[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 3131120253434.png (240 KB, 1502x458)
240 KB
240 KB PNG
Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.


ANYONE CAN VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE PODESTA EMAILS WITH THREE SIMPLE COMMANDS.

INSTALL TOOLS:
apt-get install wget opendkim-tools

DOWNLOAD A PODESTA EMAIL TO VERIFY:
wget 'https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//get/4984'

VERIFY SIGNATURE:
cat 4984 | dkimverify

THIS SHOULD PRODUCE AN "OK" MEANING THAT IT PASSED THE VERIFICATION CHECK

THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO WITH THE EMAILS RELEASED RECENTLY.
>>
intredasting
>>
what if those email addresses just dont exist anymore though
>>
>>521268463
Google keeps DNS records going back decades
If congress has the original emails they should release those emails in email format so that the DKIM signatures can be verified for authenticity at this point all they have is their word and the word of a politician means less than nothing.
>>
>>521268042
piss off, kike
>>
>>521268626
seethe more, moishe.
>>
>>521268042
Since trump banned hemp,
I don't believe you.
>>
>>521268042
DKIM keys are periodically changed or updated. It's not to uncommon for an email sent to pass a DKIM check then fail that same check months or years down the road. DESU, this is a flawed way to check the authenticity of older emails and only makes sense if you are using the checks for a spam filter or something. You could snag old keys for the sender domain from a place like security trails and check against those. Try that and let us know what you find. I am interested to know. And no, I am not going to take the time to do it myself.
>>
>>521269533
I would love to check the integrity of the DKIM signatures but sadly they refuse to release the emails in a format that preserves the header and the DKIM signatures. This is because the emails are fake and gay.
>>
>>521268591
Also the NSA has access to this information. Kikes are too busy subjugating white people to fight real crime.
>>
>>521269644
Oh, sorry. I am tired and didn't read through your post all the way. I read something something dkim checks not passed. Yeah, that is highly suspect. Probably fake and gay.
>>
>>521269644
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=vYXVFZ965hcqWaDPIM0UNTnbMLHjEJoUyq6kOyfrAtA=;
b=0duMyr2ib2RN+VC2OaYGsbx5nggqHkVZLDRQLRUTP7ElNI02UAwKa74kvcb1FuE9y6
BKTI/Q30PFvZFT+kkicpL/5c7o/D9A/O3J2m61o5JvtKF5GX5a9GNjx9TSC4OuoxYTp8
jPqKdKccWw2tLYDZSGV+x8CuiUKRIW8ZKhT8XTP1xz3t5WoggFcGcSbBxib+nGPIkVhC
GpppDIdr1knbbysFAQ3e/9G3HDkUiMc2uBVEuzOWKzeWSqznwTwUar+si7Tt3zqf0gkU
y1Sc36xx3fCNqsiAv0eNgiLczgbkVcSu/fu4zvYr/IIeS82H5X+sWaLaws7phvE52h9s
4RDA==
>>
>>521270880
AI slop
good to know that chatgpt cant fake a DKIM signature though
>>
>>521270935
That's pasted from the email.
>>
>>521271008
sure buddy
where did you find the eml file? Not on the house oversight website, so where did you get it?
>>
>>521271063
You linked it.
>>
>>521271213
Linked what? The Podesta Emails?
Post the EML file for the recent alleged Epstein Emails, retard.
>>
>>521268042
Release the files
>>
>>521268042
bro, goyim aren't human, stop bothering lmao
>>
>>521273868
Shut up, Jew. Everyone knows what DKIM signatures are you retard
>>
>>521273995
But goyem won't even give a fuck
It's cool to think there's a conspiracy
They want a head and they will be given one
Lol
>>
File: IMG_6945.jpg (173 KB, 665x1024)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>>521274065
Yes, we all know lizards bred Jews, and the other human race mixtures. You aren’t special faggot
>>
>>521268042
>>
>>521268042
>they are fake
>epstein estate released it after their lawyers gave the go ahead
>pussy dems would release something from the oversight committee without THEIR lawyers saying its ok with authentication
>GOP released more epstein files to help dilute it
sure retard, i bet the 7k per thread youve been making for the past 5 hours doing damage control is going to pay off soon
>>
>>521274065
Shut up kike.
>>
>>521268042
>>521268591

