Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the body content, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.This email is MISSING the verifiable data needed to confirm its authenticity. Its fake and gay!
Also who types like that"VICTIM speaks" in a weird font? In private emails you'd say the name. Fake as fuck (#FAF - get it trending)
>>521244481Yeah no shit the kikes just push hoax after hoax projecting their crimes onto Trump because he stopped some of their money laundering
>>521244481
>>521244481Shouldn't you be DoorDashing Vivek?
>>521244481So they thought Trump was a fed?
>>521244791>>521244715>>521244629Provide the DKIM Signatures>HintYou WONT! Cause its fake and gay!DKIM Signatures are available for the HRC leaks for the Podesta Leaks and for the DNC leaks but not for this "damning" email for some reason??? FAKE AND GAY!
Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflecting the light from Israel.
>>521244481Holy fuck the kikes are furious OP good work
>>521244481This literally doesn't matter.DKIM signatures don't appear if taken from an off-line server. They are stripped of the data whe. Transferred to a POP server. There are and have been other ways to verify the authenticity of the emails.Try harder chud
>>521244481>no email-specific metadata in the filesThe original email files weren't released. That should be obvious to anyone, because of the blacked-out sections. What was released were PDF files, which look like they were made by taking screenshots.https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/democrats-oversight.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/3-emails_redacted.pdf
>>521244631The name has been redacted before release
>>521247139>>521247719>>521247764You idiots lterally just believe anything that you are told. Try digging a little deeper and you'll see that they are totally real. Just wait
>>521244481"The dog who hasn't barked" references "who is collaborating with law enforcement"He's discussing with maxwell who ratted him out.
>>521244629>get BTFO'd>seetheHahahahahahahahahahahahaha have you ever tried just not losing? Lmao
>>521247717>I-I-IT DOESN'T MATTERPost the DKIM signatures>Hint: You will not
>>521248003Here we go just making shit up again.
>>521247717>>521247719>>521247964>>521248003Lmao kikes freaking the fuck out that their latest hoax is worthless!
>>521248086They can be faked so easily. What is the point?
>>521244481So why doesn't Trump just release the list and clear his name
>>521248149Post themPost the DKIM signatures>Hint: You will not
>>521244481take your meds or the judge is going to force long-acting antipsychotic injection treatment.
>White House confirms it's real>chuddy on 4chan disagrees
>>521248185Because he is president of the pedoamerican too
>>521247964>Just waitYOU HEARD IT HERE GUYS, JUST WAIT!PROBABLY ONLY 2 MORE WEEKS!
>>521248198How the fuck do you expect me fmto upload a DKIM signature onto an image board dumbass?
>>521248149>they can be fakedgo ahead and fake them, then.if you want to, you'll have to wait longer than the heat death of the universe.
>>521248309>how do you expect me to post text onto an imageboard dumbass?what did he mean by this?
>>521244481This one is going up on the fridge! Couldn't even try to falsify beyond a txt
>>521248405Holy shit I am a dumbassSomeone fucking with my keyboard.Fucking deepstate
>>521247717>Akshually they strip the data so you can't tell where it came from or went yeah it's pretty hacker stuffSo sad all the old shills died in the IDF. They're not sending their best anymore.
>>521244481It is something you have to set up manually though. It's meant to serve as a record to proof authenticity, it's tied to a certificate in the server. It's not a hash of the email (wtf does that even mean?)There's absolutely email forensics and dkim can be used for that, but it's not some stamp on an email like you think it is.
>>521248309OP is literally a 65 IQ mongoloid and doesn't understand the email screenshots are default microsoft outlook "print email" view which don't show any sort of encryption signature.
Even if the signature were there, how would you verify it if it's been redacted?Presumably the signatures have been removed so you can't unredact via brute force.
>>521248819Don't carePOST THE DKIM SIGNATURES>Hint: You will not
>>521248908>It doesn't matter!Post the signatures>Hint: You will not
>>521244481Wrong. There are no standard, required security or validation headers. And non-standard headers for those purposes are not typically displayed by email readers. The elites you worship fuck kids.
>>521244481>dkim migger made anudda breadKudos for trying but ur defending child rapists
>>521248950this is a classic example of 65 IQ "learning.">read about something>think you understand it>don't understand it>latch on to it to the point of obsession>engagement limited to repeating the same thing over and overif i had to guess, you had no idea what a "DKIM signature" was prior to 8 hours ago.
>>521249131Post the signatures, pedophile. >Hint: You will not.
