In which Civilizations in history were female warriors common?
>>520984625It would be easier to say in which they weren't
>>520984681By all means, be my guest.
>>520984625USSR
>>520984730Outside of a ~4 year period some time in the 40s?
>>520984625>>520984681Common? None. Some had a FEW.
>>520984625there has never been a functioning truly "matriarchal" society, it's the feminist version of we wuz kangzeven the Mosuos from china aren't really matriarchal and it's just myths made up by feminist journalists
>>520984722Ancient rome/greece. The ottomans/arabs I'm not 100% about Chinese, I know nothing about them or Koreans. Our ancestors the Dacians, the Mongols/huns I believe aswell, Indians and I have no idea about the central American civilisations, I'm pretty sure they didn't have female warriors same as the north american indians.African tribes aswell, they didn't really use women as warriors
>>520984922The British empire reached its peak under the leadership of a woman
>>520984933>Ancient romeHow many notable Romen women soldiers, officers, generals can you name?Can you give us a rough estimate of what percentage of actual combatants fielded under SPQR banner were women? Feel free to pick any point in Rome's history, whichever best supports your claim.
>>520984625That meme is the only funny thing to ever come out of Undertroon (LISA won btw)
>>520985045Did you even read what I said in my first post?
>>520985092How is it easier to list civilizations where they weren't common? Being easier to list implies they are fewer in number, meaning the rest had plenty of those.You didn't mention anything in Mesopotamia, are we to assume they had their Amazons there?
>>520985248I just listed you the ones that DID NOT have women warriors.Are you low IQ?
>>520985407You didn't list Sumeria. Why are you implying they had warrior women there?Don't see vikings, these come up often, what about them? Are you implying they had those? Scythia? Or are you going to play "not a civilization" card with these? Can't do the same with Sumeria. Do forgive me for being half-hearted in this discussion, the jannies deleted the previous thread so I'm not as interested.
>>520984625>In which Civilizations in history were female warriors common?>>520984681>It would be easier to say in which they weren't this implies that female soldiers/warriors were commonthen this was your response>>520984933Bro you arent making sense gypsy
>>520984625Female warriors were very uncommon and mostly a last resort. A lot of what is propped up as female warriors is just feminist propaganda because feminism don't want to give males their due. Men are warriors females are not. This focusing on female warriors is just a humiliation ritual for the males.
>>520985821I think his line of reasoning is along the lines of "I can't name any so I'm going to name all the civilizations I can think of because they didn't have warrior women there". Which he then proceeded to do. This is however a...strange way to argue because not only it doesn't answer the question but he also manages to miss 2 (out of 5) Cradles of civilization and also admits he is ignorant about the third. Yikes.That's like being asked to name the prime numbers in the range between 1 and 100, then claiming it's easier to name non-primes and saying 10, 15, 50 and calling it a day.>>520985993This is one of the scourges of the nu-science being pushed onto us lately. Not only they're pushing women into professions best suited for men these days, but they also try to rewrite history to make it seem like it's always been like that.Just last year a study was making its rounds in /pol/, where someone found a burial site of a woman in Scandinavia, where some of the contents of the grave had military purpose — and immediately went with the "we wuz warriarsesses".
>>520984625>female warriorsDumbest idea in the history of ideas.Instead of breeding the next generation of warriors you waste eggs on pointless battles. Really?What the fuck.
>>520986371Woman buried with axe, Gotta be hers right not her husband that might have died in a raid in some foreign country. Like i said it's a humiliation so women wont have to give men their dues. Survive a fucking shoot out and the first thing the baby making machine says is: "I can do it too!" I feel for you Israeli bro's women have their place in war but not as frontline combat soldiers. That is and always will be a mans job. Subterfuge and espionage is a different story. Think about it how can a woman lift heavy equipment wear heavy equipment use heavy equipment without any rest, they can't but ego won't let them admit it or else it proves that feminism was a sham. it's just a ego thing and women just need a reality check. Certain things are things only a man can do and combat is one of them. Instead of them nagging they should support the burden carried by mens soldier. The value of the male is exemplified on the battlefield and it's something modern society needs to understand.
>>520986916But what about MULAN?? I saw it on tv with me own eyes!
>>520984625ScythiaWonder if female warriors rape civilians too
>>520986999Imagine it's a video game and you're managing your little tribe of marauders and pillagers.In what possible scenario would you ever waste your women's baby making capacity by sending them into battle?The whole idea is entirely preposterous and insane.
