[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1734206350157741.jpg (573 KB, 1600x900)
573 KB
573 KB JPG
Should anti-white speech be protected?
>>
>>522217572
All speech should be protected.
>>
>>522217646
Shut the fuck up you turd.
>>
Only if its true and you can also speak of jews freely.
>>
>>522217572
No, anti-White speech should be punishable by a sentence of hard labor no less than 2 years.
>>
>>522217772
jews arent white. and all anti-white speech is anti-life speech.
>>
>>522217764
Suck my ass, Pierre. Fear drives you.
>>
>>522217646
should it?
Kike propaganda works because they know that the people think by two principles:
Cognitive Bias, aka "Wishful thinking".
Dunning Kruger, aka "being an expert who knows nothing".
The Catholic Schools of 100 years ago are all gone. They don't teach logic anymore in Public schools because blacks and brownoids simply cannot do math (logic is a branch of mathematics). So little Juan's and Jerome's irrational opinion are just as valid in (((public schools))) as valid logic and true premises.
Free speech has become nothing more than the monkeys screaming at the zoo, and the jew zoo keepers pick the monkeys who are listened to.
>>
>>522217572
Are westoids still considered white in its truest sense anymore? Yall are more aligned towards niggers if one has to be honest.
>>
>>522217572
sure
white people dont really gaf what you have to say
>>
>>522217572
no, and all nonwhites should be executed
>>
>>522217880
shut the fuck up when whites are speaking you brown turd
>>
Street banter yes. But if the media is doing a 24/7 hate blitz on several channels the FCC needs to do a smackdown on them before people get hurt. Possibly find the person responceable and throw into a looney bin.
>>
>>522218421
>FCC needs to do a smackdown on them before people get hurt.
lol, lmao even
>>
>>522218103
why do you think that is pajeet
>>
>>522217572
no
>>
>>522217572
You should probably be deported to a non-white country if you speak ill of whites in a white country
>>
>>522220362
jews hate that idea, it gives white people dignity
>>
>>522217830
who would oppose this?
>>
>>522218391
I'm whiter than you, frenchie. Intelligent progress demands open dialogue, even if you don't like what's being said.
>>
File: USA 2.gif (1.65 MB, 480x264)
1.65 MB
1.65 MB GIF
>>522217572
All speech.
>>
>>522221997
>>522222008
there is zero reason for anti-white speech other than suicide.

if you disagree you are brown. you cant prove me wrong.
>>
>>522220362
>>522221997
It's only dangerous if they're speaking truth that has become true and a behavior needs to be stopped. Well, it's dangerous to those with the bad behavior.
If you ban criticism, you destroy dialogue, and the one you can't criticize has power over you. Jews are doing it now. You of all people should recognize this, Schlomo.
>>
>>522222089
>you cant prove me wrong
Nope. No rational exists that can penetrate the defenses of stupid.
>>
File: french terrorism.webm (2.87 MB, 800x450)
2.87 MB
2.87 MB WEBM
>>522222089
What happened to you, France? You used to get it.
>>
>>522222126
>>522222186
>>522222297
there is NO GOOD REASON for anti-white speech.

you are a brown nigger if you disagree. end of story. this is why anti-which speech protection is suicide. brown niggers do not respect free speech (created by whites)
>>
File: please goy shovel ju.jpg (55 KB, 1080x758)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>522221635
>usual suspects
>>
>>522222089
The reason is that restrictions on speech are either uselessly specific or dangerously broad. There should be no laws restricting speech, because bad actors can easily exploit them for their own ends. This is why "hate" speech laws are dangerous and stupid.
A general understanding that crimes against those who are anti-White are tolerated though not legal is far wiser.
>>
File: based Armstrong.jpg (67 KB, 1024x1024)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>522222582
>>
File: 1554340108215.png (330 KB, 528x471)
330 KB
330 KB PNG
>>522222362
I refuse to abandon the ideal.
>>
>>522222632
thats because you are a brown nigger or suicidal. neither has proven to be wise.
>>
>>522222582
if the rules you follow led you to where you are now (invaded by pajeets and ruled by jews), of what good were the rules?

there is no good reason for anti-white speech. it is suicide.
>>
>>522217957
Somewhat correct. Bigger reason kike propaganda has taken such a stanglehold is that people think in raw numbers and not percentages and the kikes use this to manipulate the internet to create the illusion that rare beliefs and activities are actually norms

But the solution isn't allowing the jews more control by allowing them to decide what speech should be allowed. The only real solution is the final solution.

And this is why the jew would love nothing more than to have me arrested for what I just wrote (as they do in their european union vassal states)
>>
>>522222974
>But the solution isn't allowing the jews more control by allowing them to decide what speech should be allowed

jews want anti-white speech dummy
>>
whites must be PROTECTED
>>
>>522222898
I'm saying we should repeal the laws we have in place now, so I can't be fired and jailed for speaking out about the brown menace. The state is not following my rules.
>>
>>522217572
Certainly not.
>>
>>522217572
yes., but you should be allowed to also mock them for being brown or self hating cucks
>>
>>522223809
>The state is not following my rules.
No shit. Its because whites didnt protect themselves. Anti-whitism shouldnt be tolerated at all.
>>
>>522217646
Suicidal. Founders of America wouldnt tolerate anti white speech.
>>
>>522217646
>>522226018
The founders only recognized white men as people with full rights. Any anti-white speech would be seen as an act of war. It was basically unthinkable in terms of something that would happen in human free speech.
>>
>>522217572
No
>>
>>522217572
you will never be free
>>
File: images(99).jpg (48 KB, 588x336)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>522227740
>>
>>522217572
Should anti-fellow-white speech be protected?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.