>>521247139Dark Trump era incoming. Israel does not want an american base in palestine. Weirdest part? The democrats that cried about israel for 3 years now side with them in an unholy alliance because they never really belived in anything at all, only virtue signaling.
>>521244481>Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the body content, and validates the content itself as authentic./g/ here.No they don't.E-mail is a stupidly old fashioned and insecure means of communication and it's literally just a few rows of text for the headers, then a blank row, and then the contents.
>>521244481with a hash of the content it would be trivial to find who is the victim, retard
>>521249189Dkim is the dog that didnt bark but ur boy trump complicit
>>521244481Real eyes realize.
IIRC they failed to fake this with the Crowdstrike mails too. This smells of Egg McMuffin to me.
>>521249131>you should totally trust this screenshot of an email, brothere's a reason that cryptography is important, anon.any message without cryptographic authentication can be summarily ignored for the garbage that it is.
>>521249189> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;d=easydmarc.com; s=google;h=from: content-transfer-encoding: subject: message-id:date:to:mime-version;bh= 1py3bPKPbePCmMziH13AZqw0Fa +/ wnOTcnp6P-ZLMW2SwMpgo=;b= 1yc9n5JU-7bTkT9FxgIYFJutPbxbyfsBXlbD4wJ-Mdt8/15vjYvI2-IlCipp_FFTkyd3s_yA4jX65vRSsaE2hBhTw okQIHsBTfmTFEEo01BtmUZpR5M4Mtz5Q8LE97YRDE /nI1hoPWbzDaL9qhKYS 65 IQ nigger
lmao you guys are trying so hard to turn this into a conspiracy against your daddy
>>521251897>chatgpt can't fake a DKIM correctlyGood to know
>>521251897>AI SLOPNice try, pedophile
>>521249434Your butthole is complicit in pleasuring negro cocks.
If Epstein and Trump were best buds and trafficking girls together... at what point do they start calling each other by their first name?
Simping for an elderly rich pedophile. Sad.
>>521244481This is just the html of the e-mail for boomers.
>>521252061>>521252095> Goal posts moved Niggers can't even when answering the retarded nigger faggot shit.
>>521252424>posts AI slop>Gets called retarded nigger faggot for posting AI Slop>GOAL POSTS MOVED!retarded nigger faggot
>>521244631Are you actually this retarded or are you getting paid to be this retarded?
>>521252544>are you getting paid to be this retardedOf course he is.
>>521244481>they’re all fake goyim! Please!Lmao
>>521252950Post the DKIM Signatures>HINT: YOU WILL NOT
>>521251703Dude: everyone knows Trump is a creepy pedorapist. There is no putting that cat back in the bag.
>>521244481You are about to lose bigly, kike.
>>521252979Post hands and a timestamp Akshit.
>>521253223Post the DKIM Signatures>HINT: You will not
>>521248185Because even if he wasn't personally proven to have been fucking kids the kikes who were will destroy him. He's fucking owned and operated by yids.
>>521244481Nice catch anon. “Dog” was a really big red flag dog whistle lol too I became suspicious the second I read that
CAUSE THEY IS DOGS LOLOLOL HAGAHZ HAHAHA. THEY IS DOGS
>>521253273>Orange retard calls for emergency meeting on Epstein>Is begging house Republicans not to sign the release>Said he would release the files during his campaign but didntThis fucking migger thinks DT is innocent and is coping and seething for DKIM signatures because he knows it all about to go downhill. Your DKIM is in the files which Trump could release anytime. Email the White House you retarded kike faggot.>HINT: You won't so kill yourself.
Dkim- domain key identified mail.It's not hashing the entire body of the email. It includes a hashed domain key that is unique to the domain of the sender. It's a way of identifying the sender address as authentic. It's not encryption and it's not doing it over and over again. It's a hash that's stored in mx records that authoritative domain servers hold onto. Definitely would help identify the sender, but many email servers don't use it, though they should. It's something worth checking for though
>>521253749Yeah but they is dogs lol
They is dogs lol
>>521245073>provide the DKIM signatures! You are a fucking moron who has no idea how any of this shit actually works.
>>521254178provide the emails with DKIM Signatures>HINT: You will not
>>521253322Yids fuck kids. This is known.
