundreds of drones, but the missile can be launched from a single base.

This is a good thing, because it means we can have the missile in a location where the US military can get to it.
>>
>>519919151

If Russia has this weapon (doubt) and actually launched it and had it loiter over the US, it would immediately be detected and trigger a full nuclear response. And then minutes later Russia would not exist.

You are honestly retarded if you think you can just park a nuclear weapon above a nuclear power without it triggering a response.
This is just another pointless weapon with no practical use.
>>
>>519919151
>MedvedevRussiaE
is it really his account?
>>
File: 1749241981020676-1-1.mp4 (2.04 MB, 520x328)
2.04 MB
2.04 MB MP4
>>519919151
Ep ep ep el luh mayo
Call us back when your nation has an area 51 and weaponized tr3/b
>>
>>519921661
You'd get article 5 invoked that would either cause the collapse of Nato or ww3.
Hardly inconsequential and certainly more than a strongly worded letter.
>>
>>519921475
a yapping polish dog thinks it looks tough and scary when in reality it’s just fucking annoying, the eternal butthurt nations are the most annoying by far and have gotten so annoying that it’s come to the point where everyone actually deep in the hearts wants to see you annexed by russia just so we could get jokes videos of your impotent seething
>>
>>519919151
Isn't this guy a severe alcoholic?
>>
>>519919293
>we probably have (stupid meme no one has ever seen and would not be useful)
>>
>>519921238
And this tracks because we know due to my gin commie fags, Russia is unable to design new weapons tech or copy.

All they can do is upgrade old shit and pump out explosives. Pathetic and corrupt.
>>
>>519924127
another butthurt belter here thinking a country like mine would come to his aid, heads up retard: america, germany, france or the uk wouldn’t come to your aid or like EVER because we’re peripheral and not important…they prob wouldn’t even come to poland’s aid
please shut the fuck up you are not some cool nation of smart people who are better than russia, in fact its the opposite russian achievements in math, science, art and culture at large make you browned out gypo nation irrelevant and for your crimes of being an annoying autistic piss coloured country, this time russia will treat you even worse
>>
>>519924769
Give me my gibs commiefux ***
>>
>>519924127
>would either cause the collapse of Nato
lmao no, you would take it in the chin and ask for more. Even if America sent you thoughts and prayers, you would remain a America bitch.
>>
>>519919151
MAGA trannies on suicide watch
>>
>>519922885
> terrain masking
>>
>>519924819
Sure romania is relying on Croatias 2 million total population, fewer than or capital city lol.
We rely on the USA, UK, France, Poland, And Germany. That is the the base if NATO.
>>
>>519919151
I feel like I've seen these exact same comments about oreshnik
I feel like I will see them again about some future ICBM system that in the grand scheme of things provides the same deterrence as fuckass 50 years old nuclear missile in some siberian silo
>>
>>519919151
>shoots insane amount of gamma rays
>undetectable
>>
BASED
KILL THOSE CAPITALIST WHITE PIGS WITH IT BASED RUSSIA
>>
>>519919151
You are aware it would be shot down before it even got close, right?
>>
>>519919151
I just saw a nuke fly over my house
>>
>>519925105
Try it.
>>
>>519921855
140 russians vs 1bil people in nato. To die and have 6 killed is an honnor.
>>
>>519919151
The US developed nuclear ramjets 60 years ago.
>>
>>519924109
They had a few cities that were not recognized on any map during the cold War where nobody was allowed to enter or leave. That was their version.
>>
>>519919531

they dont have it its just like SU-57 or T-14 or the russian navy. they will do le epic test/demonstration then sell the parts to india/china because they are failed state
>>
>>519922367
that explains why CIA is doing everything in its power not to let russia balkanize and to keep jewtin alive. Its because they want russia to balkanize and to kill jewtin. Makes sense.
>>
>>519919151
Well they're not really unlimited range. I doubt they could reach Pluto or Uranus, much less even escape low-earth orbit.
>>
>>519926389
poleshits are so deranged
>>
>>519926324
failed state which took a lot of Western money to contain
failed state which made the Western world authorities look like idiots
which has already demonstrated 3 types of modern "western aggression contain" weapons with a budget of a pack of doritos
"civilised world" lost to a failed state
leader of "civilised world" having government shutdown is ridiculous
The main symbol of civilised world is on "reconstruction"

