Leftists care far more about hurting rich people than helping poor people. If they had to pick only one, they'd choose to make life worse for rich people rather than make life better for poor people.
Conveniently "making life better for poor people" almost always involves taking money from rich people which could be construed as "making life worse for them", thus anything other than pure ancap dystopia can be framed as "the jealous grasping of hateful undeserving poors"
>>520272963Ultra wealthy people use their money to affect other humans lives. They use other humans labor to create wealth for themselves, they leave an imprint in the earth, then they use that wealth for influencing politicians and other to do their dirty work. Money is evil. National socialism is the way.
>>520272963leftists want to take money from rich and give it to the poor. now why do righties want to take from the poor and give to the already rich? can you answer that one retard?
>itt: retards defend their slavery because charlatans use simplistic strawmen to create false equivalencies and obfuscate the reality of human societies This board is becoming completely useless very quickly.
>>520274233What ever happened to trickle down economy ? Oh that’s right capitalism doesn’t work with government subsidies
>>520272963no, leftists care about following whatever orders globohomo gives themif they dont, they will no longer be with the "in" crowd and their fellow leftards will disavow them
>>520274758>Oh that’s right capitalism doesn’t work with government subsidiesreminder that you cant even have capitalism when your central bank is a counterfeiting house and creates new money out of thin air every time a commercial loan is made
>>520272963>hate the man is better off than youWhat a fucking retard. Marx analyzed how capitalism chokes off the masses and makes them slaves to oligarchs and turns them into commodities. Now wonder these right wing economists are so fucking gay.
>>520272963Marx's system of communism was meant to exist as an expansion of capitalism. It was more of a statement of workers rights, ownership of labor, and fair pay than what Lenin interpreted it as.
not a lot to grift off of poor people, OP. When you're a professional, genetically-inclined grifter, these things come naturally. The homeless industrial complex is an important part of urban ecosystems in modern age current year.
>>520272963this makes sense because leftists consider poverty as a systemic failure, not individual. the rich only help the poor just enough to stop them from beating them in minecraft
Envy as a Virtue
>>520274878This. It’s not a free market it’s a military superpower guarding its infinite money printer owned by Jews
>>520272963
>>520277759When I see a wealthy person I’m mainly disgusted by the extravagance the flashy cars the perfect lifestyle it makes me cringe. If I was wealthy I’d be on a farm living modestly and bing back to a small community
No right winger has ever read Marx
>>520274878its even worse than fiat, we have a debt based monetary system. Theres only 4 trillion physical cash dollars just like there was before 1971, the rest is loaned into existence using that $4T as collateral. If they dont keep issuing new debt there will be a massive liquidity crisis and a second great depression.
>>520278112I have read a lot of marx and mao actually. Its unbearable because communist literature is basically just intellectual masturbation. Its just volumes and volumes of their hot takes about society that take up way more space than they need to. Its like reading a giant r/atheism post.
>>520274758>What ever happened to trickle down economy ?no idea, but that's what the rightoids have been preaching since regan and giving them tax cuts, and what currently pedo god is doing by giving the rich tax cuts yet again, saying it'll trickle down but of course it wont>Oh that’s right capitalism doesn’t work with government subsidiesnow this is one of the few both sides issues that actually happens, both sides keeps bailing out failing banks/corpos non fucking stop
Capitalism is responsible for the mass importation of foreign labor. It's also responsible for feminism, again because it doubles the labor force. In fact, much of progressive liberalism, even marxism, can be laid at the feet of the drive to acrue capital in increasingly immoral ways.(do you think trannies would exist without a financial incentive?)Sure, there shouldn't be wealth redistribution, but you need an economy that doesn't allow you to subvert the interests of your domestic labor or the traditions/ethnic composition of your society. The free market is incapable of making moral decisions and is also completely disinterested in creating a safe, moral society.This is not an arguement FOR communism, it's an acknowledgement of the problems in the west not being caused by it. Our leaders sold us out for power and wealth. The solution is some sort of socialist policy of a national persuasion where the interests of the nation and its labor are prioritized potentially even to the detriment of capital.
>>520272963Does "hurting" rich people mean telling them they aren't allowed to pollute rivers, treat their workers like animals or bribe politicians?
>>520274109stupid commie