On the TV screen and in the magazinesIf you play me close, you're on a red beamOh, you got a gun, so you wanna pop back?AK-47 now, nigga, stop thatCement shoes, now I'm on the moveYour family's cryin', now you on the newsThey can't find you and now they miss youMust I remind you, I'm only here to twist youPistol-whip you, dip you, then flip youThen dance to this motherfuckin' music we Crip to
>>521244481it's over dude, just go pro-pedo now
REMINDER THAT ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.INSTALL TOOLS:apt-get install wget opendkim-toolsDOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'VERIFY SIGNATURE:cat 4984 | dkimverifyTHIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK
>>521254552based linux detective poster
>>521254230 We don't have them you fucking retard, nor do we have the headers. On top of that, chances are that for the other half of the exchange, you wouldn't even be able to verify them at all as ellmax.com probably didn't even have DKIM as very few email servers back then did.>HINT: refer to my first post. You are a fucking moron.
>>521254916You don't have them because the emails are fake.
>>521254955 We don't have them because what we have right now are effectively screenshots of the emails compiled into a pdf. Should we also doubt the authenticity of the footage released in the Epstein productions from the DOJ because we don't have a hash to verify whether or not the footage has been modified in some form or not? Again, you are a mental midget who doesn't actually understand how any of this shit works. This isn't some big win for you, this is just a way for you to cope with the fact that your dear leader is an Israel loving pederast.
>>521255385Release the emails with DKIM signaturesGoogle had DKIM in 2011Release the files with the DKIM Signatures>Hint: You will not
>>521244481I don't care if he fucked a million kids, still voting Trump. Now and forever.MAGA all the way, patriots in control.
>>521244481If anything Epstein just typed shit like this about everyone so even if you weren’t part of his operation you could be said to have been.
>>521255585Curse Vishny by name
>>521255385>blah blah blah>logical fallacies left and rightif you falsely equivocate the strength of screenshots of emails with the strength of emailsyou lose the right to call anyone a mental midget.the risk-to-reward ratio of simply releasing fake screenshots is too high for any unbiased person to take this shit seriously.and, given that libshits have literally released fake documents before (4chan piss dossier) there is even less reason to believe them as they have lost credibility.why would anyone be satisfied for a screenshot of an email that anyone could fakeinstead of the actual email with all of it's mathematical verifiability?it's because they prefer something salacious that can't be verified.simple as.
>>521255760NEVER
Kali ma kali ma
>>521244631>... Susan spent hours at my house with him ..Stupid fucking browns.
>>521255473>Release the emails with DKIM signatures Go tell the House oversight committee. For my money, Trump's behavior falls in line pretty well with the information thus far.>>521255849>if you falsely equivocate the strength of screenshots of emails with the strength of emails Do you also doubt the rest of the evidence and documents released for which there's no hash or signature process? It's really a simple question.>4chan piss dossier I didn't know the 4chan piss dossier came directly from the Epstein estate. Again, if you think the emails are fake, why not also go along with the notion that everything else, including previously released data, is also fabricated? We don't have hashes for his birthday celebration book, we can't verify the hash of the footage of his cell, we don't have digital signatures for pictures of him in high school, etc etc.>A-anyone could fake it Yes, anyone could fake it. Did the Epstein estate fake the emails given to the House oversight committee? Most likely not.
>>521244923That’s the way I read it. And another curious facet is the fact that Michal wolf, in his podcast series, mentioned that Epstein kept a small number of incriminating photos of Trump in a safe. He said Epstein showed them to him on multiple occasions. And even though these pictures (as described by wolf) do somewhat implicate Trump, they’re hardly damning. It’s basically some photos of Trump with topless teens sitting in his lap. My question is, how does a Mossad agent with a house, an island and zoro ranch all wired at all times, he’s best friends with Trump for 15 years, they’re supposedly always together, and Jeff’s occupation is a pedo pimp blackmail operator…how is the best kompromat just a few stray snaps of topless teens? Moreover, why is he so focused on roping Trump into this ring, and why is the most damning thing Epstein has to say >he was here with so&so for hours alone. Why would he not scoff at the idea that Trump was clean (or potentially not a fed)? Something is very peculiar here. I simply cannot fully figure trump out. Something is very strange about all this, and it’s potentially exonerating for Trump.
>>521256816>Again, if you think the emails are fake, why not also go along with the notion that everything else, including previously released data, is also fabricated?Poison the well somewhere else, glownigger faggot!
>>521244481So the WH is lying when they said the emails are real proof that Trump did nothing?