The first version of that shit you are talking about only came 2007, that is only few years before those emails. It did not magicly come to everywhere.
The state of pol /hackers/... baka, faggot, baka...
>>
>>521275037
Gmail was using DKIM in 2011
nothing you say can change this fact
>>
>>521268042
Can you provide a screenshot of what it spits out when you try to verify Epstein emails?
>>
>>521275355
nothing because they haven't released eml files, can't even start the authentication process until they release files that have the header and the DKIM hash
>>
File: when-the-mohel.jpg (361 KB, 800x742)
361 KB
361 KB JPG
>>521275119
This. Why is this faggot trying to gaslight everybody? I smell mohel.
>>
>>521275119
"DKIM Standard: The DKIM standard itself was finalized in 2007.
Gmail Integration: Gmail has supported and encouraged the use of DKIM for a long time to verify email authenticity and improve deliverability.
Recent Requirements: In February 2024, Google started requiring larger senders to set up DKIM and other authentication protocols like SPF and DMARC to combat spam." -google ai

Hardcore hacker OP turned out to be a lying faggot.
>>
>>521275632
>ai slop
>google has used it for a long time
thanks for agreeing with me?
>>
echo VHJ1bXAgZnVja3Mga2lkcyBhbmQgZXZlcnlib2R5IGtub3dzIGl0Lgo= | base64 -d
>>
>>521275631
Another great 4chan hacker? XD Here: >>521275632
>>
>>521275689
It said: "supported and encouraged the use."
That is not: "has used it for a long time."

Truth is you dont really know how it works and when.
>>
>>521275727
Gmail was using DKIM in 2011 and there is nothing you can say that can change this fact. All one needs to do is google "was gmail using DKIM in 2011" and they will have the answer, your lies have no power here.
>>
>>521275912
You already lost me by lying and twisting. Truth is you really dont know how these things works and what is the timeline. I´m 100% sure, that you are not the anon to ask about, or to teach anybody in, this matter.
>>
>>521275912
What's funny, kikes can not produce fake signature no matter how hard they are trying. They are sealing the impression that their relationship with reality is quite tenuous. I think this country needs more mental institutions and more deportations. Let Israel deal with these nutcases. I am sure Trump can make a deal. It would be his biggest accomplishment.
>>
>>521276062
Just fuck off and accuse everybody of antisemitism already.
>>
>>521276062
>lying and twisting
Gmail was using DKIM in 2011 and there is nothing you can do to change this fact all anyone has to do is simply look it up themselves and they will find this to be true, your lies have no power here.
>>
>>521276191
Talmud denounced and foreskin unmutilated. One thing is for sure. You don´t know what you are talking about. I know this now and so does everybody else who sees your replys to me.
>>
>>521276205
This is how you twist:
It said: "supported and encouraged the use."
That is not: "has used it for a long time."
>>
>>521276292
Why did you repeatedly try to lie with your claims that Gmail was not using DKIM in 2011 despite it being extremely easy for anyone to simply search it up themselves and verify that Gmail was in fact using DKIM in 2011?
>>
>>521268042
200% MAGA cope
>>
Is this pro-Trump schizobabble or anti-Trump schizobabble?
>>
>>521276371
As i said, you don´t really know this subject mr. 4chan megahacker, so here:
Google began using DKIM in 2011
, though it was a gradual rollout. In June 2011, Google announced progress in implementing DKIM in a blog post, and the standard was formally published that same year. Google also worked with its Postini service to support DKIM, though there were some early integration challenges.

