You can frame illegal immigration as an act of colonialism and oppression: "Illegal aliens who trespass onto US land are colonialist. They disregard the native culture, and require the host society to spend countless amounts of time and resources to accommodate them, much like the indigenous peoples accommodated early European settlers. Where they saw it as a gift of magnanimity, the colonists saw it as right and a sign of their superiority, just like illegal aliens who feel entitled to commit identity fraud every day to get resources they feel entitled to as our oppressors.You can frame white only spaces as rectifying systemic violence and exclusion of white people: "We need white-only spaces, such as housing. With the disproportionate amount of violence against white people committed by black people, and the housing shortage, it would simply be implicitly exclusionary to white people who either have to put up with robbery, harassment and violence or find housing elsewhere." It's not as of black nationalists and female separatists don't routinely say this stuff.People will probably say "But white people are not systemically excluded at all." You can point out crime rates and quotas as both evidence of systemic discrimination and violence against white people.I'm definitely not the first to do this and /pol/ has done it sometimes deliberately but I don't see it at all just browsing the internet.
These are instantly read as right wing talking points cloaked in leftist language. As long as you're speaking in defense of whites in any way, you're not tricking them.
>>522530735this is the most retarded post I've read all day
>>522530735I'll repost what I said in that thread with the retard leftist asking to debate pol earlier>We're mostly leftists here too, most people are, that's why Trump won. He's much more leftist than the Democrats>The Nazis are leftist too, why do you think there are so many Nazis here??(The leftist OP even admitted Democrats weren't leftist, but then tried to claim mass immigration is a great leftist economic policy, what a fucking rube).
>>522530735yeah, it seems like the left and right should have figured out the differences a long time ago. seem real fucking stupid of both parties
>>522530872Well I guess everyone that promotes gibs and reparations for black people is Right wing thenGod damn you leftist niggers are retarded. How fucking braindead do you have to be to determine what's right and left based on whether or not it's helping white or black people. 85 IQ? 80 IQ? Lower even? What's your IQ bud? Don't be shy.
>>522530735First of all, this >>522530872 but secondly, if you try to operate within their ideological framework, you've already lost. Any argument you try to make in their framework will fail, by design.For example:>You can frame white only spaces as rectifying systemic violence and exclusion of white people: "We need white-only spaces, such as housing. With the disproportionate amount of violence against white people committed by black people, and the housing shortage, it would simply be implicitly exclusionary to white people who either have to put up with robbery, harassment and violence or find housing elsewhere." It's not as of black nationalists and female separatists don't routinely say this stuff.>People will probably say "But white people are not systemically excluded at all." You can point out crime rates and quotas as both evidence of systemic discrimination and violence against white people.They won't care. Crime rate stats are already considered racist and widely derided in their circles, it's your fault for being White and in any case you're privileged and deserve that violence.>>522531169Leftism, today, is synonymous with anti-White. Right-wing unfortunately is not synonymous with pro-White, but everyone who is pro-White is far to the right, and far-right is mostly synonymous with pro-White.
>>522530872Sure, but it's at least confusing to people that you can use the exact same leftist talking points in a right wing way. Some people's brains shut off when they hear "colonialism," "systemic exclusion," etc.Framing obvious left wing talking in right wing language (just framing gay marriage in terms of freedom" and "patriotism") does convince more people to support it, so I don't see why the opposite wouldn't happen.
>>522531509>Crime rate stats are already considered racist and widely derided in their circles, it's your fault for being White and in any case you're privileged and deserve that violence.Feminists routinely bring up male violence and mention crime rates. There's at least some tolerance for it. And those that bring it up the most are also more likely to support immigration restrictions for the exact same reasons (crime rates, violence against women)