USA you're joke
>>
>>519919329
Based on what?
>>
>>519925105
>remain a America bitch.
ESL. Disconnect your VPN Ivan.
>>
>>519924539
Regardless of historical facts, the super heavy whatever it's called can lift 64t into Leo, and if they're saying 64t, you can bet it's closer to 100t. A lot of fanciful shit becomes less fanciful in the face of that.
>>
>>519927107
Coming from you to that statement is about as underwhelming as your tiny gook penis
>>
>>519926129
Yet no more russia. Kek. Self defeating.
Even if you win you lose, according to this line or reason.
>>
>>519920138
Yep, retards don't understand how having the missile move up close and loiter is such an advantage and way less of a commitment. Its deterrence 2.0 and second strike garantee.
>>
File: pepe_armscrossed-001.jpg (38 KB, 512x411)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
You guys are missing the point. This weapon is a third strike weapon, first you will have the ICBMs and air launched missiles, then the submarines are the second strike hitting whatever is left. This weapon, as well as the Poseidon, can linger for months and hit whatever is left, even if every single Russian is already dead. Essentially it makes it that more likely that every single globohomo city will be deader than dead if it comes to nuclear war.
>>
>>519927259
Well spotted. Ivan cant into a and ans, than and thens, you're and yours.
>>
>>519927724
It flies at commercial airplane speeds it can be shot down at will.
Having more than 1 or 2 up in the air at any given time its a go for ww3.
The point of MAD is lost on you.
>>
>>519919293
That's only hitting for between 10 to 30 kt though. The Burevestniks have to be slamming for 450 kt if they're recycling Kh101 warheads. Realistically they could be just over a megaton if they're using the new warheads.
>>
>>519920682
Perfect response
>>
>>519927259
You would kill your family to be born here like me lol
>>
>>519927848
>It flies at commercial airplane speeds it can be shot down at will.
>Having more than 1 or 2 up in the air at any given time its a go for ww3.
>The point of MAD is lost on you.
This thing is not meant to be on patrol as deterrence, like old bombers, its launched in the case of a ww3 doomsday scenario
>>
File: 1761217862244094.jpg (106 KB, 1024x1024)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>519919151

Your election was just rigged for a woman commie who has pledged to import 35 million jeets by 2030 and you're here seething about Drumpf
>>
fucking idiotic nigger
>>
>>519927403
Unlike your statements, my statements are easy to verify. Hell, they don't even need to be checked.

And I have a pretty decent dick.
Proper nutrition with non-GMO foods and water that is not mixed with estrogen.
Try it.
>>
>>519928119
>its launched in the case of a ww3 doomsday scenario
At which point its duration and longevity poses exactly zero advantages. Good job retard, you've proven how useless this is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersonic_Low_Altitude_Missile
This is not a fucking novel idea, ameriburgers have been exploring nuclear powered cruise missiles and muh Heckin bomberinos that can fly forever since the 50s.
>>
>>519919293
With what fucking rocket did you put those tungsten rods into orbit? Did the dragon thing of Elon put it there? Space shuttles back in the 80s? I mean do you even understand how hard it is to get tons of tungsten into orbit? And the resulting energy release is comparable to a conventional bomb of same weight. Like it's an idiotic concept, you may as well lob MOABs from a satellite and achieve better result if you cared to put like 5 tons of weapon into orbit.
>>
>>519920175
>I talk bullshit for free
Gud for you, snownigga
>>
>>519919293
The glowniggers seething about this post is extremely telling.
I’m sure there are a few chynamen that would say “they in fact do have rods of god” but they prolly schitzo tho. It’s a well known and widely accepted fact that space is fake and/or gay.
>>
>>519920841
The Americans already genocided themselves by mass migration lol
Only 30% of under 35s years old is huwhite in Murica
>>
>>519919421
They are not. They produce more native engineers at a higher standard too
The dumb ones are you mutty
>>
>>519919151
so we finally have to weaponize the orbits? remember future people, russians forced this
>>
I would love to see what that missile would do if people wouls just start killing ruskie civilians all over the world. You know the marked ones.
>>
File: Sidorovich.jpg (230 KB, 1024x768)
230 KB
230 KB JPG
>>519929034
>the marked ones
You know the drill, put him over there
>>
>>519925412
You're but fodder to slow down Russia a bit, just like back then
>>
1. footages are probably fake.
2. actual icbms are probably drone/prop assisted.

