In today's world, sex, marriage and having offspring are three completely separated things, it seems most countries' law on marriage between siblings and fraternal twins is incompatible with the progress of the modern world.
>>520996931Who cares, this is such a bs thing to care about
>>520996931>fortifieWhat do you mean by this? If I had to guess you are an incestual jeet baby already.
>>520996931No. Marriage is a social thing. It serves a larger purpose than just fucking, which you shouldn't do with your sister anyways, for obvious reading. "Forfeiting" what? Babies are conceived out of wedlock and without being planted all day long. Jonathan Haidt has a good book about this, not that anyone here or anywhere at all, reads anymore butRighteous Minds.
>>520996931>fortifieforfeited?
>>520996931People did it in the Bible.
>>520996931We already allow people with heritable genetic conditions have kids
>>520996931What do you mean forfeit their rights to have offspring? Does the government kill the baby or something? I think the illegality of the marriage serves as the deterrent, any offspring still have the right to live, and they still have the right to have children as retarded as that would be.
>>520996931Incest has quickly become the least offensive fetish that is out there. As long as they are not doing it for several generations then I just cant care when worse things are being tolerated.
>>520996931I genuinely don't understand the moral difference between incest and homosexuality
>>520997005This.Every thread on /pol/s first reply should be "who cares?" Then only if it passes that test should the thread continue.
>>520996931it's about as pointless a faggot marriage. So - no
>>520997005>>521000688it would set a precedence for two faggots marrying each other and them having the benefits of marriage while being unable to contribute another member to the society>>521000879
>>521000503>>521000879funny we thought of the same thing. I hope you're not the swiss jeet
