[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 763298273.png (635 KB, 828x460)
635 KB
635 KB PNG
https://youtu.be/AjVKgCAkT7I?si=AP9IzG_ARF5_2Hlq

>So what should you do if youre in a position to influence hiring and promotion? >Recognize that, objectively speaking, women at the same career position, work experience, and salary levels as men needed to work harder to get to where they are to overcome the gender discrimination stemming from the halo and horns effects. Thus, female candidates are likely to be substantially better workers than they appear on paper, in comparison to males. And especially if youre a man, you need to give women more credit than you feel they’re due to overcome horns effect, while decreasing your evaluation of males due to halo effect.

>Consequently, and without any reference to diversity and inclusion initiatives, simply for the sake of your bottom line, you should always give preference to women.

>Seem unfair?
>Well, Im a man, and I can tell you that I would prefer to hire women over men, and recommend other males do the same. Youre simply doing whats in the best interests of the organization. In fact, if you work in a publicly traded company, you are obliged to serve the best interests of the shareholders. That means you need to go out of your way to promote, hire, mentor, and include in networks those people who are most likely to serve the best interests of your company. Those people are women, this stands apart from any diversity issues. Doing so will create the biggest profit.

>A study using the 1996 to 1997 National Organizations Survey found that greater gender diversity is associated with more customers, greater sales revenue, and higher profits. Another study showed that having women occupy at least 30 percent of a company’s Board of Directors positions correlates with increased profit. Gender-balanced business teams had better sales and profits, compared to the typical male-dominated teams, in a third study.

>So the smart money is on hiring women over men, for those who care about making a profit.

/pol/ btfo
>>
>>522549197
is that a ftm tranny?
>>
pedo phenotype
>>
>>522549197
I wish him the best of luck in his future MeToo sexual harassment lawsuit.
>>
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-you-should-hire-women-over-men-according-science



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.