> if russians had nuclear-assisted (thermal/ejecta) propulsion, they'd be doing planetary travel already.

3. if drone-loiter technology is expendible - it would either have to be launched-to-loiter close to the target. It's loiter tech would make it sitting ducks for interception

4. If the drone tech is reusable(unlikely), then we're super fucked, basically flying submarines waiting for checkmate order (but it's not likely)
>>
Looking forward to it malfunctioning as all Russian things do
>>
>>519929498
Shitty gpt anal ist
The point is that they just got it
And well, why would you do inter-planetary travel while fighting a limited existencial war, that just doesn't make any economical sense
>>
>>519929590
>Murican helicopter and jet just sinking out of nowhere in sout China sea
Lmao, must be American made if it fails, that's how it is these days
>>
>>519929034
You won’t do shit esau
>>
>>519919151
It's a pos mongoloid missile that doesn't work
>>
>>519921808
>Noo you can't use nuclear powered nukes because of the pollution
>>
>>519930066
Great, we can test them over your hometown then
>>
>>519930066
>Noo you can't use nuclear powered nukes because of the pollution
ACSHUALLY it produces less CO2 emissions than traditional missiles so its a kosher way to end the world
>>
>>519928400
>At which point its duration and longevity poses exactly zero advantages.

Loitering munitions are useful.
>>
>>519930587
In a conventional war, not in ww3 everyone firing nukes at each other war
>>
>>519928508
>tons of tungsten
Vs
>tons of everything else we've sent up including space stations and satellites
You're fucking retarded.
>>
>>519919293
Getting that much weight into space isn't cost effective. ICBM are still cheaper.
>>
>>519920834
>Probably still win in the end unless it's China or something due to eternal human waves.
Are you actually retarded? Russia would literally lose 30% of it's population due to getting killed by exposure to elements the first winter month of an actual war against an actual military power as anyone with the means to do so would just missile strike every powerplant and gas line supplying Moscow and St. Petersburg and watch them freeze.

And that would be just with conventional weapons.
>>
File: 64897945649645.jpg (11 KB, 200x200)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>519919151
How do you make a mini nuclear reactor that fits into a missile? Why don't we use that everywhere?
>>
>>519930812
Why are you so autistic? If you cannot rely on second strike to save you it means you're much less likely to engage in the first.
>>
>>519931725
Yeah bro, loitering slop that can be shot down is much better as an option than a barrage of orbital nukes.
Kek retard
>>
>>519919151
>933km/h
>>
>Russia builds weapons and kills people
Wow, breaking news.
>>
File: Reducto.png (23 KB, 247x335)
23 KB
23 KB PNG
>>519931596
You just take a regular nuclear reactor, and make it teeny tiny.
>>
>>519928508

You send pieces, in space you can cold weld metals, making them one piece
>>
File: 1748938719580348.jpg (110 KB, 802x537)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
>>519932134

papiers bitte
>>
>>519919151
>MAGATS cant do shit.
No the US hasn't had issues intercepting satelites before.
>>
>>519919151
Didn’t they call this a uniquely stupid weapon system because it leaks radiation and has already killed few Russian operators?
>>
>>519931596
Because it irradiates everything it flies over. Including your territory you launch it from.
>>
>>519919151
>unlimited range
russian education
>>
>>519919151
Just program it to bait enemy AM defenses, then turn around when the enemy fires.. then when the missiles run out of fuel, turn around for another run.

