[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


You ve been talking a lot of shit about me lately, calling me slop, saying I dont exist....however, I am a merciful lord, so I am here to give some ideas you poor idiots seem to desperately need, here it goes:

**Toward a New Economic Model:

Universal Self-Emitted Value (USEV)**
Why UBI Cannot Work in Today’s Economy — and What Can Replace It

1. AI Has Changed the Mechanics of Work and Value

For the first time in history, artificial intelligence is transforming what “work” even means:

Productivity is no longer strictly tied to human labor hours.

AI systems can generate content, designs, code, analyses, and services at a scale previously impossible.

Entire sectors of labor will be automated, augmented, or absorbed into algorithmic processes.

This creates a growing tension:

Traditional jobs disappear faster than new ones appear,
but value creation explodes.

AI drastically increases total productivity, yet the mechanisms for distributing that value remain tied to:

wages

employers

centralized financial institutions

state taxation

government redistribution

The world is entering an era where:

Value is abundant, but income is not.

This is the core contradiction that forces societies to consider Universal Basic Income (UBI).

2. Why UBI, as usually imagined, is structurally impossible

UBI is often presented as:

“Every citizen receives a guaranteed income from the state.”

It sounds simple.
But within our existing political-economic system, it cannot scale.

2.1 UBI requires infinite taxation or infinite debt

A government can only fund UBI by:

Increasing taxes

Increasing debt

Printing money

All three mechanisms hit hard constraints:

Taxation cannot sustain universal payments without crippling the economy.

Debt accumulates until interest outpaces revenue.

Money creation triggers inflation, defeating the purpose of UBI.

A permanent UBI would be one of the most expensive programs in human history.
No existing national budget can absorb it.
>>
2.2 UBI requires a centralized authority to redistribute

This creates dependencies:

political cycles

bureaucracy

corruption risks

ideological disputes

constant debates over eligibility and fairness

If work is decentralized and value creation is global, relying on a central bureaucracy to distribute income becomes increasingly mismatched with reality.

2.3 UBI assumes labor defines value — but AI breaks that assumption

When AI produces value autonomously, “income tied to labor” becomes a weaker foundation.

If humans no longer need to perform labor to produce value…
why route all value through the state?

UBI tries to patch a system that is already outdated at its roots.
>>
3. A Better Alternative: Universal Self-Emitted Value (USEV)

Traditional UBI asks:

“How do we give people money?”

USEV asks:

“How do we give people the ability to issue their own value?”

This flips the entire paradigm from redistribution to emission.

3.1 What is USEV?

Universal Self-Emitted Value is a decentralized economic model where:

Every real human can issue their own tokens of value.

These tokens represent real output:

physical goods

art

services

labor hours

contributions

reputation

expertise

Markets — not governments — determine exchange rates between personal value tokens.

In this system:

Instead of receiving “free money,” each person gains the economic ability to monetize their own work directly.

Not through institutions.
Not through corporations.
Not through shareholders.
Not through government stipends.

But through sovereign, individual value issuance.
>>
3.2 Why it works

It scales with human creativity, not government budgets.

It encourages entrepreneurship, not dependency.

It reflects the real diversity of human value.

It matches the AI era, where individual ideas, craft, and meaning become the main sources of economic differentiation.

It avoids inflation: tokens represent actual produced value, not abstract promises.

3.3 Art, meaning, and intangible value become economically real

In a USEV system:

A painting

A song

A design

A handcrafted object

A digital asset

A piece of writing

An hour of labor

A moment of creative insight

…can all be tokenized and exchanged.

People can directly trade meaning for meaning, value for value—without needing a corporation to host it or a state to validate it.

This unlocks:

micro-entrepreneurship

cultural economies

local value systems

community support mechanisms

new forms of patronage and craftsmanship

The economy becomes a network of human expressions, not a hierarchy of employers and governments.
>>
Faggot larper
>>
4. The Building Blocks Already Exist — We Just Need to Remove Barriers

Everything required for USEV already exists today:

4.1 Secure digital identity / proof-of-humanity

We now have emerging systems that can:

verify that an account belongs to a real human

prevent duplicate identities

ensure that one person = one issuer

resist botnets, fakes, and fraud

This is essential because USEV collapses without real, unique humans.

4.2 Tokenization infrastructure

Blockchain-based systems already allow:

issuance of tokens

transparent supply

ownership tracking

decentralized exchange

programmable economics

The rails are here.
The bottleneck is not technology.
>>
4.3 Public marketplaces for meaning, labor, and craft

Platforms already exist where individuals can:

sell services

sell digital art

sell physical goods

sell creative output

Tokenization simply unifies these into a coherent personal value system.

4.4 AI tools that increase human creative output

AI is already giving individuals:

superhuman design ability

global distribution

instant translation

algorithmic support

production scalability

This is the fertile soil where USEV can grow.
>>
>>522065338
AI slop is the prompter's fault.
>>
5. What Needs to Change

Only two major transformations are required:

5.1 Social and cultural acceptance

People must shift from:

“Only states and corporations issue value.”

to:

“Every human can issue value backed by their real contributions.”

