[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/5617584-guardrail-standards-electric-vehicles
>>
Will it inconvenience minorities? If so yes
>>
File: Burn it all.jpg (60 KB, 800x500)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>522039178
Let them go throughhhhhhhh

and crash and burn.

Save us from the electrotard low IQ stupidity! Let them crash and burnnnnnnnnnnnn
>>
>>522039178
Make the states that want the specialty guard rails pay for them with no federal spending, go nuts with your own peoples money not others.
>>
>>522039306
>>522039347
Retards might want to read the article. It's not about protecting the EVs, it's that being heavier they crash straight through the rails into whatever the rails were protecting
>>
Yeah yeah spend more money on guard rails. Fucking useless niggers.
if i was american congress, id nationalize everything from healthcare to insurance to student loans. think about how much money that generates. straight into paying off denbts. amerimutts are too stupid to figure out state capitalism.
>>
>>522039178
I thought those cars have safety features that keep them from veering off the road.
>>
>>522039178
>cars are getting too big for the road infrastructure, we need to build more at great expense
have they not thought about just not making cars bigger?
>>
Electric vehicles truly are a downgrade.
>>
File: 1663047349478623.jpg (95 KB, 750x749)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
>>522039178
(((Schrum)))
>>
>>522039531
Literally not possible if they want to keep pushing EVs. Their batteries are heavy as fuck.
>>
I have an electric car and it's fucking awesome. Accelerates way faster than your boomer wagon and weighs enough to ram you off of a cliff. Go die
>>
>>522039178
Are they heavier than semi trucks? Because guard rails don't really stop them either.
>>
>>522039825
Enjoy changing your tires every 6 months sheeple.
>>
File: 1762905670650.jpg (42 KB, 577x433)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>522039233
Fpbp
Keep the board on target.
>>
>>522039910
An average sized electric car weighs as much as a full size pickup.
>>
They don't stop tractor trailers either and we never had to spend obscene amounts of money overhauling the entire highway system replacing guardrails for them when despite them making up 10 times more highway traffic than EVs.
>>
>>522039178
No let them roast.
>>
>>522039178
i need to know more but don't want to click, what does mister schrum says about guard rails ? how are electric viehicals affected differently than regular steam or petrol powered ones ? and how is this political ?
>>
>>522039178
EVs cause unprecedented damage to roads.
>>
>>522040341
That is worth discussing, but perhaps a different topic. As it stands now EVs do not use gasoline so do not always contribute to the tax revenues that fund public roadways. Some states however do charge higher registration fees or fees based on miles driven to try and offset this difference.
>>
File: smart_fortwo_electric.jpg (98 KB, 900x596)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
>>522039483
The guardrails were designed when American cars were 18 feet long, and made from really heavy (but cheap) steel.
I think they'll be OK.

>>522040341
>EVs cause unprecedented damage to roads.
What you mean to say is that EV's contribute to the economy by keeping millions of useless retards employed fixing the roads.
>>
>>522039483
crashing in an EV should receive the death penalty as punishment

oh wait hahaha
>>
>>522039531
They probably have, it's not possible if you want an EV because batteries just suck that much ass. A tank of gas with the same physical space as a tesla battery pack(200 to 500mile range) would get you 2 or 2.5 times that range in a guzzling V8, even more in an eco tuned 4 or 6 banger.
>>
>>522039491
some of those only work when their sensors can see the lane, so forget about driving your EV in heavy snow or torrential rain.
>>
>>522039483
EVs are gay
>>
>>522039825
>needs a new set of specialized EV tires every 2 years or he's replacing them with normal tires every year
>needs brake work more often because of the extra weight
>it's a heavy appliance, none of them have any driving S O V L
>despite their obnoxious weight they have no towing capacity because batteries fucking suck.
>less range than a fully loaded boomer wagon
>a battery replacement costs you 2/3rds of a new car after the labour of dismantling 2/3rds of the car to get to the batteries
acceleration is about the only thing they really have going for them at this point.
>>
>>522041546
>>522041724
not to mention the cold gives batteries more shrinkage than it does to my dick.
>>
>>522041546
EVs are safer to drive in snow and rain because they are heavier and have far better traction control and braking than the average vehicle
>>
>>522041721
This
>>
>>522041824
Even a lada can make it through the snow.
>>
>>522041139
Are you really arguing old cars were heavier?
Lmao
>>
File: glorified golf cart.mp4 (3.44 MB, 364x530)
3.44 MB
3.44 MB MP4
>>522039178
Just ban the EVs. It's cheaper.
>>
>>522041306
>be me
>meet jeet
>he works for tesla
>he literally gets moved to a new state each month because he falls asleep in a tesla car while "testing" auto driving
>he crashes every time
>there are 14 people who have crashed into this same self driving jeet.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.