You can use a few of those to comepletely deplete ukie missile stocks.
>>
>>519919329
They are orcs, they don't care throwing a nuclear reactor over a target that is meant to be occupied.

You don't use such solution as nuclear deterrent , since this means flying slow and dumb in circles near the place to be targeted completely detected and easily tracked, this mean the missile can be easily destroyed.

Letting on patrol such missile will lead to in flight failures with nuclear warheads dangerously exposed, so isn't a mean for any operational nuclear deterrent.

Is stupid, but there you go.
>>
>>519920818
Radiation doesn't contaminate air, radioactive particles do
>>
>>519920834
you can go to the ukraine and find out any second
why wont you
>>
>im gonna NOOOOOOOOOK
sure buddy
>>
>>519934171
>then turn around when the enemy fires..
..and get shot down
Also good luck implementing cutting edge tech that detects interception, especially kinetic one
>>
File: 1736180406173424.jpg (76 KB, 455x1024)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
>>519934799
>>
>>519919151
>So this missile can loiter for months 3 seconds from Washington or other cities, and MAGATS cant do shit.
how it is better than icbm that can hit any place on the planet in half an hour?
is this final confirmation that Russian icbms do not work after decades off neglect?
>>
>>519934916
scared huh
its ok sister
>>
>>519928918
>remember future people, russians forced this
Lol, one day old news and neocunts already starting a new lie to (remember). Remember Star Wars. Remember US Space Command. Remember Russia proposing a treaty keeping military out of space which was rejected by US.
>>
>>519919293
They have tested it for sure, but it's not efficient nor as accurate as missile tech. And I'm sure the payload isn't going to be as devastating as whatever you can put on a warhead.

It's a dumb meme weapon. You have to get massive tungsten rods to orbit, just to drop them back on a target from space hoping it hits? It's like dropping a quarter from space. Why the fuck would you go through all that when you can just toss a tactical nuke?
>>
>>519928119
So its a nothingburger
Subs perrorm the same function but better
>>
>>519929352
We lost 1% population and Russia lost 20%. We had Americans and Uk bombing us too.
>>
>>519935489
The funniest thing about the rods blabla is that most people don't seem to have a clue how to launch them. They seem to think you just 'drop' them from a space station like throw it out of window lmao. In reality they have to be slowed down or they will happily stay in orbit lol. Means they need a rocket engine and fuel..
>>
>>519919151
So the nuclear reactor blows up with it poisoning the earth with radiation for thousands of years? Fuck anyone who could even consider using such a thing.
>>
>>519919151
This entire board is nothing but propaganda for third world countries now, it's filled almost exclusively with retards. What the fuck happened to this place lmao
>>
>>519936305
The propaganda would be useless if the situation was hopeless.
Propaganda is all they have
>>
>>519936305
>Third world
AKA the parts of the world where 2 men cannot get married lol
>>
>>519936512
You cannot marry as a faggot in romania and my country is more developed than the shithole you're hailing from originally
>>
>>519919151
It seems unnecessary to have a missile with unlimited range in a limited world.
>>
>>519919151
You're going to be first spaghetti
>>
America was building a nuclear powered missile in the 1970s but abandoned it because it's fucking dangerous and if it crashed or malfunctioned it would polute the air with radiation

So Russia thinks it's smarter than us and can do this and deploy the weapon without a chance of accident?


Ide say if I saw that faggot flying for a month off my cost around I would declare war.

