[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why does the right not care about art?
>>
>>522137849
conservatism, overlapping with traditionalism, would support artists.
money-grubbing greed at all costs doesn't.
learn the difference.
>>
>>522137849
We have this thread already 4chan bot.
>>
Not sure if I could name a single "leftist" or "conservative" """""studio"""""" they are all kike owned anyway

also that guys comics suck absolute donkey dick, he tries so hard with the art and doesn't hold a candle to stonetoss
>>
>>522137849
>animators

last time I checked they were firing animators because nobody wanted to watch the abominable slopt they were producing
>>
>>522137849
Leftists complete ruined cinema for the sake of propaganda. They don't give a shit about art for its own sake.
>>
>>522137849
>do you prefer your slop shoved down your throat or up your ass?
Kys nigger
>>
IS THAT A TWITTER SCREENCAP 1PBTID THREAD? DON'T MIND ME
>>
>>522137849
Go watch Gay Buzz Lightyear, nigger. I’m good on your “art” (gay sex, animated)
>>
>>522137849
They're acting like the monopoly on culture is because they don't embrace AI art which hasn't even been a thing long enough to even know how much it's effect on culture will be.

This reads more like fear than anything else. Typically though, when you employ the bespoke, hands-on, old craft approach you tend to get more meaningful, flawed but high quality work because it requires such a deep understanding of the media.

What you also get is a whole hell of a lot less of it, comparatively, you get more of the new thing than whatever existed of the old one anyway.

This is a very foolish approach to gloat about. AI art is a thing that people want and they can't stop it by being snooty.

What I find funny is this person says "true creativity" lies in doing it without AI, which is stupid also. That's what people said before drawing tablets: TRUE creativity was people that painted with real brushes, not Photoshop. Before that people who painted with oils were the TRUE creatives, not people that used the cheap, easily accessible and quick to dry acrylics. Before that it was only TRUE creatives that had a formal art education, not just the idiot that could begin to afford more mass produced art supplies in a post-industrialist society. So on and so forth, it's a tale as old as time.

If anything, AI democratized creativity, the barrier to entry is not a huge technical skill like learning how to work with a certain medium, understanding composition, colors, anatomy, etc. Technology has always done this, but not so substantially as to undercut a whole person's lifelong effort to cultivate an ability.

They're super salty about it too. They refuse to see the writing on the wall and can't continue to enjoy their craft for what it is.
>>
>>522137849
It's simply the difference in the answer of what makes art "art", beauty or meaning? The right has always answered beauty and the left has always answered meaning, and it's apparent in the art each side appreciates. People on the right gravitate towards classical art and architecture, geometrical symmetry, nature, things that are beautiful but may not carry any meaning beyond that. Meanwhile the left likes postmodernism, abstractionist, and other such things where they look weird or even disgusting but have a meaning to it that's supposed to be the point. So it's obvious why each side takes their position on AI, AI can make beautiful things effortlessly which is all the right cares about but is devoid of meaning which is what the left cares about.

Also the left is wrong, something that isn't beautiful isn't art nor has any worth so have fun getting replaced.
>>
>Those motherfuckers are using a paintbrush unlike us real artists that use fingerpainting

This is what anti-AI retards sound like to me.
>>
>>522139852
This is interesting to consider anon thx
>>
>>522139852
Beauty and meaning are the same thing. Good art is timeless and inspiring to anyone that isn't a spiteful mutant. Leftists just smear period blood over the wall and call it art
>>
>>522137849
art is a product of the zeitgeist of that time, of course modern 'art' is left inspired and produced. it can't match the classical renaissance periods of high beauty art tho



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.