[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9736.jpg (951 KB, 1242x1271)
951 KB
951 KB JPG
Why does nasa and the ESA refuse to release any additional Hubble images taken of 3i atlas?
Back in July we got a photo of it when it was 250 million kms from earth taken by Hubble no problem (pic rel), but now that it’s 18 million kms from earth we have no updated photos from Hubble at all. In fact there has only ever been one image from Hubble and it’s now very old.

It’s ten times closer than it was in July and yet our images of it today look worse. Why is that?
Why do the images of atlas look worse today? Why do we only release low resolution photos of it to the public?

Why is nasa not taking a photo of this thing every week with the Hubble telescope?
Why did they take one photo of it in July and nothing since?
This is complete horse shit. They want us to believe that Hubble “cant see it” - it’s complete bullshit. They are hiding it from you.

They have high resolution close up images of an interstellar object and they are too scared to release it to the public because itll cause panic.
>>
File: IMG_9659.jpg (757 KB, 1242x2121)
757 KB
757 KB JPG
Pic rel is the photo from two days ago

It is actually WORSE despite being TEN TIMES CLOSER than it was in July

How can it be ten times closer but the quality is ten times worse?
>>
File: IMG_9737.jpg (951 KB, 1242x1613)
951 KB
951 KB JPG
The fuck are they hiding chat
>>
>>522127271
Because it's a normal Jewish logistical delivery.
>>
File: IMG_9670.jpg (806 KB, 1185x2353)
806 KB
806 KB JPG
What the fuck is this shit?
Why have their photos gotten so much worse? What are they hiding?
>>
File: IMG_9657.jpg (527 KB, 1242x955)
527 KB
527 KB JPG
Why are amateur astronomers releasing better photos for free than a public funded space agency that gets $24.9 Billion in US tax dollars every year is?
>>
File: IMG_9660.jpg (332 KB, 1242x1204)
332 KB
332 KB JPG
Why does nasa get 24.9 billion dollars if they don’t even use the equipment when it’s needed

Why is nasa telling us that it is 100% a comet when they still don’t have any evidence to suggest thats the case?
Why are they so CERTAIN that it’s a natural object despite having very little proof?
>>
File: IMG_9675.jpg (383 KB, 1242x681)
383 KB
383 KB JPG
Why are they hiding the detailed images

Why are they so desperate for you to believe that it’s a rock
>>
File: IMG_9738.jpg (939 KB, 1242x1920)
939 KB
939 KB JPG
Even Google AI is shilling the narrative that 3i has already “returned to interstellar space and can’t be imaged by Hubble anymore”

This is not the case
It’s still in our solar system and can very easily be imaged by more complex telescopes

There appears to now be a coordinated effort to bury information surrounding atlas which even the AI is a part of
>>
how can NASA be hiding anything if even amateurs are getting good images? you cant hide anything if everyone else can take great photos.
>>
File: 1644548455494.jpg (39 KB, 492x388)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>522127343
>chat
do you think /pol/ is one person?
>>
>>522127658
Chang, the AI just regurgitates what's written in the embedded media, and frames it in the way you hinted at.
And I for one am very happy they don't waste more tax blood money on rock photos.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.