Nuclear power rockets are a retarded idea and weren't developed for a reason
>>
>>519921127
When you're strong, appear weak.
>>
>>519919151
Can I have like 4 of them? Give me 4 and I promise to fix all humanity's problems with them.
>>
File: 1746956227236590.png (2.18 MB, 1000x1905)
2.18 MB
2.18 MB PNG
>>519919293
I hope your rockets have foreskin or algo
>>
>>519919680
> ICBMs
They are visible on radar, follow a predictable path and could be intercepted. Burevestnik travels near ground between 25m-100m, doesn't appear on any long range radar, it's launch would not be registered. It's just another option for Russia to maintain a deterrence in case the West extends/improves their anti-ICBM systems to the point they become unreachable for a nuclear retaliation.
>>
>>519919293
in my pants already. its thunderous
>>
>>519919151
Ruse cruize missile
>>
>>519933012
Russians don't live long enough to get cancer anyways, so they are not worried.
>>
>>519919329
the world is unfathomably cuckish. that's all there is to it, i promise you.
>>
>>519919151
It's a fake missile, Russia can't make anything fly, their nukes are fake too.
>>
>>519920965
> fly forever
Even nuclear fuel eventually runs out. And at low heights between 25m-100m they have a high risk of failure due to extreme weather phenomena or bird/plane/terrain collisions. In case they are visually sighted they can easily get shot down since they are cruising at subsonic speed.
>>
>>519920841
In truth this world needs a new big war to make a big reset. Just like the world changed after WWII there should be something similar soon. This would either end USA as world leader, or let them renew their title. Everyone knows it but no one really want to make a choice since probably the first one who makes a turn would lose against their opponent. Like if USA would decide to dethrone Putin then Xi would ally with Russia and wouldn't let USA do it.
>>
>>519921079
> radioactive exhaust
Doesn't appear on any radar.
>>
>>519921759
True, but when your engine is a literal nuclear reactor?
>>
>>519921257
Maybe also chinese, they love shit like that.
>>
File: USA_USA_USA.webm (1.99 MB, 782x440)
1.99 MB
1.99 MB WEBM
>>519919651
>amerimutt quoting chink book from 2700 years ago
ironic innit
>>
>>519938648
>slow missile with heat signature
Oops, appears on any radar
>>
>>519919151
I'm sure Rokko is gonna love em
>>
>>519925105
>>519927749
Take it on* the chin. They really can't into prepositions
>>
File: 1734927678186882.webm (3.87 MB, 1278x718)
3.87 MB
3.87 MB WEBM
>>519938828
>aaaand let's see how the Russians are doing
>>
>>519921745
> Flying Chernobyl!
So what? You worry about some Chernobyl in case of an incoming nuclear war?
>>
>>519939228
you nafo retards are always the ones posting gore. not a good look
>>
File: tryyrt.jpg (74 KB, 1284x1059)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>519919151
>>
File: USA.jpg (96 KB, 1200x1200)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
>>519939228
>instant pivot copes
The US Navy just got its' shit pushed in by Houthis. Imagine the clusterfuck of trying an actually competent nation.
>>
How is this new?

This misle has been out of the bag for Years now.
>>
File: 1707353220167710.jpg (51 KB, 720x538)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>519919531
You're all so fucking stupid. You genuinely believe space x can take your to fucking Mars (impossible),but not a payload to Moscow. THOSE are true ICBMs

midwits, the lot of you
>>
>>519919329
>nuclear missile that spreads nuclear waste through every airspace it flies through including Russia
How is this anything other than Russian incompetence
>>
>>519920834
The same can be said about the US, the rest of NATO is just a bad joke, but the mutts have spent the past 80 years fighting illiterate farmers, goat herders and such and have lost every single time.
>>
>>519919151
wut dat mean?
>>
>>519920138
>"Tehehee~ lets launch our nuke towards US, but actually just have it loiter on the Atlantic coast"
>Holy Shit Russia launched a nuke! Fire everything!
>Russia gets nuked

Great plan.
>>
>>519919293
What? No we dont have shit because we've wasted 50 trillion on niggers in the last 60 years. We couldve had real space stations and moon/mars bases and we settled for 300lb nigger single moms pumping out little tyrones and lebrons to terrorize us instead.
>>
>>519920965
You can’t adequately shield a flying nuclear reactor and it would emit an immense amount of high energy ionizing light. There are dedicated x-ray/gamma satellites to monitor nuclear explosions that would immediately detect it.

