Was Charlie Kirk such a great debater? What are his best debate arguments?
He could BTFO kids 10 years younger than him.
>>520963159he owned libs
>>520963159>counting or not counting gang vio -ACCKKHe would have survived if he knew how to dodge bullets like he dodged questions.
>>520963159On par with maybe Ben Shapiro or Stephen Crowder (Crowder is a lot better than he used to be admittedly). Basically just a mediocre shabbos goy trying to farm easy gotchas. Guy is basically right wing Dean Withers. Debate is just a fake and gay circle jerk anyway. All you're trying to do is make your opponent look like a dumbass and get a few good quips in. Sometimes it's entertaining if done in a Killstream bloodsports fashion but if you're easily swayed by livestreamer debates you're too low IQ to understand anything.
>>520963625>Sometimes it's entertaining if done in a Killstream bloodsports fashionEthan ralph is not going to be much of a moderator. He's too high on xanax to understand what's going on.
Kirk was not a good debater whoch is why his opponents were college kids.This is also why its so ridiculous they assassinated him, he wasn't even a top tier debate bro.
>>520963159Who?
>>520964041It was just one faggot that killed him
>>520963309thanks for reminding me why I could never watch this turd for more than 5 seconds even if he came on right after Bannon's War Room. In actual practice he was more cringy than that "Taking down the CPP " song with Miles Guo chink billionaire making faggy shadow boxing motions standing on his nouveau riche yot. Disgusting.https://youtu.be/DXbwKf-2iB8
>>520964142>It was just one faggot that killed himNo it was brown shirt, CK's bodyguard.
>>520964304TAKE DOWN THE CCPlol
republicans LE GOODdemocrats LE BAD
>>520963159His best debate moment was that time his throat flew into space.
>>520963159Enough to make the left seethe so hard they had to kill himYou can find his debates on youtubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0D_fa2hy3OU
>>520963159>argue gun violence is part of the deal>implicitly states gun violence should be expected>doesn't protect himself from potential gun violence at his own eventsI think he wanted to become a martyr
>>520964349Its crazy to me every discussion of the latest psyop that usher ins and new era of the violtion of our right, only last two weeks now. It was a set up and nobody talks about it anymore, while JFK was talked to death since the day. Look at the digital ID in Vietnam and was only talked about for a day or two. Yet the massess will ingore the set up and argue about left or right.
>>520963159>Was Charlie Kirk such a great debaterHe was a Master Baiter. For retards.
>>520963159He was a YouTuber. Not a debater. I don't think actual debate makes for good content.Meaning his debate skills were related inverse to his YouTube popularity, subs, and views.
>>520965090>digital ID in Vietnamdigital ID in India. They do not install Vietnamese as our leaderspoo ceos are pushing Aadhaar in USA
>>520963159how weird would it be if he was living under an assumed identity in Israel?
One of his main arguments was that the school shootings are worth it so that you can buy an assault rifle in walmart to sometimes shoot cans withGot what he voted for award
>>520963625accurate
>>520970289not at all according to patel
>>520963159why kikes should gnaw off your son's foreskin.
He was "debating" some 18-year old American students and just talked over them, talked loudly, changed the subject and hit them with prepared gotchas that have nothing to do with the issue.When he went to Cambridge(?) the students there made him look pathetic, especially when he started bitching about the Bible and Israel lmao.
>>520963309He had gay rumors and it doesn't help that Erika was most likely an arranged wife
>>520974250fey?gay?you don't say!
>>520963159>grrrrhrhrlllgl pfththe will be remembered for this one
>>520973577>>520974250that bitch is as fake as a 3 dollar bill
>>520964041Kirk dogwalked hasan in the debate they had
>>520973799Check yourself before (((we))) wreck your cock, goy.
>>520975247I just asked grok why make circumcision would be considered mutilation. It gave based answers and suggested a comparison to female circumcision. Also based response. Grok says "male circumcision isn't considered genital mutilation (yet). Picrel
>>520973799what did he say? did he mention anything about mohels?>>>/wsg/6004328https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1760925463070923.webm
>>520963159He low key wanted his daughter to get raped by a nigger so he could virtue signal to all his christ cuckin followers how pious he was when he took the little nigger rape baby in. Something very wrong with these cultists.
>>520964349dude was dodging a bullet, it was an exit wound
>>520963159he was really good at taking money from the pockets of other conservatives and putting it in his pocket, he took millions from conservative donors through TPUSA
>>520963159>literally proved that some gun deaths are worth the cost of freedom and that the left are unhinged murderersKirk won
>>520981107>Kirk wonwon what? another psyop for us?
>>520963159I mean, some faggot had to shoot him because apparently facts hurt these faggots feelings so much. So.... yeah I would say he was a kinda great debater
>>520964349>>>/wsg/6016800https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1761977815468109.webm
He didn't debate people in any traditional sense he was more of an entertainer presenting whatever the fuck he was told to at the time
>>520981426No one gets angry at people for saying facts. You get angry at people when they are stupid or illogical yet they are still believed.
>>520963159he was a master debater
>>520963309This can't be fucking real, too close to the meme.
>>520976041
>>520963159No he just continued the Ben Shapiro "debate college kids and talk really fast" method and had funding from some GOP suits for his campus organization to prop him up. TPUSA was essentially a youth outreach/surrogate arm of the GOP, and Kirk a middling normie talking head frat boy more or less
>>520984632I doubt he ever masturbated. Not even once
>>520963159Charlie kirk wasnt a great debaterHe wasnt even a good debaterKirk was a gracious and temperate debater who never got angry or resorted to ad hominems.Kirk wasnt successful because he was good he was successful because he had grace.
>>520975245True, but Hasan is an idiotic nepobaby larperKirk was charismatic, I'll give him that, and he was valuable for engaging with normies and the average college kid, but his content didn't offer much for someone going deeper into this stuff
>>520965090Debate itself is inherently a Jewish practice, popular among the pharisees and sadducees and its pointless argument that goes no where besides sewing discord and division. You will never convince anyone of anything and will only motivate them to make stronger arguments until they "win". It is a complete waste of time, even if you identify a bunch of fallacies, people will pick and choose what is and is not a fallacy and pick and choose what they think is right completely ignoring the rest. Total waste of time.
