>>520983762grok, is op fake and gay no fluff?
>>520983996>>520983762Bottom one looks more like a MOAB or FOAB to me.
>>520983762Nice AI nigger.
care to explain?a complete explanation, beginning to end, without a bunch of out of context schizo shit where you expect us to read your mind or already know the backstory.
>>520985759>Bottom one looks more like a MOAB or FOAB to me.close but it's actually a ZOAB
>>520986040where do you think you are nigger?
>>520986040wait we're allowed to request this?
>>520986040Torpets was hit in September 2024 by two airburst explosions with yields of 10-20ktons (Hiroshima yield was 15ktons). Radiation was then detected in Finland following the prevailing winds. The only possibility is this was a nuclear strike on the Torpets ammunition depot. And the only means would be a stealth cruise missile (JASSMER) launched from the F-16s over Estonia at the time.This is proof Putin has no balls because instead of doing a fucking thing about it he claimed the 10-20kton explosions were just “drone parts”. And all the kremlin bots have parroted that absurd line lest they find themselves in Strelkovs shoes. Is that enough explanation for you?
>>520983762Nice tnt blast remember the casinos amd no radiation raeto west big lies org mensa and what camrbige physics that Kim philby horsehit
>>520986590https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toropets_depot_explosions> On 20 September, Colonel Kiviselg, head of the Estonian Defense Forces Intelligence Center, estimated that the strike had caused 30,000 tonnes of munitions to explode, the size of which he equated to 750,000 shells, adding that the strike destroyed two to three months of Russia's ammunition supply. The depot reportedly stored not only artillery shells, but also Iskander missiles, Tochka-U ballistic missiles and glide bombs and it is unclear if his bomb damage assessment includes both missiles and artillery ammunition.Yea, sure bro. Drone parts.
>>520986590so you're saying nato hit russia with a tactical nuke and putin is pretending it never happened so he doesn't need to escalate a response? but the target was an ammunition depot. why would you need a nuke for an explosive target anyways when conventional munitions could easily cause the ammo to cook off? also its the JASSM not JASSMER and its not nuclear. what's your proof its a nuke? nobody is reading all that ai psychosis slop text posted in op.
>>520987133>30,000 tons>Only 40% destroyed>Meaning 12,000 tons went up>At most half of the weight is explosive>Meaning 6,000 tons of yield from the ammo>and most of that had to go off on the ground to push the rest into the air for the airburst>without leaving a surface explosion crater>all caused by some drone partsIts crazy just how BaD the official story is
>>520987152>so you're saying nato hit russia with a tactical nuke and putin is pretending it never happened so he doesn't need to escalate a response?No. Im stating CLEARLY this was two Hiroshima scale nukes AND there is no way Putin doesnt know it. So he is a cuck.>but the target was an ammunition depot. why would you need a nuke for an explosive target anyways when conventional munitions could easily cause the ammo to cook off? also its the JASSM not JASSMER and its not nuclear.Hardened ammo depots are extremely difficult to destroy. Even these twin 10-20kton blasts only damaged 40% of the depot. And this was a soviet one with hardened steel reinforced bunkers. A standard missile might make one go up but will NOT make that bunker go airborne and release 20x more energy than is stored in the bunker.>what's your proof its a nuke? nobody is reading all that ai psychosis slop text posted in op.Classic shill tactic. What conventional munition can produce a 10-20kton airburst? How does the ammo IN the ground produce a 10-20 kton airburst. Until you have a viable alternative the ONLY option is nuclear.