Progress and integration: In June 2011, a Google Enterprise blog post mentioned a new tool in the fight against spam and abuse, signaling progress in DKIM implementation, according to blog.thestateofme.com.
Standardization: The standard for DKIM (RFC 6376) was first published in 2011, according to EasyDMARC.
Early challenges: There were early issues with integration, particularly with Google's Postini service, which initially prevented DKIM from working correctly for some users.

p.s. OP IS A LYING FAGGOT
>>
>>521276556
>Google began using DKIM in 2011
Thanks for agreeing with me?
>>
>>521268042
It's pretty funny that as soon as the loser Democrats don't have their pointless and cruel shutdown any more there are 20 "Trump is a pedo because I say so" spamthreads in the catalog.
>>
>>521276599
>though it was a gradual rollout. In June 2011 Google announced progress in implementing DKIM in a blog post, and the standard was formally published that same year. Google also worked with its Postini service to support DKIM, though there were some early integration challenges.

Progress and integration: In June 2011, a Google Enterprise blog post mentioned a new tool in the fight against spam and abuse, signaling progress in DKIM implementation...

You really are stupid, are you not? XD Pls, keep lurking and don´t try to be some assum 4chan hacker who "HAS THE EVIDENCE" XD XD XD

As always, OP is a lying faggot. propably a tranny.
>>
>>521276725
> In June 2011 Google announced progress in implementing DKIM in a blog post, and the standard was formally published that same year.
Again... thanks for agreeing with me?
>>
>>521276599
One more thing. As google started using DKIM partially in JUNE 2011, those emails you see here are from MARCH/MAY 2011. jan, feb, mar, apr, may, jun, jul,...
OP IS A FAAAAGGOOOOOOOOOOOT!!!
>>
>>521276725
He's been spamming this gay shit for hours. This was already explained to him. He's just another jewboy trying to save his ZOGdaddy pedophile.
>>
>>521276725
some emails are from 2018, faggot
>>
>>521276779
Nobody is agreeing with you and you really dont know how these thing work. You arlready lost us all with your stupidity. Here: >>521276779


Go to mirror and see a faggot and NEVER do these same mistakes here again. Start lurking, you have not done the 2 years that are in the rules. If you would have, you would not do this - you would be me.
>>
>>521277019

Who the fuck are you? Religion/Ethnicity. No people as dumb as you exist on this planet.
>>
File: 3211120254444.png (70 KB, 665x431)
70 KB
70 KB PNG
>>521277019
Again, why are you lying? This can be easily verified with a simple google search. Your lies have no power here.
>>521276952
He is lying anyways because Gmail has supported DKIM since 2004 but made it the default in January of 2011.
>>
>>521276952
Here, stupid. What is requiring?

"When did Gmail start requiring DKIM?
Beginning in February 2024, Gmail and Yahoo will begin implementing new requirements of large senders to combat spam and abuse through email. We recommend that Action Network partners with over 5,000 people on their lists meet these requirements. Install DKIM and SPF records. Click here to learn how to do this."

And here:
"At that time, the support was available for both regular Gmail and for Google Apps users, though the setup for Google Apps users was tied to the "Next Generation" control panel settings"

Just stop it. You are making a fool out of yourself. Nobody believes you anymore. You blew it, mr "4chan hacker with evidence who has not lurked a single day".
>>
>>521277194
Why are you lying when anyone can simply look it up themselves and they will find that Gmail has supported DKIM since 2004 and Google made it mandatory in January of 2011.
>>
>>521277110
Can you read?