>>521256816>Do you also doubt the rest of the evidence and documents released for which there's no hash or signature process? It's really a simple question.another false equivocation.why release something that was designed to be verifiable in an unverifiable format?>b b but, they were RELEASEDby whom? from where? and, how do you know that?> I didn't know the 4chan piss dossier came directly from the Epstein estate.the steele dossier came directly from 4chins, fag.if they're willing to run with that to obtain warrants, there is no text document produced by libshits that i would ever trust.>Again, if you think the emails are fake, why not also go along with the notion that everything else, including previously released data, is also fabricated?i don't believe that i've ever stated that i trust anything released by libshits...they are, by definition, untrustworthy.>We don't have hashes for his birthday celebration book, we can't verify the hash of the footage of his cell, we don't have digital signatures for pictures of him in high school, etc etc.apples and oranges.you are purporting to have an email.emails are very easy to verify by everyone with a laptop.why go out of your way to release something in a format that removes its ability to be verified?the answer is because you don't want it to be verified; and given the source is untrustworthy as hell, it's essentially tabloid garbage.it is literally as verifiable as bigfoot's batboy baby.> Yes, anyone could fake it. Did the Epstein estate fake the emails given to the House oversight committee?why make the extra step, anon?the real question is did the house oversight committee fake emails?i wouldn't put it past them.and, the way to answer that question without a doubt is very simple--release the alleged emails instead of screenshots.why not release the emails as emails, anon?because then anyone could run the verification process and see that they are, in fact, fake.simple as.
Cope
>>521244715
>>521257518Extremely based
>>521257518>why release something that was designed to be verifiable in an unverifiable format? Email was not 'designed to be verifiable', why do you think DKIM, SPF and everything in between came out 4 decades after the fact?>by whom? from where? and, how do you know that? By the House Oversight Committee from the Epstein estate you dumb faggot. Same place we got all other information, screenshots and pictures from.>the steele dossier came directly from 4chins, fag. I see the point went right over your boomer head..>i don't believe that i've ever stated that i trust anything released by libshits... You're a mentally retarded cultist stuck in a binary way of thinking about the world. Libshits can't ever tell the truth, republicans can't ever be liars or pedophiles.>apples and oranges. It's literally not. Again, if you don't trust the emails in the PDFs to be authentic, why on earth aren't you applying that same standard to everything else release in the files?>why go out of your way to release something in a format that removes its ability to be verified? You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, they didn't 'go out of their way' to remove its ability to verified, they just hit 'export to pdfs' on the emails and decided to upload that instead of raw email data because the vast majority of the American public isn't composed of retards sperging about DKIM signatures. Go ahead, export an email to pdf, see what headers you can get lmao. Again, you people are fucking retarded and keep going out of your way to find every angle that allows for you to keep sucking off MIGA Trump, even when he covers up for Jewish pedophilia. Get fucked.
>>521258352>Email was not 'designed to be verifiable', why do you think DKIM, SPF and everything in between came out 4 decades after the fact?nonsequitor.the alleged emails of concern would have dkim (@gmail email address...)> By the House Oversight Committee from the Epstein estate you dumb faggot. Same place we got all other information, screenshots and pictures from.i literally don't care. i wrote that to make fun of you.my doubt of the authenticity of a screenshot and the ability to verify a message are, thankfully, do not require trust.release the alleged emails as emails so that they can be verified by everyone, otherwise they can be safely discounted as the tabloid garbage they are.> You're a mentally retarded cultist stuck in a binary way of thinking about the world. Libshits can't ever tell the truth, republicans can't ever be liars or pedophiles.what if i don't trust anyone, republicans or libshits?a screen shot of an email is not an email.simple as.> It's literally not. Again, if you don't trust the emails in the PDFs to be authentic, why on earth aren't you applying that same standard to everything else release in the files?i don't have to trust anything to be able to verify an email, anon.release the emails as emails or they're bullshit.simple as.>You have no idea what the fuck you're talking about, they didn't 'go out of their way' to remove its ability to verified, they just hit 'export to pdfs' on the emails and decided to upload that instead of raw email data because the vast majority of the American public isn't composed of retards sperging about DKIM signatures. Go ahead, export an email to pdf, see what headers you can get lmao.ad hom.also, nonsequitor.they chose to export as pdf.why not release the emails as emails?it's even more simple than exporting them as pdfs.>blah blah blah i'm so gay i can't even think straightwe know.it's pretty evident.