>>520985008she reigned over the fall of that empire.
>>520986999KEK
>>520986958Oh yea, now that you mention, jews do force women to serve. That's a particular case though because when it comes to conscription Israeli society is split not between men and women but between secular and orthodox. The secular lot are more or less similar to what the westerners are like, complete with low birth rates. Orthodox dress like webm related, breed like rabbi(t)s but are exempt from the service because god said so or something. The government's been trying to make the orthodox serve too (because much like the westerners, the secular israelis are dying out, I think), but each time they attempt it the orthodox chimp out or a war reignites and distracts everyone.
>>520987218And here we have another legendary (no, really, she is revered) female Bri'ish figure in action:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudican_revolt
>>520985008QE2 reigned over the COLLAPSE of the empire. There was almost a fucking coup to oust parliament and tell the Queen to shape the fuck up but thanks to Jewish accounting they were made wealthy instead. By all accounts QE2 was an absolutely dysmal monarch and her legacy should be remembered as such.
>>520987353I thought you were jewish, so you're just Israeli then? Anyways the Orthodox need to shape up because they don't want to go to war but still wanna reap the benefits which don't make sense to me. Its like they are waiting for the mossiach to save them not understanding that:A: it really was just a fairy tail (which mean they fucked up)B: Israel could only exist after the messiah came so why the fuck are they there?C: who say that the lord will defend you if you don't defend yourself?It seems that the orthodox are hell bend on magical thinking and the secular needs to understand that traditions are there for a reason. So either the secular start fucking and making babies or the orthodox start to man up and provide soldiers. Just make a all male base and shit should be good no?
>>520984625Asia. some even war as far as to genocide whole villages worth of men. Reason: POWER!
>>520984625Those who are not around anymore for being retards and sending their only means of repopulation to the frontlines
>>520985617Is this guy on crack?
>>520984681we should have gifted you to the Bulgars
>>520988300I just moved here from Britain after getting b& for making the thread with the same text contents as this one. Perhaps they'd be less willing to assault someone under their master's flag.I'm frankly not sure all the orthodox ones are true believers anyway, it's just a very convenient class of people who, as you aptly mentioned, reap the benefits, without having to risk their lives. I'm sure that plenty of such moochers have already come up with some justification for not partaking (e.g. they're already paying taxes, or someone has to grow Israel's population, or maybe the business they work at is super important for Israel's survival, or something)Having a conscription in 21st century is an affront to human rights, imo, but at least they're not bailing women out like most other countries with conscriptions are. For example, in Finland, I think it's voluntary for them (but compulsory for men, obviously). Though I think some of the countries with forced conscriptions offer non-combatant civil service for conscientious objectors. But, why should a man toil for his state like that? At least compensate him with the salary equal to that of politicians who sent him there.
>>520988951aren't like 50% of the orthodox jobless. I believe that was also part of the problem. they are just focused and torah study and aren't producing nothing of value! Like they could write books about the lessons they're learning are about judiasm in the modern era or something like that. They should be more priestly for their secular counterparts but it's something they refuse to do which is weird. Seems like it's just a excuse to get NEETbux desu
>>520989586AI recap from google so could be wrong:>The employment rate for Orthodox Jewish men is significantly lower than for women, though the figures vary by community. In the ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) sector, about 50% to 70% of men are employed, with some estimates suggesting higher unemployment rates depending on the specific group. Conversely, around 75% of Orthodox Jewish women are employed.Over a quarter of adults not working doesn't look good. This also doesn't tell us what kind of employment the rest have, they could be working part-time or have bogus jobs like talmud knower or something.>Seems like it's just a excuse to get NEETbux desuThis has been my impression as well. Can sort of understand those who aren't actually true believers and just want to leech off of a nasty shady government they have.
> 1479–1458 BC– Reign of Hatshepsut. It is possible that she led military campaigns against Nubia and Canaan.Fought niggers and jews.
Celts, and Pictish women fought naked in battle.
>>520990805A neat little historical tidbit that also saves us the effort of asking what happened to Celts and Picts.
>>520987550Victoria you dumbfuck
In 1970 People’s Republic of China under the one-party leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bHjkXv7IUJ0&pp=ygUeQ2hpbmVzZSBndWVyaWxsYSB0cmFpbmluZyAxOTcw