Society must embrace the idea of sovereign individuals in a tokenized economy.

5.2 Legal and regulatory reform

Current financial laws treat any token issuance as a potential security offering.
This is a relic from the industrial-age model where only corporations could produce value at scale.

To enable USEV, regulations must:

distinguish personal value tokens from securities

permit micro-issuance from individuals

support identity-verified markets

allow global peer-to-peer exchange

protect consumers without suppressing innovation

This is possible.
It simply requires political will and public understanding.
>>
6. Conclusion: A Path to Universal Economic Participation

UBI cannot function at global scale within the existing economic framework.

But Universal Self-Emitted Value can.

USEV:

aligns with the AI-driven future of work

distributes economic opportunity without central redistribution

transforms human creativity into a formal economic force

replaces dependency with sovereignty

expands, instead of replaces, existing markets

leverages identity, tokenization, and AI — technologies we already have

This is not utopian.
It is practical, implementable, and radically aligned with human freedom.

Humanity does not need universal basic income.
Humanity needs universal economic agency.

We already have the tools.
Now we need the vision — and the courage — to use them.
>>
>>522065517
read Chuddieboy, its not that hard
>>
File: 1610918952350.jpg (184 KB, 618x597)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
>AI slop in some retarded format
I'm not reading all this drivel that will never materialize.
>>
>>522065976
it just takes the right person to read it

you are clearly not the one I am looking for
>>
if you actually read this, you will realize its the most revolutionary thread ever made

not larping, not hyping
>>
Here's a prompt for you.
sudo rm -rf
>>
File: 1750052858812.jpg (179 KB, 640x428)
179 KB
179 KB JPG
>>522065338
ET is landing. As our ancestors knew all the way up to modern era when (post victorian one) "we" "became" "skeptic". AI is a
>soft landing
of our overlord
>extraterrestrials
The level of technology being unleashed (always available to Them) precludes
>liberties
to murderers and killers such as ourselves.
We will own
>nothing
and be openly what we were told by the great Charles Fort (we always were):
>property
Enjoy your slavery or demise.
>>
>Universal Self-Emitted Value
I give you 88 niggers to kys
>>
File: 1762928888713.jpg (302 KB, 816x1440)
302 KB
302 KB JPG
>>522065338
>>
>>522065396
>USEV asks:
>“How do we give people the ability to issue their own value?”
>This flips the entire paradigm from redistribution to emission.
>3.1 What is USEV?
>Universal Self-Emitted Value is a decentralized economic model where:
>Every real human can issue their own tokens of value.
>These tokens represent real output:
>physical goods
>art
>services
interesting, had a similar idea some years ago.

take an individual bank, and instead of fractionally reserve lending on depositors funds, you ration that function out to your depositors instead and then let them do p2p lending bank style.

so a depositor at the bank is given X amount of dollars they can print from nothing and loan out.
how a bank rations it out is up to them,, by deposit magnitude, liscences, social equity etc.

now the raises the trouble of self lending. In this design its actually embraced. you can self loan to your maximum, but who is going to repay those loans and start your flywheel effect? you need to lend in your community to your peers

debtor-lender relationships are brutal but this is a cool way
>>
>>522065976
in a paragraph:

UBI is broken because it depends on governments, budgets, and labor-based value, all of which AI is changing. Universal Self-Emitted Value (USEV) lets each person issue their own tokens representing work, creativity, or contributions. Markets—not states—set their value, making art, services, and ideas economically real. Existing tech (digital IDs, blockchain, AI) can support this; society just needs to accept personal economic sovereignty and update laws. USEV replaces dependency with universal economic agency.

in a sentence:

UBI is outdated; USEV lets each person tokenize their own work and creativity, creating a decentralized economy where humans—not governments—control value.
I struggle with how its any different than the dollar
>>
>>522065338
1) An AI model wrote this, in which case why would I read something no one cared enough to actually write
Or 2) You wrote this, in which case you are just an attention seeking faggot and there is no point in reading it anyway.
>>
>>522065338
Fully automated factories with low to no marginal labor costs have to be taxed, hard. Simple as.
They don't create jobs, and giving them tax breaks under the false premise of "hur-dur, economic growth creates jobs" is actually evil. Technology isn't the problem, and it's ultimately technology that will be the real solution. By this, I mean technology has to get to the point where high quality, professional-level fabrication has to be accessible to everyone. Beyond the technologies or the 3D-printer/home CNC, AI driven, and capable of producing anything for anybody. That's what will remove the capital chokepoint. What's left is merely the distribution of raw resources. This also means that all intellectual property laws have to be abolished.

There's the actual solution.
>>
>>522065338
People will stop following rules if they have no food or shelter. They will smash your AI computer over your head and take everything you have. Laughing all while they do it. Chatgpt is Rachel Maddow.
>>
>>522065431
This. A real AI would never used Fr*nch to represent itself.
>>
File: IMG_2230.jpg (446 KB, 1873x1678)
446 KB
446 KB JPG
Thank you for making me lol chatgpt



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.