>climate change is a hoax Prove me wrong
>>521007029lmao okay Fox News sure thing guys
>>521007029This is an example of why nobody believes them.
>>521007113>>521007322It has a source jews.
>>521007322That's tve trick doesn't it, they can't tell what he knows the people signing deals are not the guys tied to trees getting attacked by jaguarsThey don't care about them.
>>521007455Oh okay go ahead and link me to that source then pal
>>521007029This is taken completely out of context.
I apologize to brics for thinking the jaguars should have expensive real state
>>521007029Look at pictures of LA from thr 80s, before environmental standards for vehicles were established. It was one small cloud. Start there, bait faggot.
It's fake but I wish it was real
>>521007622Source is you're gay
>>521007029Always has been. Redditors should be shot and fed to niggers.
>>521007884what does local pollution have to do with climate change?the people of LA are fucking pigs no shit
>>521007029So it said Bill Gates a couple of days ago.
>>521007884That's pollution you retarded nigger. Something people cared about before your masters convinced you subhumans that co2 is the only thing that matters.
100,000 trees are cut in the amazon every 5 minutes by logging faggots
>>521007029
>>521007029http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19962/climate-emergency-hoaxsee river stones in europe from 500 years ago severe drought heat waves>500 years ago>500 years agohttp://www.google.com/search?q=river+stones+europe
>>521008345Pollution is unpleasant because it changes the climate you imbecile.
>>521007029I wonder who got all of that expensive Lignum Vitae? Im guessing all of the politicians have million dollar hardwood floors now.
exclamation point!
>>521007898To the bitter endShilling!
>>5210070291 PTID /slide
>>521007622How about BBC? They're saying the same thing. Use google you broccoli haired glue eater.
>>521007029I am a Big Strong Man! Of course I can change the climate! What do you think I'm a fucking weakling?
Literally bill gates had interview LAST weak saying global warming doesn't mean/do anything yeah it's real but it didn't change/will change much. If he's backpedaling you can bet your ass it was a hoax
>>521007029This is too absurd to be true, nobody is buying something this absurd.
>>521009072It's a way for NGO's to make money from people's fears.
Trumps law. This is for israel.
>>521008420According to your post it should be -30° Celsius where I am. Instead it's 10° Celsius.Climate change debunked again
>>521007029World is going end due to climate change any day now chud!
>>521007029>we should build our conference center in the rainforest
>>521007029Have you ever collected rainwater in a barrel? In late autumn and winter the barrel can break, if the water therein is alot to freeze -- frozen water is voluminous than liquid water.
>>521007029>big scandaljust like the epstein files. False flag.
>>521007029LOL. Like Pedo Trump gives a fuck about anything aside from raping children and selling us out to his Jewish brethren.
>>521012643>more voluminous*Bleh. Also: >>521010412, is a great example for the absolute state of (physics) education. It's bewildering that people ever fell for it.
>>521007029Driving my Testicle to Brazil. Who needs a lift?
>>521007029>The climate is changing and it's going to kill us all!>The climate is changing but it's not so bad.>The climate isn't changing.Third is demonstrably true.
>>521012911People like to think scientists are all virtuous unbiased seekers of truth but the thing is if you're a climate change scientist you are financially incentivized to make climate change sound as bad as possible to get further funding.We all know we can't trust scientists paid by tobacco companies on the health risk of cigarettes or companies paid by insect poison companies on crops on the health risks on humans because they have financial incentives for a specific conclusion.Climate change scientists also have a financial incentive to come to certain conclusions to make climate change sound as bad as possible for further funding but we can totally trust them because.... ?
>>521008420 100s of years.How we saw this from satellites that didn't go up till the 1960s?