""At that time, the support was available for both regular Gmail and for Google Apps users, though the setup for Google Apps users was tied to the "Next Generation" control panel settings""

WHY, oh why, you are this STUPID? Like talking to a retard child who took covid vaccine.

p.s. google some more in panic. XD XD MOre proof that you have 0 idea what you are even talking about.
>>
>>521277305
Why are you lying when anyone can simply look it up themselves and they will find that Gmail has supported DKIM since 2004 and Google made it mandatory in January of 2011.
>>
Glowniggers would never allow such sloppy job for a big happening like this one. Just look at all the hard work they did for a little event like the 2017 Las Vegas shooting.
>>
>>521277240
Same answer: >>521277305

+ You come to 4chan and try to fool us with your word plays and twisted information. We all know that you are not the person to educate us. I bet you are a tranny...
>>
>>521277399
>we
oyy veyy
>>
>>521277347
Does support mean it is acive in every account or did it specificly say: "Activated via control panel, requirement 2024 for bulk senders"

You lost, tranny and everybody can see it. You dont even know what suppot means. XD The state of /pol/ hackers these days.... Holy kek.
>>
>>521277370
That was extremely fucking sloppy too, the only thing they did "right" was to get mainstream media to stop talking about it so few people would notice/care.
>>
>>521276779
fuck off kike
>>
>>521277510
cope and seethe, moishe
>>
>>521274762
Damage control for what though? The emails look fake, but what's more funny is how they're fake AND gay. They contain nothing but whining TDS and claim Trump was being set up. They show the villain as a petty, manipulative liar and make Trump look good. You demented freaks think everything is a smoking gun. I hope they're real, so we can laugh at you when they backfire.
>>
Im off to work, bye.
>>
>>521277486
Not really, they silenced all the witnesses and later discretly murdered the real target of the shooting.

If they did all of that just for one guy, then for sure they could just fake a whole new database with bullshit emails with legit signatures so the goyim stops asking for the evidence of the pedo cabal running the government.
>>
>>521268042
DKIM is neither an absolute requirement, nor does DKIM validate the content is unmodified.

Lack of DKIM doesn't refute authenticity
> Lack of DKIM doesn't refute authenticity
Lack of DKIM doesn't refute authenticity

DKIM doesn't confirm authenticity
> DKIM doesn't confirm authenticity
DKIM doesn't confirm authenticity

Nice try doe
>>
>>521277792
It's a moot point because the emails were released as PDF so none of the lost metadata is relevant. It's a bad faith straw man argument and there's nothing to explain or defend.
Just laugh at the miggers and tell them Trump fucks kids.
>>
>>521278401
Lezbehonest it's probably some kid who did his first week of Sysadmin at his mom's boyfriends failing GPT wrapper start up and thinks he's linus torvalds
>>
521277621
NIGGER you weren't at work already? you're posting that kikery for FREE?
yikes,... this isn't reddit, btw
>>
>>521278401
>>521278548
Post the DKIM signatures
>Hint: You will NOT!
>>
>>521281130
They've been trimmed or who ever released the documents didn't believe they were relevant. It doesn't matter you stupid turbo nigger DKIM is not a suitable method to validate the authenticity of the email months after it was delivered nor does it validate the sender beyond the server that signed it. You're grasping at straws champ
>>
File: 3181120253131.png (359 KB, 1214x1247)
359 KB
359 KB PNG
>>521281460
Wrong
See pic related from the Wikileaks website
>>
File: 1732310125509843.jpg (479 KB, 1811x1953)
479 KB
479 KB JPG
>>521268042
Imagine guntguarding shitbag Trump. What a huge faggot you are.
>>
>>521281512
Facts don't care about your feelings
Post the DKIM signatures, pedophile
>>
Very interesting find, OP.
>>
>>521281487
> The failure of the validation process has little meaning
From your own standard kek.

Ergo there are only two conclusions that can be drawn:
1. They have the header and it passes, making this release highly likely to be authentic.
2. The header fails and you can draw no conclusions from this.

You have nothing to gain and the headers are meaningless. Your endless hunt for plausible deniability is just sad, face it, you got duped by a Jew loving pedophile who hangs out with other Jew pedophiles and frees known Jew pedophiles and sends them back to Israel at your expense.
>>
>>521276952
The VICTIM was reveled to Virginia Giuffre who said she never saw Trump do anything.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.