[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (185 KB, 612x416)
185 KB
185 KB PNG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRb1sbuCNWA

This guy explains it.

>If you've had that feeling like your life doesn't belong to you, something is off.
>Maybe the choices, the emotions, even the arguments in your head aren't really yours.
>That is not you being paranoid at all.
>That is the program running.

>But here's what almost nobody understands.
>There is a reason that outrage feels addictive.
>There's a reason that despair feels normal.
>There's a reason that you wake up with dread and blame yourself for it. It was designed.
>And the moment you see how you can't unsee it.
>So, let me rip this open for you. Where did all of this programming really begin?
>There's a quiet office in London in 1921. This is the Tavistock Institute.

Feminism, COVID, reduced investment in energy projects... all of these things point to one thing: a ruling class that does not want to see its people thrive. A ruling class that wants to control behavior and reduce population.

It's true that feminism causes birth rate decline (and then collapse), but feminism never came from women. It came from the people who made "outrage feel addictive".

Look, I get it. We still need to take responsibility for our own actions, and we need to uphold these standards for others, but when we talk about societal shifts along the lines of feminism, the massive fucking element in the room is how we've been manipulated to get here. Toss out your sophomoric philosophy lectures and religious dogma, and start there.

If you focus on your hatred of women or of feminism, then you'll never get anywhere. The only thing you'll never find is confirmation that something today isn't right. Yes, religion used to support values inverse to the current values. Yes, the ideals of feminism are causing social problems. Yes, birth rate collapse is causing social problems. Wow, you fixed it! No, actually you didn't. You just recognized the same problem in 5 million different ways without actually identifying the root cause.
>>
>>522106798
Yes, I know this video is edgelordy. This guy also seems to be CIA or something.

This article covers a lot more: https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/921_frankfurt.html
>>
>>522106798
Wow I fucking hate useless feminists.
>>
>>522107673
And?
>>
>>522106798
>The only thing you'll never find
*ever
>>
>>522107954
I'm vindicated and do what I want. It's fun to stunt and hate on losers like that. Then I go back to my leisure and sex with hotties. I'm not part of a hate movement if that's what you're asking.
>>
I actually read the OP by now and it's some kind of blatant misdirection to confuse and nullify the target.
>>
File: 1755251666768835.png (429 KB, 753x641)
429 KB
429 KB PNG
>>522106798
I remember the guy from the body language show he does with 3 other guys. He's alright, but he's obviously not hitting the mark there.
Who were the people who tried to re-educate all of Russia to become a different people, killing 20+ million of them in the process? Who did the same with the Frankfurt School and their antiauthoritarian attacks on the family and their sexual liberation first in war-torn Germany, then in the US? Kikes.
Who were Freud and Bernays, the first trying to dream up a way to pathologize antisemitism; the second selling (and thus devaluing) status by turning mass-produced items into signifiers of it - both abusing the fact that Whites for the most part live in their fantasies? Kikes.
Who invented and pushed feminism on western women all while fully embracing traditional families themselves? Kikes.
The Tavistock Institute was a willing participant in this shitshow, but not the root cause.
>>
>>522106798
>There's a quiet office in London in 1921.
Man people will say the craziest shit find avoid naming the jew
>>
>>522106798
>>
>>522110603
Ya, but at the same time, liberalism is just christianity if you strip away literally everything but faith/feeling itself. It's not a new game.
>>
>>522114171
To clarify, I don't mean liberalism is just feeling. It's universalism by way of feeling, which comes out as some weird sort of semi-egalitarianism (really more like victim politics that pretends it's egalitarian).

Christianity is also just universalism through feeling, but there are symbols and stories attached. Liberalism stripped the latter out and kept the root.

Another interesting thing I just noticed: liberals love to pretend they can read people's minds. They will find any excuse to call someone a fascist or racist, and they'll have conviction in that belief. That is the same thing as believing someone talks to spirits that they don't like, like "muh devil" or some bullshit.

