If the right wing wants stay-at-home Moms, they better be able to tolerate some "Socialism".
True
>>522531899We could just take women out of the workforce and the problem would solve itself, wages would go up for the men and the women would have to find a man to survive.
>>522531987This. I would also add that prices would go down
why should I argue about what a hole put into xshitter. low effort spam
>>522531987>Wages would go up for menNo, they'd just keep replacing you with pajeets on h1-bs to keep wages suppressed. They hate you and the only value you have to them is to labor and consume. Take back what you deserve
>>522531899Because they want natural market forces to increase pay, not mandatory $50/h min wage
>>522531899I agree.
>>522531899I have no problem with socialism. But you need strict borders and deportations to prevent free loading, so it'll never happen because the left got tricked into supporting mass 3rd world immigration.
>>522531987Either >>522532151 or the GDP would literally halve. Taking out that much of the workforce is going to suck for the economy. That's basically forcing half the population to go on strike.What happened in the past is that working class women did work, both jobs and in the home, but were paid low wages or were not paid in the home.Women are also increasingly dominating in university degree attainment. I'm sure you could go full Taliban and just ban women from college, but there's no guarantee men would even take their place and there wouldn't just be fewer educated workers.
>>522531899Yes i support Billionaire's who do no work to underpay me/sLet's stop being retarded
>>522532593One step towards getting birthrates back up is getting women out of college and out of the workforce. By the time they are done with education they are 24 or 28 for the most educated and they are in massive debt. We were advancing society well enough without them in college, men can carry the brunt of everything again like we did for all of history before the women's rights movement. Economy would suffer for a while but things would eventually course correct, lot needs revamped without economy in general replacing out fiat with something more legitimate is a start.
Debt jubilee to create mass deflation, then ban all loans and insurance. There, now you can support a family on one income again.
Doubling the average household income by having women in the workforce halves actual buying power of limited commodites like land. That is how economics works.Increasing average household income other ways does the same thing. Including have 10 immigrants live in a house to combine income. Enough do that and it pushes the required income for housing closer to needing 10 incomes.The higher the average household income the higher housing costs. So you cannot fix it by just paying everyone more.You fix it by reducing demand by removing tens of millions of immigrants, restricting how many homes someone can own, and no longer letting businesses or foriegners, equity firms etc buy residential properties.When women all entered the workforce then demanded similar pay it doubled the income of households, making that new amount the baseline to compete over housing. This would naturaly make housing prices double.Of course they didn't double they went up 5-10x.But most of the price spike has been due to immigrant population growth. Starting in 1991 in California. Which is why housing costs spiked worst and there first.
>>522532593Thankfully GDP means so little Russia can outproduce all of NATO.
>>522532593By "the economy" you mean Jewish profits.
>>522533414But anon our productivity has increased several fold since then. Sure, in the past we produced enough that everyone could have a good house, commodities and raise a family on a single factory wage but we're producing WAY more now. I just don't know what it is that we're producing way more of because everyone has less stuff.
>>522533893Central banking destroyed all of those things yet you support it
>>522532270>natural market forces to increase payStock buy backs and CEOs etc bring paid in stocks is why that's just not going to happen. Wages have been stagnate for a very long time, by design.
>>522531899>Wanting employers to be forced by market forces (lack of foreign scabs and women) to pay a fair wage is socialismHas anyone with a normal-sized nose ever said this?
>>522531899You’re just as stupid as this bitch. You cut the workforce in half by removing women and what do you think happens to wages? Stupid fsggot.
>>522534150No have you seen our GDP? We are producing wayyyy more. Everyone has less stuff though but we're making more of it apparently.
>>522533893we don’t produce anything, lol.all of our manufacturing was given to china, vietnam, india.
>>522535602No our gross domestic product (what we PRODUCE) is super high so we must be producing a shit on of something.
>>522532593No need to ban women from college.Just eliminate all the bullshit degrees and up academic standards to where only those in the top 10% for IQ can get in.