>>521258925>nonsequitor. It's not a nonsequitor when we wouldn't be able to verify DKIM for one half of the exchange. Does this mean that Epstein was talking to someone running a phishing scheme? most likely not.>m-muh tabloid garbage Right, because the Epstein estate is well known for producing tabloid clickbait, sending it to the House Oversight Committee and having it all uploaded onto a government website. What a rube. Again, if you're willing to dismiss the emails because they supposedly have no verifiability, then it seems foolish not to dismiss most, if not all other data from the uploads.>ad hom.>also, nonsequitor. No, I literally just addressed the argument as you presented it. You made it out like there was some conspiracy by either the estate or the oversight committee to upload the emails in such a way as to obscure their authenticity when the reality is they just hit 'print to pdf' and uploaded the pdfs as opposed to raw email data because raw email data just so happens to not have the same accessibility for the average person as opening up a fucking pdf.>muh muh wikileaks>Muh muh dnc emails Right, because those were totally released by boomers at government agencies. Right. Holy shit nigger, go back to fucking reddit with your retardation.
>>521244481every time the board gets invaded by this fake hysteria you know its a dem gayop. this isn't our first rodeo libtards. we know you are here-Randyfrom Ohio
>>521244481>>521244631>>521244660>>521245073>>521247139The cope ia fucking insane lmao
If all these messages are false, all the senders and recipients of these emails will take legal action for defamation...For the moment, we have not received any news from them.
>>521244481are you a retard? These weren't government e-mails like DNC and Podesta they don't have signature chains it's people private emails
>>521260594google gmail had DKIM in 2011
>>521260020>It's not a nonsequitor when we wouldn't be able to verify DKIM for one half of the exchange. Does this mean that Epstein was talking to someone running a phishing scheme? most likely not.... that's not how dkim works, anon.>you have to throw the baby out with the bath waterokay. and? what has that got to do with this alleged email?>No, I literally just addressed the argument as you presented it. You made it out like there was some conspiracy by either the estate or the oversight committee to upload the emails in such a way as to obscure their authenticity when the reality is they just hit 'print to pdf' and uploaded the pdfs as opposed to raw email data because raw email data just so happens to not have the same accessibility for the average person as opening up a fucking pdf.let's assume that you're acting in good faith (you aren't) and there is no conspiracy.okay. release the emails as emails so that i can verify them and i don't have to take your, or anyone's, word for it.it's pretty simple stuff.i don't have to trust anyone to run a simple verification, anon.> Right, because those were totally released by boomers at government agencies. Right.100% irrelevant.if people are claiming that emails exist, but are releasing pdfs instead of emails, then there is no reason to believe that those emails exist.presumably they didn't delete the emails after they exported them as pdfs, right?great. no harm no foul.release the emails and i'll get on board with impeaching everyone and imprisoning all the things.just don't ask me to blindly believe something so extraordinary without any evidence.
naa
>>521260743the Email you are looking at is gmax1@ellmax.com, NOT Gmail, it is Ghislaine Maxwel private company email, and she can format it how ever the hell she wants
>>521244481damn i guess it's really over for Trump they finally got him now
>>521260925>private company emailno ellmax was a free email service like gmail in 2011 but it doesn't matter because epstein was using gmail and that DOES have DKIM signature
>>521261010this email wasn't sent from Epstein it was sent from gmax1@ellmax.com, says it right at the top
>>521247717>DKIM signatures don't appear if taken from an off-line server.> They are stripped of the data whe. Transferred to a POP server. No, retard, but if that were true than these aren't emails. Actually, they aren't emails anyway. They are an approximation of what an email like that might look like in a shitty email client that no one would use today. Stick with what you know--dreaming of cutting your dick off and killing yourself.
>>521261156That's right. When that bitch wasn't trafficking ho's, she was setting up MTAs 'n shit.Stop being a retarded nigger.
>>521261579no I'm 100% right, she copied the text and emailed it, there wont be a DKIM signature because she is not using gmail
>>521248351>>go ahead and fake them, then.not an expert but I work in tech, dont the DKIM signatures only prove that an email came from the domain (key exchange) and that the message is what the sender sent? (hashing)which means I could have completely legit DKIM signatures if I just emailed two accounts I have access to back and forth? I dont think you can use these signatures to prove the email exchange is legit or not, they're more designed for you to check if an email you received is who you assume it is.
>>521244481we know the font and the hash, you could always just generate a list of names that would fit in that space in that font until one of them creates a mashing hash. This isn't the sort of thing it'd be hard to brute force, I doubt there are more than about ten thousand womens names that would fit in that space.
