[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What is the exact criteria which which you can justify historical wars of aggression and genocides as whether being good or bad?
>>
>>520989173
The jews are the bad guys, the crusaders were good, the muslims are also bad. Clear?
>>
Augustine laid it out in the just war doctrine. Humus eater fail at every point.

1. Legitimate Authority
Only a rightful sovereign or ruler may declare and wage war.

2. Just Cause
War must be fought to correct a grave wrong or defend against aggression.

3. Right Intention
The goal must be peace and justice, not revenge, conquest, or gain.

4. Last Resort
All peaceful means of resolution must have been tried and failed.

5. Proportionality
The expected good must outweigh the harm and suffering caused by the war.

6. Probability of Success
There must be a reasonable chance of achieving the just outcome.

7. Discrimination
Force should be directed only at combatants, not civilians or innocents



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.