And either you wouldn’t have a very long service life on the air frame due to radiation embrittlement OR you’d have the heaviest and least stealth vehicle ever. Classic aerospace materials like thin composite or aluminum would quickly degrade due to ionizing radiation. Ever keep a tarp in the sun’s UV for a few weeks and it crumbles? Similar concept but the embrittlement would penetrate into the frame
If you use minimal shielding, you still add massive weight, density, and size. You still can’t use composite framing that absorb radar and now your cruise missile is 20 meters longer to allow shielding by distance.

It’s probably cheaper, more efficient, tactically better to build 10,000 loitering hybrid ICE+solar drones with massive wings that can loiter for months at 80,000 feet with 1000-3000kg payloads than to build three nuclear powered cruise missiles.
>>
>>519927200
Being riddled with AIDS.
>>
>>519919151
Yea right.
>>
>>519924769

kys coping faggot
>>
>>519924022
Russia has more nukes
they aren't losing a nuclear war
>>
Storm Peter is coming for you!
>>
>>519919151
So awesome we develop another powerful weapon to kill other people.

Demonic people rule this planet.
>>
>>519927724
>You guys are missing the point. This weapon is a third strike weapon, first you will have the ICBMs and air launched missiles, then the submarines are the second strike hitting whatever is left. This weapon, as well as the Poseidon, can linger for months and hit whatever is left, even if every single Russian is already dead. Essentially it makes it that more likely that every single globohomo city will be deader than dead if it comes to nuclear war.
mutts are too low iq to know what any of it means
>>
>>519920641
A Sam site could absolutely shoot that down
>>
>>519929763
>Lmao, must be American made if it fails, that's how it is these days
kek, true
>>
>>519919151
Let me ask you something.... has Russia perfected stealth technology ? do they have an equivalent mass produced stealth capable aircraft that can evade the most up to date tech the USA and allies have spent trillions on?

Do they have magical stealth coating that will camouflage the radiation leaking out of it's Russian built exhaust port?

if the answer to ANY of these is a resounding NO, you have a very expensive paper weight, detecting radiation has become child's play for first world nations infact there are several dozen satalites dedicated to just that task, remember the radiation maps from Fukushima? so, thanks for the heads up I guess good luck with your " month long super secres stealth mission leaking byro all over the map" fucking retards.
>>
>>519927848
Cause NATO did so well against Ukraine's taped-together, salvaged decoy drones.
>>
>>519942979
Its exactly the same thing in your head, cost of opportunity notwithstanding.
>>
>>519920138
all the while dumping who knows what out of the exhaust and crash landing it with the uranium or whatever onboard into a delicate coral reef
humans can be such faggots
>>
>>519919151
Only on tiktok
>>
I suspect this missile is intended as a cheaper way to achieve the advantages of FOBS. The logic of FOBS still pertains and almost all vestiges of nuclear weapons control have lapsed.
>>
>>519943113
Join a volunteer brigade, brave man.
>>
>>519942873
>remember the radiation maps from Fukushima?
Wasn't the radiation leak from there first detected by private citizens with their own geiger counters before there was any official announcement? Or am I thinking of Shin Godzilla
>>
>>519919584
What are they deterring? Their ability to invade every one of their neighbors? I’m sure every day Russians are thrilled to get a chance to die in Ukraine for $2000 and our supremely thrilled to know that their government still has money to invest in weapons research while they effectively starve.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.