>>522110726
It's the symbolic jew. There are Jewish Jews, Catholic Jews, Hindu Jews. As a result of cognitive bias, some people try to say all of these people are just "Jews", which is absolutely stupid of course. It only makes sense to say everyone is Jewish if you look at the world through a Christian lens. Outside of that, and Jews are less special. One of several tribes. No doubt, of prominent importance in the past 200 years, but people overrate their historical importance.
>>
>>522106798
another simp trying to wash women pure. they enjoy seeing you suffer on an atomic level. theyre demons. stop coping. women are demons and so are men.

the problem being most of you are bottom feeding demons. the scum of hell.

one day you might realize that greater demons orchestrate all this and now humans. you will see more clearly when you stop being stupid and accept the world as is.
>>
good luck becoming one with alef you idiots. this is the goal. this is the entire humanities purpos.

stop being stupid.
>>
you contrarian dumb fucks think you can make up your own rules :3
>>
>>522106798
that's a lotta words when you could just point at jew
>>
>>522114611
>simp
I'm pretty sure I said very clearly in OP that we all need to take responsibility for our actions and uphold those standards for others (including women).

>>522114748
>one with alef
Is this some gay hebrew reference?

Christ, you people are dull. I'm pointing out that feminism is specifically designed to be a population control agenda, JUST like COVID was designed to control population. They have been trying to kill off excess population in the west since Thomas Malthus.

Does anyone have a brain here? Bueller?
>>
>>522114861
>Christ, you people are dull. I'm pointing out that feminism is specifically designed to be a population control agenda, JUST like COVID was designed to control population. They have been trying to kill off excess population in the west since Thomas Malthus.
Ok, I can believe that. So what's next?
>>
File: IMG_9232.jpg (31 KB, 541x567)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
>>522106798
The boomer feminists who defined modern feminism were jewish women who were horribly molested by their talmudic relatives and religious figures and redirected their vengeance on unrelated white men and boys. The addition of the marxist element made feminism an even more invasive proselytizer.
>>
>>522115005
You know your enemy, and you are unburdened. Women aren't "evil". They are naive, like children. If you spend time with women who have retained feminine qualities, you'll find that they'll follow anyone who presents a good narrative. If you present a good narrative, and you're a good and strong man, then you win.

Most women have some amount of feminist dogma inside of them, and they can't even see it. Now your job is to shine a light on it for them and make them understand that it's not their fault. This is decades and decades of subliminal advertising with laser-guided precision.

>>522115200
No, like the video in OP said, it was an intellectual undertaking. Guys like Bernays and the Frankfurt school people were the masterminds. It starts in thinktanks, not weaving class.
>>
>>522106798
>gay music
>balding manlet
>us
>we
Yeah fuck off kike respect the grift though
>>
>>522115287
>Women aren't "evil". They are naive, like children.
lmao no, they know what they are doing and they are definitely evil
>>
Nothing happened to women. You just see their real face.
>>
>>522106798
>all of these things point to one thing: a ruling class that does not want to see its people thrive.
Idiots still don't get it.
In capitalism the people are human resources for exploitation.
A resource can not thrive.
It can only be abundant or scarced.
And since a lot of countries produce massive amoynra ofnhuman resources they export them so no state's rich ruling capitalist class can become low on human resources for exploitation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Aa4rQ9wzI

Enjoy capitalism!
>>
>>522115717
>capitalism
Capitalism has a literal origin and an implication.

The literal origin is that the first joint stock company and stock market were founded in the Netherlands in the 1600s, and this spread to Britain and then the US. Initially, Britain was reluctant to transition from their mercantile economy which focused on the ledger of the king, but power transitioned from the king's ledger to the private bank's ledger. These are the only things that changed between mercantilism and capitalism. People get way lost in the weeds when using Marx's definition of capitalism.

Now, the implication is that a private ledger no longer has a check on its power, particularly when it captures the interests of political figures who might otherwise regulate it. This means low regulation of industry and trade. Long-term, this means the private ledger collects all the power in the world.

Now, these same people who own the private ledger also seek to minimize their liabilities (people). That's where population control comes in.

Would a non-capitalist system defeat this private ledger? Maybe, but not necessarily.
Could a capitalism system defeat this private ledger? Yes, potentially, although not likely.

Once you stop relying upon tropes like "muh capitalism bad", you can see that there is no panacea ideology coming to save you.
>>
>>But here's what almost nobody understands.
>>There is a reason that outrage feels addictive.
>>There's a reason that despair feels normal.
>>There's a reason that you wake up with dread and blame yourself for it. It was designed.
>>And the moment you see how you can't unsee it.

sounds like generic LLM schizo vomit being narrated
miss me with that shit



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.