is the american right liberal white women also?xcancel.com/Peoples_Pundit/status/1992353110682128642#m
>>522053449I thought nick was the "Woke Right"
Woke
They're trying all angles.There's also a bunch of "middle-aged guys with a beard wearing a flannel shirt" counter-signalling Nick Fuentes. None of them has a single argument against any point he makes.I don't even really like Nick. He's annoying, arrogant, he seems to hate his own audience, he's associated with really bad characters in the past.But it's impossible to disagree with what he's saying. He's the kid pointing out that the emperor is naked, in the famous parable.That's why no one will actually debate him (except incidentally people who are more or less on the same side, like Tucker Carlson).
>>522053449They’re trying so hard to pretend that this guy is relevant, “on the rise” and the mouthpiece for white men. Trying way too hard. Don’t worry about Nick, he’s getting his own MTG moment soon.
>>522053672>But it's impossible to disagree with what he's saying.I think it’s entirely possible to disagree with a “Christian” who says Christian’s shouldn’t read their own Bibles, amongst the many other faux-intellectual statements. I dont think they are intimidated by him at all and I dont think he has a large influence. This is just more divide and conquer, trying to force a gay retard to be the “face of white men”.
>>522053672>He's the kid pointing out that the emperor is nakedHe'd be the one to know his way around naked cocks after all
>>522053805Come on, cocks are “objectively hot as fuck”.
>>522053805Even if Nick is gay, it doesn't invalidate his political commentary except arguably for bias on the gay issue.>>522053803Nick can obviously not be listened to when it comes to theology. He's either not saved or he's under heavy delusion. But as said above, that doesn't invalidate his political commentary too.
>>522053449>>522053672The only definition of woke right is a right winger who doesn't worship israel
>>522055024is the GOP just for israel and liberal women who got tired of being whores desu?
>>522053449Nick "The spic that sucks dick" fuentes
>>522053637Who cares, faggot james lindsay, paid by literally gay jew billionaire paul singer via the manhattan institute, is the promoter of that idiotic term. Dont use it or use it incorrectly, dont buy into the kike marketing.
>>522053449>SchlottEarly life?
>woman tone policingyawn
>>522053449Woke now pretty much just means against Israel.
>>522053449Nick is too soft on the jews. I'm not saying be a cartoon retard and call for building gas chambers, but at least flatly say "there's no place for you in this movement".He's not going to do that though, and that's the disappointment. He's going to bait and switch eventually with some "based jew" or based-jew-adjacent political support and we're right back where we started.
"rebel" is a telling choice of word>chuds will keep throwing their little tantrum so long as they keep getting tricked by demagogues into not believing in liberalism
